Demonstration prototype. Figures and text are generated automatically from open data and AI models and may contain errors or be out of date: quality-assure against the linked sources before using anything in a decision.
Example brief. Made on the live service for a reconstruction investor (a made-up organisation; real data, as of the day it was made). Reviewed example: read against its cited evidence after generation; no changes needed.Same country, another reader →See the other examples →
Ukraine reconstruction finance: partnership leads and pre-visit checks
Ukrainereconstruction finance and economic development62 evidence cards24 sources consulted36 figures traced to their cardsmade in 1 min 23 s+ Keep watching thisThe strongest entry point is to investigate institution-backed financing and procurement channels, rather than treat reconstruction needs as evidence of investable demand: the World Bank approved the First Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPO, with a USD 3,390.0 million commitment, on 22 June 2026. E49 Official gross disbursements in the selected reconstruction-related sectors were USD 9,558.5 million in 2024; separately, officially mobilised private finance in those sectors was USD 1,799.1 million—not a measure of all private investment. E25E38 Norfund, IFC and MIGA offer concrete financing or risk-mitigation leads, while municipal and energy programmes offer potential project and procurement counterparts; their present availability and eligibility require confirmation. E7E8E17E19E20 Make the visit conditional on location-specific security and delivery checks: ACAPS rated humanitarian access constraints in Ukraine as Extreme in October 2026, including hostilities, movement restrictions and explosive hazards. E43
Crisis severity (all crisis types, incl. conflict) and natural-hazard alerts
Retrieved 14 Oct 2026 · ACAPS crisis severity: September 2026 · ACAPS access: Oct 2026 · GDACS alerts: 14 Oct 2025 – 14 Oct 2026
Crisis severity scale (ACAPS, 1–10, all crisis types including conflict; each country is shaded by ACAPS's country rating, or by its most severe crisis where ACAPS gives none)
- Shade: crisis severity (ACAPS), the whole humanitarian crisis
- Very high9.1Ukraine: Conflict in Ukraine
- Dots: natural-hazard alerts (GDACS), one per flood, storm, wildfire or earthquake; colour is the need for international help from that event alone, not the overall crisis
- Green7this event alone: international assistance unlikely to be needed; local impact can still be significant
- Orange0this event alone: international assistance may be needed
- Red0this event alone: international assistance likely to be needed
Dots: 7 GDACS alert records plotted in this frame (tap or hover for details); a geographic subset of the evidence card, not an exhaustive disaster count. See the card for the recorded event-start window. Their colour is GDACS's estimate of the need for international humanitarian assistance, not of local severity E57. Outlines: Natural Earth.
Crises tracked by ACAPS E42 E43 · severity 1 to 10, higher is more severe; access constraints 0 to 5, 5 is extreme
- Conflict in Ukraine: severity 9.1 of 10, decreasing; access constraints 5 of 5 (extreme)
Where conflict is reported, by district
Period · Twelve months to Sep 2026
- 1–2451districts
- 25–9916districts
- 100–2498districts
- 250–4993districts
- 500+10districts
- None42districts, no fatalities reported
- No match8boundary not matched to ACLED
At a glance
Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs
Source: OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview ↗ · E50Retrieved 2026-10-14
Source: ACAPS INFORM Severity ↗ · E42Retrieved 2026-10-14
Source: ACAPS Humanitarian Access ↗ · E43Retrieved 2026-10-14
Source: UN OCHA FTS ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14
Source: OECD mobilised private finance ↗ · E38Retrieved 2026-10-14
USD millions
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321
Source: OECD, mobilised private finance for development ↗ · E38Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions
Source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions
Control of corruption
Regulatory quality
Rule of law
Political stability
Source: World Bank WGI ↗ · E58Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI
Need against funding
Computed by the app from the evidence cards it links to, with fixed rules, so two briefs on the same scope say the same thing.
Where need is outpacing money E61
Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E50).
| Cluster | People in need, 2025 (change) | Appeal funded | Against the whole appeal | Funded per person in need (USD) | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Security | 5.00 m -31% | 31% · USD 190.9 m of 613.4 m | -32 points | 38 | Underfunded |
| Emergency Shelter and NFI | 6.88 m -13% | 36% · USD 196.8 m of 544.6 m | -27 points | 29 | Underfunded |
| Water Sanitation Hygiene | 8.52 m -11% | 37% · USD 135.3 m of 365.3 m | -26 points | 16 | Underfunded |
| Protection - Child Protection | 3.47 m +9% | 40% · USD 51.9 m of 128.9 m | -23 points | 15 | Underfundedgap widening |
| Multipurpose Cash | No need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector) n/a | 44% · USD 180.8 m of 410.2 m | -19 points | n/a | Underfunded |
| Health | 9.21 m +18% | 106% · USD 138.4 m of 130.9 m | +43 points | 15 | Half funded or more |
| Protection | 9.53 m -14% | 120% · USD 205.6 m of 171.9 m | +57 points | 22 | Half funded or more |
| Protection - Mine Action | 5.44 m -19% | 130% · USD 112.8 m of 86.5 m | +67 points | 21 | Half funded or more |
Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.
Donor concentration and cuts E62
Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 9,558.5m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E39).
donor's total aid fell more than 10% in the latest provisional year
- 88% Largest donor's share
- 96% Three largest donors' share
- 91% Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) (USD 8,702.7 m)
- 49% Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly (USD 4,691.8 m)
Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.
Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions
The OECD recorded USD 9,558.5 million in gross official disbursements to Ukraine in 2024 across governance, transport, renewable generation, banking, business services and industry, against USD 11,114.9 million in 2023. E25 This is a selected-sector measure, not a comprehensive reconstruction total or an available investment pool. E25 Large donor-reported projects include PEACE administrative-capacity support, development-policy operations and fiscal governance; their titles and government delivery channels suggest that headline aid volumes should not be read as construction contracts. E26
More recent World Bank leads include the active Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results, P516254, approved on 22 May 2026 with a USD 390.0 million commitment, and SURGE, P516223, approved on 26 June 2026 with USD 584.2 million. E49 These are approval commitments, not disbursements or evidence of accessible business opportunities. E49 Ask the World Bank to identify the responsible Ukrainian institutions, procurement routes and enterprise eligibility.
Funding continuity deserves investigation. US total aid fell 56% in provisional 2025 data, while its selected-sector funding to Ukraine had risen from USD 121.0 million in 2019 to USD 8,364.5 million in 2024; the OECD country series cannot show what happened locally in 2025. E39 A separate US fiscal-year series records selected-sector payments of USD 4,881.2 million in FY2024 and USD 4,306.4 million in FY2025. E40 Its FY2026 reporting is incomplete and lagged, so it cannot establish a full-year outcome. E40
Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics
Officially mobilised private finance in Ukraine’s selected sectors rose from USD 1,341.4 million in 2023 to USD 1,799.1 million in 2024. E38 Across all sectors, guarantees mobilised USD 1,615.9 million in 2024—the largest mechanism by amount—but the data cannot attribute this to individual institutions or establish a selected-sector mechanism split. E38 This suggests starting discussions with risk-sharing structures, then testing whether a specific project can support commercial financing.
- Norfund: Norway recorded NOK 500.0 million in payments during 2024–2025 for annual capital replenishment of the Ukraine Investment Fund. E7 This is public capital supporting private-sector development, not proof that the same amount reached investee businesses. Verify the current mandate, investment criteria and pipeline. E7
- IFC: the ERA programme description provides for blending IFC funds with donor contributions to reduce investment risk. Norway recorded NOK 250.0 million in payments in 2024. E19 Ask which financing windows remain available and through which intermediaries. E19
- MIGA: Norway recorded NOK 240.0 million in payments in 2023 to SURE, designed to support investor risk reduction, including war-insurance cover. E8 Verify eligible investors, assets, locations, exclusions, pricing and claims procedures; the record does not establish current coverage availability. E8
Private philanthropy is a separate category, not commercial investment. The Howard G. Buffett Foundation reported USD 9.218 million for Ukraine Modular Bridges in 2023, a historical project lead rather than an open funding opportunity. E47 Coverage is limited to foundations reporting to the OECD. E47
Energy and municipalities offer specific counterpart leads
- Energy Community Secretariat and the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy: the Ukraine Energy Support Fund is described as a donor basket for energy-sector support, with the Secretariat acting as trustee for the ministry. Norway’s related agreement recorded payments in 2025 and describes equipment procurement, repairs, decentralised generation, training and maintenance. Investigate live procurement and acceptance procedures rather than assume an investment pipeline. E28E20
- NEFCO and participating municipalities: the Green Recovery Programme is designed to support municipal planning, public-service buildings, utilities and social infrastructure. Payments were recorded during 2022–2025; delivery progress and municipal capacity remain to be verified. E17
- EBRD: the E5P Ukraine window is described as co-financing district heating, public buildings, local transport, solid waste and street lighting. Ask whether suitable municipal projects and co-financing arrangements are presently available. E21
- World Bank: Renewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine, P515275, is listed in the pipeline with a planned 21 December 2026 approval and USD 320.0 million commitment. E49 Treat it as a planning lead whose amount and date may change. E49
Keep financing purposes distinct. Norway’s NOK 1,500.0 million payment recorded in 2025 through the EU Ukraine Investment Framework, implemented by EIB, was earmarked for emergency gas purchases for the 2025/2026 heating season—not generic capital for reconstruction businesses. E22 These related energy and multisector agreements extend beyond the selected-sector totals above and should not be summed into them.
Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks
ACAPS’s September 2026 edition rated the conflict crisis Very High at 9.1, despite a decreasing three-month severity trend; its October access assessment still identified Extreme constraints. E42 Neither measure establishes commercial site accessibility. E42E43 ACLED reported 7,754 civilian-targeting events nationally during October 2025–September 2026, compared with 5,052 in the preceding twelve months. E44 This warrants route- and site-specific assessment rather than reliance on an improving aggregate crisis trend. E44
The IMF projects real GDP growth of 1.0%, inflation of 8.9% and government gross debt of 111.8% of GDP in 2026. E52 Projected government revenue of 66.5% of GDP includes grants and therefore does not establish domestically financed capacity to co-fund or sustain projects. E52 Test payment security, currency exposure, tariff assumptions and operating-cost funding project by project.
Ukraine’s perception-based WGI scores were 34 for control of corruption and 46 for rule of law in 2025. E58 These are due-diligence context, not findings about a particular counterpart. E58 Denmark reports the EU Anti-Corruption Initiative in implementation, and UNDP reports recovery-planning and sustainable-recovery activities updated in October 2026; these are useful institutional leads to verify, not endorsements of project quality. E48
For utilities and civil works, also check weather resilience: GDACS recorded an Orange regional drought alert including Ukraine on 21 December 2025 and a Green flood alert on 23 September 2026. E57 These alerts do not establish damage at a proposed site. E57
Current context from the web — search leads, verify before use
Written by a search-grounded model separately from the brief above. Its figures and claims are not checked against the evidence.
Where current reporting differs from the brief
- Web reporting says the World Bank approved a $540 million jobs and private-sector-growth policy operation in June 2026, which conflicts with the brief’s $3,390 million commitment for the First Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPO.
- Web reporting says RDNA5 estimated nearly $588 billion in ten-year recovery needs and more than $15 billion in 2026 public investment and recovery programmes, adding planning context to the brief’s selected-sector disbursement totals.
- Web reporting says the EU Ukraine Facility provides up to €50 billion for 2024–27 and its Investment Framework allocated up to €5.5 billion in guarantees and blended finance in 2025, adding financing leads beyond those detailed in the brief.
- Web reporting says the World Bank reported $4.8 billion in private capital enabled by its Ukraine trust fund and MIGA reported $573 million in guarantee issuances through June 2026, adding institution-level figures absent from the brief’s financing discussion.
Read the full web research (4 sources)
As of October 2026, Ukraine’s recovery is being planned alongside the continuing war—not as a postwar programme alone. The figures below distinguish announced plans and financing from money actually disbursed.
- Plans and priorities: The Government’s emerging “Ukraine Economy of the Future” strategy emphasizes macro-fiscal stability, governance and rule-of-law reform, private-sector growth, infrastructure, and investment in people, according to a joint World Bank, Ukrainian Government, European Commission and UN assessment in February 2026. That assessment, RDNA5, estimated ten-year recovery and reconstruction needs at nearly $588 billion. It reported more than $15 billion in 2026 public investment and recovery programmes, including housing, demining and economic support; this is a programme total, not a claim that the funds have all been spent.
- Public and multilateral finance: The European Commission describes the Ukraine Facility as up to €50 billion in support for 2024–27. In 2025, its Ukraine Investment Framework allocated up to €5.5 billion in guarantees and blended finance to encourage investment through partner institutions, the Commission reported. The World Bank said in June 2025 that it had mobilized more than $81 billion for Ukraine since February 2022, of which $57 billion had been disbursed. In June 2026, the Bank approved a $540 million jobs and private-sector-growth policy operation; approval is not disbursement.
- Private-sector investment and risk-sharing: The World Bank reported in April 2026 that its Ukraine trust fund had committed $2.8 billion in grants, enabling $8.9 billion in development financing, including $4.8 billion in private capital. MIGA reported $573 million in guarantee issuances since the invasion through June 2026. These instruments can help share risk, but do not remove it; the World Bank noted that private reinsurers remain largely unwilling to provide political-risk cover. In May 2025, Ukraine and the United States signed an agreement establishing a jointly managed Reconstruction Investment Fund; the agreement created a framework, not a stated amount of immediate investment.
- Institutional leads: The Ukrainian Government sets recovery priorities and leads its public-investment system. The Ministry of Finance initiated public-investment-management reform; the Ministry of Economy and Ministry for Development of Communities and Territories, alongside DREAM, have roles in project planning and management, according to Ukrainian government sources in 2025–26. The EU, World Bank Group, European Commission and UN jointly produce the damage-and-needs assessments; IFIs and donor-backed facilities help finance projects.
- Operational risks for partners: The World Bank and IMF reported risks from continuing attacks on energy and transport, labor shortages and displacement, and uncertainty that can deter investment. The IMF also highlighted governance, anti-corruption and state-enterprise reform as priorities. For businesses, these translate into risks to personnel and assets, power and logistics continuity, hiring, insurance availability, procurement integrity and project execution. Due diligence should test site-specific security, insurance exclusions, contractor and beneficial-ownership chains, permits, payment security and contingency plans.
Sources
Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) E25
| Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope | Donor | Trend | 2019 (USD m) | 2020 (USD m) | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 121.0 | 133.5 | 131.7 | 8,643.7 | 10,210.3 | 8,364.5 | 84% | |
| 2 | EU Institutions | 256.8 | 159.5 | 241.1 | 1,052.4 | 309.2 | 622.8 | 8% | |
| 3 | Germany | 23.1 | 23.5 | 34.9 | 168.2 | 199.2 | 100.1 | 2% | |
| 4 | France | 0.4 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 422.3 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1% | |
| 5 | Japan | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 8.6 | 222.0 | 1% | |
| 6 | United Kingdom | 9.3 | 11.2 | 11.0 | 119.2 | 54.5 | 26.4 | 1% | |
| 7 | Sweden | 20.4 | 15.4 | 21.6 | 20.7 | 50.3 | 55.7 | 1% | |
| 8 | Switzerland | 8.1 | 8.2 | 10.7 | 42.5 | 51.6 | 51.9 | 1% | |
| 9 | Canada | 33.0 | 24.0 | 22.5 | 38.6 | 37.2 | 16.8 | 1% | |
| 10 | Poland | 10.7 | 7.8 | 32.4 | 21.0 | 5.9 | 16.1 | 0% | |
| 11 | Norway | 12.2 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 30.0 | 20.2 | 0% | |
| All official donors | 514.1 | 428.2 | 539.4 | 10,689.6 | 11,114.9 | 9,558.5 | 100% |
OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; retrieved 2026-10-14. 54 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 514.1m in 2019 → USD 9,558.5m in 2024 (+1759%); peak USD 11,114.9m in 2023. United States: Trend: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024 (+6814%); peak USD 10,210.3m in 2023. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024 (+142%); peak USD 1,052.4m in 2022. Germany: Trend: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024 (+332%); peak USD 199.2m in 2023. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.
Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) E38
| Mechanism | Trend | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guarantees | 303.8 | 983.2 | 1,615.9 | |
| Direct investment in companies and SPVs | 32.1 | 184.1 | 471.3 | |
| Syndicated loans | 0.0 | 293.3 | 43.4 | |
| Shares in investment funds (CIVs) | 0.5 | 320.2 | 5.7 | |
| Simple co-financing | 2.8 | 1.8 | 254.6 | |
| Credit lines | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| All mechanisms, all sectors | 342.4 | 1,782.6 | 2,390.9 | |
| In this brief's sectors (151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321) | 331.1 | 1,341.4 | 1,799.1 | |
| of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors) | 331.7 | 1,463.0 | 1,366.3 | |
| of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors) | 10.7 | 319.6 | 1,024.6 |
OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Guarantees: Trend: USD 303.8m in 2022 → USD 1,615.9m in 2024 (+432%); peak USD 1,615.9m in 2024. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers this brief's sectors. No sector-level provider split is supplied. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.
World Bank projects: pipeline and active E49
| Country | Project | Project ID | Status | Board approval | Commitment (USD m) | Major sectors | Closing date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | SupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) | P513816 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-08-31 | 1.5 | Financial Sector; Digital Development | 2028-06-29 |
| Ukraine | Strengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and Reform | P514828 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-09-07 | 5.0 | Public Administration; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Digital Development; Social Protection; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry | 2029-12-31 |
| Ukraine | Strengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in Ukraine | P506719 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-10-16 | 4.5 | Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services; Financial Sector; Social Sustainability and Inclusion | 2029-01-31 |
| Ukraine | Youth Empowerment Support in Ukraine Project | P505079 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-11-30 | 2.8 | Social Protection; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Public Administration | 2030-10-02 |
| Ukraine | Renewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine Project | P515275 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-12-21 | 320.0 | Energy and Mineral Resources | 2030-12-31 |
| Ukraine | Supporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE) | P516223 | Active | 2026-06-26 | 584.2 | Public Administration | Not reported |
| Ukraine | First Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPO | P510090 | Active | 2026-06-22 | 3,390.0 | Public Administration; Financial Sector; Energy and Mineral Resources; Social Protection; Industry, Trade and Services | 2027-11-30 |
| Ukraine | Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results | P516254 | Active | 2026-05-22 | 390.0 | Financial Sector; Industry, Trade and Services | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in Ukraine | P515704 | Active | 2026-05-11 | 271.4 | Public Administration; Health; Social Protection | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Strengthening Government Capacity for Fiscal Reform Implementation | P513305 | Active | 2026-05-01 | 30.0 | Public Administration; Digital Development | Not reported |
World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-10-14. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.
Talking points
I want to distinguish donor-funded procurement, public co-financing and commercially repayable finance before discussing individual projects.
The Norfund fund, IFC ERA programme and MIGA SURE mechanism provide useful starting points; I would like to understand their present eligibility and risk-sharing terms. E7E8E19
For each prospective partnership, I would want a named project owner, a documented payment source and clarity on who carries construction, operating, currency and conflict-related risks.
A scoping visit should test delivery readiness and local priorities, not presume that a funded programme is an investable project.
Questions to ask
- Do Norfund, IFC ERA and MIGA SURE currently accept proposals matching the contemplated business activity, and what eligibility, coverage and risk-retention terms apply? [E7, E8, E19]
Programme descriptions establish financing designs, not an offer available to this investor. - Which World Bank enterprise and energy operations have approved implementing arrangements, and do they create procurement, intermediary-finance or co-financing routes relevant to private businesses? [E49]
Separates policy support and pipeline commitments from actionable partnership channels. - For each candidate municipality or utility, who owns the assets, controls procurement and revenues, and is authorised to enter a partnership?
Tests whether an identified need has a legally empowered and financially accountable counterpart. - Can the proposed sites and routes be accessed safely, with verified explosive-hazard assessments, shelter, evacuation and business-interruption arrangements?
National access constraints include movement restrictions, hostilities and mines; site conditions need separate verification. [E43] - What evidence supports payment capacity, currency convertibility, enforceable contracts, beneficial ownership and long-term maintenance funding?
Tests commercial and integrity risks that public funding volumes cannot resolve.
Next steps
Request mandate and eligibility discussions with Norfund, IFC and MIGA, confirming their present Ukraine contact points and obtaining current financing or insurance documentation. E7E8E19
Ask the World Bank’s Ukraine team for implementation, procurement and eligibility documents for the enterprise programme and renewable-energy pipeline, including the responsible Ukrainian counterpart institutions. E49
Seek current project lists and procurement schedules from the Energy Community Secretariat, NEFCO and EBRD’s E5P team; distinguish equipment supply contracts from financing partnerships. E20E17E21
Before fixing an itinerary, obtain a location-specific security review and commission Ukrainian legal and financial checks on candidate counterparties, permits, ownership, payment arrangements and currency rules.
What would change this advice
- Current financing-window availability, guarantee exclusions, remaining capacity and investor eligibility.
- Verified project pipelines, Ukrainian implementing authorities, procurement schedules and municipal or utility financial statements.
- Site-level security, explosive-hazard clearance, infrastructure reliability and emergency arrangements.
- Current legal, tax, currency, sanctions and contract-enforcement requirements, plus independent commercial feasibility evidence.
Before you use this brief
14 changed by the app
No figure needs checking: the automatic trace matched every cited figure to its evidence card. That is not proof of every claim, unit or interpretation.
Changed by the app 14
Shown so nothing changes silently. No action needed. A source is added only where the figure is in that card.
- Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source added
The OECD recorded USD 9,558.5 million in gross official disbursements to Ukraine in 2024 across governance, transport, renewable generation, banking, business services and industry, against USD 11,114.9 million in 2023.
Open E25 - Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source added
More recent World Bank leads include the active Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results, P516254, approved on 22 May 2026 with a USD 390.0 million commitment, and SURGE, P516223, approved on 26 June 2026 with USD 584.2 million.
Open E49 - Public finance is substantial—but much supports government functions Source added
A separate US fiscal-year series records selected-sector payments of USD 4,881.2 million in FY2024 and USD 4,306.4 million in FY2025.
Open E40 - Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source added
Officially mobilised private finance in Ukraine’s selected sectors rose from USD 1,341.4 million in 2023 to USD 1,799.1 million in 2024.
Open E38 - Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source added
Norfund: Norway recorded NOK 500.0 million in payments during 2024–2025 for annual capital replenishment of the Ukraine Investment Fund.
Open E7 - Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source added
Norway recorded NOK 250.0 million in payments in 2024.
Open E19 - Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source added
MIGA: Norway recorded NOK 240.0 million in payments in 2023 to SURE, designed to support investor risk reduction, including war-insurance cover.
Open E8 - Private finance: test risk-sharing terms before project economics Source added
Buffett Foundation reported USD 9.218 million for Ukraine Modular Bridges in 2023, a historical project lead rather than an open funding opportunity.
Open E47 - Energy and municipalities offer specific counterpart leads Source added
World Bank: Renewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine, P515275, is listed in the pipeline with a planned 21 December 2026 approval and USD 320.0 million commitment.
Open E49 - Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source added
ACAPS’s September 2026 edition rated the conflict crisis Very High at 9.1, despite a decreasing three-month severity trend; its October access assessment still identified Extreme constraints.
Open E42 - Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source added
ACLED reported 7,754 civilian-targeting events nationally during October 2025–September 2026, compared with 5,052 in the preceding twelve months.
Open E44 - Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source added
The IMF projects real GDP growth of 1.0%, inflation of 8.9% and government gross debt of 111.8% of GDP in 2026.
Open E52 - Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source added
Ukraine’s perception-based WGI scores were 34 for control of corruption and 46 for rule of law in 2025.
Open E58 - Visit readiness requires security, fiscal and integrity checks Source added
For utilities and civil works, also check weather resilience: GDACS recorded an Orange regional drought alert including Ukraine on 21 December 2025 and a Green flood alert on 23 September 2026.
Open E57
Keep watching this for me
The agent checks this scope every Monday and on days when something is due, and sends at most one brief a week, only when something has changed, and always says why. No email needed: you get a private link. While this is a demonstration, starting a watch needs an owner or invited reviewer sign-in; the agent board shows the demo watches to everyone.
What can change within a week: humanitarian funding and pooled-fund allocations, disaster alerts and newly published activities. Each month: crisis severity and food prices. Once or twice a year: economic outlook, displacement, needs and access. Official aid totals, including Norway's, change about once a year. How often each source updates
Evidence
Every citation in the brief opens its card here. Icons show what each source is useful for.
Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs
Show all 62 evidence cards
E1 Norwegian disbursements by year · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Year | Disbursed (NOK) | In 2025 kroner | Agreements | Share of all Norwegian aid to these recipients |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 59.5 m | 70.5 m | 13 | 37.4% |
| 2022 | 32.5 m | 36.4 m | 9 | 0.6% |
| 2023 | 316.7 m | 336.5 m | 11 | 4.0% |
| 2024 | 467.1 m | 481.5 m | 19 | 5.0% |
| 2025 | 721.4 m | 721.4 m | 36 | 6.2% |
| Total | 1,597.2 m | 1,646.3 m |
Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Trend: 59.5 m in 2021 → 721.4 m in 2025 (+1113%); peak 721.4 m in 2025. In 2025 kroner, adjusted for inflation with Statistics Norway's consumer price index (annual average, table 08981; retrieved 2026-10-14): 70.5 m in 2021 → 721.4 m in 2025 (+923%); peak 721.4 m in 2025.
E2 Largest agreement partners · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Partner | Type | Disbursed (NOK) | Agreements | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norfund | Norwegian public sector | 500.0 m | 1 | 2024–2025 |
| MIGA - Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency | Multilateral institutions | 240.0 m | 1 | 2023 |
| FCDO - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK) | Public sector other donor countries | 105.0 m | 1 | 2024–2025 |
| ICMP - International Commission on Missing Persons | Multilateral institutions | 76.6 m | 1 | 2023–2025 |
| UN Women | Multilateral institutions | 55.5 m | 3 | 2021–2025 |
| GIZ - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit | Public sector other donor countries | 55.0 m | 2 | 2024–2025 |
| OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development | Multilateral institutions | 50.5 m | 3 | 2023–2025 |
| ISAR Ednannia | NGO Local | 50.1 m | 1 | 2024–2025 |
| Council of Europe | Multilateral institutions | 47.0 m | 3 | 2023–2025 |
| OHCHR – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights | Multilateral institutions | 33.3 m | 3 | 2022–2025 |
| IRF - International Renaissance Foundation | NGO Local | 32.7 m | 1 | 2024–2025 |
| IDEA - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance | Multilateral institutions | 30.0 m | 1 | 2025 |
Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Agreement partner labels as recorded; not resolved organisation identities.
E3 Channels: who receives the funds · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Partner type | Assistance type | Disbursed (NOK) | Share (rounded; listed groups only) | Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multilateral institutions | Earmarked to multilaterals | 607.1 m | 38% | 20 |
| Norwegian public sector | Bilateral | 550.5 m | 34% | 6 |
| Public sector other donor countries | Bilateral | 165.3 m | 10% | 4 |
| NGO Local | Bilateral | 84.2 m | 5% | 11 |
| NGO Norwegian | Bilateral | 78.2 m | 5% | 7 |
| NGO International | Bilateral | 50.4 m | 3% | 2 |
| Norwegian private sector | Bilateral | 47.4 m | 3% | 6 |
| Private sector in developing countries | Bilateral | 7.7 m | 0% | 2 |
| NGO Other donor countries | Bilateral | 6.5 m | 0% | 1 |
Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Shares use the listed channel groups, not necessarily the entire portfolio. Rounded 100% is not exactly all and rounded 0% is not none; retain nonzero amounts.
E4 What the money is for (sub-sectors) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Sub-sector | Disbursed (NOK) | Agreements |
|---|---|---|
| 10 - Business Policy and Administration | 500.0 m | 1 |
| 30 - Formal sector financial intermediaries | 240.0 m | 1 |
| 50 - Democratic participation and civil society | 216.9 m | 6 |
| 60 - Human rights | 128.5 m | 12 |
| 30 - Legal and judicial development | 70.4 m | 4 |
| 70 - Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions | 65.5 m | 3 |
| 10 - Public sector policy and administrative management | 60.1 m | 4 |
| 53 - Media and free flow of information | 52.9 m | 5 |
| 40 - Wind energy | 35.2 m | 3 |
| 13 - Anti-corruption organisations and institutions | 33.5 m | 2 |
Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025.
E5 Where Norway spends in this sector (recipients) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Recipient | Disbursed (NOK) | Rank among countries |
|---|---|---|
| Global Unspecified | 22,809.9 m | — |
| Ukraine | 1,597.2 m | 1 |
| Somalia | 792.4 m | 2 |
| Africa Regional | 764.5 m | — |
| South of Sahara Regional | 728.5 m | — |
| Europe Regional | 570.4 m | — |
| South Sudan | 499.2 m | 3 |
| Mozambique | 488.5 m | 4 |
| Nepal | 465.9 m | 5 |
| Brazil | 432.4 m | 6 |
All recipients; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. 115 recipients in scope. Regional and unallocated lines (e.g. Global Unspecified) are shown but not ranked.
E6 Policy markers (share of disbursements tagged significant or principal) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Marker | Share |
|---|---|
| Gender equality | 35% |
| Climate adaptation | 0% |
| Climate mitigation | 3% |
| Disability inclusion | 7% |
Ukraine; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2021–2025. Donor-reported OECD policy markers; not outcome evidence.
E7 Largest agreement: Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-24/0170 — "Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund" in Ukraine. Partner: Norfund (Norwegian public sector). Sector: 10 - Business Policy and Administration. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 500.0 m NOK in the selected years; 500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Annual capital replenishment of Norfund Ukraine Investment Fund. The fund is part of Norway's private sector development efforts in Ukraine.
E8 Largest agreement: MIGA - Support to Ukraine’s Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund (SURE) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-23/0023 — "MIGA - Support to Ukraine’s Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund (SURE)" in Ukraine. Partner: MIGA - Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 30 - Formal sector financial intermediaries. Payments recorded in 2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 240.0 m NOK in the selected years; 240.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: MIGA's "Support to Ukriane's Reconstruction and Economy Trust Fund" (SURE TF) is part of the wider World Bank Group response to supporting Ukraine. With the help of funds contributed to SURE TF, MIGA can expand its suite of products to reduce the risk for investors and private sector at large in operating in Ukraine during the conflict and preparing for when reconstruction may commence. As a mechanism to provide war insurance cover, it aims to reduce risk for investors in continuing to operate in and with Ukraine as well as to prepare for the reconstruction.
E9 Largest agreement: PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0011 — "PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: FCDO - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK) (Public sector other donor countries). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 105.0 m NOK in the selected years; 105.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: PFRU Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine supports liberated communities’ early recovery needs through community engagement, addressing local government capacity gaps, and strategically communicating results back to residents to sustain trust in state institution. Supporting local communities includes both supporting good consultation processes and dialogue and also supporting delivery of services and community work. Inclusion, and particularly of vulnerable groups in the processes and the project themselves is a main focus, and GEDSI (Gender Equality, Disability and Social Inclusion) is a central focus throughout the program. Conflict related sexual violence is another aspect that is relevant for several of the components in the program. The environmental challenges related to the concflict are becoming clearer, and managing these risks and well as improving the local enviroment …
E10 Largest agreement: ICMP Support to Ukraine in Accounting for Missing Persons · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-23/0032 — "ICMP Support to Ukraine in Accounting for Missing Persons" in Ukraine. Partner: ICMP - International Commission on Missing Persons (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 60 - Human rights. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 76.6 m NOK in the selected years; 76.6 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: This project aims to support the Ukrainian authorities in accounting for large numbers of missing persons to judicial standards that will make it possible to hold perpetrators of atrocities to account, provide the public with credible information regarding disappeared persons and related crimes, and secure the rights of families of the missing. ICMP will support further development and strengthening of Ukraine’s technical capacity for dedicated and sustainable impartial investigations into missing persons cases. It will support meaningful participation by Ukraine’s civil society and family associations, especially those that are women-led, in the missing persons process, facilitate intergovernmental and in-country cooperation and raise awareness about the central role of this issue in security and peacebuilding. The project is gender mainstreamed.
E11 Largest agreement: ISAR Ednannia - Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0026 — "ISAR Ednannia - Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy" in Ukraine. Partner: ISAR Ednannia (NGO Local). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 50.1 m NOK in the selected years; 50.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project "Strong Civil Society of Ukraine - a driver towards reforms and democracy", by the Initiative Center to Support Social Action "Ednannia" aims at strengthening CSOs to foster inclusive and sustainable recovery and to advance democratic governance reforms in Ukraine through small grants programs, educational and networking activities and research. This will be accomplished through three specific objectives: Objective 1: Strengthen organisational capacities of Ukrainian CSOs Outcome: Strengthened organisational capacities of CSOs. Activities include providing capacity-building through small grants and educational activities such as workshops, webinars, and the development of an educational program. The focus is on enhancing functional and adaptive capacities of CSOs. Research and Media grants will support activities in the Objective 1 scope, providing opportunities of …
E12 Largest agreement: Building democratic, peaceful and gender equal society in Ukraine II · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-21/0001 — "Building democratic, peaceful and gender equal society in Ukraine II" in Ukraine. Partner: UN Women (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 70 - Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions. Payments recorded in 2021–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 46.0 m NOK in the selected years; 46.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The overarching goal of the project is as follows: Women will meaningfully participate in, and equally benefit from, peace and security processes at all levels in Ukraine. The project will build capacities of women's organizations to meaningfully participate in conflict prevention and recovery at all levels. The project will improve economic conditions and gaps in services. Build capacity of government institutions at all levels to implement and monitor WPS commitments in sustainable and inclusive ways.
E13 Largest agreement: Council of Europe Ukraine Action Plan 2023-2026 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-23/0010 — "Council of Europe Ukraine Action Plan 2023-2026" in Ukraine. Partner: Council of Europe (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 30 - Legal and judicial development. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 43.0 m NOK in the selected years; 43.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Programme period stated in the description: 2023–2026. Description: The Council of Europe Action Plan for Ukraine “Resilience, Recovery and Reconstruction” 2023-2026 has been prepared in close consultation with the Ukrainian authorities, as a response to the determination and resolve of Ukraine’s authorities and people to engage in rebuilding the country. The proposed measures, based on Council of Europe standards, are aimed at accompanying the reconstruction process and economic recovery in Ukraine with support to strengthen the resilience of Ukrainian public institutions, to enhance democratic governance and the rule of law and to protect citizens’ fundamental rights. The intervention is based on a gender analysis that has informed the intervention design. Several outcomes include objectives explicitly addressing women and gender equality, and also includes indicators disaggregated by gender, degree to which new/adjusted policies are gender sensitive …
E14 Largest agreement: OECD Country Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-23/0007 — "OECD Country Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Public sector policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 37.5 m NOK in the selected years; 37.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The overall objecive of OECD's country programme for Ukraine is to support "the reconstruction and recovery of Ukraine in line with Ukraine's own priorities". The point of departure for the country programme, is Ukraine's official request for accession to the OECD and the OECD Council's recgnition of Ukraine as a prospective member. The country programme is a partnership "with a view to both Ukraine's recovery and its EU adn OECD accession ambition". The expected outcomes for the four year country programme for Ukraine are as follows: - enhanced access to international best practice and exchange of experiences via greater participation in OECD bodies - tailor-made reviews and peer learning - improved quality of policy eforms in line with OECD standards - further anchoring of long-term reforms, including via adherence to selected OECD legal instruments - enhanced network of international …
E15 Largest agreement: IRF Empowering Civil Society Action for Resilience and Recovery of Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0031 — "IRF Empowering Civil Society Action for Resilience and Recovery of Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: IRF - International Renaissance Foundation (NGO Local). Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 32.7 m NOK in the selected years; 32.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project involves a partnership between two large Ukrainian civil society organisations (CSO), International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) and the East European Foundation (EEF), which will work with smaller CSOs to address early recovery and democratic reforms in Ukraine. Among other things, the project will also build capacity of member organisations in gender sensitive budgeting and collection and use of gender disaaggregated data and also build capacity in sustainable and green recovery and climate action.
E16 Largest agreement: IDEA - Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections (U-VOTE) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0051 — "IDEA - Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections (U-VOTE)" in Ukraine. Partner: IDEA - International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 51 - Elections. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 30.0 m NOK in the selected years; 30.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The U-VOTE (Ukrainians Voting: Organizing Trustworthy Elections) programme, implemented by International IDEA, supports Ukraine’s preparation for credible, inclusive, and secure post-war elections. Working with the Central Election Commission, Verkhovna Rada, NACP, and civil society, the project strengthens electoral integrity, cybersecurity, transparency in political finance, and voter participation. It contributes to the governance, public sector capacity, and gender equality sectors. Gender and inclusion are mainstreamed, ensuring participation of women, youth, displaced persons, and veterans. U-VOTE enhances democratic resilience and supports Ukraine’s path toward accountable, European-aligned governance.
E17 Related project (semantic match): NEFCO - Green Recovery Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-22/0009 — "NEFCO - Green Recovery Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: NEFCO - Nordic Environment Finance Corporation (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Energy policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 330.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The objective of the Fund is solely and exclusively to fund activities in support of sustainable rehabilitation and rebuilding the infrastructure destroyed or damaged as a result of the Russian war in Ukraine to ensure that Ukraine is built back better and greener in accordance with Annex 1 hereto. The expected outcomes of the Contribution are: Enhanced capacity and capability of Ukrainian municipalities to plan and implement green recovery measures; Short-term repair, maintenance, and upgrade of municipal infrastructure, including restoration of public service buildings and rebuilding of medium-sized utilities and facilities; Improved access to basic municipal services for internally displaced people; Restoration and upgrade of social infrastructure.
E18 Related project (semantic match): UNDP - Green Energy Recovery Programme in Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0014 — "UNDP - Green Energy Recovery Programme in Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: UNDP - UN Development Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Hybrid energy electric power plants. Payments recorded in 2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 120.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project, supported by Norad and UNDP, focuses on the critical repair and enhancement of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, particularly in Kharkiv. This includes designing emergency power supplies and procuring small gas turbines, gas engines, and solar panels to ensure the functionality of critical infrastructure. UNDP will provide extensive installation support and training for local actors, covering installation procedures, maintenance protocols, and troubleshooting techniques. Additionally, tailored training programs for local authorities will enhance their capacities in energy management, data management, analytical skills, and strategic planning. An awareness campaign will be launched to promote energy conservation and efficiency in the affected areas. Furthermore, an energy cluster will be established to coordinate emergency response efforts and mobilize resources for both …
E19 Related project (semantic match): IFC Economic Resilience Action (ERA) Programme for Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-24/0025 — "IFC Economic Resilience Action (ERA) Programme for Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: IFC - International Finance Corporation (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 250.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The Economic Resilience Action (ERA) will provide a framework for IFC to address the private sector financing needs during Russia's invasion of Ukraine and prepare for the reconstruction phase. IFC blends own funds with contribution from donors such as Norway as levers to reduce investment risk, thereby enabling more investments to critically important sectors of Ukaine's economy. NOK 50 million are earmarked to renewable energy projects in the Ukraine.
E20 Related project (semantic match): Energy Community - critical repair of energy infrastructure in Ukraine · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-25/0009 — "Energy Community - critical repair of energy infrastructure in Ukraine" in Ukraine. Partner: Energy Community Secretariat (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Hybrid energy electric power plants. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Norway is committed to supporting Ukraine's energy recovery through the Ukraine Energy Support Fund, focusing on urgent needs and long-term resilience. Key actions include procuring and deploying essential energy infrastructure like gas turbines, transformers, and decentralized solutions, alongside repairing damaged systems and implementing protective measures. The 2025 strategy emphasizes developing green energy and decentralized production, including a national plan for repairing power plants and gas infrastructure. Norway's support aims to strengthen Ukraine's energy security, increase generation capacity, enhance grid stability, and expand decentralized renewable energy use. Critical infrastructure delivery includes modular gas compressor units, mobile cogeneration units, and solar systems for hospitals, supported with training and maintenance. The Fund seeks unrestricted support …
E21 Related project (semantic match): EBRD - E5P - Ukraine window · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-23/0028 — "EBRD - E5P - Ukraine window" in Ukraine. Partner: EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 83 - Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency. Payments recorded in 2023–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 60.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The E5P was established to facilitate municipal infrastructure investments boosting energy efficiency and environmental protection in the Eastern Partnership countries, in particular aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Fund has been operating in Ukraine since 2010 and has by now expanded to all the EU Eastern Partnership countries of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia and Moldova. The Fund co-finances district heating and public buildings projects together with local transport, solid waste and street lighting investments. The EBRD acts as the fund manager on behalf of contributors and other IFIs. The E5P Fund has different country windows to which donors earmark resources. This contribution is for the Ukraine window.
E22 Related project (semantic match): EU Ukraine Investment Framework - pillar 2 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-25/0031 — "EU Ukraine Investment Framework - pillar 2" in Ukraine. Partner: EC - European Commission (Multilateral institutions); implementing: EIB - European Investment Bank. Sector: 40 - Retail gas distribution. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 1,500.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The funding from Norway is being channelled through the EU’s Ukraine Investment Framework (UIF), which seeks to mobilise public and private investments for the recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine following the destruction caused by Russia’s war of aggression. The UIF is a part of the Ukraine Facility, the EU’s dedicated instrument for providing civilian support to Ukraine. This is the first time Ukraine will be receiving support from Norway directly through this instrument. The funding is earmarked for emergency gas purchases for the heating season 2025/2026 to replace the production losses stemming from the attacks on Ukraine's gas production facilities. The European Commission will use the European Investment Bank as the implementing partner of this support.
E23 Related project (semantic match): Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform Trust Fund (URTF) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-22/0012 — "Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform Trust Fund (URTF)" in Ukraine. Partner: IBRD - International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 9,300.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Ukraine Relief, Recovery, Reconstruction and Reform is to provide a coordinated financing mechanism to assist the Government of Ukraine to: (a) sustain its administrative and service delivery capacity and conduct relief efforts; and (b) plan and implement Ukraine’s recovery and resilient reconstruction.
E24 Related project (semantic match): UNDP Thematic support to energy · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement UKR-22/0013 — "UNDP Thematic support to energy" in Ukraine. Partner: UNDP - UN Development Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Energy policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2022–2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 103.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The first phase of reconstruction efforts under the UNDP Resilience Building and Recovery Programme will focus on the restoration of essential utility services, including water and sanitation, solid waste management, and heating and energy supply. UNDP is working on 3 parallel streams on the Energy Crisis: • Stream 1: Energy Sector Assessment: supporting the Government of Ukraine and national partners for carrying out quantification of macro-economic impact of the Russian aggression. • Stream 2: Provision of Emergency Equipment and support to urgent infrastructure repair for affected communities/regions: UNDP has been also providing emergency response through the immediate procurement and quick repair of generators, diesel oil, and other mobile energy items • Stream 3: System procurement for mid- and long-term rehabilitation of the energy infrastructure.
E25 Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) · OECD DAC Creditor Reporting System
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope | Donor | Trend | 2019 (USD m) | 2020 (USD m) | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 121.0 | 133.5 | 131.7 | 8,643.7 | 10,210.3 | 8,364.5 | 84% | |
| 2 | EU Institutions | 256.8 | 159.5 | 241.1 | 1,052.4 | 309.2 | 622.8 | 8% | |
| 3 | Germany | 23.1 | 23.5 | 34.9 | 168.2 | 199.2 | 100.1 | 2% | |
| 4 | France | 0.4 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 422.3 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1% | |
| 5 | Japan | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 8.6 | 222.0 | 1% | |
| 6 | United Kingdom | 9.3 | 11.2 | 11.0 | 119.2 | 54.5 | 26.4 | 1% | |
| 7 | Sweden | 20.4 | 15.4 | 21.6 | 20.7 | 50.3 | 55.7 | 1% | |
| 8 | Switzerland | 8.1 | 8.2 | 10.7 | 42.5 | 51.6 | 51.9 | 1% | |
| 9 | Canada | 33.0 | 24.0 | 22.5 | 38.6 | 37.2 | 16.8 | 1% | |
| 10 | Poland | 10.7 | 7.8 | 32.4 | 21.0 | 5.9 | 16.1 | 0% | |
| 11 | Norway | 12.2 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 30.0 | 20.2 | 0% | |
| All official donors | 514.1 | 428.2 | 539.4 | 10,689.6 | 11,114.9 | 9,558.5 | 100% |
OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients UKR (combined); DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; retrieved 2026-10-14. 54 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 514.1m in 2019 → USD 9,558.5m in 2024 (+1759%); peak USD 11,114.9m in 2023. United States: Trend: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024 (+6814%); peak USD 10,210.3m in 2023. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024 (+142%); peak USD 1,052.4m in 2022. Germany: Trend: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024 (+332%); peak USD 199.2m in 2023. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.
E26 Other donors' largest projects in scope (OECD CRS, 2023 to 2024) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Donor | Project | Channel of delivery | Recipient | Disbursed (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Development Association [IDA] | Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in Ukraine | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 1,998.9 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Ukraine Relief and Recovery Development Policy Loan | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 954.5 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Growth Foundations DPO | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 712.0 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Second Growth Foundations Development Policy Operation | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 600.9 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in Ukraine | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 488.8 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Supporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE) | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 401.3 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Fifth Additional Financing for Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in UKRAINE | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 386.8 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 251.2 |
| EU Institutions | PROVISIONING OF THE UKRAINE GUARANTEE | European Union Institutions | Ukraine | 216.3 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development [IBRD] | Sixth Additional Financing for Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in Ukraine | Recipient Government | Ukraine | 197.6 |
| European Bank for Reconstruction and Development [EBRD] | Aggregated disbursements and reflows | Private sector in recipient country | Ukraine | 161.8 |
| EU Institutions | HYDRO POWER PLANTS REHABILITATION | Central Government (recipient govt.) | Ukraine | 143.8 |
OECD CRS project-level records, gross disbursements 2023 to 2024, current USD millions; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; Norway excluded (see the Norwegian data); retrieved 2026-10-14. 798 projects from 47 donors report in scope. Titles and descriptions are donor-reported; a project may cover more than the sector named.
E27 Other donor's project: Meteorology cooperation in Ukraine (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: University, college or other teaching institution, research institute or think-tank. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 1.0m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): Ukraine is prone to extreme weather events such as floods, droughts and harsh winter conditions. Natural disasters threaten food, water and energy security, health and the country's development objectives. An integrated approach to disaster management, including weather forecasts, hydrometeorological and environmental monitoring, public awareness, disaster mitigation and reconstruction, reduces human and economic losses and benefits society as a whole.UHMC 's (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center) capacity will improve to provide weather and early warning services at all levels. The vulnerability of citizens, society and sectors in Ukraine and south-eastern Europe to disaster risks, changing weather and extreme weather events will be reduced and preparedness will increase. The aim is also to increase the visibility of UHMC.The main beneficiaries are UHMC, the State Emergency Service, as
E28 Other donor's project: Ukraine Energy Support Fund (Germany) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Germany. Channel of delivery: Other multilateral institutions. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies. Disbursed USD 66.1m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): Russia's war of aggression on Ukraine is causing devastation in the Ukrainian energy sector. Especially since the beginning of October 2022, there have been massive waves of attacks by Russia on the civilian infrastructure. Among other things, thermal and hydroelectric power plants as well as electricity transmission have been severely damaged. As a result, many people are without electricity and heating. At the request of the European Commission and in agreement with the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy, the Secretariat of the Energy Community has set up the 'Ukraine Energy Support Fund' (UESF) to mitigate the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the energy sector. The UESF is designed as a basket funding, so that different donors can participate. The Secretariat of the Energy Community acts as trustee of the donor funds for the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy. The UESF funds are used
E29 Other donor's project: Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Co-financing of the Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endur (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: World Bank Group (WB). Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Public finance management (PFM); Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 15.1m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): The Russian invasion in Ukraine on 24 February 2022 has led to considerable economic losses and human suffering in Ukraine. The decline of Ukraine's economy is risking the already achieved development results and raises poverty among the population.The World Bank's Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) trust fund in Ukraine supports the Government of Ukraine in sustaining core government functions at the national and regional levels by funding the non-security sector expenses. The support enables the Government of Ukraine to maintain control over functions such as collecting revenues, making social payments, responding to emergencies and to maintain 90% schools functioning by covering teachers' salaries.Finland supports Ukraine's resilience and long term reforms. The objectives of Finland's country strategy in Ukraine include protecting Ukraine's territorial i
E30 Other donor's project: Economic Integration of Internally Displaced People (Germany) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Germany. Channel of delivery: International Organisation for Migration. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) development. Disbursed USD 3.2m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): The financial sector project with a volume of EUR 10.85 million in Ukraine is aimed directly at promoting the stock of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and indirectly at internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable population groups. The objective of the measure is to improve economic self-reliance and thus the living conditions of IDPs and conflict-affected populations with high economic vulnerability. Given the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic also on Ukrainian MSMEs, the project aims to keep MSMEs of different sizes and types functioning so that they can maintain existing jobs and adopt working modalities that are better suited to the challenges and demands of the pandemic. Where possible, the businesses will also be expanded to create new jobs. Participating MSMEs will receive grants to invest in new equipment and training to help them make the necessary b
E31 Other donor's project: Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU) (Switzerland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Switzerland. Channel of delivery: Third Country Government (Delegated co-operation). Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Decentralisation and support to subnational government. Disbursed USD 2.4m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): With a contribution to the Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU), Switzerland aims at strengthening communities and at enhancing government legitimacy in Eastern Ukraine through improved services, economic recovery and empowered civil society. The PFRU is an innovative multi-donor financing tool which focuses on supporting the implementation of reforms in the conflict-affected areas of the country through an integrated approach (humanitarian-development-peace nexus). The PFRU unites five development partners (UK, US, Canada, Sweden, Switzerland) and it is co-owned by the Government of Ukraine.
E32 Other donor's project: Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (Finland) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Finland. Channel of delivery: Other multilateral institutions. Recipient: Ukraine. Purpose: Democratic participation and civil society; Human rights; Public sector policy and administrative management. Disbursed USD 2.2m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): Finland's goal in Ukraine is to provide long-term support for the resilience of Ukrainian society and its own reforms. The objectives of the Country Strategy are to restore Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty and to respect international law, to strengthen bilateral relations and expand co-operation between Finland and Ukraine, to improve the sustainability of society and the living conditions of its citizens, and to strengthen relations between the European Union and Ukraine.The Partnership Fund for a Resilient Ukraine (PFRU) is an ODA-eligible fund set up by the UK Foreign Office and prepared in co-operation with the Ukrainian government since 2020. The fund's partner in Ukraine is the Ministry of Reintegration. Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The fund is intended to provide broad support to the resilience of Ukraine's local government, NGOs, local communities,
E33 Norway's aid through multilateral organisations, attributed to the country (imputed, USD m) · ONE Imputed Multilateral Sectors and OECD DAC2A, via the Development Finance Observatory
About this source: Estimates of where a donor's core contributions to multilateral organisations end up, by country and sector, by ONE and the OECD. They are modelled from each organisation's spending, not reported project by project.
Trace this: ONE: Imputed Multilateral Sectors, methodology ↗ · Development Finance Observatory: sources and licences ↗
| Country | Measure | Trend | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | All sectors (OECD estimate) | 2.70 | 4.40 | 7.07 | 4.38 | 2.87 | |
| Ukraine | Sectors in this brief (ONE estimate) | 0.68 | 0.96 | 1.77 | 2.60 | 4.03 | |
| Ukraine | of which Government and civil society, general (151) | 0.28 | 0.41 | 1.49 | 2.35 | 3.90 | |
| Ukraine | of which Transport and storage (210) | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |
| Ukraine | of which Energy generation, renewable sources (232) | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
| Ukraine | of which Banking and financial services (240) | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.02 | |
| Ukraine | of which Business and other services (250) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| Ukraine | of which Industry (321) | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Imputed multilateral ODA from Norway, gross disbursements in current USD millions: all sectors from OECD DAC2A, the brief's sectors from ONE's Imputed Multilateral Sectors (CRS purpose codes starting 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321), via the Development Finance Observatory; retrieved 2026-10-14. Modelled estimates: each multilateral organisation's spending in the country is attributed to Norway in proportion to Norway's share of its core funding. Norway did not direct this money to the country. It covers core contributions only, so it does not overlap with the Norwegian agreement data (Norway's own agreements, including funds earmarked through multilaterals). The OECD and ONE totals differ slightly because their methods do. Sector rows are sums of ONE's purpose-code rows, added up by this app.
E34 Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service
About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.
Trace this: FTS plan: Ukraine 2024 ↗ · FTS plan: Ukraine 2025 ↗ · FTS plan: Ukraine 2026 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2024 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2026 (all countries) ↗
| Country | Year | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 2024 | 3,107.7 | 2,351.8 | 76% |
| Ukraine | 2025 | 2,633.5 | 1,663.6 | 63% |
| Ukraine | 2026 (in progress) | 2,304.0 | 1,654.9 | 72% |
UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.
E35 Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service
About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.
Trace this: FTS plan: Ukraine 2025 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗
| Country | Cluster | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Food Security | 613.4 | 190.9 | 31% |
| Ukraine | Emergency Shelter and NFI | 544.6 | 196.8 | 36% |
| Ukraine | Multipurpose Cash | 410.2 | 180.8 | 44% |
| Ukraine | Water Sanitation Hygiene | 365.3 | 135.3 | 37% |
| Ukraine | Protection | 171.9 | 205.6 | 120% |
| Ukraine | Health | 130.9 | 138.4 | 106% |
| Ukraine | Protection - Child Protection | 128.9 | 51.9 | 40% |
| Ukraine | Protection - Mine Action | 86.5 | 112.8 | 130% |
UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ukraine 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 280.1m; Norway, Government of USD 218.9m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 212.1m; Germany, Government of USD 178.9m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 99.3m.
E36 Country-based pooled fund allocations by partner type (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)
About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.
Trace this: OCHA CBPF data hub (allocations by fund and partner) ↗ · CBPF API: allocations by year, fund and partner type ↗
| Fund | Allocation year | UN agencies (USD m) | International NGOs (USD m) | National NGOs (USD m) | Other organisations (USD m) | Total approved (USD m) | National NGO share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 2026 (to date) | 50.70 | 144.47 | 134.53 | 0.20 | 329.90 | 40.8% |
| Ukraine | 2025 | 0.00 | 85.14 | 117.47 | 0.00 | 202.61 | 58.0% |
| Ukraine | 2024 | 5.00 | 84.58 | 74.76 | 0.00 | 164.34 | 45.5% |
UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Ukraine; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Approved allocations only (pipeline excluded); the current year is still being allocated, and years with no approved allocation are not shown. The national NGO share counts direct allocations, not sub-grants, so it is not the whole local share. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.
E37 Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)
About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.
Trace this: CBPF API: Ukraine project records (CSV) ↗
| Organisation | Type | Fund | Projects | In the reader's clusters (USD m) | All approved (USD m) | Largest clusters | Allocation years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proliska | National NGO | Ukraine | 5 | 11.38 | 22.67 | Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| CHARITY ORGANIZATION «CHARITABLE FOUNDATION «АNGELS OF SALVATION» | National NGO | Ukraine | 7 | 7.28 | 42.33 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Protection, Multi-purpose CASH | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Charitable Organization 'Charity Fund Team4UA' | National NGO | Ukraine | 4 | 6.23 | 40.50 | Multi-purpose CASH, Protection, Camp Coordination / Management | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Charitable Organization 'Charity Fund 'POSMISHKA UA' | National NGO | Ukraine | 9 | 5.13 | 20.78 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Protection, Camp Coordination / Management | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Charitable Organization 'Charitable Fund 'The Right to Protection' | National NGO | Ukraine | 8 | 4.94 | 46.67 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Camp Coordination / Management, Protection | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Corus International | International NGO | Ukraine | 3 | 4.42 | 8.38 | Protection, Health, Multi-purpose CASH | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| CIVIC ORGANIZATION “THE TENTH OF APRIL” | National NGO | Ukraine | 3 | 3.84 | 7.79 | Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Emergency Shelter and NFI | 2024, 2025 |
| Nonviolent Peaceforce International | International NGO | Ukraine | 3 | 3.66 | 7.18 | Protection, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Camp Coordination / Management | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Charitable organization “Charitable foundation “ROKADA” | National NGO | Ukraine | 5 | 3.64 | 14.07 | Camp Coordination / Management, Protection, Emergency Shelter and NFI | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION “CHARITY FOUNDATION “EAST-SOS” | National NGO | Ukraine | 3 | 3.50 | 6.73 | Protection, Camp Coordination / Management, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene | 2025 |
UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Ukraine; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ranked by approved budget in the reader's clusters (Protection); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.
E38 Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) · OECD, mobilised private finance for development
About this source: The OECD's measure of private money brought in by public development finance, for example through guarantees or co-investment. It is the main reference for blended finance; amounts follow the OECD's attribution rules and are published here for groups of providers.
Trace this: OECD mobilised private finance dataflow (DSD_MOB@DF_MOBILISATION) ↗
| Mechanism | Trend | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guarantees | 303.8 | 983.2 | 1,615.9 | |
| Direct investment in companies and SPVs | 32.1 | 184.1 | 471.3 | |
| Syndicated loans | 0.0 | 293.3 | 43.4 | |
| Shares in investment funds (CIVs) | 0.5 | 320.2 | 5.7 | |
| Simple co-financing | 2.8 | 1.8 | 254.6 | |
| Credit lines | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| All mechanisms, all sectors | 342.4 | 1,782.6 | 2,390.9 | |
| In this brief's sectors (151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321) | 331.1 | 1,341.4 | 1,799.1 | |
| of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors) | 331.7 | 1,463.0 | 1,366.3 | |
| of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors) | 10.7 | 319.6 | 1,024.6 |
OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Ukraine (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Guarantees: Trend: USD 303.8m in 2022 → USD 1,615.9m in 2024 (+432%); peak USD 1,615.9m in 2024. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers this brief's sectors. No sector-level provider split is supplied. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.
E39 Donors' total aid (net ODA), all recipients (2021 to 2025, 2025 provisional) · OECD DAC1 (includes preliminary data)
About this source: The OECD's headline aid totals for each donor, the source of the yearly figures on aid as a share of national income. It shows a donor's overall trend, not where the money goes.
Trace this: OECD DAC1 dataflow (DSD_DAC1@DF_DAC1) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Donor | Trend | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | 2025 (USD m) provisional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 47,528.2 | 60,328.7 | 64,461.9 | 65,336.8 | 29,021.9 | |
| EU Institutions | 20,639.1 | 27,165.9 | 37,544.2 | 35,654.1 | 52,904.8 | |
| Germany | 32,455.6 | 36,444.6 | 41,253.3 | 33,249.3 | 28,032.0 | |
| France | 16,721.9 | 17,560.9 | 15,862.0 | 15,073.8 | 13,905.7 | |
| Japan | 15,767.0 | 16,747.3 | 18,661.9 | 15,245.9 | 13,523.6 | |
| United Kingdom | 16,277.8 | 15,761.3 | 18,615.7 | 16,269.5 | 16,365.1 | |
| Sweden | 5,937.6 | 5,463.8 | 5,481.9 | 4,829.0 | 5,769.2 | |
| Switzerland | 3,911.4 | 4,496.4 | 5,191.6 | 4,557.2 | 4,513.5 | |
| Canada | 6,257.7 | 9,274.1 | 9,058.0 | 8,422.9 | 10,131.3 | |
| Poland | 971.2 | 3,481.3 | 2,571.1 | 1,829.9 | 1,607.9 | |
| Norway | 4,673.0 | 5,161.0 | 5,292.9 | 4,905.3 | 5,156.8 |
OECD DAC1, net ODA disbursements to all recipients and sectors, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Shows each donor's overall aid, not its spending in this country or sector. 2025 figures are the OECD's preliminary estimates of aid already disbursed that year (not forecasts) and may be revised. United States: USD 65,336.8m in 2024 → USD 29,021.9m in 2025 (-56% in one year). EU Institutions: USD 35,654.1m in 2024 → USD 52,904.8m in 2025 (+48% in one year). Germany: USD 33,249.3m in 2024 → USD 28,032.0m in 2025 (-16% in one year). France: USD 15,073.8m in 2024 → USD 13,905.7m in 2025 (-8% in one year). Japan: USD 15,245.9m in 2024 → USD 13,523.6m in 2025 (-11% in one year). The same donors in this country and sector (OECD CRS, gross disbursements; ends earlier): United States: USD 121.0m in 2019 → USD 8,364.5m in 2024. EU Institutions: USD 256.8m in 2019 → USD 622.8m in 2024. Germany: USD 23.1m in 2019 → USD 100.1m in 2024. France: USD 0.4m in 2019 → USD 2.9m in 2024. Japan: USD 2.9m in 2019 → USD 222.0m in 2024. United Kingdom: USD 9.3m in 2019 → USD 26.4m in 2024. Sweden: USD 20.4m in 2019 → USD 55.7m in 2024. Switzerland: USD 8.1m in 2019 → USD 51.9m in 2024. Canada: USD 33.0m in 2019 → USD 16.8m in 2024. Poland: USD 10.7m in 2019 → USD 16.1m in 2024. Norway: USD 12.2m in 2019 → USD 20.2m in 2024. Measure: net ODA disbursement flows in current USD, not budgets or grant-only funding. Preserve the provisional label on the corresponding observation year.
E40 US foreign assistance by fiscal year (ForeignAssistance.gov), to FY2026 · ForeignAssistance.gov (US government)
About this source: The US government's own record of its foreign assistance: every obligation and payment by country, sector, agency and implementing partner, published much sooner than the OECD's data. It shows the effect of the 2025 US cuts country by country; economic and military aid are kept apart.
Trace this: ForeignAssistance.gov data downloads ↗
| Country | Measure | FY2021 (USD m) | FY2022 (USD m) | FY2023 (USD m) | FY2024 (USD m) | FY2025 (USD m) | FY2026 to date (USD m) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Disbursed, all economic aid | 303.3 | 9,639.1 | 16,486.7 | 6,418.8 | 5,741.2 | 447.7 | |
| Ukraine | Disbursed, in this brief's sectors | 123.3 | 8,678.7 | 14,655.7 | 4,881.2 | 4,306.4 | 30.2 | |
| Ukraine | Newly obligated (committed), in this brief's sectors | 150.2 | 8,707.4 | 14,846.3 | 5,173.0 | 4,043.9 | 181.7 |
US government obligations and disbursements of economic (non-military) assistance, current USD, from the ForeignAssistance.gov complete dataset (file of Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:40:59 GMT); loaded 2026-10-14; retrieved 2026-10-14. US fiscal years run October to September; FY2026 is incomplete. Obligations are new commitments; disbursements are payments, often against earlier commitments, so they fall later than obligations. Agencies report with a lag and revise. Sectors use the OECD codes the US assigns, which can differ from the recipient's or the OECD's classification. Military and security assistance is excluded. Partners the US withholds by name (redacted) are left out of the partner list. Largest implementing partners by disbursements, FY2025–FY2026: World Bank Group (USD 3,410.8m); U.S. Government - U.S. Agency for International Development (USD 535.2m); International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (USD 34.3m); Development Alternatives, Inc. (USD 26.8m); Chemonics International, Inc. (USD 15.5m).
E41 Crisis risk: INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026 · INFORM Risk Index (EU Joint Research Centre)
About this source: An index from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and partners that rates how likely a humanitarian crisis or disaster is to overwhelm a country's capacity to cope. Humanitarian donors and agencies use it to compare countries; it measures structural risk, not current needs.
Trace this: INFORM Risk results and data (EU JRC) ↗
| Country | INFORM Risk Mid 2026 (0-10) | Class | Rank (1 = highest risk) | Hazard & exposure | Vulnerability | Lack of coping capacity | INFORM Risk 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 5.7 | High | 39 of 191 | 8.1 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 4.5 |
INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026, EU Joint Research Centre with IASC partners; retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0-10, higher means a higher risk that a humanitarian crisis overwhelms national capacity; the earlier score is from the published edition of that year, whose method differed slightly. Ukraine: the highest of the three dimensions is Hazard & exposure (8.1); read the score through that dimension. Ukraine: INFORM Risk 4.5 in 2022 → 5.7 in Mid 2026 (Medium → High).
E42 Humanitarian crisis severity: INFORM Severity - September 2026 · ACAPS INFORM Severity Index (via HDX)
About this source: ACAPS's rating of how severe each ongoing humanitarian crisis is, based on its analysts' review of many sources. It is used to compare crises and to see whether one is getting worse.
Trace this: ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly files on HDX ↗
| Country | Crisis | Drivers | Severity (1-10) | Category | Trend (last 3 months) | Complexity (1-10) | Data reliability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Conflict in Ukraine | Conflict/ Violence | 9.1 | Very High | Decreasing | 8.1 | Very High |
ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly edition published on the Humanitarian Data Exchange; retrieved 2026-10-14. It rates the severity of ongoing crises (impact, conditions of people affected, complexity); countries without an active crisis are not listed.
E43 Humanitarian access constraints: ACAPS, Oct 2026 · ACAPS Humanitarian Access
About this source: ACAPS's rating of how hard it is for humanitarian organisations to reach people in a crisis, because of insecurity, bureaucratic restrictions or physical obstacles.
Trace this: ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset ↗
| Country | Crisis | Access constraints (0-5) | Level | People's access to aid | Aid actors' access to people | Security and physical constraints | Strongest constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Conflict in Ukraine | 5 | Extreme | 5 | 4 | 5 | obstructed access to services and aid; restricted movement within the country; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; mines and explosive devices; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure) |
ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset, Oct 2026 edition (API); retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0 (no constraints) to 5 (extreme), from three pillars and nine indicators; countries without a tracked crisis are not listed. Ukraine: the most constrained crisis is Conflict in Ukraine (5 of 5, Extreme).
E44 Conflict and protest events reported by ACLED, to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX
About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.
Trace this: Ukraine - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗
| Country | Area | Category | Events Sep 2026 | Fatalities Sep 2026 | Events, 12 months | Fatalities, 12 months | Events, previous 12 months | Fatalities, previous 12 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | National | Political violence | 7,714 | 3,907 | 86,336 | 61,206 | 70,611 | 80,131 |
| Ukraine | National | Civilian targeting | 821 | 348 | 7,754 | 3,584 | 5,052 | 2,513 |
| Ukraine | National | Demonstrations | 13 | Not reported | 485 | Not reported | 348 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Region: Kherson | Political violence | 1,094 | 1,011 | 14,722 | 25,125 | 12,343 | 28,445 |
| Ukraine | Region: Donetsk | Political violence | 1,716 | 1,698 | 21,922 | 21,309 | 24,126 | 41,627 |
| Ukraine | Region: Zaporizhia | Political violence | 1,862 | 409 | 17,245 | 4,935 | 6,006 | 2,542 |
ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. National and regional figures are sums of ACLED's district rows, added up by this app; the district card lists the districts. Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.
E45 Conflict and protest events by district (ACLED), to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX
About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.
Trace this: Ukraine - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗
| Country | Region | District | District code (P-code) | Category | Events Sep 2026 | Fatalities Sep 2026 | Events, 12 months | Fatalities, 12 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Kherson | Khersonskyi | UA6510 | Political violence | 670 | 997 | 7,668 | 24,762 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Pokrovskyi | UA1416 | Political violence | 517 | 1,129 | 7,098 | 15,049 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Kramatorskyi | UA1412 | Political violence | 992 | 533 | 10,940 | 5,350 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Synelnykivskyi | UA1214 | Political violence | 183 | 190 | 3,920 | 3,319 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Polohivskyi | UA2310 | Political violence | 864 | 169 | 9,221 | 2,543 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Kupianskyi | UA6308 | Political violence | 380 | 181 | 4,299 | 2,305 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Zaporizkyi | UA2306 | Political violence | 741 | 219 | 5,347 | 2,047 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Sumskyi | UA5908 | Political violence | 387 | 100 | 4,465 | 873 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Iziumskyi | UA6304 | Political violence | 148 | 74 | 1,609 | 749 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Kharkivskyi | UA6312 | Political violence | 172 | 28 | 1,387 | 627 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Kramatorskyi | UA1412 | Civilian targeting | 102 | 50 | 1,000 | 520 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Bakhmutskyi | UA1402 | Political violence | 13 | 4 | 1,878 | 481 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Khersonskyi | UA6510 | Civilian targeting | 56 | 30 | 822 | 394 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Vasylivskyi | UA2304 | Political violence | 222 | 11 | 2,367 | 290 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Shostkynskyi | UA5910 | Political violence | 390 | 33 | 3,542 | 288 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Zaporizkyi | UA2306 | Civilian targeting | 46 | 18 | 471 | 230 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv City | Kyiv | UA8000 | Political violence | 119 | 29 | 376 | 222 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Bohodukhivskyi | UA6302 | Political violence | 88 | 28 | 1,104 | 215 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv City | Kyiv | UA8000 | Civilian targeting | 53 | 29 | 163 | 213 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Beryslavskyi | UA6502 | Political violence | 382 | 11 | 5,635 | 173 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Kharkivskyi | UA6312 | Civilian targeting | 38 | 6 | 359 | 155 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Volnovaskyi | UA1404 | Political violence | 59 | 8 | 820 | 140 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Horlivskyi | UA1406 | Political violence | 48 | 9 | 416 | 129 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Nikopolskyi | UA1208 | Political violence | 125 | 17 | 1,541 | 124 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Dniprovskyi | UA1202 | Political violence | 20 | 17 | 226 | 123 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Sumskyi | UA5908 | Civilian targeting | 34 | 17 | 399 | 119 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Kupianskyi | UA6308 | Civilian targeting | 10 | 1 | 355 | 116 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Kryvorizkyi | UA1206 | Political violence | 41 | 2 | 424 | 106 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Nikopolskyi | UA1208 | Civilian targeting | 27 | 13 | 285 | 105 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Dniprovskyi | UA1202 | Civilian targeting | 12 | 17 | 87 | 101 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Odeskyi | UA5110 | Political violence | 54 | 8 | 320 | 95 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Odeskyi | UA5110 | Civilian targeting | 24 | 7 | 160 | 93 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Shostkynskyi | UA5910 | Civilian targeting | 32 | 11 | 309 | 92 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Polohivskyi | UA2310 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 1 | 146 | 86 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Synelnykivskyi | UA1214 | Civilian targeting | 10 | 8 | 169 | 82 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Iziumskyi | UA6304 | Civilian targeting | 20 | 7 | 162 | 81 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Buchanskyi | UA3208 | Political violence | 29 | 5 | 74 | 77 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Buchanskyi | UA3208 | Civilian targeting | 13 | 5 | 33 | 77 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Mariupolskyi | UA1414 | Political violence | 28 | 8 | 182 | 75 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Donetskyi | UA1408 | Political violence | 49 | 4 | 456 | 72 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Kakhovskyi | UA6506 | Political violence | 34 | 3 | 911 | 68 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Vasylivskyi | UA2304 | Civilian targeting | 28 | 9 | 195 | 64 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Pokrovskyi | UA1416 | Civilian targeting | 9 | 3 | 184 | 63 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Horlivskyi | UA1406 | Civilian targeting | 26 | 8 | 182 | 63 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Henicheskyi | UA6504 | Political violence | 3 | 0 | 88 | 62 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Skadovskyi | UA6508 | Political violence | 5 | 0 | 420 | 60 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Skadovskyi | UA6508 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 97 | 60 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Kryvorizkyi | UA1206 | Civilian targeting | 9 | 2 | 79 | 54 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Okhtyrskyi | UA5904 | Political violence | 37 | 0 | 546 | 52 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Kakhovskyi | UA6506 | Civilian targeting | 10 | 3 | 153 | 52 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Donetskyi | UA1408 | Civilian targeting | 19 | 4 | 146 | 52 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Sievierodonetskyi | UA4412 | Political violence | 28 | 2 | 164 | 51 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Pavlohradskyi | UA1212 | Political violence | 15 | 8 | 183 | 47 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Bohodukhivskyi | UA6302 | Civilian targeting | 25 | 5 | 208 | 46 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Melitopolskyi | UA2308 | Political violence | 20 | 9 | 183 | 45 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Konotopskyi | UA5902 | Political violence | 82 | 8 | 893 | 42 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Pavlohradskyi | UA1212 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 6 | 64 | 42 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Brovarskyi | UA3206 | Political violence | 19 | 0 | 77 | 39 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Brovarskyi | UA3206 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 0 | 33 | 39 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Beryslavskyi | UA6502 | Civilian targeting | 15 | 5 | 126 | 38 |
| Ukraine | Ternopil | Ternopilskyi | UA6104 | Political violence | 2 | 0 | 9 | 38 |
| Ukraine | Ternopil | Ternopilskyi | UA6104 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 3 | 38 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Okhtyrskyi | UA5904 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 0 | 113 | 34 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Sievierodonetskyi | UA4412 | Civilian targeting | 17 | 2 | 78 | 32 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Mykolaivskyi | UA4806 | Political violence | 32 | 8 | 437 | 30 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Lozivskyi | UA6310 | Political violence | 41 | 4 | 255 | 29 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Starobilskyi | UA4414 | Political violence | 9 | 1 | 84 | 29 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Melitopolskyi | UA2308 | Civilian targeting | 8 | 6 | 38 | 27 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Mykolaivskyi | UA4806 | Civilian targeting | 8 | 8 | 78 | 25 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Novomoskovskyi | UA1210 | Political violence | 7 | 2 | 44 | 25 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Chernihivskyi | UA7410 | Political violence | 19 | 0 | 513 | 23 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Mariupolskyi | UA1414 | Civilian targeting | 10 | 8 | 33 | 23 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Konotopskyi | UA5902 | Civilian targeting | 11 | 1 | 91 | 21 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Novhorod-Siverskyi | UA7406 | Political violence | 195 | 1 | 2,552 | 20 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Novhorod-Siverskyi | UA7406 | Civilian targeting | 5 | 1 | 88 | 19 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Kamianskyi | UA1204 | Political violence | 18 | 8 | 104 | 18 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Chernihivskyi | UA7410 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 62 | 18 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Volnovaskyi | UA1404 | Civilian targeting | 17 | 5 | 61 | 18 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Poltavskyi | UA5308 | Political violence | 16 | 0 | 116 | 17 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Svativskyi | UA4410 | Political violence | 17 | 0 | 284 | 16 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Alchevskyi | UA4402 | Political violence | 18 | 3 | 142 | 16 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Lozivskyi | UA6310 | Civilian targeting | 5 | 4 | 56 | 16 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Bakhchysaraiskyi | UA0102 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 47 | 15 |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Korostenskyi | UA1806 | Political violence | 10 | 3 | 36 | 15 |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Korostenskyi | UA1806 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 3 | 15 | 15 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Simferopolskyi | UA0116 | Political violence | 5 | 2 | 108 | 14 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Bakhmutskyi | UA1402 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 20 | 14 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Kalmiuskyi | UA1410 | Political violence | 10 | 3 | 132 | 13 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Poltavskyi | UA5308 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 23 | 13 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Alchevskyi | UA4402 | Civilian targeting | 9 | 3 | 35 | 12 |
| Ukraine | Kherson | Henicheskyi | UA6504 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 16 | 12 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Simferopolskyi | UA0116 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Koriukivskyi | UA7402 | Political violence | 69 | 0 | 811 | 11 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Luhanskyi | UA4406 | Political violence | 9 | 0 | 96 | 11 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Koriukivskyi | UA7402 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 56 | 11 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Boryspilskyi | UA3204 | Political violence | 23 | 4 | 54 | 11 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Boryspilskyi | UA3204 | Civilian targeting | 8 | 4 | 25 | 11 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Berdianskyi | UA2302 | Political violence | 15 | 1 | 127 | 10 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Svativskyi | UA4410 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 0 | 38 | 10 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Kalmiuskyi | UA1410 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 3 | 25 | 10 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Kamianskyi | UA1204 | Civilian targeting | 5 | 8 | 24 | 10 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Izmailskyi | UA5108 | Political violence | 12 | 1 | 60 | 9 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Prylutskyi | UA7408 | Political violence | 3 | 3 | 43 | 9 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Prylutskyi | UA7408 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 3 | 14 | 9 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Romenskyi | UA5906 | Political violence | 4 | 0 | 88 | 8 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Fastivskyi | UA3214 | Political violence | 24 | 3 | 51 | 8 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Fastivskyi | UA3214 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 3 | 18 | 8 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Izmailskyi | UA5108 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 1 | 17 | 8 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Nizhynskyi | UA7404 | Political violence | 4 | 0 | 79 | 7 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Krasnohradskyi | UA6306 | Political violence | 5 | 0 | 31 | 7 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Lvivskyi | UA4606 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 29 | 7 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Nizhynskyi | UA7404 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 22 | 7 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Romenskyi | UA5906 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 18 | 7 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Kerchenskyi | UA0110 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 47 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Dzhankoiskyi | UA0106 | Political violence | 2 | 0 | 24 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Starobilskyi | UA4414 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 1 | 20 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Voznesenskyi | UA4804 | Political violence | 3 | 2 | 15 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Voznesenskyi | UA4804 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Kerchenskyi | UA0110 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Dzhankoiskyi | UA0106 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Bashtanskyi | UA4802 | Political violence | 8 | 1 | 70 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Vyshhorodskyi | UA3210 | Political violence | 8 | 2 | 47 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi | UA5104 | Political violence | 2 | 2 | 23 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Bashtanskyi | UA4802 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 1 | 15 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Vyshhorodskyi | UA3210 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 2 | 14 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Lvivskyi | UA4606 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi | UA5104 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Dovzhanskyi | UA4404 | Political violence | 11 | 1 | 59 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Rovenkivskyi | UA4408 | Political violence | 9 | 3 | 53 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Cherkaskyi | UA7108 | Political violence | 4 | 0 | 47 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Zhytomyrskyi | UA1804 | Political violence | 12 | 0 | 44 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Luhanskyi | UA4406 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 0 | 22 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Rivnenskyi | UA5606 | Political violence | 8 | 0 | 21 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Kurmanskyi | UA0112 | Political violence | 2 | 0 | 21 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Cherkaskyi | UA7108 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Rovenkivskyi | UA4408 | Civilian targeting | 6 | 3 | 13 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Zolotoniskyi | UA7104 | Political violence | 3 | 0 | 12 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Krasnohradskyi | UA6306 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Zolotoniskyi | UA7104 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Kurmanskyi | UA0112 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Shchastynskyi | UA4416 | Political violence | 5 | 2 | 49 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Obukhivskyi | UA3212 | Political violence | 21 | 2 | 46 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Obukhivskyi | UA3212 | Civilian targeting | 7 | 2 | 15 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Dovzhanskyi | UA4404 | Civilian targeting | 4 | 1 | 10 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Rivnenskyi | UA5606 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 0 | 10 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Luhansk | Shchastynskyi | UA4416 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Perekopskyi | UA0114 | Political violence | 7 | 0 | 50 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Khmelnytskyi | UA6804 | Political violence | 7 | 1 | 23 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Bilotserkivskyi | UA3202 | Political violence | 7 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Berdianskyi | UA2302 | Civilian targeting | 7 | 1 | 18 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ivano-Frankivskyi | UA2604 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 17 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Novomoskovskyi | UA1210 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Lubenskyi | UA5304 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Uzhhorodskyi | UA2110 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Bilotserkivskyi | UA3202 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ivano-Frankivskyi | UA2604 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Uzhhorodskyi | UA2110 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Lubenskyi | UA5304 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Perekopskyi | UA0114 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Berezivskyi | UA5102 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Berezivskyi | UA5102 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Yevpatoriiskyi | UA0108 | Political violence | 15 | 0 | 158 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Myrhorodskyi | UA5306 | Political violence | 7 | 0 | 48 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Kremenchutskyi | UA5302 | Political violence | 8 | 0 | 35 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Vinnytskyi | UA0502 | Political violence | 8 | 0 | 27 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Zhytomyrskyi | UA1804 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Kremenchutskyi | UA5302 | Civilian targeting | 3 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Khmelnytskyi | UA6804 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Shepetivskyi | UA6806 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Vinnytskyi | UA0502 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Haisynskyi | UA0504 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Myrhorodskyi | UA5306 | Civilian targeting | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Shepetivskyi | UA6806 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Yevpatoriiskyi | UA0108 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Chernivtsi | Chernivetskyi | UA7306 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Haisynskyi | UA0504 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Mukachivskyi | UA2104 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Chernivtsi | Chernivetskyi | UA7306 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Kamianets-Podilskyi | UA6802 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Kamianets-Podilskyi | UA6802 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Mukachivskyi | UA2104 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Feodosiiskyi | UA0118 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 76 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Mykolaivskyi | UA4806 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 67 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Kyiv City | Kyiv | UA8000 | Demonstrations | 3 | Not reported | 56 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Cherkaskyi | UA7108 | Demonstrations | 2 | Not reported | 54 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Khmelnytskyi | UA6804 | Demonstrations | 3 | Not reported | 33 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Yaltynskyi | UA0120 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ivano-Frankivskyi | UA2604 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 27 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Uzhhorodskyi | UA2110 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 23 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Lvivskyi | UA4606 | Demonstrations | 1 | Not reported | 21 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Lutskyi | UA0708 | Political violence | 5 | 0 | 19 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Dniprovskyi | UA1202 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 19 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Odeskyi | UA5110 | Demonstrations | 1 | Not reported | 18 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Bilohirskyi | UA0104 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Poltavskyi | UA5308 | Demonstrations | 2 | Not reported | 13 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Kharkiv | Kharkivskyi | UA6312 | Demonstrations | 1 | Not reported | 13 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Umanskyi | UA7106 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Voznesenskyi | UA4804 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 13 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Kovelskyi | UA0706 | Political violence | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Pervomaiskyi | UA4808 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 11 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Zvenyhorodskyi | UA7102 | Political violence | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Vinnytskyi | UA0502 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 11 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Rivnenskyi | UA5606 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 11 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Ternopil | Ternopilskyi | UA6104 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 10 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Zhytomyrskyi | UA1804 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 9 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Lutskyi | UA0708 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 8 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Pervomaiskyi | UA4808 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Kovelskyi | UA0706 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 6 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Zaporizkyi | UA2306 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 5 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Sarnenskyi | UA5608 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Chervonohradskyi | UA4612 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Sumskyi | UA5908 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 5 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Podilskyi | UA5112 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Bolhradskyi | UA5106 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Donetsk | Mariupolskyi | UA1414 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 5 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Kolomyiskyi | UA2608 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 5 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Chernivtsi | Chernivetskyi | UA7306 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 4 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Dubenskyi | UA5604 | Political violence | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Lutskyi | UA0708 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Khustskyi | UA2112 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Chernihiv | Chernihivskyi | UA7410 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 3 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Chernivtsi | Dnistrovskyi | UA7304 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Zvenyhorodskyi | UA7102 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Stryiskyi | UA4610 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Mukachivskyi | UA2104 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 3 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Chervonohradskyi | UA4612 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Mohyliv-Podilskyi | UA0508 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Korostenskyi | UA1806 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Kovelskyi | UA0706 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Varaskyi | UA5602 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Podilskyi | UA5112 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Umanskyi | UA7106 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Umanskyi | UA7106 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Yavorivskyi | UA4614 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Drohobytskyi | UA4602 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Rozdilnianskyi | UA5114 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Stryiskyi | UA4610 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Romenskyi | UA5906 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Ternopil | Chortkivskyi | UA6106 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Nadvirnianskyi | UA2612 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Haisynskyi | UA0504 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 2 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Kolomyiskyi | UA2608 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Yaltynskyi | UA0120 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Yaltynskyi | UA0120 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Sarnenskyi | UA5608 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Sarnenskyi | UA5608 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zakarpattia | Khustskyi | UA2112 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Chervonohradskyi | UA4612 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Tulchynskyi | UA0510 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Vasylivskyi | UA2304 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Shepetivskyi | UA6806 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Bashtanskyi | UA4802 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Mykolaiv | Pervomaiskyi | UA4808 | Civilian targeting | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Simferopolskyi | UA0116 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Rivne | Varaskyi | UA5602 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Volyn | Kamin-Kashyrskyi | UA0704 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Cherkasy | Zolotoniskyi | UA7104 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Zaporizhia | Melitopolskyi | UA2308 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Zolochivskyi | UA4604 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Berezivskyi | UA5102 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Odesa | Izmailskyi | UA5108 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Lviv | Yavorivskyi | UA4614 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Crimea | Feodosiiskyi | UA0118 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Zhytomyr | Berdychivskyi | UA1802 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Nadvirnianskyi | UA2612 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Vinnytsia | Zhmerynskyi | UA0506 | Political violence | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ternopil | Kremenetskyi | UA6102 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Verkhovynskyi | UA2602 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Verkhovynskyi | UA2602 | Civilian targeting | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Khmelnytskyi | Kamianets-Podilskyi | UA6802 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Konotopskyi | UA5902 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Kyiv | Buchanskyi | UA3208 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Poltava | Kremenchutskyi | UA5302 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Kaluskyi | UA2606 | Political violence | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ukraine | Ivano-Frankivsk | Kaluskyi | UA2606 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Dnipropetrovsk | Pavlohradskyi | UA1212 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Sumy | Okhtyrskyi | UA5904 | Demonstrations | 0 | Not reported | 1 | Not reported |
ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. ACLED's district rows and P-codes, summed only over months: one row per district and category with at least one event in the twelve months, most fatalities first. The P-code joins a row to administrative boundaries. The full monthly files are on HDX (links). Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.
E46 Private foundations in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)
About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.
Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped aggregate query (CSV) ↗
| Rank | Foundation | Trend | 2019 (USD m) | 2020 (USD m) | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Reported period total (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard G. Buffett Foundation | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | 62.437 | not reported | 62.437 | |
| 2 | Open Society Foundations | not reported | not reported | 1.455 | 1.196 | 1.551 | not reported | 4.202 | |
| 3 | Arcadia | not reported | not reported | not reported | 1.273 | not reported | not reported | 1.273 | |
| 4 | Omidyar Network Fund, Inc. | 1.250 | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | not reported | 1.250 | |
| 5 | Rockefeller Foundation | not reported | not reported | not reported | 1.199 | not reported | not reported | 1.199 | |
| 6 | John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation | not reported | not reported | not reported | 0.050 | 1.000 | not reported | 1.050 | |
| 7 | LEGO Foundation | not reported | not reported | not reported | 0.707 | 0.055 | not reported | 0.762 |
OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Top ten by sum of available observations. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.
E47 Foundation projects in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)
About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.
Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped project query (CSV) ↗
| Foundation | Project | Reported project ID | Recipient | Years | Disbursed (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Izyum Police Precinct Construction | 2023000060 | Ukraine | 2023 | 16.000 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Ukraine Modular Bridges | 2023000059 | Ukraine | 2023 | 9.218 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | National Police of Ukraine Kyiv Regional Police K9 Center | 2023000067 | Ukraine | 2023 | 6.268 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Construction of Borodianka Police Station | 2023000066 | Ukraine | 2023 | 5.304 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | DNA Identification Equipment and Capacity Building | 2023000053 | Ukraine | 2023 | 4.347 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Advancing Economic Recovery in Ukraine | 2023000077 | Ukraine | 2023 | 3.534 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Fire Trucks and Equipment | 2023000073 | Ukraine | 2023 | 3.533 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | General Operating Support | 2023000040 | Ukraine | 2023 | 2.886 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Canines and Vehicles | 2023000065 | Ukraine | 2023 | 2.548 |
| Howard G. Buffett Foundation | Canines, Vehicles and Equipment | 2023000083 | Ukraine | 2023 | 2.548 |
OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients UKR; DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ten largest returned titled project records, grouped by reported ID, title and recipient. Not a complete activity inventory; reporting IDs/titles can change between years. Project values are a drilldown, not additional to the foundation totals. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.
E48 Current activities reported to IATI: who is active now, and through whom · IATI Datastore (activities as published by each organisation)
About this source: The International Aid Transparency Initiative: an open standard under which donors, UN agencies and NGOs publish their own activity data, often more up to date than the OECD's. Completeness and quality depend on each publisher.
Trace this: EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) III 2024-2027 (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · The EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) in Ukraine Phase I (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · Globale stemmer i danske klasselokaler (CISU Civil Society in Development) ↗
| Country | Publisher | Activity | Implementing organisations | Start | Planned end | Last updated | IATI identifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark | EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) III 2024-2027 | Not stated | 2023-12-01 | 2027-12-31 | 2026-10-13 | XM-DAC-3-1-288593-36677 |
| Ukraine | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark | The EU Anti-Corruption Initiative (EUACI) in Ukraine Phase III | Not stated | 2023-12-01 | 2027-12-31 | 2026-10-13 | XM-DAC-3-1-288593-36684 |
| Ukraine | CISU Civil Society in Development | Globale stemmer i danske klasselokaler | Dar Media Production; Flygtningebørn.dk; Fundacja ReFOCUS Media Labs | 2025-09-01 | 2027-08-31 | 2026-10-12 | DK-CVR-19348407-25-6429-OpEn-OE |
| Ukraine | United Nations Development Programme | Strengthening evidencebased planning for recovery UKR | Not stated | 2022-11-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-10-12 | XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00146644 |
| Ukraine | United Nations Development Programme | Empowered Partnership for Sustainable Recovery | UNDP | 2022-12-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-10-12 | XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-00147041 |
| Ukraine | Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) | Recovery for All project | Not stated | 2025-02-21 | 2031-03-31 | 2026-10-12 | CA-3-P013543001 |
| Ukraine | Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) | Renewed Women's Voice and Leadership - in Crisis and Conflict-affected Contexts | Not stated | 2025-01-16 | 2030-03-31 | 2026-10-12 | CA-3-P013656001 |
| Ukraine | Sweden | Earmarked support UN Women 2026-2028 | Not stated | 2026-01-01 | 2029-06-30 | 2026-10-09 | SE-0-SE-2-92405 |
| Ukraine | Sweden | Additional support IDEA 2026 for Ukraine | Not stated | 2026-01-01 | 2027-06-30 | 2026-10-09 | SE-0-SE-2-92511 |
IATI Datastore, activities in implementation (status 2) in Ukraine, DAC sectors 151, 210, 232, 240, 250, 321; most recently updated first, at most two per publisher; activities whose planned end has passed or that have no end date and started over five years ago are left out; retrieved 2026-10-14. Published by each organisation to the IATI Standard, usually more current than the OECD but uneven: coverage depends on who publishes, and the same work can be reported by both funder and implementer. Leads to check, not a complete list; amounts are not shown or totalled here and must not be added to OECD or OCHA figures.
E49 World Bank projects: pipeline and active · World Bank Projects API (active and pipeline projects)
About this source: The World Bank's own database of the projects it finances, with approved amounts, dates and status, including projects still in preparation.
Trace this: SupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) (P513816) ↗ · Strengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and Reform (P514828) ↗ · Strengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in Ukraine (P506719) ↗ · World Bank projects and operations ↗
| Country | Project | Project ID | Status | Board approval | Commitment (USD m) | Major sectors | Closing date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | SupTech Implementation for National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) | P513816 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-08-31 | 1.5 | Financial Sector; Digital Development | 2028-06-29 |
| Ukraine | Strengthening Ukraine’s Statistical Systems for Recovery and Reform | P514828 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-09-07 | 5.0 | Public Administration; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Digital Development; Social Protection; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry | 2029-12-31 |
| Ukraine | Strengthening the Capacity of the State Agrarian Register in Ukraine | P506719 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-10-16 | 4.5 | Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services; Financial Sector; Social Sustainability and Inclusion | 2029-01-31 |
| Ukraine | Youth Empowerment Support in Ukraine Project | P505079 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-11-30 | 2.8 | Social Protection; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Education; Public Administration | 2030-10-02 |
| Ukraine | Renewable Acceleration and Market Development for Ukraine Project | P515275 | Pipeline | Planned 2026-12-21 | 320.0 | Energy and Mineral Resources | 2030-12-31 |
| Ukraine | Supporting Reconstruction through Smart Fiscal Governance (SURGE) | P516223 | Active | 2026-06-26 | 584.2 | Public Administration | Not reported |
| Ukraine | First Ukraine Jobs and Private Sector Growth DPO | P510090 | Active | 2026-06-22 | 3,390.0 | Public Administration; Financial Sector; Energy and Mineral Resources; Social Protection; Industry, Trade and Services | 2027-11-30 |
| Ukraine | Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Enterprise Program for Results | P516254 | Active | 2026-05-22 | 390.0 | Financial Sector; Industry, Trade and Services | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Public Expenditures for Administrative Capacity Endurance (PEACE) in Ukraine | P515704 | Active | 2026-05-11 | 271.4 | Public Administration; Health; Social Protection | Not reported |
| Ukraine | Strengthening Government Capacity for Fiscal Reform Implementation | P513305 | Active | 2026-05-01 | 30.0 | Public Administration; Digital Development | Not reported |
World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-10-14. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.
E50 People in need of humanitarian assistance (OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)
About this source: The yearly humanitarian needs overviews agreed by UN agencies and partners in each crisis, with the official number of people in need. They are the basis of humanitarian appeals.
Trace this: Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2025, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2024, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2026, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗
| Country | Sector | People in need | People targeted | Plan period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | All sectors (intersectoral) | 10,849,697 | 4,118,954 | 2026 |
| Ukraine | Protection | 6,536,132 | 2,031,916 | 2026 |
| Ukraine | Child protection | 2,477,741 | 1,271,100 | 2026 |
| Ukraine | Gender-based violence | 2,909,499 | 548,350 | 2026 |
| Ukraine | Mine action | 5,435,923 | 1,424,456 | 2025 |
OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle (Humanitarian Needs Overview), national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest plan period per country and sector; retrieved 2026-10-14. The intersectoral figure counts each person once across all sectors; sector figures overlap and must not be added together, or to the intersectoral figure. Targeted is the part of the need the response plan aims to reach. Figures are planning estimates. Each row is its sector's latest overview, so the plan period can differ between rows.
E51 Displacement: people hosted at the end of 2025 (UNHCR year-end count, not a current figure) · UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics
About this source: UNHCR's official statistics on refugees and other forcibly displaced people, compiled from governments and its own operations; the global reference for refugee numbers.
Trace this: UNHCR population API: hosted in UKR, 2025 ↗ · UNHCR Refugee Data Finder ↗
| Country | End of year | Refugees hosted | Asylum seekers | Internally displaced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 2025 | 2,370 | 443 | 3,712,000 |
UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics API, end-year figures by country of asylum; retrieved 2026-10-14. Internally displaced counts cover people UNHCR protects or assists and may be zero where it does not report them.
E52 Economic outlook (IMF World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor) · IMF World Economic Outlook
About this source: The IMF's twice-yearly economic figures and forecasts for its member countries, the standard reference for growth, inflation and public debt; revenue comes from its Fiscal Monitor. Forecasts are revised as conditions change.
Trace this: IMF WEO DataMapper: real GDP growth ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: inflation ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: government debt ↗
| Country | Measure | 2025 | 2026 (projection) | 2027 (projection) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Real GDP growth (%) | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.5 |
| Ukraine | Inflation, average consumer prices (%) | 12.7 | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ukraine | Government gross debt (% of GDP) | 107.1 | 111.8 | 110.3 |
| Ukraine | Government revenue including grants (% of GDP) | 56.6 | 66.5 | 63.1 |
IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2026) (growth, inflation, debt) and Fiscal Monitor (October 2026) (revenue) via the DataMapper API; retrieved 2026-10-14. 2026 and 2027 are IMF projections and are revised twice a year.
E53 External debt and public debt service (World Bank International Debt Statistics) · World Bank International Debt Statistics
About this source: The World Bank's official statistics on low- and middle-income countries' external debt and debt payments, reported by the borrowing countries.
Trace this: World Bank International Debt Statistics ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (USD m) ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (% of GNI) ↗ · World Bank data: Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) ↗
| Country | Measure | Trend | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | External debt stocks (USD m) | 133,405.5 | 136,907.6 | 143,390.6 | 178,988.9 | 193,492.5 | |
| Ukraine | External debt stocks (% of GNI) | 83.4 | 70.6 | 84.1 | 96.1 | 101.3 | |
| Ukraine | Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) | 6,879.5 | 5,066.0 | 2,326.3 | 1,848.6 | 3,611.4 |
World Bank International Debt Statistics via the World Bank API (DT.DOD.DECT.CD, DT.DOD.DECT.GN.ZS, DT.TDS.DPPG.CD), current USD; retrieved 2026-10-14. Debt stocks are all external debt outstanding at year end (public, publicly guaranteed and private non-guaranteed, including IMF credit). Debt service is principal and interest actually paid on public and publicly guaranteed external debt in the year. The World Bank publishes the statistics once a year, in December.
E54 Who funds climate action here: climate-related development finance by provider (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)
About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.
Trace this: OECD: development finance for climate and the environment ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2022.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2023.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗
| Country | Rank | Provider | Provider type | Trend | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | DAC member | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1,634.3 | 25% | |
| Ukraine | 2 | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | Multilateral development bank | 104.6 | 0.0 | 1,213.0 | 20% | |
| Ukraine | 3 | European Bank for Reconstruction and Development | Multilateral development bank | 194.9 | 239.0 | 595.0 | 16% | |
| Ukraine | 4 | Germany | DAC member | 189.1 | 255.5 | 235.7 | 11% | |
| Ukraine | 5 | International Development Association | Multilateral development bank | 0.0 | 0.0 | 325.5 | 5% | |
| Ukraine | 6 | Netherlands | DAC member | 75.7 | 138.1 | 32.0 | 4% | |
| Ukraine | 7 | Norway | DAC member | 3.1 | 12.9 | 166.3 | 3% | |
| Ukraine | 8 | United States | DAC member | 35.8 | 56.0 | 62.5 | 2% | |
| Ukraine | 9 | Korea | DAC member | 0.1 | 1.0 | 144.0 | 2% | |
| Ukraine | 10 | United Kingdom | DAC member | 0.0 | 40.1 | 90.2 | 2% | |
| Ukraine | All providers | 684.7 | 955.0 | 4,800.4 | 100% | |||
| Ukraine | All providers: adaptation (includes overlap) | 114.9 | 285.6 | 629.9 | ||||
| Ukraine | All providers: mitigation (includes overlap) | 595.4 | 855.4 | 4,285.4 | ||||
| Ukraine | All providers: principal objective or climate component only | 368.7 | 480.0 | 2,406.4 |
OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2022–2024: commitments in current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. Commitments, not disbursements. Bilateral activities count at full value when climate is a principal or significant objective (OECD Rio markers), so the totals are an upper bound; multilateral development banks report only each project's climate component. The 'principal objective or climate component only' row is the stricter measure. Adaptation and mitigation overlap where an activity targets both, so they do not add up to the total. Ukraine: USD 684.7m in 2022 → USD 4,800.4m in 2024 (+601%); peak USD 4,800.4m in 2024.
E55 Largest climate-related commitments in 2024 (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)
About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.
Trace this: OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗
| Country | Provider | Project | Purpose | Climate objective | Instrument | USD m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | PROVISIONING UKRAINE GUARANTEE 2024 | Transport policy and administrative management; Health policy and administrative management and 7 more | Significant | Standard grant | 885.8 |
| Ukraine | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | BLENDING 2024 | Transport policy and administrative management; Health policy and administrative management and 7 more | Significant | Standard grant | 570.0 |
| Ukraine | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | SECOND GROWTH FOUNDATIONS DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATION | Public Procurement; Domestic revenue mobilisation and 3 more | Climate Components | Standard loan | 451.9 |
| Ukraine | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | GROWTH FOUNDATIONS DPO | Public Procurement; Domestic revenue mobilisation and 5 more | Climate Components | Standard loan | 333.4 |
| Ukraine | Norway | (untitled) | Energy policy and administrative management; Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency and 4 more | Significant, Principal | Standard grant | 166.3 |
| Ukraine | International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | SUPPORTING RECONSTRUCTION THROUGH SMART FISCAL GOVERNANCE (SURGE) | Public sector policy and administrative management; Decentralisation and support to subnational government | Climate Components | Standard loan | 165.7 |
| Ukraine | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | TECHNICAL COOPERATION FACILITY (TCF) 2024 | Communications policy and administrative management; Employment creation and 5 more | Significant | Standard grant | 154.1 |
| Ukraine | Korea | (untitled) | Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency; Rail transport and 1 more | Significant | Standard grant, Standard loan | 144.0 |
OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2024; climate-related amount of each commitment, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. The climate-related amount of each activity as the OECD counts it (the whole activity when climate is a Rio-marked objective; the climate component for multilateral development banks). Titles as reported by the provider.
E56 Human development, poverty and displacement (UNDP, IOM) · UNDP Human Development Report Office and IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix
About this source: UNDP's Human Development Index combines health, education and income into one measure and is the best-known summary of human development; IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix counts people displaced within their own country in crises.
Trace this: UNDP Human Development Report: data center ↗ · UNDP country data and charts: Ukraine ↗ · UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index: downloads ↗
| Country | Measure | Value | Year | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Human Development Index (0-1) | 0.779 | 2023 | |
| Ukraine | HDI rank | 87 | 2023 | |
| Ukraine | Inequality-adjusted HDI (0-1) | 0.715 | 2023 | |
| Ukraine | Human development lost to inequality (%) | 8.2% | 2023 |
UNDP Human Development Report, composite indices time series; UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index; latest year per measure; retrieved 2026-10-14. The HDI combines life expectancy, schooling and income per person; the inequality-adjusted HDI discounts it for how unequally these are shared. Multidimensional poverty counts people deprived in several of health, education and living standards at once, from the household survey named in the year column. Displacement counts are IOM's latest national round and are shown only where IOM reports one; check the year before comparing. Ukraine HDI: 0.789 in 2013 → 0.779 in 2023 (-1%); peak 0.789 in 2013.
E57 Recent disaster alerts (GDACS, 2025-10-14 to 2026-10-14) · GDACS (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre)
About this source: A UN and European Commission alert system that estimates within hours how serious an earthquake, cyclone, flood or drought may be for people. Alerts are model estimates to guide international response, not damage assessments.
Trace this: GDACS alert archive ↗
| Country | Hazard | Alerts | Highest alert level | Date of highest alert | Latest alert (any level) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Flood | 7 | Green | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-23 |
| Ukraine | Drought | 1 | Orange | 2025-12-21 | 2025-12-21 |
| Ukraine | Earthquake | 1 | Green | 2026-02-02 | 2026-02-02 |
Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre), automatic near-real-time alerts; retrieved 2026-10-14. Colours estimate the need for international humanitarian assistance: Green = unlikely (local impact can still be significant), Orange = possible, Red = likely; one disaster can raise several alerts. Country attribution uses affected-country ISO3; window applies to event start date, not last update. Counts are returned records, not unique disasters; regional records may appear for multiple countries. Map shows only valid coordinates in the displayed frame. Ukraine orange/red alerts: Drought in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belgium, Belarus, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, Croatia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Russia, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, San Marino, Ukraine, (Orange, 2025-12-21).
E58 Governance and investment climate · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators
About this source: The World Bank's composite measures of governance, built from surveys and expert assessments. They are widely used to compare countries, but they measure perceptions and come with margins of error.
Trace this: Worldwide Governance Indicators in the World Bank DataBank ↗ · WDI FDI net inflows (% of GDP) (BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS) ↗
| Country | Measure | Score | Year | Score 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Control of corruption | 34 | 2025 | 32 |
| Ukraine | Political stability and absence of violence | 60 | 2025 | 47 |
| Ukraine | Regulatory quality | 51 | 2025 | 51 |
| Ukraine | Government effectiveness | 40 | 2025 | 44 |
| Ukraine | Rule of law | 46 | 2025 | 49 |
| Ukraine | Voice and accountability | 56 | 2025 | 60 |
| Ukraine | FDI net inflows (% of GDP) | 0.8 | 2025 |
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI; retrieved 2026-10-14. WGI uses an absolute 0-100 scale anchored to fixed reference points, not percentile ranks. Perception-based estimates have uncertainty; small differences should not be overinterpreted.
E59 Country indicators — Ukraine · World Bank World Development Indicators
About this source: The World Bank's main collection of development statistics on poverty, health, education and the economy, compiled from national and international sources. It is the common reference for country indicators; the latest years are often missing.
Trace this: Population (SP.POP.TOTL) ↗ · GDP per capita (current US$) (NY.GDP.PCAP.CD) ↗ · Access to electricity (% of population) (EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS) ↗ · Total greenhouse gas emissions excl. land use (Mt CO2e) (EN.GHG.ALL.MT.CE.AR5) ↗
| Indicator | Value | Year | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,980,376 | 2025 | |
| GDP per capita (current US$) | 5,866 | 2025 | |
| Access to electricity (% of population) | 100.0 | 2024 | |
| Total greenhouse gas emissions excl. land use (Mt CO2e) | 197.0 | 2024 |
World Bank World Development Indicators, most recent value; retrieved 2026-10-14. Most recent non-empty year differs by indicator. Trend lines cover the reported years of the last ten.
E60 Need against funding at a glance (computed) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Country | Measure | Value | Detail | Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Humanitarian appeal funded | 76% → 63% | 2024 → 2025 | E34 |
Computed by the app from the cards named in the last column. Each figure is taken from the named card; changes are computed from the card's own figures.
E61 Need against funding by cluster, 2025 (computed from cards E35, E50, E34) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Country | Cluster | People in need, 2025 | Change from 2024 | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage | Against the whole appeal | Funded per person in need (USD) | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | Food Security | 5.00 m | -31% | 613.4 | 190.9 | 31% | -32 points | 38 | Underfunded |
| Ukraine | Emergency Shelter and NFI | 6.88 m | -13% | 544.6 | 196.8 | 36% | -27 points | 29 | Underfunded |
| Ukraine | Water Sanitation Hygiene | 8.52 m | -11% | 365.3 | 135.3 | 37% | -26 points | 16 | Underfunded |
| Ukraine | Protection - Child Protection | 3.47 m | +9% | 128.9 | 51.9 | 40% | -23 points | 15 | Underfunded, gap widening |
| Ukraine | Multipurpose Cash | No need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector) | n/a | 410.2 | 180.8 | 44% | -19 points | n/a | Underfunded |
| Ukraine | Health | 9.21 m | +18% | 130.9 | 138.4 | 106% | +43 points | 15 | Half funded or more |
| Ukraine | Protection | 9.53 m | -14% | 171.9 | 205.6 | 120% | +57 points | 22 | Half funded or more |
| Ukraine | Protection - Mine Action | 5.44 m | -19% | 86.5 | 112.8 | 130% | +67 points | 21 | Half funded or more |
Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E50). Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.
E62 How exposed the money is: donor concentration and cuts (computed from cards E25, E39) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Donor or measure | Aid in this scope, 2024 (USD m) | Share | Change in the donor's total aid, 2024→2025 | Exposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 8,364.5 | 88% | -56% | Yes |
| EU Institutions | 622.8 | 7% | +48% | No |
| Japan | 222.0 | 2% | -11% | Yes |
| Germany | 100.1 | 1% | -16% | Yes |
| Sweden | 55.7 | 1% | +19% | No |
| Switzerland | 51.9 | 1% | -1% | No |
| United Kingdom | 26.4 | 0% | +1% | No |
| Norway | 20.2 | 0% | +5% | No |
| Canada | 16.8 | 0% | +20% | No |
| Poland | 16.1 | 0% | -12% | Yes |
| France | 2.9 | 0% | -8% | No |
| Largest donor's share | 88% | |||
| Three largest donors' share | 96% | |||
| Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) | 8,702.7 | 91% | ||
| Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly | 4,691.8 | 49% |
Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 9,558.5m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E39). Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.
How this brief was made
Scoped as: A concise, evidence-based map of Ukraine’s reconstruction financing landscape—separating public aid, private finance, and investment prospects—and the institutional counterparts and operational risks to investigate before a scoping visit, without recommending asset or securities purchases.
- Interpreted “reconstruction and economic development” as cross-sector recovery finance, infrastructure and energy restoration, and private-sector development.
Data path: Norwegian aid data (bistandsresultater.no), cleaned and reconciled → exact totals and search by meaning over 20k agreement descriptions. Live: OECD CRS (all donors), World Bank WDI, web search.
Timings (s): inform 0.0, governance 0.0, outlook 0.0, severity 0.0, access 0.0, food_prices 0.0, rainfall 0.0, debt_risk 0.0, climate_finance 0.0, education 0.0, us_aid 0.09, external_debt 0.11, imputed_multilateral 0.15, refugees 0.29, disasters 0.32, iati 0.36, private_finance 0.62, bank_projects 0.69, presence 0.76, conflict 1.08, semantic_search 1.15, needs 1.11, portfolio 1.24, humanitarian 1.67, human_development 1.62, philanthropy 1.89, oecd_projects 5.66, cerf 6.09, indicators 8.09, oecd 8.94, oecd_totals 8.94, cbpf 13.66, plan 5.41, web 20.95, web_compare 6.78, compose 57.19, total 83.12.
Trace checks: 0 items to check, listed under Before you use this brief.
Draft for review. Figures come from the evidence cards; highlighted figures could not be traced automatically. Web research is a lead, not verified evidence.