Development cooperation · prepared forBusiness reconstruction investor exploring potential partnerships

Demonstration prototype. Figures and text are generated automatically from open data and AI models and may contain errors or be out of date: quality-assure against the linked sources before using anything in a decision.

Example brief. Made on the live service for a reconstruction investor (a made-up organisation; real data, as of the day it was made). Reviewed example: read against its cited evidence after generation; no changes needed.Same country, another reader →See the other examples →

Ukraine reconstruction finance: partnership leads and pre-visit checks

Ukrainereconstruction finance and economic development62 evidence cards24 sources consulted36 figures traced to their cardsmade in 1 min 23 s+ Keep watching this

The strongest entry point is to investigate institution-backed financing and procurement channels, rather than treat reconstruction needs as evidence of investable demand: the World Bank approved the First Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPO, with a USD 3,390.0 million commitment, on 22 June 2026. E49 Official gross disbursements in the selected reconstruction-related sectors were USD 9,558.5 million in 2024; separately, officially mobilised private finance in those sectors was USD 1,799.1 million—not a measure of all private investment. E25E38 Norfund, IFC and MIGA offer concrete financing or risk-mitigation leads, while municipal and energy programmes offer potential project and procurement counterparts; their present availability and eligibility require confirmation. E7E8E17E19E20 Make the visit conditional on location-specific security and delivery checks: ACAPS rated humanitarian access constraints in Ukraine as Extreme in October 2026, including hostilities, movement restrictions and explosive hazards. E43

Crisis severity (all crisis types, incl. conflict) and natural-hazard alerts

Retrieved 14 Oct 2026 · ACAPS crisis severity: September 2026 · ACAPS access: Oct 2026 · GDACS alerts: 14 Oct 2025 – 14 Oct 2026

Ukraine: ACAPS severity 9.1 of 10, Conflict in Ukraine (very high, ACAPS)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-09-23)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-07-28)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-07-19)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-07-02)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-06-08)Flood: Flood in Ukraine (Green, 2026-02-14)Earthquake: Earthquake in Ukraine (Green, 2026-02-02)

Dots: 7 GDACS alert records plotted in this frame (tap or hover for details); a geographic subset of the evidence card, not an exhaustive disaster count. See the card for the recorded event-start window. Their colour is GDACS's estimate of the need for international humanitarian assistance, not of local severity E57. Outlines: Natural Earth.

Crises tracked by ACAPS E42 E43 · severity 1 to 10, higher is more severe; access constraints 0 to 5, 5 is extreme

Where conflict is reported, by district

Period · Twelve months to Sep 2026

Bakhchysaraiskyi (UA0102): 15 reported fatalities, 47 eventsBilohirskyi (UA0104): 0 reported fatalities, 18 eventsDzhankoiskyi (UA0106): 6 reported fatalities, 24 eventsYevpatoriiskyi (UA0108): 1 reported fatalities, 158 eventsKerchenskyi (UA0110): 6 reported fatalities, 47 eventsKurmanskyi (UA0112): 4 reported fatalities, 21 eventsPerekopskyi (UA0114): 2 reported fatalities, 50 eventsSimferopolskyi (UA0116): 14 reported fatalities, 108 eventsFeodosiiskyi (UA0118): 0 reported fatalities, 76 eventsYaltynskyi (UA0120): 0 reported fatalities, 28 eventsVinnytskyi (UA0502): 1 reported fatalities, 27 eventsHaisynskyi (UA0504): 1 reported fatalities, 5 eventsZhmerynskyi (UA0506): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsMohyliv-Podilskyi (UA0508): no political violence reportedTulchynskyi (UA0510): no political violence reportedKhmilnytskyi (UA0512): no political violence reportedVolodymyrskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsKamin-Kashyrskyi (UA0704): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsKovelskyi (UA0706): 0 reported fatalities, 12 eventsLutskyi (UA0708): 0 reported fatalities, 19 eventsDniprovskyi (UA1202): 123 reported fatalities, 226 eventsKamianskyi (UA1204): 18 reported fatalities, 104 eventsKryvorizkyi (UA1206): 106 reported fatalities, 424 eventsNikopolskyi (UA1208): 124 reported fatalities, 1,541 eventsSamarivskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsPavlohradskyi (UA1212): 47 reported fatalities, 183 eventsSynelnykivskyi (UA1214): 3,319 reported fatalities, 3,920 eventsBakhmutskyi (UA1402): 481 reported fatalities, 1,878 eventsVolnovaskyi (UA1404): 140 reported fatalities, 820 eventsHorlivskyi (UA1406): 129 reported fatalities, 416 eventsDonetskyi (UA1408): 72 reported fatalities, 456 eventsKalmiuskyi (UA1410): 13 reported fatalities, 132 eventsKramatorskyi (UA1412): 5,350 reported fatalities, 10,940 eventsMariupolskyi (UA1414): 75 reported fatalities, 182 eventsPokrovskyi (UA1416): 15,049 reported fatalities, 7,098 eventsBerdychivskyi (UA1802): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsZhytomyrskyi (UA1804): 4 reported fatalities, 44 eventsKorostenskyi (UA1806): 15 reported fatalities, 36 eventsZviahelskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsBerehivskyi (UA2102): no political violence reportedMukachivskyi (UA2104): 1 reported fatalities, 2 eventsRakhivskyi (UA2106): no political violence reportedTiachivskyi (UA2108): no political violence reportedUzhhorodskyi (UA2110): 2 reported fatalities, 6 eventsKhustskyi (UA2112): 0 reported fatalities, 3 eventsBerdianskyi (UA2302): 10 reported fatalities, 127 eventsVasylivskyi (UA2304): 290 reported fatalities, 2,367 eventsZaporizkyi (UA2306): 2,047 reported fatalities, 5,347 eventsMelitopolskyi (UA2308): 45 reported fatalities, 183 eventsPolohivskyi (UA2310): 2,543 reported fatalities, 9,221 eventsVerkhovynskyi (UA2602): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsIvano-Frankivskyi (UA2604): 2 reported fatalities, 17 eventsKaluskyi (UA2606): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsKolomyiskyi (UA2608): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsKosivskyi (UA2610): no political violence reportedNadvirnianskyi (UA2612): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsChornobyl Exclusion Zone: not matched to ACLED's districtsBilotserkivskyi (UA3202): 2 reported fatalities, 22 eventsBoryspilskyi (UA3204): 11 reported fatalities, 54 eventsBrovarskyi (UA3206): 39 reported fatalities, 77 eventsBuchanskyi (UA3208): 77 reported fatalities, 74 eventsVyshhorodskyi (UA3210): 5 reported fatalities, 47 eventsObukhivskyi (UA3212): 3 reported fatalities, 46 eventsFastivskyi (UA3214): 8 reported fatalities, 51 eventsHolovanivskyi (UA3502): no political violence reportedKropyvnytskyi (UA3504): no political violence reportedNovoukrainskyi (UA3506): no political violence reportedOleksandriiskyi (UA3508): no political violence reportedAlchevskyi (UA4402): 16 reported fatalities, 142 eventsDovzhanskyi (UA4404): 4 reported fatalities, 59 eventsLuhanskyi (UA4406): 11 reported fatalities, 96 eventsRovenkivskyi (UA4408): 4 reported fatalities, 53 eventsSvativskyi (UA4410): 16 reported fatalities, 284 eventsSiverskodonetskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsStarobilskyi (UA4414): 29 reported fatalities, 84 eventsShchastynskyi (UA4416): 3 reported fatalities, 49 eventsDrohobytskyi (UA4602): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsZolochivskyi (UA4604): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsLvivskyi (UA4606): 7 reported fatalities, 29 eventsSambirskyi (UA4608): no political violence reportedStryiskyi (UA4610): 0 reported fatalities, 3 eventsSheptytskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsYavorivskyi (UA4614): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsBashtanskyi (UA4802): 5 reported fatalities, 70 eventsVoznesenskyi (UA4804): 6 reported fatalities, 15 eventsMykolaivskyi (UA4806): 30 reported fatalities, 437 eventsPervomaiskyi (UA4808): 0 reported fatalities, 6 eventsBerezivskyi (UA5102): 2 reported fatalities, 1 eventsBilhorod-Dnistrovskyi (UA5104): 5 reported fatalities, 23 eventsBolhradskyi (UA5106): 0 reported fatalities, 5 eventsIzmailskyi (UA5108): 9 reported fatalities, 60 eventsOdeskyi (UA5110): 95 reported fatalities, 320 eventsPodilskyi (UA5112): 0 reported fatalities, 5 eventsRozdilnianskyi (UA5114): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsKremenchutskyi (UA5302): 1 reported fatalities, 35 eventsLubenskyi (UA5304): 2 reported fatalities, 7 eventsMyrhorodskyi (UA5306): 1 reported fatalities, 48 eventsPoltavskyi (UA5308): 17 reported fatalities, 116 eventsVaraskyi (UA5602): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsDubenskyi (UA5604): 0 reported fatalities, 4 eventsRivnenskyi (UA5606): 4 reported fatalities, 21 eventsSarnenskyi (UA5608): 0 reported fatalities, 5 eventsKonotopskyi (UA5902): 42 reported fatalities, 893 eventsOkhtyrskyi (UA5904): 52 reported fatalities, 546 eventsRomenskyi (UA5906): 8 reported fatalities, 88 eventsSumskyi (UA5908): 873 reported fatalities, 4,465 eventsShostkynskyi (UA5910): 288 reported fatalities, 3,542 eventsKremenetskyi (UA6102): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsTernopilskyi (UA6104): 38 reported fatalities, 9 eventsChortkivskyi (UA6106): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsBohodukhivskyi (UA6302): 215 reported fatalities, 1,104 eventsIziumskyi (UA6304): 749 reported fatalities, 1,609 eventsBerestynskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsKupianskyi (UA6308): 2,305 reported fatalities, 4,299 eventsLozivskyi (UA6310): 29 reported fatalities, 255 eventsKharkivskyi (UA6312): 627 reported fatalities, 1,387 eventsChuhuivskyi: not matched to ACLED's districtsBeryslavskyi (UA6502): 173 reported fatalities, 5,635 eventsHenicheskyi (UA6504): 62 reported fatalities, 88 eventsKakhovskyi (UA6506): 68 reported fatalities, 911 eventsSkadovskyi (UA6508): 60 reported fatalities, 420 eventsKhersonskyi (UA6510): 24,762 reported fatalities, 7,668 eventsKamianets-Podilskyi (UA6802): 1 reported fatalities, 1 eventsKhmelnytskyi (UA6804): 2 reported fatalities, 23 eventsShepetivskyi (UA6806): 1 reported fatalities, 5 eventsZvenyhorodskyi (UA7102): 0 reported fatalities, 11 eventsZolotoniskyi (UA7104): 4 reported fatalities, 12 eventsUmanskyi (UA7106): 0 reported fatalities, 13 eventsCherkaskyi (UA7108): 4 reported fatalities, 47 eventsVyzhnytskyi (UA7302): no political violence reportedDnistrovskyi (UA7304): 0 reported fatalities, 3 eventsChernivetskyi (UA7306): 1 reported fatalities, 2 eventsKoriukivskyi (UA7402): 11 reported fatalities, 811 eventsNizhynskyi (UA7404): 7 reported fatalities, 79 eventsNovhorod-Siverskyi (UA7406): 20 reported fatalities, 2,552 eventsPrylutskyi (UA7408): 9 reported fatalities, 43 eventsChernihivskyi (UA7410): 23 reported fatalities, 513 eventsKyiv (UA8000): 222 reported fatalities, 376 eventsUkraine
  • 1–2451districts
  • 25–9916districts
  • 100–2498districts
  • 250–4993districts
  • 500+10districts
  • None42districts, no fatalities reported
  • No match8boundary not matched to ACLED
Reported fatalities from political violence per district, twelve months to Sep 2026, from ACLED's district rows E45. Tap or hover a district for its figures. Boundaries: Ukraine - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 130 of 137 ACLED districts matched by code and name).

At a glance

Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs

10.8mpeople in need, Ukraine 2026 (all sectors)

Source: OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview ↗ · E50Retrieved 2026-10-14

9.1/10Crisis severity, Ukraine · September 2026

Source: ACAPS INFORM Severity ↗ · E42Retrieved 2026-10-14

5/5Access constraints, Ukraine · Oct 2026

Source: ACAPS Humanitarian Access ↗ · E43Retrieved 2026-10-14

72%of Ukraine's 2026 national appeal funded to date (2025: 63%)

Source: UN OCHA FTS ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14

2,390.9mUSD of private finance mobilised, 2024

Source: OECD mobilised private finance ↗ · E38Retrieved 2026-10-14

Official funding in the brief's sectors rose 1759%: 2019–2024All official donors in scope, current USD millions, gross disbursements; observations 2019–2024; OECD data by recipient end in 2024, 2025 due in December 2026
2019: 514.1 (USD millions)51420192020: 428.2 (USD millions)20202021: 539.4 (USD millions)20212022: 10,689.6 (USD millions)20222023: 11,114.9 (USD millions)11,11520232024: 9,558.5 (USD millions)9,5582024

USD millions

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321

United States provided 84% of official funding, 2019–2024Share of scoped gross disbursements over 2019–2024 combined, not a latest-year share
United States84%
EU Institutions8%
Germany2%
France1%
Japan1%

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321

Guarantees led the USD 2,390.9m mobilised in 2024Private finance mobilised by official development finance, 2024, USD millions
Guarantees1,615.9
Direct investment471.3
Simple co-financing254.6
Syndicated loans43.4
Fund shares5.7

Source: OECD, mobilised private finance for development ↗ · E38Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions

Ukraine's 2026 appeal: 72% funded to dateNational humanitarian response plans, share of requirements funded; 2026 still being funded
Ukraine 202476%
Ukraine 2026 (in progress)72%
Ukraine 202563%

Source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions

Weakest score: control of corruption in Ukraine (34/100)Worldwide Governance Indicators, 0 to 100, higher is better; observations 2025; ticks: Score 2019

Control of corruption

Ukraine34

Regulatory quality

Ukraine51

Rule of law

Ukraine46

Political stability

Ukraine60

Source: World Bank WGI ↗ · E58Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI

Need against funding

Computed by the app from the evidence cards it links to, with fixed rules, so two briefs on the same scope say the same thing.

Where need is outpacing money E61

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E50).

ClusterPeople in need, 2025 (change)Appeal fundedAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
Food Security5.00 m -31%31% · USD 190.9 m of 613.4 m-32 points38Underfunded
Emergency Shelter and NFI6.88 m -13%36% · USD 196.8 m of 544.6 m-27 points29Underfunded
Water Sanitation Hygiene8.52 m -11%37% · USD 135.3 m of 365.3 m-26 points16Underfunded
Protection - Child Protection3.47 m +9%40% · USD 51.9 m of 128.9 m-23 points15Underfundedgap widening
Multipurpose CashNo need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector) n/a44% · USD 180.8 m of 410.2 m-19 pointsn/aUnderfunded
Health9.21 m +18%106% · USD 138.4 m of 130.9 m+43 points15Half funded or more
Protection9.53 m -14%120% · USD 205.6 m of 171.9 m+57 points22Half funded or more
Protection - Mine Action5.44 m -19%130% · USD 112.8 m of 86.5 m+67 points21Half funded or more

Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

Donor concentration and cuts E62

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 9,558.5m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E39).

United States
88%-56% total aid
EU Institutions
7%+48% total aid
Japan
2%-11% total aid
Germany
1%-16% total aid
Sweden
1%+19% total aid
Switzerland
1%-1% total aid
United Kingdom
0%+1% total aid
Norway
0%+5% total aid

donor's total aid fell more than 10% in the latest provisional year

  • 88% Largest donor's share
  • 96% Three largest donors' share
  • 91% Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) (USD 8,702.7 m)
  • 49% Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly (USD 4,691.8 m)

Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions

The OECD recorded USD 9,558.5 million in gross official disbursements to Ukraine in 2024 across governance, transport, renewable generation, banking, business services and industry, against USD 11,114.9 million in 2023. E25 This is a selected-sector measure, not a comprehensive reconstruction total or an available investment pool. E25 Large donor-reported projects include PEACE administrative-capacity support, development-policy operations and fiscal governance; their titles and government delivery channels suggest that headline aid volumes should not be read as construction contracts. E26

More recent World Bank leads include the active Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results, P516254, approved on 22 May 2026 with a USD 390.0 million commitment, and SURGE, P516223, approved on 26 June 2026 with USD 584.2 million. E49 These are approval commitments, not disbursements or evidence of accessible business opportunities. E49 Ask the World Bank to identify the responsible Ukrainian institutions, procurement routes and enterprise eligibility.

Funding continuity deserves investigation. US total aid fell 56% in provisional 2025 data, while its selected-sector funding to Ukraine had risen from USD 121.0 million in 2019 to USD 8,364.5 million in 2024; the OECD country series cannot show what happened locally in 2025. E39 A separate US fiscal-year series records selected-sector payments of USD 4,881.2 million in FY2024 and USD 4,306.4 million in FY2025. E40 Its FY2026 reporting is incomplete and lagged, so it cannot establish a full-year outcome. E40

Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics

Officially mobilised private finance in Ukraine’s selected sectors rose from USD 1,341.4 million in 2023 to USD 1,799.1 million in 2024. E38 Across all sectors, guarantees mobilised USD 1,615.9 million in 2024—the largest mechanism by amount—but the data cannot attribute this to individual institutions or establish a selected-sector mechanism split. E38 This suggests starting discussions with risk-sharing structures, then testing whether a specific project can support commercial financing.

Private philanthropy is a separate category, not commercial investment. The Howard G. Buffett Foundation reported USD 9.218 million for Ukraine Modular Bridges in 2023, a historical project lead rather than an open funding opportunity. E47 Coverage is limited to foundations reporting to the OECD. E47

Energy and municipalities offer specific counterpart leads

Keep financing purposes distinct. Norway’s NOK 1,500.0 million payment recorded in 2025 through the EU Ukraine Investment Framework, implemented by EIB, was earmarked for emergency gas purchases for the 2025/2026 heating season—not generic capital for reconstruction businesses. E22 These related energy and multisector agreements extend beyond the selected-sector totals above and should not be summed into them.

Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks

ACAPS’s September 2026 edition rated the conflict crisis Very High at 9.1, despite a decreasing three-month severity trend; its October access assessment still identified Extreme constraints. E42 Neither measure establishes commercial site accessibility. E42E43 ACLED reported 7,754 civilian-targeting events nationally during October 2025–September 2026, compared with 5,052 in the preceding twelve months. E44 This warrants route- and site-specific assessment rather than reliance on an improving aggregate crisis trend. E44

The IMF projects real GDP growth of 1.0%, inflation of 8.9% and government gross debt of 111.8% of GDP in 2026. E52 Projected government revenue of 66.5% of GDP includes grants and therefore does not establish domestically financed capacity to co-fund or sustain projects. E52 Test payment security, currency exposure, tariff assumptions and operating-cost funding project by project.

Ukraine’s perception-based WGI scores were 34 for control of corruption and 46 for rule of law in 2025. E58 These are due-diligence context, not findings about a particular counterpart. E58 Denmark reports the EU Anti-Corruption Initiative in implementation, and UNDP reports recovery-planning and sustainable-recovery activities updated in October 2026; these are useful institutional leads to verify, not endorsements of project quality. E48

For utilities and civil works, also check weather resilience: GDACS recorded an Orange regional drought alert including Ukraine on 21 December 2025 and a Green flood alert on 23 September 2026. E57 These alerts do not establish damage at a proposed site. E57

Current context from the web — search leads, verify before use

Written by a search-grounded model separately from the brief above. Its figures and claims are not checked against the evidence.

Where current reporting differs from the brief

Read the full web research (4 sources)

As of October 2026, Ukraine’s recovery is being planned alongside the continuing war—not as a postwar programme alone. The figures below distinguish announced plans and financing from money actually disbursed.

  • Plans and priorities: The Government’s emerging “Ukraine Economy of the Future” strategy emphasizes macro-fiscal stability, governance and rule-of-law reform, private-sector growth, infrastructure, and investment in people, according to a joint World Bank, Ukrainian Government, European Commission and UN assessment in February 2026. That assessment, RDNA5, estimated ten-year recovery and reconstruction needs at nearly $588 billion. It reported more than $15 billion in 2026 public investment and recovery programmes, including housing, demining and economic support; this is a programme total, not a claim that the funds have all been spent.
  • Public and multilateral finance: The European Commission describes the Ukraine Facility as up to €50 billion in support for 2024–27. In 2025, its Ukraine Investment Framework allocated up to €5.5 billion in guarantees and blended finance to encourage investment through partner institutions, the Commission reported. The World Bank said in June 2025 that it had mobilized more than $81 billion for Ukraine since February 2022, of which $57 billion had been disbursed. In June 2026, the Bank approved a $540 million jobs and private-sector-growth policy operation; approval is not disbursement.
  • Private-sector investment and risk-sharing: The World Bank reported in April 2026 that its Ukraine trust fund had committed $2.8 billion in grants, enabling $8.9 billion in development financing, including $4.8 billion in private capital. MIGA reported $573 million in guarantee issuances since the invasion through June 2026. These instruments can help share risk, but do not remove it; the World Bank noted that private reinsurers remain largely unwilling to provide political-risk cover. In May 2025, Ukraine and the United States signed an agreement establishing a jointly managed Reconstruction Investment Fund; the agreement created a framework, not a stated amount of immediate investment.
  • Institutional leads: The Ukrainian Government sets recovery priorities and leads its public-investment system. The Ministry of Finance initiated public-investment-management reform; the Ministry of Economy and Ministry for Development of Communities and Territories, alongside DREAM, have roles in project planning and management, according to Ukrainian government sources in 2025–26. The EU, World Bank Group, European Commission and UN jointly produce the damage-and-needs assessments; IFIs and donor-backed facilities help finance projects.
  • Operational risks for partners: The World Bank and IMF reported risks from continuing attacks on energy and transport, labor shortages and displacement, and uncertainty that can deter investment. The IMF also highlighted governance, anti-corruption and state-enterprise reform as priorities. For businesses, these translate into risks to personnel and assets, power and logistics continuity, hiring, insurance availability, procurement integrity and project execution. Due diligence should test site-specific security, insurance exclusions, contractor and beneficial-ownership chains, permits, payment security and contingency plans.

Sources

  1. Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Released · official
  2. The Ukraine Facility · official
  3. URTF · official
  4. Reform of Public Investment Management (PIM) | Ministry for Recovery, Infrastructure and Transport of Ukraine · official

Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) E25

Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scopeDonorTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope
1United StatesTrend 2019–2024: 121 to 8,364 (6 years reported)121.0133.5131.78,643.710,210.38,364.584%
2EU InstitutionsTrend 2019–2024: 257 to 623 (6 years reported)256.8159.5241.11,052.4309.2622.88%
3GermanyTrend 2019–2024: 23.1 to 100 (6 years reported)23.123.534.9168.2199.2100.12%
4FranceTrend 2019–2024: 0.4 to 2.9 (6 years reported)0.43.12.8422.31.32.91%
5JapanTrend 2019–2024: 2.9 to 222 (6 years reported)2.90.60.30.88.6222.01%
6United KingdomTrend 2019–2024: 9.3 to 26.4 (6 years reported)9.311.211.0119.254.526.41%
7SwedenTrend 2019–2024: 20.4 to 55.7 (6 years reported)20.415.421.620.750.355.71%
8SwitzerlandTrend 2019–2024: 8.1 to 51.9 (6 years reported)8.18.210.742.551.651.91%
9CanadaTrend 2019–2024: 33.0 to 16.8 (6 years reported)33.024.022.538.637.216.81%
10PolandTrend 2019–2024: 10.7 to 16.1 (6 years reported)10.77.832.421.05.916.10%
11NorwayTrend 2019–2024: 12.2 to 20.2 (6 years reported)12.210.96.93.430.020.20%
All official donorsTrend 2019–2024: 514 to 9,558 (6 years reported)514.1428.2539.410,689.611,114.99,558.5100%

OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; retrieved 2026-10-14. 54 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 514.1m in 2019 → USD 9,558.5m in 2024 (+1759%); peak USD 11,114.9m in 2023. United States: Trend: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024 (+6814%); peak USD 10,210.3m in 2023. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024 (+142%); peak USD 1,052.4m in 2022. Germany: Trend: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024 (+332%); peak USD 199.2m in 2023. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.

Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) E38

MechanismTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)
GuaranteesTrend 2022–2024: 304 to 1,616 (3 years reported)303.8983.21,615.9
Direct investment in companies and SPVsTrend 2022–2024: 32.1 to 471 (3 years reported)32.1184.1471.3
Syndicated loansTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 43.4 (3 years reported)0.0293.343.4
Shares in investment funds (CIVs)Trend 2022–2024: 0.5 to 5.7 (3 years reported)0.5320.25.7
Simple co-financingTrend 2022–2024: 2.8 to 255 (3 years reported)2.81.8254.6
Credit linesTrend 2022–2024: 3.1 to 0 (3 years reported)3.10.00.0
All mechanisms, all sectorsTrend 2022–2024: 342 to 2,391 (3 years reported)342.41,782.62,390.9
In this brief's sectors (151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321)Trend 2022–2024: 331 to 1,799 (3 years reported)331.11,341.41,799.1
of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 332 to 1,366 (3 years reported)331.71,463.01,366.3
of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 10.7 to 1,025 (3 years reported)10.7319.61,024.6

OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Guarantees: Trend: USD 303.8m in 2022 → USD 1,615.9m in 2024 (+432%); peak USD 1,615.9m in 2024. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers this brief's sectors. No sector-level provider split is supplied. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.

World Bank projects: pipeline and active E49

CountryProjectProject IDStatusBoard approvalCommitment (USD m)Major sectorsClosing date
UkraineSupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU)P513816PipelinePlanned 2026-08-311.5Financial Sector; Digital Development2028-06-29
UkraineStrengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and ReformP514828PipelinePlanned 2026-09-075.0Public Administration; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Digital Development; Social Protection; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry2029-12-31
UkraineStrengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in UkraineP506719PipelinePlanned 2026-10-164.5Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services; Financial Sector; Social Sustainability and Inclusion2029-01-31
UkraineYouth Empowerment Support in Ukraine ProjectP505079PipelinePlanned 2026-11-302.8Social Protection; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Public Administration2030-10-02
UkraineRenewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine ProjectP515275PipelinePlanned 2026-12-21320.0Energy and Mineral Resources2030-12-31
UkraineSupporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE)P516223Active2026-06-26584.2Public AdministrationNot reported
UkraineFirst Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPOP510090Active2026-06-223,390.0Public Administration; Financial Sector; Energy and Mineral Resources; Social Protection; Industry, Trade and Services2027-11-30
UkraineResilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for ResultsP516254Active2026-05-22390.0Financial Sector; Industry, Trade and ServicesNot reported
UkrainePublic Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UkraineP515704Active2026-05-11271.4Public Administration; Health; Social ProtectionNot reported
UkraineStrengthening Government Capacity for Fiscal Reform ImplementationP513305Active2026-05-0130.0Public Administration; Digital DevelopmentNot reported

World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-10-14. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.

Talking points

Questions to ask

Next steps

What would change this advice

Before you use this brief

14 changed by the app

No figure needs checking: the automatic trace matched every cited figure to its evidence card. That is not proof of every claim, unit or interpretation.

Changed by the app 14

Shown so nothing changes silently. No action needed. A source is added only where the figure is in that card.

  • Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source addedThe OECD recorded USD 9,558.5 million in gross official disbursements to Ukraine in 2024 across governance, transport, renewable generation, banking, business services and industry, against USD 11,114.9 million in 2023.Open E25
  • Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source addedMore recent World Bank leads include the active Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results, P516254, approved on 22 May 2026 with a USD 390.0 million commitment, and SURGE, P516223, approved on 26 June 2026 with USD 584.2 million.Open E49
  • Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source addedA separate US fiscal-year series records selected-sector payments of USD 4,881.2 million in FY2024 and USD 4,306.4 million in FY2025.Open E40
  • Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source addedOfficially mobilised private finance in Ukraine’s selected sectors rose from USD 1,341.4 million in 2023 to USD 1,799.1 million in 2024.Open E38
  • Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source addedNorfund: Norway recorded NOK 500.0 million in payments during 2024–2025 for annual capital replenishment of the Ukraine Investment Fund.Open E7
  • Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source addedNorway recorded NOK 250.0 million in payments in 2024.Open E19
  • Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source addedMIGA: Norway recorded NOK 240.0 million in payments in 2023 to SURE, designed to support investor risk reduction, including war-insurance cover.Open E8
  • Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source addedBuffett Foundation reported USD 9.218 million for Ukraine Modular Bridges in 2023, a historical project lead rather than an open funding opportunity.Open E47
  • Energy and municipalities offer specific counterpart leads Source addedWorld Bank: Renewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine, P515275, is listed in the pipeline with a planned 21 December 2026 approval and USD 320.0 million commitment.Open E49
  • Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source addedACAPS’s September 2026 edition rated the conflict crisis Very High at 9.1, despite a decreasing three-month severity trend; its October access assessment still identified Extreme constraints.Open E42
  • Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source addedACLED reported 7,754 civilian-targeting events nationally during October 2025–September 2026, compared with 5,052 in the preceding twelve months.Open E44
  • Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source addedThe IMF projects real GDP growth of 1.0%, inflation of 8.9% and government gross debt of 111.8% of GDP in 2026.Open E52
  • Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source addedUkraine’s perception-based WGI scores were 34 for control of corruption and 46 for rule of law in 2025.Open E58
  • Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source addedFor utilities and civil works, also check weather resilience: GDACS recorded an Orange regional drought alert including Ukraine on 21 December 2025 and a Green flood alert on 23 September 2026.Open E57

Keep watching this for me

The agent checks this scope every Monday and on days when something is due, and sends at most one brief a week, only when something has changed, and always says why. No email needed: you get a private link. While this is a demonstration, starting a watch needs an owner or invited reviewer sign-in; the agent board shows the demo watches to everyone.

What can change within a week: humanitarian funding and pooled-fund allocations, disaster alerts and newly published activities. Each month: crisis severity and food prices. Once or twice a year: economic outlook, displacement, needs and access. Official aid totals, including Norway's, change about once a year. How often each source updates

Evidence

Every citation in the brief opens its card here. Icons show what each source is useful for.

Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs

Show all 62 evidence cards
E1 Norwegian disbursements by year · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Trend 2021–2025: 70.5 m to 721.4 m (5 years reported)In 2025 kroner: 70.5 m in 2021 → 721.4 m in 2025
YearDisbursed (NOK)In 2025 kronerAgreementsShare of all Norwegian aid to these recipients
202159.5 m70.5 m1337.4%
202232.5 m36.4 m90.6%
2023316.7 m336.5 m114.0%
2024467.1 m481.5 m195.0%
2025721.4 m721.4 m366.2%
Total1,597.2 m1,646.3 m

Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Trend: 59.5 m in 2021 → 721.4 m in 2025 (+1113%); peak 721.4 m in 2025. In 2025 kroner, adjusted for inflation with Statistics Norway's consumer price index (annual average, table 08981; retrieved 2026-10-14): 70.5 m in 2021 → 721.4 m in 2025 (+923%); peak 721.4 m in 2025.

E2 Largest agreement partners · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

PartnerTypeDisbursed (NOK)AgreementsYears
NorfundNorwegian public sector500.0 m12024–2025
MIGA - Multilateral Investment Guarantee AgencyMultilateral institutions240.0 m12023
FCDO - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK)Public sector other donor countries105.0 m12024–2025
ICMP - International Commission on Missing PersonsMultilateral institutions76.6 m12023–2025
UN WomenMultilateral institutions55.5 m32021–2025
GIZ - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale ZusammenarbeitPublic sector other donor countries55.0 m22024–2025
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentMultilateral institutions50.5 m32023–2025
ISAR EdnanniaNGO Local50.1 m12024–2025
Council of EuropeMultilateral institutions47.0 m32023–2025
OHCHR – UN High Commissioner for Human RightsMultilateral institutions33.3 m32022–2025
IRF - International Renaissance FoundationNGO Local32.7 m12024–2025
IDEA - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral AssistanceMultilateral institutions30.0 m12025

Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Agreement partner labels as recorded; not resolved organisation identities.

E3 Channels: who receives the funds · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Partner typeAssistance typeDisbursed (NOK)Share (rounded; listed groups only)Agreements
Multilateral institutionsEarmarked to multilaterals607.1 m38%20
Norwegian public sectorBilateral550.5 m34%6
Public sector other donor countriesBilateral165.3 m10%4
NGO LocalBilateral84.2 m5%11
NGO NorwegianBilateral78.2 m5%7
NGO InternationalBilateral50.4 m3%2
Norwegian private sectorBilateral47.4 m3%6
Private sector in developing countriesBilateral7.7 m0%2
NGO Other donor countriesBilateral6.5 m0%1

Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Shares use the listed channel groups, not necessarily the entire portfolio. Rounded 100% is not exactly all and rounded 0% is not none; retain nonzero amounts.

E4 What the money is for (sub-sectors) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Sub-sectorDisbursed (NOK)Agreements
10 - Business Policy and Administration500.0 m1
30 - Formal sector financial intermediaries240.0 m1
50 - Democratic participation and civil society216.9 m6
60 - Human rights128.5 m12
30 - Legal and judicial development70.4 m4
70 - Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions65.5 m3
10 - Public sector policy and administrative management60.1 m4
53 - Media and free flow of information52.9 m5
40 - Wind energy35.2 m3
13 - Anti-corruption organisations and institutions 33.5 m2

Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025.

E5 Where Norway spends in this sector (recipients) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

RecipientDisbursed (NOK)Rank among countries
Global Unspecified22,809.9 m—
Ukraine1,597.2 m1
Somalia792.4 m2
Africa Regional764.5 m—
South of Sahara Regional728.5 m—
Europe Regional570.4 m—
South Sudan499.2 m3
Mozambique488.5 m4
Nepal465.9 m5
Brazil432.4 m6

All recipients; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. 115 recipients in scope. Regional and unallocated lines (e.g. Global Unspecified) are shown but not ranked.

E6 Policy markers (share of disbursements tagged significant or principal) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

MarkerShare
Gender equality35%
Climate adaptation0%
Climate mitigation3%
Disability inclusion7%

Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Donor-reported OECD policy markers; not outcome evidence.

E7 Largest agreement: Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-24/0170 — "Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund" in Ukraine. Partner: Norfund (Norwegian public sector). Sector: 10 - Business Policy and Administration. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 500.0 m NOK in the selected years; 500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Annual capital replenishment of Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund. The fund is part of Norway's private sector development efforts in Ukraine.

E8 Largest agreement: MIGA - Support to Ukraine’s Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund (SURE) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-23/0023 — "MIGA - Support to Ukraine’s Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund (SURE)" in Ukraine. Partner: MIGA - Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 30 - Formal sector financial intermediaries. Payments recorded in 2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 240.0 m NOK in the selected years; 240.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: MIGA's "Support to Ukriane's Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund" (SURE TF) is part of the wider World Bank Group response to supporting Ukraine. With the help of funds contributed to SURE TF, MIGA can expand its suite of products to reduce the risk for investors and private sector at large in operating in Ukraine during the conflict and preparing for when reconstruction may commence. As a mechanism to provide war insurance cover, it aims to reduce risk for investors in continuing to operate in and with Ukraine as well as to prepare for the reconstruction.

E9 Largest agreement: PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0011 — "PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: FCDO - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK) (Public sector other donor countries). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 105.0 m NOK in the selected years; 105.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine supports liberated communities’ early recovery needs through community engagement, addressing local government capacity gaps, and strategically communicating results back to residents to sustain trust in state institution. Supporting local communities includes both supporting good consultation processes and dialogue and also supporting delivery of services and community work. Inclusion, and particularly of vulnerable groups in the processes and the project themselves is a main focus, and GEDSI (Gender Equality, Disability and Social Inclusion) is a central focus throughout the program. Conflict related sexual violence is another aspect that is relevant for several of the components in the program. The environmental challenges related to the concflict are becoming clearer, and managing these risks and well as improving the local enviroment …

E10 Largest agreement: ICMP Support to Ukraine in Accounting for Missing Persons · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-23/0032 — "ICMP Support to Ukraine in Accounting for Missing Persons" in Ukraine. Partner: ICMP - International Commission on Missing Persons (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 60 - Human rights. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 76.6 m NOK in the selected years; 76.6 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: This project aims to support the Ukrainian authorities in accounting for large numbers of missing persons to judicial standards that will make it possible to hold perpetrators of atrocities to account, provide the public with credible information regarding disappeared persons and related crimes, and secure the rights of families of the missing. ICMP will support further development and strengthening of Ukraine’s technical capacity for dedicated and sustainable impartial investigations into missing persons cases. It will support meaningful participation by Ukraine’s civil society and family associations, especially those that are women-led, in the missing persons process, facilitate intergovernmental and in-country cooperation and raise awareness about the central role of this issue in security and peacebuilding. The project is gender mainstreamed.

E11 Largest agreement: ISAR Ednannia - Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0026 — "ISAR Ednannia - Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy" in Ukraine. Partner: ISAR Ednannia (NGO Local). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 50.1 m NOK in the selected years; 50.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project "Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy", by the Initiative Center to Support Social Action "Ednannia" aims at strengthening CSOs to foster inclusive and sustainable recovery and to advance democratic governance reforms in Ukraine through small grants programs, educational and networking activities and research. This will be accomplished through three specific objectives: Objective 1: Strengthen organisational capacities of Ukrainian CSOs Outcome: Strengthened organisational capacities of CSOs. Activities include providing capacity-building through small grants and educational activities such as workshops, webinars, and the development of an educational program. The focus is on enhancing functional and adaptive capacities of CSOs. Research and Media grants will support activities in the Objective 1 scope, providing opportunities of …

E12 Largest agreement: Building democratic, peaceful and gender equal society in Ukraine II · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-21/0001 — "Building democratic, peaceful and gender equal society in Ukraine II" in Ukraine. Partner: UN Women (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 70 - Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions. Payments recorded in 2021–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 46.0 m NOK in the selected years; 46.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The overarching goal of the project is as follows: Women will meaningfully participate in, and equally benefit from, peace and security processes at all levels in Ukraine. The project will build capacities of women's organizations to meaningfully participate in conflict prevention and recovery at all levels. The project will improve economic conditions and gaps in services. Build capacity of government institutions at all levels to implement and monitor WPS commitments in sustainable and inclusive ways.

E13 Largest agreement: Council of Europe Ukraine Action Plan 2023-2026 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-23/0010 — "Council of Europe Ukraine Action Plan 2023-2026" in Ukraine. Partner: Council of Europe (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 30 - Legal and judicial development. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 43.0 m NOK in the selected years; 43.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Programme period stated in the description: 2023–2026. Description: The Council of Europe Action Plan for Ukraine “Resilience, Recovery and Reconstruction” 2023-2026 has been prepared in close consultation with the Ukrainian authorities, as a response to the determination and resolve of Ukraine’s authorities and people to engage in rebuilding the country. The proposed measures, based on Council of Europe standards, are aimed at accompanying the reconstruction process and economic recovery in Ukraine with support to strengthen the resilience of Ukrainian public institutions, to enhance democratic governance and the rule of law and to protect citizens’ fundamental rights. The intervention is based on a gender analysis that has informed the intervention design. Several outcomes include objectives explicitly addressing women and gender equality, and also includes indicators disaggregated by gender, degree to which new/adjusted policies are gender sensitive …

E14 Largest agreement: OECD Country Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-23/0007 — "OECD Country Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Public sector policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 37.5 m NOK in the selected years; 37.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The overall objecive of OECD's country programme for Ukraine is to support "the reconstruction and recovery of Ukraine in line with Ukraine's own priorities". The point of departure for the country programme, is Ukraine's official request for accession to the OECD and the OECD Council's recgnition of Ukraine as a prospective member. The country programme is a partnership "with a view to both Ukraine's recovery and its EU adn OECD accession ambition". The expected outcomes for the four year country programme for Ukraine are as follows: - enhanced access to international best practice and exchange of experiences via greater participation in OECD bodies - tailor-made reviews and peer learning - improved quality of policy eforms in line with OECD standards - further anchoring of long-term reforms, including via adherence to selected OECD legal instruments - enhanced network of international …

E15 Largest agreement: IRF Empowering Civil Society Action for Resilience and Recovery of Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0031 — "IRF Empowering Civil Society Action for Resilience and Recovery of Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: IRF - International Renaissance Foundation (NGO Local). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 32.7 m NOK in the selected years; 32.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project involves a partnership between two large Ukrainian civil society organisations (CSO), International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) and the East European Foundation (EEF), which will work with smaller CSOs to address early recovery and democratic reforms in Ukraine. Among other things, the project will also build capacity of member organisations in gender sensitive budgeting and collection and use of gender disaaggregated data and also build capacity in sustainable and green recovery and climate action.

E16 Largest agreement: IDEA - Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections (U-VOTE) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0051 — "IDEA - Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections (U-VOTE)" in Ukraine. Partner: IDEA - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 51 - Elections. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 30.0 m NOK in the selected years; 30.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The U-VOTE (Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections) programme, implemented by International IDEA, supports Ukraine’s preparation for credible, inclusive, and secure post-war elections. Working with the Central Election Commission, Verkhovna Rada, NACP, and civil society, the project strengthens electoral integrity, cybersecurity, transparency in political finance, and voter participation. It contributes to the governance, public sector capacity, and gender equality sectors. Gender and inclusion are mainstreamed, ensuring participation of women, youth, displaced persons, and veterans. U-VOTE enhances democratic resilience and supports Ukraine’s path toward accountable, European-aligned governance.

E17 Related project (semantic match): NEFCO - Green Recovery Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-22/0009 — "NEFCO - Green Recovery Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: NEFCO - Nordic Environment Finance Corporation (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Energy policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 330.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The objective of the Fund is solely and exclusively to fund activities in support of sustainable rehabilitation and rebuilding the infrastructure destroyed or damaged as a result of the Russian war in Ukraine to ensure that Ukraine is built back better and greener in accordance with Annex 1 hereto. The expected outcomes of the Contribution are: Enhanced capacity and capability of Ukrainian municipalities to plan and implement green recovery measures; Short-term repair, maintenance, and upgrade of municipal infrastructure, including restoration of public service buildings and rebuilding of medium-sized utilities and facilities; Improved access to basic municipal services for internally displaced people; Restoration and upgrade of social infrastructure.

E18 Related project (semantic match): UNDP - Green Energy Recovery Programme in Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0014 — "UNDP - Green Energy Recovery Programme in Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: UNDP - UN Development Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Hybrid energy electric power plants. Payments recorded in 2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 120.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project, supported by Norad and UNDP, focuses on the critical repair and enhancement of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, particularly in Kharkiv. This includes designing emergency power supplies and procuring small gas turbines, gas engines, and solar panels to ensure the functionality of critical infrastructure. UNDP will provide extensive installation support and training for local actors, covering installation procedures, maintenance protocols, and troubleshooting techniques. Additionally, tailored training programs for local authorities will enhance their capacities in energy management, data management, analytical skills, and strategic planning. An awareness campaign will be launched to promote energy conservation and efficiency in the affected areas. Furthermore, an energy cluster will be established to coordinate emergency response efforts and mobilize resources for both …

E19 Related project (semantic match): IFC Economic Resilience Action (ERA) Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-24/0025 — "IFC Economic Resilience Action (ERA) Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: IFC - International Finance Corporation (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 250.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The Economic Resilience Action (ERA) will provide a framework for IFC to address the private sector financing needs during Russia's invasion of Ukraine and prepare for the reconstruction phase. IFC blends own funds with contribution from donors such as Norway as levers to reduce investment risk, thereby enabling more investments to critically important sectors of Ukaine's economy. NOK 50 million are earmarked to renewable energy projects in the Ukraine.

E20 Related project (semantic match): Energy Community - critical repair of energy infrastructure in Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-25/0009 — "Energy Community - critical repair of energy infrastructure in Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: Energy Community Secretariat (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Hybrid energy electric power plants. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Norway is committed to supporting Ukraine's energy recovery through the Ukraine Energy Support Fund, focusing on urgent needs and long-term resilience. Key actions include procuring and deploying essential energy infrastructure like gas turbines, transformers, and decentralized solutions, alongside repairing damaged systems and implementing protective measures. The 2025 strategy emphasizes developing green energy and decentralized production, including a national plan for repairing power plants and gas infrastructure. Norway's support aims to strengthen Ukraine's energy security, increase generation capacity, enhance grid stability, and expand decentralized renewable energy use. Critical infrastructure delivery includes modular gas compressor units, mobile cogeneration units, and solar systems for hospitals, supported with training and maintenance. The Fund seeks unrestricted support …

E21 Related project (semantic match): EBRD - E5P - Ukraine window · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-23/0028 — "EBRD - E5P - Ukraine window" in Ukraine. Partner: EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 83 - Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency. Payments recorded in 2023–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 60.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The E5P was established to facilitate municipal infrastructure investments boosting energy efficiency and environmental protection in the Eastern Partnership countries, in particular aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Fund has been operating in Ukraine since 2010 and has by now expanded to all the EU Eastern Partnership countries of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia and Moldova. The Fund co-finances district heating and public buildings projects together with local transport, solid waste and street lighting investments. The EBRD acts as the fund manager on behalf of contributors and other IFIs. The E5P Fund has different country windows to which donors earmark resources. This contribution is for the Ukraine window.

E22 Related project (semantic match): EU Ukraine Investment Framework - pillar 2 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-25/0031 — "EU Ukraine Investment Framework - pillar 2" in Ukraine. Partner: EC - European Commission (Multilateral institutions); implementing: EIB - European Investment Bank. Sector: 40 - Retail gas distribution. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 1,500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The funding from Norway is being channelled through the EU’s Ukraine Investment Framework (UIF), which seeks to mobilise public and private investments for the recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine following the destruction caused by Russia’s war of aggression. The UIF is a part of the Ukraine Facility, the EU’s dedicated instrument for providing civilian support to Ukraine. This is the first time Ukraine will be receiving support from Norway directly through this instrument. The funding is earmarked for emergency gas purchases for the heating season 2025/2026 to replace the production losses stemming from the attacks on Ukraine's gas production facilities. The European Commission will use the European Investment Bank as the implementing partner of this support.

E23 Related project (semantic match): Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform Trust Fund (URTF) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-22/0012 — "Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform Trust Fund (URTF)" in Ukraine. Partner: IBRD - International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 9,300.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform is to provide a coordinated financing mechanism to assist the Government of Ukraine to: (a) sustain its administrative and service delivery capacity and conduct relief efforts; and (b) plan and implement Ukraine’s recovery and resilient reconstruction.

E24 Related project (semantic match): UNDP Thematic support to energy · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement UKR-22/0013 — "UNDP Thematic support to energy" in Ukraine. Partner: UNDP - UN Development Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Energy policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2022–2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 103.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The first phase of reconstruction efforts under the UNDP Resilience Building and Recovery Programme will focus on the restoration of essential utility services, including water and sanitation, solid waste management, and heating and energy supply. UNDP is working on 3 parallel streams on the Energy Crisis: • Stream 1: Energy Sector Assessment: supporting the Government of Ukraine and national partners for carrying out quantification of macro-economic impact of the Russian aggression. • Stream 2: Provision of Emergency Equipment and support to urgent infrastructure repair for affected communities/regions: UNDP has been also providing emergency response through the immediate procurement and quick repair of generators, diesel oil, and other mobile energy items • Stream 3: System procurement for mid- and long-term rehabilitation of the energy infrastructure.

E25 Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) · OECD DAC Creditor Reporting System

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scopeDonorTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope
1United StatesTrend 2019–2024: 121 to 8,364 (6 years reported)121.0133.5131.78,643.710,210.38,364.584%
2EU InstitutionsTrend 2019–2024: 257 to 623 (6 years reported)256.8159.5241.11,052.4309.2622.88%
3GermanyTrend 2019–2024: 23.1 to 100 (6 years reported)23.123.534.9168.2199.2100.12%
4FranceTrend 2019–2024: 0.4 to 2.9 (6 years reported)0.43.12.8422.31.32.91%
5JapanTrend 2019–2024: 2.9 to 222 (6 years reported)2.90.60.30.88.6222.01%
6United KingdomTrend 2019–2024: 9.3 to 26.4 (6 years reported)9.311.211.0119.254.526.41%
7SwedenTrend 2019–2024: 20.4 to 55.7 (6 years reported)20.415.421.620.750.355.71%
8SwitzerlandTrend 2019–2024: 8.1 to 51.9 (6 years reported)8.18.210.742.551.651.91%
9CanadaTrend 2019–2024: 33.0 to 16.8 (6 years reported)33.024.022.538.637.216.81%
10PolandTrend 2019–2024: 10.7 to 16.1 (6 years reported)10.77.832.421.05.916.10%
11NorwayTrend 2019–2024: 12.2 to 20.2 (6 years reported)12.210.96.93.430.020.20%
All official donorsTrend 2019–2024: 514 to 9,558 (6 years reported)514.1428.2539.410,689.611,114.99,558.5100%

OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; retrieved 2026-10-14. 54 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 514.1m in 2019 → USD 9,558.5m in 2024 (+1759%); peak USD 11,114.9m in 2023. United States: Trend: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024 (+6814%); peak USD 10,210.3m in 2023. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024 (+142%); peak USD 1,052.4m in 2022. Germany: Trend: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024 (+332%); peak USD 199.2m in 2023. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.

E26 Other donors' largest projects in scope (OECD CRS, 2023 to 2024) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorProjectChannel of deliveryRecipientDisbursed (USD m)
International Development Association [IDA]Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UkraineRecipient GovernmentUkraine1,998.9
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Ukraine Relief and Recovery Development Policy LoanRecipient GovernmentUkraine954.5
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Growth Foundations DPORecipient GovernmentUkraine712.0
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Second Growth Foundations Development Policy OperationRecipient GovernmentUkraine600.9
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UkraineRecipient GovernmentUkraine488.8
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Supporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE)Recipient GovernmentUkraine401.3
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Fifth Additional Financing for Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UKRAINERecipient GovernmentUkraine386.8
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for ResultsRecipient GovernmentUkraine251.2
EU InstitutionsPROVISIONING OF THE UKRAINE GUARANTEEEuropean Union InstitutionsUkraine216.3
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD]Sixth Additional Financing for Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UkraineRecipient GovernmentUkraine197.6
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development [EBRD]Aggregated disbursements and reflowsPrivate sector in recipient countryUkraine161.8
EU InstitutionsHYDRO POWER PLANTS REHABILITATIONCentral Government (recipient govt.)Ukraine143.8

OECD CRS project-level records, gross disbursements 2023 to 2024, current USD millions; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; Norway excluded (see the Norwegian data); retrieved 2026-10-14. 798 projects from 47 donors report in scope. Titles and descriptions are donor-reported; a project may cover more than the sector named.

E27 Other donor's project: Meteorology cooperation in Ukraine (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: University, college or other teaching institution, research institute or think-tank. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 1.0m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): Ukraine is prone to extreme weather events such as floods, droughts and harsh winter conditions. Natural disasters threaten food, water and energy security, health and the country's development objectives. An integrated approach to disaster management, including weather forecasts, hydrometeorological and environmental monitoring, public awareness, disaster mitigation and reconstruction, reduces human and economic losses and benefits society as a whole.UHMC 's (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center) capacity will improve to provide weather and early warning services at all levels. The vulnerability of citizens, society and sectors in Ukraine and south-eastern Europe to disaster risks, changing weather and extreme weather events will be reduced and preparedness will increase. The aim is also to increase the visibility of UHMC.The main beneficiaries are UHMC, the State Emergency Service, as

E28 Other donor's project: Ukraine Energy Support Fund (Germany) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Germany. Channel of delivery: Other multilateral institutions. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies. Disbursed USD 66.1m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): Russia's war of aggression on Ukraine is causing devastation in the Ukrainian energy sector. Especially since the beginning of October 2022, there have been massive waves of attacks by Russia on the civilian infrastructure. Among other things, thermal and hydroelectric power plants as well as electricity transmission have been severely damaged. As a result, many people are without electricity and heating. At the request of the European Commission and in agreement with the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy, the Secretariat of the Energy Community has set up the 'Ukraine Energy Support Fund' (UESF) to mitigate the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the energy sector. The UESF is designed as a basket funding, so that different donors can participate. The Secretariat of the Energy Community acts as trustee of the donor funds for the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy. The UESF funds are used

E29 Other donor's project: Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Co-financing of the Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endur (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: World Bank Group (WB). Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Public finance management (PFM); Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 15.1m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): The Russian invasion in Ukraine on 24 February 2022 has led to considerable economic losses and human suffering in Ukraine. The decline of Ukraine's economy is risking the already achieved development results and raises poverty among the population.The World Bank's Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) trust fund in Ukraine supports the Government of Ukraine in sustaining core government functions at the national and regional levels by funding the non-security sector expenses. The support enables the Government of Ukraine to maintain control over functions such as collecting revenues, making social payments, responding to emergencies and to maintain 90% schools functioning by covering teachers' salaries.Finland supports Ukraine's resilience and long term reforms. The objectives of Finland's country strategy in Ukraine include protecting Ukraine's territorial i

E30 Other donor's project: Economic Integration of Internally Displaced People (Germany) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Germany. Channel of delivery: International Organisation for Migration. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) development. Disbursed USD 3.2m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): The financial sector project with a volume of EUR 10.85 million in Ukraine is aimed directly at promoting the stock of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and indirectly at internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable population groups. The objective of the measure is to improve economic self-reliance and thus the living conditions of IDPs and conflict-affected populations with high economic vulnerability. Given the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic also on Ukrainian MSMEs, the project aims to keep MSMEs of different sizes and types functioning so that they can maintain existing jobs and adopt working modalities that are better suited to the challenges and demands of the pandemic. Where possible, the businesses will also be expanded to create new jobs. Participating MSMEs will receive grants to invest in new equipment and training to help them make the necessary b

E31 Other donor's project: Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU) (Switzerland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Switzerland. Channel of delivery: Third Country Government (Delegated co-operation). Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Decentralisation and support to subnational government. Disbursed USD 2.4m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): With a contribution to the Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU), Switzerland aims at strengthening communities and at enhancing government legitimacy in Eastern Ukraine through improved services, economic recovery and empowered civil society. The PFRU is an innovative multi-donor financing tool which focuses on supporting the implementation of reforms in the conflict-affected areas of the country through an integrated approach (humanitarian-development-peace nexus). The PFRU unites five development partners (UK, US, Canada, Sweden, Switzerland) and it is co-owned by the Government of Ukraine.

E32 Other donor's project: Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: Other multilateral institutions. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Democratic participation and civil society; Human rights; Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 2.2m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): Finland's goal in Ukraine is to provide long-term support for the resilience of Ukrainian society and its own reforms. The objectives of the Country Strategy are to restore Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty and to respect international law, to strengthen bilateral relations and expand co-operation between Finland and Ukraine, to improve the sustainability of society and the living conditions of its citizens, and to strengthen relations between the European Union and Ukraine.The Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU) is an ODA-eligible fund set up by the UK Foreign Office and prepared in co-operation with the Ukrainian government since 2020. The fund's partner in Ukraine is the Ministry of Reintegration. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The fund is intended to provide broad support to the resilience of Ukraine's local government, NGOs, local communities,

E33 Norway's aid through multilateral organisations, attributed to the country (imputed, USD m) · ONE Imputed Multilateral Sectors and OECD DAC2A, via the Development Finance Observatory

About this source: Estimates of where a donor's core contributions to multilateral organisations end up, by country and sector, by ONE and the OECD. They are modelled from each organisation's spending, not reported project by project.

Trace this: ONE: Imputed Multilateral Sectors, methodology ↗ · Development Finance Observatory: sources and licences ↗

CountryMeasureTrend20202021202220232024
UkraineAll sectors (OECD estimate)Trend 2020–2024: 2.7 to 2.9 (5 years reported)2.704.407.074.382.87
UkraineSectors in this brief (ONE estimate)Trend 2020–2024: 0.68 to 4.0 (5 years reported)0.680.961.772.604.03
Ukraineof which Government and civil society, general (151)Trend 2020–2024: 0.28 to 3.9 (5 years reported)0.280.411.492.353.90
Ukraineof which Transport and storage (210)Trend 2020–2024: 0.13 to 0.05 (5 years reported)0.130.190.130.070.05
Ukraineof which Energy generation, renewable sources (232)Trend 2020–2024: 0.13 to 0.04 (5 years reported)0.130.120.030.020.04
Ukraineof which Banking and financial services (240)Trend 2020–2024: 0.06 to 0.02 (5 years reported)0.060.130.080.100.02
Ukraineof which Business and other services (250)Trend 2020–2024: 0 to 0 (5 years reported)0.000.000.000.040.00
Ukraineof which Industry (321)Trend 2020–2024: 0.1 to 0.02 (5 years reported)0.100.110.040.030.02

Imputed multilateral ODA from Norway, gross disbursements in current USD millions: all sectors from OECD DAC2A, the brief's sectors from ONE's Imputed Multilateral Sectors (CRS purpose codes starting 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321), via the Development Finance Observatory; retrieved 2026-10-14. Modelled estimates: each multilateral organisation's spending in the country is attributed to Norway in proportion to Norway's share of its core funding. Norway did not direct this money to the country. It covers core contributions only, so it does not overlap with the Norwegian agreement data (Norway's own agreements, including funds earmarked through multilaterals). The OECD and ONE totals differ slightly because their methods do. Sector rows are sums of ONE's purpose-code rows, added up by this app.

E34 Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: Ukraine 2024 ↗ · FTS plan: Ukraine 2025 ↗ · FTS plan: Ukraine 2026 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2024 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2026 (all countries) ↗

CountryYearRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
Ukraine20243,107.72,351.876%
Ukraine20252,633.51,663.663%
Ukraine2026 (in progress)2,304.01,654.972%

UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.

E35 Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: Ukraine 2025 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗

CountryClusterRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
UkraineFood Security613.4190.931%
UkraineEmergency Shelter and NFI544.6196.836%
UkraineMultipurpose Cash410.2180.844%
UkraineWater Sanitation Hygiene365.3135.337%
UkraineProtection171.9205.6120%
UkraineHealth130.9138.4106%
UkraineProtection - Child Protection128.951.940%
UkraineProtection - Mine Action86.5112.8130%

UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ukraine 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 280.1m; Norway, Government of USD 218.9m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 212.1m; Germany, Government of USD 178.9m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 99.3m.

E36 Country-based pooled fund allocations by partner type (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: OCHA CBPF data hub (allocations by fund and partner) ↗ · CBPF API: allocations by year, fund and partner type ↗

FundAllocation yearUN agencies (USD m)International NGOs (USD m)National NGOs (USD m)Other organisations (USD m)Total approved (USD m)National NGO share
Ukraine2026 (to date)50.70144.47134.530.20329.9040.8%
Ukraine20250.0085.14117.470.00202.6158.0%
Ukraine20245.0084.5874.760.00164.3445.5%

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Ukraine; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Approved allocations only (pipeline excluded); the current year is still being allocated, and years with no approved allocation are not shown. The national NGO share counts direct allocations, not sub-grants, so it is not the whole local share. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

E37 Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: CBPF API: Ukraine project records (CSV) ↗

OrganisationTypeFundProjectsIn the reader's clusters (USD m)All approved (USD m)Largest clustersAllocation years
ProliskaNational NGOUkraine511.3822.67Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
CHARITY ORGANIZATION «CHARITABLE FOUNDATION «АNGELS OF SALVATION»National NGOUkraine77.2842.33Emergency Shelter and NFI, Protection, Multi-purpose CASH2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Charitable Organization 'Charity Fund Team4UA'National NGOUkraine46.2340.50Multi-purpose CASH, Protection, Camp Coordination / Management2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Charitable Organization 'Charity Fund 'POSMISHKA UA'National NGOUkraine95.1320.78Emergency Shelter and NFI, Protection, Camp Coordination / Management2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Charitable Organization 'Charitable Fund 'The Right to Protection'National NGOUkraine84.9446.67Emergency Shelter and NFI, Camp Coordination / Management, Protection2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Corus InternationalInternational NGOUkraine34.428.38Protection, Health, Multi-purpose CASH2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
CIVIC ORGANIZATION “THE TENTH OF APRIL”National NGOUkraine33.847.79Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Emergency Shelter and NFI2024, 2025
Nonviolent Peaceforce InternationalInternational NGOUkraine33.667.18Protection, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Camp Coordination / Management2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Charitable organization “Charitable foundation “ROKADA”National NGOUkraine53.6414.07Camp Coordination / Management, Protection, Emergency Shelter and NFI2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION “CHARITY FOUNDATION “EAST-SOS”National NGOUkraine33.506.73Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2025

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Ukraine; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ranked by approved budget in the reader's clusters (Protection); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

E38 Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) · OECD, mobilised private finance for development

About this source: The OECD's measure of private money brought in by public development finance, for example through guarantees or co-investment. It is the main reference for blended finance; amounts follow the OECD's attribution rules and are published here for groups of providers.

Trace this: OECD mobilised private finance dataflow (DSD_MOB@DF_MOBILISATION) ↗

MechanismTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)
GuaranteesTrend 2022–2024: 304 to 1,616 (3 years reported)303.8983.21,615.9
Direct investment in companies and SPVsTrend 2022–2024: 32.1 to 471 (3 years reported)32.1184.1471.3
Syndicated loansTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 43.4 (3 years reported)0.0293.343.4
Shares in investment funds (CIVs)Trend 2022–2024: 0.5 to 5.7 (3 years reported)0.5320.25.7
Simple co-financingTrend 2022–2024: 2.8 to 255 (3 years reported)2.81.8254.6
Credit linesTrend 2022–2024: 3.1 to 0 (3 years reported)3.10.00.0
All mechanisms, all sectorsTrend 2022–2024: 342 to 2,391 (3 years reported)342.41,782.62,390.9
In this brief's sectors (151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321)Trend 2022–2024: 331 to 1,799 (3 years reported)331.11,341.41,799.1
of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 332 to 1,366 (3 years reported)331.71,463.01,366.3
of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 10.7 to 1,025 (3 years reported)10.7319.61,024.6

OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Guarantees: Trend: USD 303.8m in 2022 → USD 1,615.9m in 2024 (+432%); peak USD 1,615.9m in 2024. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers this brief's sectors. No sector-level provider split is supplied. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.

E39 Donors' total aid (net ODA), all recipients (2021 to 2025, 2025 provisional) · OECD DAC1 (includes preliminary data)

About this source: The OECD's headline aid totals for each donor, the source of the yearly figures on aid as a share of national income. It shows a donor's overall trend, not where the money goes.

Trace this: OECD DAC1 dataflow (DSD_DAC1@DF_DAC1) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorTrend2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)2025 (USD m) provisional
United StatesTrend 2021–2025: 47,528 to 29,022 (5 years reported)47,528.260,328.764,461.965,336.829,021.9
EU InstitutionsTrend 2021–2025: 20,639 to 52,905 (5 years reported)20,639.127,165.937,544.235,654.152,904.8
GermanyTrend 2021–2025: 32,456 to 28,032 (5 years reported)32,455.636,444.641,253.333,249.328,032.0
FranceTrend 2021–2025: 16,722 to 13,906 (5 years reported)16,721.917,560.915,862.015,073.813,905.7
JapanTrend 2021–2025: 15,767 to 13,524 (5 years reported)15,767.016,747.318,661.915,245.913,523.6
United KingdomTrend 2021–2025: 16,278 to 16,365 (5 years reported)16,277.815,761.318,615.716,269.516,365.1
SwedenTrend 2021–2025: 5,938 to 5,769 (5 years reported)5,937.65,463.85,481.94,829.05,769.2
SwitzerlandTrend 2021–2025: 3,911 to 4,514 (5 years reported)3,911.44,496.45,191.64,557.24,513.5
CanadaTrend 2021–2025: 6,258 to 10,131 (5 years reported)6,257.79,274.19,058.08,422.910,131.3
PolandTrend 2021–2025: 971 to 1,608 (5 years reported)971.23,481.32,571.11,829.91,607.9
NorwayTrend 2021–2025: 4,673 to 5,157 (5 years reported)4,673.05,161.05,292.94,905.35,156.8

OECD DAC1, net ODA disbursements to all recipients and sectors, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Shows each donor's overall aid, not its spending in this country or sector. 2025 figures are the OECD's preliminary estimates of aid already disbursed that year (not forecasts) and may be revised. United States: USD 65,336.8m in 2024 → USD 29,021.9m in 2025 (-56% in one year). EU Institutions: USD 35,654.1m in 2024 → USD 52,904.8m in 2025 (+48% in one year). Germany: USD 33,249.3m in 2024 → USD 28,032.0m in 2025 (-16% in one year). France: USD 15,073.8m in 2024 → USD 13,905.7m in 2025 (-8% in one year). Japan: USD 15,245.9m in 2024 → USD 13,523.6m in 2025 (-11% in one year). The same donors in this country and sector (OECD CRS, gross disbursements; ends earlier): United States: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024. EU Institutions: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024. Germany: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024. France: USD 0.4m in 2019 → USD 2.9m in 2024. Japan: USD 2.9m in 2019 → USD 222.0m in 2024. United Kingdom: USD 9.3m in 2019 → USD 26.4m in 2024. Sweden: USD 20.4m in 2019 → USD 55.7m in 2024. Switzerland: USD 8.1m in 2019 → USD 51.9m in 2024. Canada: USD 33.0m in 2019 → USD 16.8m in 2024. Poland: USD 10.7m in 2019 → USD 16.1m in 2024. Norway: USD 12.2m in 2019 → USD 20.2m in 2024. Measure: net ODA disbursement flows in current USD, not budgets or grant-only funding. Preserve the provisional label on the corresponding observation year.

E40 US foreign assistance by fiscal year (ForeignAssistance.gov), to FY2026 · ForeignAssistance.gov (US government)

About this source: The US government's own record of its foreign assistance: every obligation and payment by country, sector, agency and implementing partner, published much sooner than the OECD's data. It shows the effect of the 2025 US cuts country by country; economic and military aid are kept apart.

Trace this: ForeignAssistance.gov data downloads ↗

CountryMeasureFY2021 (USD m)FY2022 (USD m)FY2023 (USD m)FY2024 (USD m)FY2025 (USD m)FY2026 to date (USD m)Trend
UkraineDisbursed, all economic aid303.39,639.116,486.76,418.85,741.2447.7Trend 2021–2025: 303 to 5,741 (5 years reported)
UkraineDisbursed, in this brief's sectors123.38,678.714,655.74,881.24,306.430.2Trend 2021–2025: 123 to 4,306 (5 years reported)
UkraineNewly obligated (committed), in this brief's sectors150.28,707.414,846.35,173.04,043.9181.7Trend 2021–2025: 150 to 4,044 (5 years reported)

US government obligations and disbursements of economic (non-military) assistance, current USD, from the ForeignAssistance.gov complete dataset (file of Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:40:59 GMT); loaded 2026-10-14; retrieved 2026-10-14. US fiscal years run October to September; FY2026 is incomplete. Obligations are new commitments; disbursements are payments, often against earlier commitments, so they fall later than obligations. Agencies report with a lag and revise. Sectors use the OECD codes the US assigns, which can differ from the recipient's or the OECD's classification. Military and security assistance is excluded. Partners the US withholds by name (redacted) are left out of the partner list. Largest implementing partners by disbursements, FY2025–FY2026: World Bank Group (USD 3,410.8m); U.S. Government - U.S. Agency for International Development (USD 535.2m); International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (USD 34.3m); Development Alternatives, Inc. (USD 26.8m); Chemonics International, Inc. (USD 15.5m).

E41 Crisis risk: INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026 · INFORM Risk Index (EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: An index from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and partners that rates how likely a humanitarian crisis or disaster is to overwhelm a country's capacity to cope. Humanitarian donors and agencies use it to compare countries; it measures structural risk, not current needs.

Trace this: INFORM Risk results and data (EU JRC) ↗

CountryINFORM Risk Mid 2026 (0-10)ClassRank (1 = highest risk)Hazard & exposureVulnerabilityLack of coping capacityINFORM Risk 2022
Ukraine5.7High39 of 1918.16.13.84.5

INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026, EU Joint Research Centre with IASC partners; retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0-10, higher means a higher risk that a humanitarian crisis overwhelms national capacity; the earlier score is from the published edition of that year, whose method differed slightly. Ukraine: the highest of the three dimensions is Hazard & exposure (8.1); read the score through that dimension. Ukraine: INFORM Risk 4.5 in 2022 → 5.7 in Mid 2026 (Medium → High).

E42 Humanitarian crisis severity: INFORM Severity - September 2026 · ACAPS INFORM Severity Index (via HDX)

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how severe each ongoing humanitarian crisis is, based on its analysts' review of many sources. It is used to compare crises and to see whether one is getting worse.

Trace this: ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly files on HDX ↗

CountryCrisisDriversSeverity (1-10)CategoryTrend (last 3 months)Complexity (1-10)Data reliability
UkraineConflict in UkraineConflict/ Violence9.1Very HighDecreasing8.1Very High

ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly edition published on the Humanitarian Data Exchange; retrieved 2026-10-14. It rates the severity of ongoing crises (impact, conditions of people affected, complexity); countries without an active crisis are not listed.

E43 Humanitarian access constraints: ACAPS, Oct 2026 · ACAPS Humanitarian Access

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how hard it is for humanitarian organisations to reach people in a crisis, because of insecurity, bureaucratic restrictions or physical obstacles.

Trace this: ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset ↗

CountryCrisisAccess constraints (0-5)LevelPeople's access to aidAid actors' access to peopleSecurity and physical constraintsStrongest constraints
UkraineConflict in Ukraine5Extreme545obstructed access to services and aid; restricted movement within the country; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; mines and explosive devices; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure)

ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset, Oct 2026 edition (API); retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0 (no constraints) to 5 (extreme), from three pillars and nine indicators; countries without a tracked crisis are not listed. Ukraine: the most constrained crisis is Conflict in Ukraine (5 of 5, Extreme).

E44 Conflict and protest events reported by ACLED, to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX

About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.

Trace this: Ukraine - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗

CountryAreaCategoryEvents Sep 2026Fatalities Sep 2026Events, 12 monthsFatalities, 12 monthsEvents, previous 12 monthsFatalities, previous 12 months
UkraineNationalPolitical violence7,7143,90786,33661,20670,61180,131
UkraineNationalCivilian targeting8213487,7543,5845,0522,513
UkraineNationalDemonstrations13Not reported485Not reported348Not reported
UkraineRegion: KhersonPolitical violence1,0941,01114,72225,12512,34328,445
UkraineRegion: DonetskPolitical violence1,7161,69821,92221,30924,12641,627
UkraineRegion: ZaporizhiaPolitical violence1,86240917,2454,9356,0062,542

ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. National and regional figures are sums of ACLED's district rows, added up by this app; the district card lists the districts. Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.

E45 Conflict and protest events by district (ACLED), to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX

About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.

Trace this: Ukraine - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗

CountryRegionDistrictDistrict code (P-code)CategoryEvents Sep 2026Fatalities Sep 2026Events, 12 monthsFatalities, 12 months
UkraineKhersonKhersonskyiUA6510Political violence6709977,66824,762
UkraineDonetskPokrovskyiUA1416Political violence5171,1297,09815,049
UkraineDonetskKramatorskyiUA1412Political violence99253310,9405,350
UkraineDnipropetrovskSynelnykivskyiUA1214Political violence1831903,9203,319
UkraineZaporizhiaPolohivskyiUA2310Political violence8641699,2212,543
UkraineKharkivKupianskyiUA6308Political violence3801814,2992,305
UkraineZaporizhiaZaporizkyiUA2306Political violence7412195,3472,047
UkraineSumySumskyiUA5908Political violence3871004,465873
UkraineKharkivIziumskyiUA6304Political violence148741,609749
UkraineKharkivKharkivskyiUA6312Political violence172281,387627
UkraineDonetskKramatorskyiUA1412Civilian targeting102501,000520
UkraineDonetskBakhmutskyiUA1402Political violence1341,878481
UkraineKhersonKhersonskyiUA6510Civilian targeting5630822394
UkraineZaporizhiaVasylivskyiUA2304Political violence222112,367290
UkraineSumyShostkynskyiUA5910Political violence390333,542288
UkraineZaporizhiaZaporizkyiUA2306Civilian targeting4618471230
UkraineKyiv CityKyivUA8000Political violence11929376222
UkraineKharkivBohodukhivskyiUA6302Political violence88281,104215
UkraineKyiv CityKyivUA8000Civilian targeting5329163213
UkraineKhersonBeryslavskyiUA6502Political violence382115,635173
UkraineKharkivKharkivskyiUA6312Civilian targeting386359155
UkraineDonetskVolnovaskyiUA1404Political violence598820140
UkraineDonetskHorlivskyiUA1406Political violence489416129
UkraineDnipropetrovskNikopolskyiUA1208Political violence125171,541124
UkraineDnipropetrovskDniprovskyiUA1202Political violence2017226123
UkraineSumySumskyiUA5908Civilian targeting3417399119
UkraineKharkivKupianskyiUA6308Civilian targeting101355116
UkraineDnipropetrovskKryvorizkyiUA1206Political violence412424106
UkraineDnipropetrovskNikopolskyiUA1208Civilian targeting2713285105
UkraineDnipropetrovskDniprovskyiUA1202Civilian targeting121787101
UkraineOdesaOdeskyiUA5110Political violence54832095
UkraineOdesaOdeskyiUA5110Civilian targeting24716093
UkraineSumyShostkynskyiUA5910Civilian targeting321130992
UkraineZaporizhiaPolohivskyiUA2310Civilian targeting4114686
UkraineDnipropetrovskSynelnykivskyiUA1214Civilian targeting10816982
UkraineKharkivIziumskyiUA6304Civilian targeting20716281
UkraineKyivBuchanskyiUA3208Political violence2957477
UkraineKyivBuchanskyiUA3208Civilian targeting1353377
UkraineDonetskMariupolskyiUA1414Political violence28818275
UkraineDonetskDonetskyiUA1408Political violence49445672
UkraineKhersonKakhovskyiUA6506Political violence34391168
UkraineZaporizhiaVasylivskyiUA2304Civilian targeting28919564
UkraineDonetskPokrovskyiUA1416Civilian targeting9318463
UkraineDonetskHorlivskyiUA1406Civilian targeting26818263
UkraineKhersonHenicheskyiUA6504Political violence308862
UkraineKhersonSkadovskyiUA6508Political violence5042060
UkraineKhersonSkadovskyiUA6508Civilian targeting009760
UkraineDnipropetrovskKryvorizkyiUA1206Civilian targeting927954
UkraineSumyOkhtyrskyiUA5904Political violence37054652
UkraineKhersonKakhovskyiUA6506Civilian targeting10315352
UkraineDonetskDonetskyiUA1408Civilian targeting19414652
UkraineLuhanskSievierodonetskyiUA4412Political violence28216451
UkraineDnipropetrovskPavlohradskyiUA1212Political violence15818347
UkraineKharkivBohodukhivskyiUA6302Civilian targeting25520846
UkraineZaporizhiaMelitopolskyiUA2308Political violence20918345
UkraineSumyKonotopskyiUA5902Political violence82889342
UkraineDnipropetrovskPavlohradskyiUA1212Civilian targeting466442
UkraineKyivBrovarskyiUA3206Political violence1907739
UkraineKyivBrovarskyiUA3206Civilian targeting303339
UkraineKhersonBeryslavskyiUA6502Civilian targeting15512638
UkraineTernopilTernopilskyiUA6104Political violence20938
UkraineTernopilTernopilskyiUA6104Civilian targeting10338
UkraineSumyOkhtyrskyiUA5904Civilian targeting4011334
UkraineLuhanskSievierodonetskyiUA4412Civilian targeting1727832
UkraineMykolaivMykolaivskyiUA4806Political violence32843730
UkraineKharkivLozivskyiUA6310Political violence41425529
UkraineLuhanskStarobilskyiUA4414Political violence918429
UkraineZaporizhiaMelitopolskyiUA2308Civilian targeting863827
UkraineMykolaivMykolaivskyiUA4806Civilian targeting887825
UkraineDnipropetrovskNovomoskovskyiUA1210Political violence724425
UkraineChernihivChernihivskyiUA7410Political violence19051323
UkraineDonetskMariupolskyiUA1414Civilian targeting1083323
UkraineSumyKonotopskyiUA5902Civilian targeting1119121
UkraineChernihivNovhorod-SiverskyiUA7406Political violence19512,55220
UkraineChernihivNovhorod-SiverskyiUA7406Civilian targeting518819
UkraineDnipropetrovskKamianskyiUA1204Political violence18810418
UkraineChernihivChernihivskyiUA7410Civilian targeting006218
UkraineDonetskVolnovaskyiUA1404Civilian targeting1756118
UkrainePoltavaPoltavskyiUA5308Political violence16011617
UkraineLuhanskSvativskyiUA4410Political violence17028416
UkraineLuhanskAlchevskyiUA4402Political violence18314216
UkraineKharkivLozivskyiUA6310Civilian targeting545616
UkraineCrimeaBakhchysaraiskyiUA0102Political violence104715
UkraineZhytomyrKorostenskyiUA1806Political violence1033615
UkraineZhytomyrKorostenskyiUA1806Civilian targeting431515
UkraineCrimeaSimferopolskyiUA0116Political violence5210814
UkraineDonetskBakhmutskyiUA1402Civilian targeting002014
UkraineDonetskKalmiuskyiUA1410Political violence10313213
UkrainePoltavaPoltavskyiUA5308Civilian targeting102313
UkraineLuhanskAlchevskyiUA4402Civilian targeting933512
UkraineKhersonHenicheskyiUA6504Civilian targeting001612
UkraineCrimeaSimferopolskyiUA0116Civilian targeting12812
UkraineChernihivKoriukivskyiUA7402Political violence69081111
UkraineLuhanskLuhanskyiUA4406Political violence909611
UkraineChernihivKoriukivskyiUA7402Civilian targeting105611
UkraineKyivBoryspilskyiUA3204Political violence2345411
UkraineKyivBoryspilskyiUA3204Civilian targeting842511
UkraineZaporizhiaBerdianskyiUA2302Political violence15112710
UkraineLuhanskSvativskyiUA4410Civilian targeting303810
UkraineDonetskKalmiuskyiUA1410Civilian targeting132510
UkraineDnipropetrovskKamianskyiUA1204Civilian targeting582410
UkraineOdesaIzmailskyiUA5108Political violence121609
UkraineChernihivPrylutskyiUA7408Political violence33439
UkraineChernihivPrylutskyiUA7408Civilian targeting33149
UkraineSumyRomenskyiUA5906Political violence40888
UkraineKyivFastivskyiUA3214Political violence243518
UkraineKyivFastivskyiUA3214Civilian targeting43188
UkraineOdesaIzmailskyiUA5108Civilian targeting21178
UkraineChernihivNizhynskyiUA7404Political violence40797
UkraineKharkivKrasnohradskyiUA6306Political violence50317
UkraineLvivLvivskyiUA4606Political violence10297
UkraineChernihivNizhynskyiUA7404Civilian targeting00227
UkraineSumyRomenskyiUA5906Civilian targeting00187
UkraineCrimeaKerchenskyiUA0110Political violence00476
UkraineCrimeaDzhankoiskyiUA0106Political violence20246
UkraineLuhanskStarobilskyiUA4414Civilian targeting41206
UkraineMykolaivVoznesenskyiUA4804Political violence32156
UkraineMykolaivVoznesenskyiUA4804Civilian targeting2266
UkraineCrimeaKerchenskyiUA0110Civilian targeting0056
UkraineCrimeaDzhankoiskyiUA0106Civilian targeting0026
UkraineMykolaivBashtanskyiUA4802Political violence81705
UkraineKyivVyshhorodskyiUA3210Political violence82475
UkraineOdesaBilhorod-DnistrovskyiUA5104Political violence22235
UkraineMykolaivBashtanskyiUA4802Civilian targeting21155
UkraineKyivVyshhorodskyiUA3210Civilian targeting22145
UkraineLvivLvivskyiUA4606Civilian targeting1095
UkraineOdesaBilhorod-DnistrovskyiUA5104Civilian targeting2265
UkraineLuhanskDovzhanskyiUA4404Political violence111594
UkraineLuhanskRovenkivskyiUA4408Political violence93534
UkraineCherkasyCherkaskyiUA7108Political violence40474
UkraineZhytomyrZhytomyrskyiUA1804Political violence120444
UkraineLuhanskLuhanskyiUA4406Civilian targeting40224
UkraineRivneRivnenskyiUA5606Political violence80214
UkraineCrimeaKurmanskyiUA0112Political violence20214
UkraineCherkasyCherkaskyiUA7108Civilian targeting00164
UkraineLuhanskRovenkivskyiUA4408Civilian targeting63134
UkraineCherkasyZolotoniskyiUA7104Political violence30124
UkraineKharkivKrasnohradskyiUA6306Civilian targeting30104
UkraineCherkasyZolotoniskyiUA7104Civilian targeting1034
UkraineCrimeaKurmanskyiUA0112Civilian targeting0034
UkraineLuhanskShchastynskyiUA4416Political violence52493
UkraineKyivObukhivskyiUA3212Political violence212463
UkraineKyivObukhivskyiUA3212Civilian targeting72153
UkraineLuhanskDovzhanskyiUA4404Civilian targeting41103
UkraineRivneRivnenskyiUA5606Civilian targeting30103
UkraineLuhanskShchastynskyiUA4416Civilian targeting1293
UkraineCrimeaPerekopskyiUA0114Political violence70502
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKhmelnytskyiUA6804Political violence71232
UkraineKyivBilotserkivskyiUA3202Political violence70222
UkraineZaporizhiaBerdianskyiUA2302Civilian targeting71182
UkraineIvano-FrankivskIvano-FrankivskyiUA2604Political violence10172
UkraineDnipropetrovskNovomoskovskyiUA1210Civilian targeting1072
UkrainePoltavaLubenskyiUA5304Political violence0072
UkraineZakarpattiaUzhhorodskyiUA2110Political violence0062
UkraineKyivBilotserkivskyiUA3202Civilian targeting1052
UkraineIvano-FrankivskIvano-FrankivskyiUA2604Civilian targeting1052
UkraineZakarpattiaUzhhorodskyiUA2110Civilian targeting0032
UkrainePoltavaLubenskyiUA5304Civilian targeting0032
UkraineCrimeaPerekopskyiUA0114Civilian targeting0022
UkraineOdesaBerezivskyiUA5102Political violence0012
UkraineOdesaBerezivskyiUA5102Civilian targeting0012
UkraineCrimeaYevpatoriiskyiUA0108Political violence1501581
UkrainePoltavaMyrhorodskyiUA5306Political violence70481
UkrainePoltavaKremenchutskyiUA5302Political violence80351
UkraineVinnytsiaVinnytskyiUA0502Political violence80271
UkraineZhytomyrZhytomyrskyiUA1804Civilian targeting1061
UkrainePoltavaKremenchutskyiUA5302Civilian targeting3061
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKhmelnytskyiUA6804Civilian targeting2161
UkraineKhmelnytskyiShepetivskyiUA6806Political violence0051
UkraineVinnytsiaVinnytskyiUA0502Civilian targeting1051
UkraineVinnytsiaHaisynskyiUA0504Political violence0051
UkrainePoltavaMyrhorodskyiUA5306Civilian targeting2041
UkraineKhmelnytskyiShepetivskyiUA6806Civilian targeting0031
UkraineCrimeaYevpatoriiskyiUA0108Civilian targeting0031
UkraineChernivtsiChernivetskyiUA7306Political violence0021
UkraineVinnytsiaHaisynskyiUA0504Civilian targeting0021
UkraineZakarpattiaMukachivskyiUA2104Political violence0021
UkraineChernivtsiChernivetskyiUA7306Civilian targeting0011
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKamianets-PodilskyiUA6802Political violence0011
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKamianets-PodilskyiUA6802Civilian targeting0011
UkraineZakarpattiaMukachivskyiUA2104Civilian targeting0011
UkraineCrimeaFeodosiiskyiUA0118Political violence10760
UkraineMykolaivMykolaivskyiUA4806Demonstrations0Not reported67Not reported
UkraineKyiv CityKyivUA8000Demonstrations3Not reported56Not reported
UkraineCherkasyCherkaskyiUA7108Demonstrations2Not reported54Not reported
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKhmelnytskyiUA6804Demonstrations3Not reported33Not reported
UkraineCrimeaYaltynskyiUA0120Political violence00280
UkraineIvano-FrankivskIvano-FrankivskyiUA2604Demonstrations0Not reported27Not reported
UkraineZakarpattiaUzhhorodskyiUA2110Demonstrations0Not reported23Not reported
UkraineLvivLvivskyiUA4606Demonstrations1Not reported21Not reported
UkraineVolynLutskyiUA0708Political violence50190
UkraineDnipropetrovskDniprovskyiUA1202Demonstrations0Not reported19Not reported
UkraineOdesaOdeskyiUA5110Demonstrations1Not reported18Not reported
UkraineCrimeaBilohirskyiUA0104Political violence10180
UkrainePoltavaPoltavskyiUA5308Demonstrations2Not reported13Not reported
UkraineKharkivKharkivskyiUA6312Demonstrations1Not reported13Not reported
UkraineCherkasyUmanskyiUA7106Political violence10130
UkraineMykolaivVoznesenskyiUA4804Demonstrations0Not reported13Not reported
UkraineVolynKovelskyiUA0706Political violence50120
UkraineMykolaivPervomaiskyiUA4808Demonstrations0Not reported11Not reported
UkraineCherkasyZvenyhorodskyiUA7102Political violence30110
UkraineVinnytsiaVinnytskyiUA0502Demonstrations0Not reported11Not reported
UkraineRivneRivnenskyiUA5606Demonstrations0Not reported11Not reported
UkraineTernopilTernopilskyiUA6104Demonstrations0Not reported10Not reported
UkraineZhytomyrZhytomyrskyiUA1804Demonstrations0Not reported9Not reported
UkraineVolynLutskyiUA0708Demonstrations0Not reported8Not reported
UkraineMykolaivPervomaiskyiUA4808Political violence1060
UkraineVolynKovelskyiUA0706Demonstrations0Not reported6Not reported
UkraineZaporizhiaZaporizkyiUA2306Demonstrations0Not reported5Not reported
UkraineRivneSarnenskyiUA5608Political violence1050
UkraineLvivChervonohradskyiUA4612Political violence0050
UkraineSumySumskyiUA5908Demonstrations0Not reported5Not reported
UkraineOdesaPodilskyiUA5112Political violence0050
UkraineOdesaBolhradskyiUA5106Political violence0050
UkraineDonetskMariupolskyiUA1414Demonstrations0Not reported5Not reported
UkraineIvano-FrankivskKolomyiskyiUA2608Demonstrations0Not reported5Not reported
UkraineChernivtsiChernivetskyiUA7306Demonstrations0Not reported4Not reported
UkraineRivneDubenskyiUA5604Political violence2040
UkraineVolynLutskyiUA0708Civilian targeting0030
UkraineZakarpattiaKhustskyiUA2112Political violence0030
UkraineChernihivChernihivskyiUA7410Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
UkraineChernivtsiDnistrovskyiUA7304Political violence0030
UkraineCherkasyZvenyhorodskyiUA7102Civilian targeting0030
UkraineLvivStryiskyiUA4610Political violence1030
UkraineZakarpattiaMukachivskyiUA2104Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
UkraineLvivChervonohradskyiUA4612Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineVinnytsiaMohyliv-PodilskyiUA0508Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineZhytomyrKorostenskyiUA1806Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineVolynKovelskyiUA0706Civilian targeting1020
UkraineRivneVaraskyiUA5602Political violence0020
UkraineOdesaPodilskyiUA5112Civilian targeting0020
UkraineCherkasyUmanskyiUA7106Civilian targeting1020
UkraineCherkasyUmanskyiUA7106Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineLvivYavorivskyiUA4614Political violence0020
UkraineLvivDrohobytskyiUA4602Political violence0020
UkraineOdesaRozdilnianskyiUA5114Political violence1020
UkraineLvivStryiskyiUA4610Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineSumyRomenskyiUA5906Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineTernopilChortkivskyiUA6106Political violence0020
UkraineIvano-FrankivskNadvirnianskyiUA2612Political violence0020
UkraineVinnytsiaHaisynskyiUA0504Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
UkraineIvano-FrankivskKolomyiskyiUA2608Political violence0020
UkraineCrimeaYaltynskyiUA0120Civilian targeting0010
UkraineCrimeaYaltynskyiUA0120Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineRivneSarnenskyiUA5608Civilian targeting0010
UkraineRivneSarnenskyiUA5608Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineZakarpattiaKhustskyiUA2112Civilian targeting0010
UkraineLvivChervonohradskyiUA4612Civilian targeting0010
UkraineVinnytsiaTulchynskyiUA0510Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineZaporizhiaVasylivskyiUA2304Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineKhmelnytskyiShepetivskyiUA6806Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineMykolaivBashtanskyiUA4802Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineMykolaivPervomaiskyiUA4808Civilian targeting1010
UkraineCrimeaSimferopolskyiUA0116Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineRivneVaraskyiUA5602Civilian targeting0010
UkraineVolynKamin-KashyrskyiUA0704Political violence0010
UkraineCherkasyZolotoniskyiUA7104Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineZaporizhiaMelitopolskyiUA2308Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineLvivZolochivskyiUA4604Political violence0010
UkraineOdesaBerezivskyiUA5102Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineOdesaIzmailskyiUA5108Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineLvivYavorivskyiUA4614Civilian targeting0010
UkraineCrimeaFeodosiiskyiUA0118Civilian targeting0010
UkraineZhytomyrBerdychivskyiUA1802Political violence0010
UkraineIvano-FrankivskNadvirnianskyiUA2612Civilian targeting0010
UkraineVinnytsiaZhmerynskyiUA0506Political violence1010
UkraineTernopilKremenetskyiUA6102Political violence0010
UkraineIvano-FrankivskVerkhovynskyiUA2602Political violence0010
UkraineIvano-FrankivskVerkhovynskyiUA2602Civilian targeting0010
UkraineKhmelnytskyiKamianets-PodilskyiUA6802Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineSumyKonotopskyiUA5902Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineKyivBuchanskyiUA3208Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkrainePoltavaKremenchutskyiUA5302Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineIvano-FrankivskKaluskyiUA2606Political violence0010
UkraineIvano-FrankivskKaluskyiUA2606Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineDnipropetrovskPavlohradskyiUA1212Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
UkraineSumyOkhtyrskyiUA5904Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported

ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. ACLED's district rows and P-codes, summed only over months: one row per district and category with at least one event in the twelve months, most fatalities first. The P-code joins a row to administrative boundaries. The full monthly files are on HDX (links). Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.

E46 Private foundations in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)

About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.

Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped aggregate query (CSV) ↗

RankFoundationTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Reported period total (USD m)
1Howard G. Buffett Foundationnot reportednot reportednot reportednot reported62.437not reported62.437
2Open Society FoundationsTrend 2021–2023: 1.5 to 1.6 (3 years reported)not reportednot reported1.4551.1961.551not reported4.202
3Arcadianot reportednot reportednot reported1.273not reportednot reported1.273
4Omidyar Network Fund, Inc.1.250not reportednot reportednot reportednot reportednot reported1.250
5Rockefeller Foundationnot reportednot reportednot reported1.199not reportednot reported1.199
6John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationTrend 2022–2023: 0.05 to 1.0 (2 years reported)not reportednot reportednot reported0.0501.000not reported1.050
7LEGO FoundationTrend 2022–2023: 0.707 to 0.055 (2 years reported)not reportednot reportednot reported0.7070.055not reported0.762

OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Top ten by sum of available observations. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.

E47 Foundation projects in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)

About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.

Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped project query (CSV) ↗

FoundationProjectReported project IDRecipientYearsDisbursed (USD m)
Howard G. Buffett FoundationIzyum Police Precinct Construction2023000060Ukraine202316.000
Howard G. Buffett FoundationUkraine Modular Bridges2023000059Ukraine20239.218
Howard G. Buffett FoundationNational Police of Ukraine Kyiv Regional Police K9 Center2023000067Ukraine20236.268
Howard G. Buffett FoundationConstruction of Borodianka Police Station2023000066Ukraine20235.304
Howard G. Buffett FoundationDNA Identification Equipment and Capacity Building2023000053Ukraine20234.347
Howard G. Buffett FoundationAdvancing Economic Recovery in Ukraine2023000077Ukraine20233.534
Howard G. Buffett FoundationFire Trucks and Equipment2023000073Ukraine20233.533
Howard G. Buffett FoundationGeneral Operating Support2023000040Ukraine20232.886
Howard G. Buffett FoundationCanines and Vehicles2023000065Ukraine20232.548
Howard G. Buffett FoundationCanines, Vehicles and Equipment2023000083Ukraine20232.548

OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ten largest returned titled project records, grouped by reported ID, title and recipient. Not a complete activity inventory; reporting IDs/titles can change between years. Project values are a drilldown, not additional to the foundation totals. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.

E48 Current activities reported to IATI: who is active now, and through whom · IATI Datastore (activities as published by each organisation)

About this source: The International Aid Transparency Initiative: an open standard under which donors, UN agencies and NGOs publish their own activity data, often more up to date than the OECD's. Completeness and quality depend on each publisher.

Trace this: EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) III 2024-2027 (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · The EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) in Ukraine Phase I (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · Globale stemmer i danske klasselokaler (CISU Civil Society in Development) ↗

CountryPublisherActivityImplementing organisationsStartPlanned endLast updatedIATI identifier
UkraineMinistry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkEU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) III 2024-2027Not stated2023-12-012027-12-312026-10-13XM-DAC-3-1-288593-36677
UkraineMinistry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkThe EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) in Ukraine Phase IIINot stated2023-12-012027-12-312026-10-13XM-DAC-3-1-288593-36684
UkraineCISU Civil Society in DevelopmentGlobale stemmer i danske klasselokalerDar Media Production; Flygtningebørn.dk; Fundacja ReFOCUS Media Labs2025-09-012027-08-312026-10-12DK-CVR-19348407-25-6429-OpEn-OE
UkraineUnited Nations Development ProgrammeStrengthening evidencebased planning for recovery UKRNot stated2022-11-012026-12-312026-10-12XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00146644
UkraineUnited Nations Development ProgrammeEmpowered Partnership for Sustainable RecoveryUNDP2022-12-012026-12-312026-10-12XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00147041
UkraineForeign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD)Recovery for All projectNot stated2025-02-212031-03-312026-10-12CA-3-P013543001
UkraineForeign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD)Renewed Women's Voice and Leadership - in Crisis and Conflict-affected ContextsNot stated2025-01-162030-03-312026-10-12CA-3-P013656001
UkraineSwedenEarmarked support UN Women 2026-2028Not stated2026-01-012029-06-302026-10-09SE-0-SE-2-92405
UkraineSwedenAdditional support IDEA 2026 for UkraineNot stated2026-01-012027-06-302026-10-09SE-0-SE-2-92511

IATI Datastore, activities in implementation (status 2) in Ukraine, DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; most recently updated first, at most two per publisher; activities whose planned end has passed or that have no end date and started over five years ago are left out; retrieved 2026-10-14. Published by each organisation to the IATI Standard, usually more current than the OECD but uneven: coverage depends on who publishes, and the same work can be reported by both funder and implementer. Leads to check, not a complete list; amounts are not shown or totalled here and must not be added to OECD or OCHA figures.

E49 World Bank projects: pipeline and active · World Bank Projects API (active and pipeline projects)

About this source: The World Bank's own database of the projects it finances, with approved amounts, dates and status, including projects still in preparation.

Trace this: SupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) (P513816) ↗ · Strengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and Reform (P514828) ↗ · Strengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in Ukraine (P506719) ↗ · World Bank projects and operations ↗

CountryProjectProject IDStatusBoard approvalCommitment (USD m)Major sectorsClosing date
UkraineSupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU)P513816PipelinePlanned 2026-08-311.5Financial Sector; Digital Development2028-06-29
UkraineStrengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and ReformP514828PipelinePlanned 2026-09-075.0Public Administration; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Digital Development; Social Protection; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry2029-12-31
UkraineStrengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in UkraineP506719PipelinePlanned 2026-10-164.5Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services; Financial Sector; Social Sustainability and Inclusion2029-01-31
UkraineYouth Empowerment Support in Ukraine ProjectP505079PipelinePlanned 2026-11-302.8Social Protection; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Public Administration2030-10-02
UkraineRenewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine ProjectP515275PipelinePlanned 2026-12-21320.0Energy and Mineral Resources2030-12-31
UkraineSupporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE)P516223Active2026-06-26584.2Public AdministrationNot reported
UkraineFirst Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPOP510090Active2026-06-223,390.0Public Administration; Financial Sector; Energy and Mineral Resources; Social Protection; Industry, Trade and Services2027-11-30
UkraineResilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for ResultsP516254Active2026-05-22390.0Financial Sector; Industry, Trade and ServicesNot reported
UkrainePublic Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UkraineP515704Active2026-05-11271.4Public Administration; Health; Social ProtectionNot reported
UkraineStrengthening Government Capacity for Fiscal Reform ImplementationP513305Active2026-05-0130.0Public Administration; Digital DevelopmentNot reported

World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-10-14. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.

E50 People in need of humanitarian assistance (OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)

About this source: The yearly humanitarian needs overviews agreed by UN agencies and partners in each crisis, with the official number of people in need. They are the basis of humanitarian appeals.

Trace this: Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2025, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2024, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2026, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗

CountrySectorPeople in needPeople targetedPlan period
UkraineAll sectors (intersectoral)10,849,6974,118,9542026
UkraineProtection6,536,1322,031,9162026
UkraineChild protection2,477,7411,271,1002026
UkraineGender-based violence2,909,499548,3502026
UkraineMine action5,435,9231,424,4562025

OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle (Humanitarian Needs Overview), national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest plan period per country and sector; retrieved 2026-10-14. The intersectoral figure counts each person once across all sectors; sector figures overlap and must not be added together, or to the intersectoral figure. Targeted is the part of the need the response plan aims to reach. Figures are planning estimates. Each row is its sector's latest overview, so the plan period can differ between rows.

E51 Displacement: people hosted at the end of 2025 (UNHCR year-end count, not a current figure) · UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics

About this source: UNHCR's official statistics on refugees and other forcibly displaced people, compiled from governments and its own operations; the global reference for refugee numbers.

Trace this: UNHCR population API: hosted in UKR, 2025 ↗ · UNHCR Refugee Data Finder ↗

CountryEnd of yearRefugees hostedAsylum seekersInternally displaced
Ukraine20252,3704433,712,000

UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics API, end-year figures by country of asylum; retrieved 2026-10-14. Internally displaced counts cover people UNHCR protects or assists and may be zero where it does not report them.

E52 Economic outlook (IMF World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor) · IMF World Economic Outlook

About this source: The IMF's twice-yearly economic figures and forecasts for its member countries, the standard reference for growth, inflation and public debt; revenue comes from its Fiscal Monitor. Forecasts are revised as conditions change.

Trace this: IMF WEO DataMapper: real GDP growth ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: inflation ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: government debt ↗

CountryMeasure20252026 (projection)2027 (projection)
UkraineReal GDP growth (%)1.81.03.5
UkraineInflation, average consumer prices (%)12.78.98.7
UkraineGovernment gross debt (% of GDP)107.1111.8110.3
UkraineGovernment revenue including grants (% of GDP)56.666.563.1

IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2026) (growth, inflation, debt) and Fiscal Monitor (October 2026) (revenue) via the DataMapper API; retrieved 2026-10-14. 2026 and 2027 are IMF projections and are revised twice a year.

E53 External debt and public debt service (World Bank International Debt Statistics) · World Bank International Debt Statistics

About this source: The World Bank's official statistics on low- and middle-income countries' external debt and debt payments, reported by the borrowing countries.

Trace this: World Bank International Debt Statistics ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (USD m) ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (% of GNI) ↗ · World Bank data: Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) ↗

CountryMeasureTrend20202021202220232024
UkraineExternal debt stocks (USD m)Trend 2020–2024: 133,406 to 193,492 (5 years reported)133,405.5136,907.6143,390.6178,988.9193,492.5
UkraineExternal debt stocks (% of GNI)Trend 2020–2024: 83.4 to 101 (5 years reported)83.470.684.196.1101.3
UkrainePublic and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m)Trend 2020–2024: 6,880 to 3,611 (5 years reported)6,879.55,066.02,326.31,848.63,611.4

World Bank International Debt Statistics via the World Bank API (DT.DOD.DECT.CD, DT.DOD.DECT.GN.ZS, DT.TDS.DPPG.CD), current USD; retrieved 2026-10-14. Debt stocks are all external debt outstanding at year end (public, publicly guaranteed and private non-guaranteed, including IMF credit). Debt service is principal and interest actually paid on public and publicly guaranteed external debt in the year. The World Bank publishes the statistics once a year, in December.

E54 Who funds climate action here: climate-related development finance by provider (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD: development finance for climate and the environment ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2022.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2023.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryRankProviderProvider typeTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share
Ukraine1EU Institutions (excl. EIB)DAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 1,634 (3 years reported)0.00.01,634.325%
Ukraine2International Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 105 to 1,213 (3 years reported)104.60.01,213.020%
Ukraine3European Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 195 to 595 (3 years reported)194.9239.0595.016%
Ukraine4GermanyDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 189 to 236 (3 years reported)189.1255.5235.711%
Ukraine5International Development AssociationMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 326 (3 years reported)0.00.0325.55%
Ukraine6NetherlandsDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 75.7 to 32.0 (3 years reported)75.7138.132.04%
Ukraine7NorwayDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 3.1 to 166 (3 years reported)3.112.9166.33%
Ukraine8United StatesDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 35.8 to 62.5 (3 years reported)35.856.062.52%
Ukraine9KoreaDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 0.1 to 144 (3 years reported)0.11.0144.02%
Ukraine10United KingdomDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 90.2 (3 years reported)0.040.190.22%
UkraineAll providersTrend 2022–2024: 685 to 4,800 (3 years reported)684.7955.04,800.4100%
UkraineAll providers: adaptation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 115 to 630 (3 years reported)114.9285.6629.9
UkraineAll providers: mitigation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 595 to 4,285 (3 years reported)595.4855.44,285.4
UkraineAll providers: principal objective or climate component onlyTrend 2022–2024: 369 to 2,406 (3 years reported)368.7480.02,406.4

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2022–2024: commitments in current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. Commitments, not disbursements. Bilateral activities count at full value when climate is a principal or significant objective (OECD Rio markers), so the totals are an upper bound; multilateral development banks report only each project's climate component. The 'principal objective or climate component only' row is the stricter measure. Adaptation and mitigation overlap where an activity targets both, so they do not add up to the total. Ukraine: USD 684.7m in 2022 → USD 4,800.4m in 2024 (+601%); peak USD 4,800.4m in 2024.

E55 Largest climate-related commitments in 2024 (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryProviderProjectPurposeClimate objectiveInstrumentUSD m
UkraineEU Institutions (excl. EIB)PROVISIONING UKRAINE GUARANTEE 2024Transport policy and administrative management; Health policy and administrative management and 7 moreSignificantStandard grant885.8
UkraineEU Institutions (excl. EIB)BLENDING 2024Transport policy and administrative management; Health policy and administrative management and 7 moreSignificantStandard grant570.0
UkraineInternational Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentSECOND GROWTH FOUNDATIONS DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATIONPublic Procurement; Domestic revenue mobilisation and 3 moreClimate ComponentsStandard loan451.9
UkraineInternational Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentGROWTH FOUNDATIONS DPOPublic Procurement; Domestic revenue mobilisation and 5 moreClimate ComponentsStandard loan333.4
UkraineNorway(untitled)Energy policy and administrative management; Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency and 4 moreSignificant, PrincipalStandard grant166.3
UkraineInternational Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentSUPPORTING RECONSTRUCTION THROUGH SMART FISCAL GOVERNANCE (SURGE)Public sector policy and administrative management; Decentralisation and support to subnational governmentClimate ComponentsStandard loan165.7
UkraineEU Institutions (excl. EIB)TECHNICAL COOPERATION FACILITY (TCF) 2024Communications policy and administrative management; Employment creation and 5 moreSignificantStandard grant154.1
UkraineKorea(untitled)Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency; Rail transport and 1 moreSignificantStandard grant, Standard loan144.0

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2024; climate-related amount of each commitment, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. The climate-related amount of each activity as the OECD counts it (the whole activity when climate is a Rio-marked objective; the climate component for multilateral development banks). Titles as reported by the provider.

E56 Human development, poverty and displacement (UNDP, IOM) · UNDP Human Development Report Office and IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix

About this source: UNDP's Human Development Index combines health, education and income into one measure and is the best-known summary of human development; IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix counts people displaced within their own country in crises.

Trace this: UNDP Human Development Report: data center ↗ · UNDP country data and charts: Ukraine ↗ · UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index: downloads ↗

CountryMeasureValueYearTrend
UkraineHuman Development Index (0-1)0.7792023Trend 2013–2023: 0.789 to 0.779 (11 years reported)
UkraineHDI rank872023
UkraineInequality-adjusted HDI (0-1)0.7152023
UkraineHuman development lost to inequality (%)8.2%2023

UNDP Human Development Report, composite indices time series; UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index; latest year per measure; retrieved 2026-10-14. The HDI combines life expectancy, schooling and income per person; the inequality-adjusted HDI discounts it for how unequally these are shared. Multidimensional poverty counts people deprived in several of health, education and living standards at once, from the household survey named in the year column. Displacement counts are IOM's latest national round and are shown only where IOM reports one; check the year before comparing. Ukraine HDI: 0.789 in 2013 → 0.779 in 2023 (-1%); peak 0.789 in 2013.

E57 Recent disaster alerts (GDACS, 2025-10-14 to 2026-10-14) · GDACS (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: A UN and European Commission alert system that estimates within hours how serious an earthquake, cyclone, flood or drought may be for people. Alerts are model estimates to guide international response, not damage assessments.

Trace this: GDACS alert archive ↗

CountryHazardAlertsHighest alert levelDate of highest alertLatest alert (any level)
UkraineFlood7Green2026-09-232026-09-23
UkraineDrought1Orange2025-12-212025-12-21
UkraineEarthquake1Green2026-02-022026-02-02

Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre), automatic near-real-time alerts; retrieved 2026-10-14. Colours estimate the need for international humanitarian assistance: Green = unlikely (local impact can still be significant), Orange = possible, Red = likely; one disaster can raise several alerts. Country attribution uses affected-country ISO3; window applies to event start date, not last update. Counts are returned records, not unique disasters; regional records may appear for multiple countries. Map shows only valid coordinates in the displayed frame. Ukraine orange/red alerts: Drought in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belgium, Belarus, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Russia, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, San Marino, Ukraine, (Orange, 2025-12-21).

E58 Governance and investment climate · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's composite measures of governance, built from surveys and expert assessments. They are widely used to compare countries, but they measure perceptions and come with margins of error.

Trace this: Worldwide Governance Indicators in the World Bank DataBank ↗ · WDI FDI net inflows (% of GDP) (BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS) ↗

CountryMeasureScoreYearScore 2019
UkraineControl of corruption34202532
UkrainePolitical stability and absence of violence60202547
UkraineRegulatory quality51202551
UkraineGovernment effectiveness40202544
UkraineRule of law46202549
UkraineVoice and accountability56202560
UkraineFDI net inflows (% of GDP)0.82025

World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI; retrieved 2026-10-14. WGI uses an absolute 0-100 scale anchored to fixed reference points, not percentile ranks. Perception-based estimates have uncertainty; small differences should not be overinterpreted.

E59 Country indicators — Ukraine · World Bank World Development Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's main collection of development statistics on poverty, health, education and the economy, compiled from national and international sources. It is the common reference for country indicators; the latest years are often missing.

Trace this: Population (SP.POP.TOTL) ↗ · GDP per capita (current US$) (NY.GDP.PCAP.CD) ↗ · Access to electricity (% of population) (EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS) ↗ · Total greenhouse gas emissions excl. land use (Mt CO2e) (EN.GHG.ALL.MT.CE.AR5) ↗

IndicatorValueYearTrend
Population38,980,3762025Trend 2016–2025: 45.6 m to 39.0 m (10 years reported)
GDP per capita (current US$)5,8662025Trend 2016–2025: 2,158 to 5,866 (10 years reported)
Access to electricity (% of population)100.02024Trend 2016–2024: 100 to 100 (9 years reported)
Total greenhouse gas emissions excl. land use (Mt CO2e)197.02024Trend 2016–2024: 323 to 197 (9 years reported)

World Bank World Development Indicators, most recent value; retrieved 2026-10-14. Most recent non-empty year differs by indicator. Trend lines cover the reported years of the last ten.

E60 Need against funding at a glance (computed) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryMeasureValueDetailCard
UkraineHumanitarian appeal funded76% → 63%2024 → 2025E34

Computed by the app from the cards named in the last column. Each figure is taken from the named card; changes are computed from the card's own figures.

E61 Need against funding by cluster, 2025 (computed from cards E35, E50, E34) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryClusterPeople in need, 2025Change from 2024Required (USD m)Funded (USD m)CoverageAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
UkraineFood Security5.00 m-31%613.4190.931%-32 points38Underfunded
UkraineEmergency Shelter and NFI6.88 m-13%544.6196.836%-27 points29Underfunded
UkraineWater Sanitation Hygiene8.52 m-11%365.3135.337%-26 points16Underfunded
UkraineProtection - Child Protection3.47 m+9%128.951.940%-23 points15Underfunded, gap widening
UkraineMultipurpose CashNo need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector)n/a410.2180.844%-19 pointsn/aUnderfunded
UkraineHealth9.21 m+18%130.9138.4106%+43 points15Half funded or more
UkraineProtection9.53 m-14%171.9205.6120%+57 points22Half funded or more
UkraineProtection - Mine Action5.44 m-19%86.5112.8130%+67 points21Half funded or more

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E50). Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

E62 How exposed the money is: donor concentration and cuts (computed from cards E25, E39) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
Donor or measureAid in this scope, 2024 (USD m)ShareChange in the donor's total aid, 2024→2025Exposed
United States8,364.588%-56%Yes
EU Institutions622.87%+48%No
Japan222.02%-11%Yes
Germany100.11%-16%Yes
Sweden55.71%+19%No
Switzerland51.91%-1%No
United Kingdom26.40%+1%No
Norway20.20%+5%No
Canada16.80%+20%No
Poland16.10%-12%Yes
France2.90%-8%No
Largest donor's share88%
Three largest donors' share96%
Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025)8,702.791%
Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly4,691.849%

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 9,558.5m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E39). Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

How this brief was made

Scoped as: A concise, evidence-based map of Ukraine’s reconstruction financing landscape—separating public aid, private finance, and investment prospects—and the institutional counterparts and operational risks to investigate before a scoping visit, without recommending asset or securities purchases.

Data path: Norwegian aid data (bistandsresultater.no), cleaned and reconciled → exact totals and search by meaning over 20k agreement descriptions. Live: OECD CRS (all donors), World Bank WDI, web search.

Timings (s): inform 0.0, governance 0.0, outlook 0.0, severity 0.0, access 0.0, food_prices 0.0, rainfall 0.0, debt_risk 0.0, climate_finance 0.0, education 0.0, us_aid 0.09, external_debt 0.11, imputed_multilateral 0.15, refugees 0.29, disasters 0.32, iati 0.36, private_finance 0.62, bank_projects 0.69, presence 0.76, conflict 1.08, semantic_search 1.15, needs 1.11, portfolio 1.24, humanitarian 1.67, human_development 1.62, philanthropy 1.89, oecd_projects 5.66, cerf 6.09, indicators 8.09, oecd 8.94, oecd_totals 8.94, cbpf 13.66, plan 5.41, web 20.95, web_compare 6.78, compose 57.19, total 83.12.

Trace checks: 0 items to check, listed under Before you use this brief.

Draft for review. Figures come from the evidence cards; highlighted figures could not be traced automatically. Web research is a lead, not verified evidence.

Prepare another brief