Humanitarian · prepared forProgramme director at Riverbend Relief Fund (synthetic)

Demonstration prototype. Figures and text are generated automatically from open data and AI models and may contain errors or be out of date: quality-assure against the linked sources before using anything in a decision.

Example brief. Made on the live service for a humanitarian ngo (a made-up organisation; real data, as of the day it was made). Reviewed example: read against its cited evidence after generation; no changes needed.See the other examples →

South Sudan: fund delivery continuity, not a single modality

South Sudanhumanitarian food assistance and nutrition67 evidence cards29 sources consulted39 figures traced to their cardsmade in 1 min 14 s＋ Keep watching this

South Sudan’s humanitarian access constraints were rated Extreme in October 2026, while both tracked crises were worsening in the September severity assessment; the supplied access data does not establish how access itself has changed over time. E43E44 Humanitarian appeal coverage fell from 72% in 2024 to 46% in 2025, with the 2026 appeal 36% funded so far. E34 US disbursements to South Sudan in the broad food-assistance, emergency-response and basic-health scope fell from USD 640.2 million in FY2024 to USD 385.3 million in FY2025. E41 Riverbend should prioritise flexible grants to verified national partners, pairing food assistance with nutrition services and allowing switches between cash and in-kind delivery after local market and access checks.

Crisis severity (all crisis types, incl. conflict) and natural-hazard alerts

Retrieved 14 Oct 2026 · ACAPS crisis severity: September 2026 · ACAPS access: Oct 2026 · GDACS alerts: 14 Oct 2025 – 14 Oct 2026

South Sudan: ACAPS severity 9.5 of 10, Complex crisis in South Sudan (very high, ACAPS)Flood: Flood in South Sudan (Green, 2026-08-15)Drought: Drought in Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, Cameroon, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, South Sudan, Chad (Orange, 2026-06-21)

Dots: 2 GDACS alert records plotted in this frame (tap or hover for details); a geographic subset of the evidence card, not an exhaustive disaster count. See the card for the recorded event-start window. Their colour is GDACS's estimate of the need for international humanitarian assistance, not of local severity E62. Outlines: Natural Earth.

Crises tracked by ACAPS E43 E44 · severity 1 to 10, higher is more severe; access constraints 0 to 5, 5 is extreme

Where conflict is reported, by district

Period · Twelve months to Sep 2026

Juba (SS0101): 172 reported fatalities, 80 eventsKajo-keji (SS0102): 14 reported fatalities, 7 eventsLainya (SS0103): 23 reported fatalities, 13 eventsMorobo (SS0104): 43 reported fatalities, 31 eventsTerekeka (SS0105): 28 reported fatalities, 3 eventsYei (SS0106): 35 reported fatalities, 45 eventsBudi (SS0201): 44 reported fatalities, 18 eventsIkotos (SS0202): 3 reported fatalities, 2 eventsKapoeta East (SS0203): 37 reported fatalities, 25 eventsKapoeta North (SS0204): 6 reported fatalities, 6 eventsKapoeta South (SS0205): 9 reported fatalities, 4 eventsLafon (SS0206): 13 reported fatalities, 13 eventsMagwi (SS0207): 10 reported fatalities, 9 eventsTorit (SS0208): 52 reported fatalities, 49 eventsAkobo (SS0301): 204 reported fatalities, 49 eventsAyod (SS0302): 86 reported fatalities, 17 eventsBor South (SS0303): 51 reported fatalities, 39 eventsCanal/Pigi (SS0304): 44 reported fatalities, 18 eventsDuk (SS0305): 128 reported fatalities, 27 eventsFangak (SS0306): 2 reported fatalities, 6 eventsNyirol (SS0307): 124 reported fatalities, 48 eventsPibor (SS0308): 180 reported fatalities, 50 eventsPochalla (SS0309): 8 reported fatalities, 7 eventsTwic East (SS0310): 58 reported fatalities, 23 eventsUror (SS0311): 161 reported fatalities, 44 eventsAwerial (SS0401): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsCueibet (SS0402): 63 reported fatalities, 24 eventsRumbek Centre (SS0403): 33 reported fatalities, 20 eventsRumbek East (SS0404): 12 reported fatalities, 11 eventsRumbek North (SS0405): 55 reported fatalities, 26 eventsWulu (SS0406): 2 reported fatalities, 2 eventsYirol East (SS0407): 14 reported fatalities, 6 eventsYirol West (SS0408): 8 reported fatalities, 3 eventsAweil Centre (SS0501): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsAweil East (SS0502): 6 reported fatalities, 2 eventsAweil North (SS0503): no political violence reportedAweil South (SS0504): no political violence reportedAweil West (SS0505): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsAbiemnhom (SS0601): 218 reported fatalities, 6 eventsGuit (SS0602): 11 reported fatalities, 8 eventsKoch (SS0603): 8 reported fatalities, 5 eventsLeer (SS0604): 7 reported fatalities, 5 eventsMayendit (SS0605): 6 reported fatalities, 4 eventsMayom (SS0606): 80 reported fatalities, 46 eventsPanyijiar (SS0607): 46 reported fatalities, 15 eventsPariang: not matched to ACLED's districtsRubkona (SS0609): 54 reported fatalities, 28 eventsBaliet (SS0701): 276 reported fatalities, 11 eventsFashoda (SS0702): 1 reported fatalities, 1 eventsLongochuk: not matched to ACLED's districtsLuakpiny/Nasir (SS0704): 46 reported fatalities, 29 eventsMaban (SS0705): 4 reported fatalities, 6 eventsMaiwut (SS0706): 0 reported fatalities, 1 eventsMalakal (SS0707): 8 reported fatalities, 15 eventsManyo (SS0708): 1 reported fatalities, 2 eventsMelut (SS0709): no political violence reportedPanyikang (SS0710): 25 reported fatalities, 10 eventsRenk (SS0711): 1 reported fatalities, 1 eventsUlang (SS0712): 99 reported fatalities, 30 eventsGogrial East (SS0801): 68 reported fatalities, 18 eventsGogrial West (SS0802): 5 reported fatalities, 3 eventsTonj East (SS0803): 153 reported fatalities, 46 eventsTonj North (SS0804): 270 reported fatalities, 40 eventsTonj South (SS0805): 58 reported fatalities, 18 eventsTwic (SS0806): 23 reported fatalities, 14 eventsAbyei: not matched to ACLED's districtsJur River (SS0901): 52 reported fatalities, 13 eventsRaja (SS0902): 4 reported fatalities, 3 eventsWau (SS0903): 18 reported fatalities, 18 eventsEzo (SS1001): 1 reported fatalities, 5 eventsIbba (SS1002): 1 reported fatalities, 1 eventsMaridi (SS1003): 0 reported fatalities, 2 eventsMundri East (SS1004): 46 reported fatalities, 31 eventsMundri West (SS1005): 7 reported fatalities, 8 eventsMvolo (SS1006): 11 reported fatalities, 4 eventsNagero (SS1007): 8 reported fatalities, 8 eventsNzara: not matched to ACLED's districtsTambura (SS1009): 15 reported fatalities, 15 eventsYambio (SS1010): 34 reported fatalities, 19 eventsSouth Sudan
  • 1–2433districts
  • 25–9924districts
  • 100–2498districts
  • 250–4992districts
  • 500+0districts
  • None8districts, no fatalities reported
  • No match4boundary not matched to ACLED
Reported fatalities from political violence per district, twelve months to Sep 2026, from ACLED's district rows E46. Tap or hover a district for its figures. Boundaries: South Sudan - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 75 of 78 ACLED districts matched by code and name).

Rainfall against the usual, by region

Period · Three months to 30 Sep 2026

Older than usual. Newest available: 30 Sep 2026, about 2 months old. CHIRPS rainfall (WFP) usually covers the last few weeks; the publisher has released nothing newer yet.

Central Equatoria (SS01): 74% of average, 330 mm against 448 mm over three monthsEastern Equatoria (SS02): 61% of average, 205 mm against 338 mm over three monthsJonglei (SS03): 76% of average, 350 mm against 459 mm over three monthsLakes (SS04): 73% of average, 343 mm against 472 mm over three monthsNorthern Bahr el Ghazal (SS05): 86% of average, 471 mm against 550 mm over three monthsUnity (SS06): 75% of average, 383 mm against 514 mm over three monthsUpper Nile (SS07): 83% of average, 362 mm against 436 mm over three monthsWarrap (SS08): 78% of average, 406 mm against 523 mm over three monthsWestern Bahr el Ghazal (SS09): 87% of average, 557 mm against 644 mm over three monthsWestern Equatoria (SS10): 79% of average, 437 mm against 553 mm over three monthsSouth Sudan
  • Under 60%0regions
  • 60–85%8regions
  • 85–115%2regions
  • 115–140%0regions
  • Over 140%0regions
Rainfall over the three months to 30 Sep 2026 as a share of the 1989–2018 average for the same months, from WFP's regional figures E55. Brown is drier than usual, blue wetter. Tap or hover a region for its figures. Only regions whose name and boundary were confirmed against WFP's data are drawn. Boundaries: OCHA common operational boundaries (COD-AB), current and earlier editions (CC BY-IGO; 10 of 10 regions drawn).

Food insecurity by district

Analysis period · South Sudan: IPC, Sep–Nov 2025

Juba (SS0101): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 325,538 of 651,079 people analysedKajo-keji (SS0102): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 111,543 of 247,876 people analysedLainya (SS0103): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 54,470 of 121,047 people analysedMorobo (SS0104): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 55,498 of 123,332 people analysedTerekeka (SS0105): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 123,616 of 274,704 people analysedYei (SS0106): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 80,618 of 322,475 people analysedBudi (SS0201): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 39,440 of 112,688 people analysedIkotos (SS0202): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 17,043 of 113,622 people analysedKapoeta East (SS0203): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 73,444 of 183,613 people analysedKapoeta North (SS0204): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 66,813 of 167,037 people analysedKapoeta South (SS0205): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 35,332 of 117,777 people analysedLafon (SS0206): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 75,205 of 167,125 people analysedMagwi (SS0207): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 42,397 of 282,656 people analysedTorit (SS0208): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 22,154 of 73,850 people analysedAkobo (SS0301): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 134,611 of 244,749 people analysedAyod (SS0302): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 93,244 of 207,210 people analysedBor South (SS0303): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 54,543 of 363,622 people analysedCanal/Pigi (SS0304): 70% in Phase 3 or worse, 79,190 of 113,129 people analysedDuk (SS0305): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 84,741 of 211,856 people analysedFangak (SS0306): 80% in Phase 3 or worse, 181,955 of 227,445 people analysedNyirol (SS0307): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 83,261 of 151,386 people analysedPibor (SS0308): 70% in Phase 3 or worse, 169,630 of 242,329 people analysedPochalla (SS0309): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 42,371 of 84,745 people analysedTwic East (SS0310): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 66,263 of 132,529 people analysedUror (SS0311): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 114,596 of 208,359 people analysedAwerial (SS0401): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 59,396 of 148,492 people analysedCueibet (SS0402): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 29,239 of 194,933 people analysedRumbek Centre (SS0403): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 114,723 of 229,448 people analysedRumbek East (SS0404): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 83,542 of 185,651 people analysedRumbek North (SS0405): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 30,940 of 77,350 people analysedWulu (SS0406): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 14,204 of 94,695 people analysedYirol East (SS0407): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 85,416 of 170,834 people analysedYirol West (SS0408): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 64,931 of 185,519 people analysedAweil Centre (SS0501): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 42,662 of 94,808 people analysedAweil East (SS0502): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 209,246 of 418,494 people analysedAweil North (SS0503): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 102,990 of 205,981 people analysedAweil South (SS0504): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 85,566 of 155,576 people analysedAweil West (SS0505): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 103,036 of 228,970 people analysedAbiemnhom (SS0601): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 24,481 of 61,203 people analysedGuit (SS0602): 60% in Phase 3 or worse, 45,716 of 76,195 people analysedKoch (SS0603): 60% in Phase 3 or worse, 64,286 of 107,144 people analysedLeer (SS0604): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 42,976 of 85,953 people analysedMayendit (SS0605): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 34,310 of 76,247 people analysedMayom (SS0606): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 87,847 of 175,695 people analysedPanyijiar (SS0607): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 64,086 of 128,173 people analysedPariang (SS0608): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 56,776 of 141,940 people analysedRubkona (SS0609): 60% in Phase 3 or worse, 248,520 of 414,201 people analysedBaliet (SS0701): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 20,032 of 36,424 people analysedFashoda (SS0702): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 41,561 of 103,905 people analysedLongochuk (SS0703): 65% in Phase 3 or worse, 51,935 of 79,902 people analysedLuakpiny/Nasir (SS0704): 70% in Phase 3 or worse, 230,768 of 329,670 people analysedMaban (SS0705): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 53,628 of 107,258 people analysedMaiwut (SS0706): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 50,120 of 143,201 people analysedMalakal (SS0707): 65% in Phase 3 or worse, 182,923 of 281,421 people analysedManyo (SS0708): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 64,527 of 117,324 people analysedMelut (SS0709): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 72,862 of 145,727 people analysedPanyikang (SS0710): 60% in Phase 3 or worse, 44,194 of 73,658 people analysedRenk (SS0711): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 345,361 of 627,930 people analysedUlang (SS0712): 65% in Phase 3 or worse, 99,521 of 153,111 people analysedGogrial East (SS0801): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 42,086 of 140,289 people analysedGogrial West (SS0802): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 105,668 of 352,231 people analysedTonj East (SS0803): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 88,533 of 196,740 people analysedTonj North (SS0804): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 98,154 of 280,443 people analysedTonj South (SS0805): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 32,008 of 128,038 people analysedTwic (SS0806): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 106,446 of 304,133 people analysedAbyei: not in this analysis, or not matchedJur River (SS0901): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 45,233 of 301,556 people analysedRaja (SS0902): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 29,653 of 84,724 people analysedWau: not in this analysis, or not matchedEzo (SS1001): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 14,109 of 141,097 people analysedIbba (SS1002): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 7,060 of 70,600 people analysedMaridi (SS1003): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 17,588 of 117,256 people analysedMundri East (SS1004): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 21,276 of 106,382 people analysedMundri West (SS1005): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 10,558 of 52,794 people analysedMvolo (SS1006): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 27,979 of 79,941 people analysedNagero (SS1007): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 25,363 of 63,411 people analysedNzara (SS1008): 5% in Phase 3 or worse, 4,443 of 88,870 people analysedTambura (SS1009): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 37,981 of 126,606 people analysedYambio (SS1010): 5% in Phase 3 or worse, 8,960 of 179,216 people analysedSouth Sudan
  • Under 10%2districts
  • 10–19%9districts
  • 20–29%4districts
  • 30–39%12districts
  • 40–49%20districts
  • 50% or more30districts
  • Not analysed2districts, or not matched; not zero need
Share of each district's analysed population in Phase 3 (Crisis) or worse, from the latest current analysis E53; where an analysis splits a district (rural, urban, displaced people), its groups are added up. This is the population share, not the IPC area classification, and it describes the analysis period, not today. Drawn only where the analysis uses the same districts as the boundary set. Tap or hover a district for its figures. Boundaries: South Sudan - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 77 of 77 analysis areas matched by code and name).

Food prices against a year earlier, by market

Period · Oct 2026, each against the same month a year earlier

Pamir (Pariang, Unity): Wheat flour 12,000 SSP in Oct 2026; no price for Oct 2025Torit (Torit, Eastern Equatoria): Wheat flour 9,000 SSP in Oct 2026; no price for Oct 2025Mayom (Mayom, Unity): Wheat flour 14,286 SSP in Oct 2026; no price for Oct 2025Leer (Leer, Unity): Wheat flour 17,500 SSP in Oct 2026; no price for Oct 2025Wedwil (Aweil West, Northern Bahr el Ghazal): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026; no price for Oct 2025Ajoun Thok (Pariang, Unity): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +4% from 9,614 SSP in Oct 2025Rumbek (Rumbek Centre, Lakes): Wheat flour 12,500 SSP in Oct 2026, +4% from 12,000 SSP in Oct 2025Old Fangak (Fangak, Jonglei): Wheat flour 15,000 SSP in Oct 2026, -6% from 16,000 SSP in Oct 2025Bentiu-Kalibalek (Rubkona, Unity): Wheat flour 14,286 SSP in Oct 2026, -12% from 16,285 SSP in Oct 2025Rubkona (Rubkona, Unity): Wheat flour 14,286 SSP in Oct 2026, -12% from 16,285 SSP in Oct 2025Suk Shabi (Renk, Upper Nile): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +25% from 8,000 SSP in Oct 2025Yida (Pariang, Unity): Wheat flour 13,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +27% from 10,243 SSP in Oct 2025Gorom (Juba, Central Equatoria): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +28% from 7,833 SSP in Oct 2025Malek Alel (Aweil South, Northern Bahr el Ghazal): Wheat flour 9,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +34% from 6,719 SSP in Oct 2025Malakal (Malakal, Upper Nile): Wheat flour 14,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +35% from 10,395 SSP in Oct 2025Bunj (Maban, Upper Nile): Wheat flour 14,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +40% from 10,000 SSP in Oct 2025Bor (Bor South, Jonglei): Wheat flour 9,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +40% from 6,412 SSP in Oct 2025Aweil Town (Aweil Centre, Northern Bahr el Ghazal): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +42% from 7,065 SSP in Oct 2025Konyokonyo (Juba, Central Equatoria): Wheat flour 9,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +50% from 6,000 SSP in Oct 2025Abyei (Twic, Warrap): Wheat flour 11,500 SSP in Oct 2026, +50% from 7,667 SSP in Oct 2025Kuajok (Gogrial West, Warrap): Wheat flour 10,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +59% from 6,292 SSP in Oct 2025Kapoeta South (Kapoeta South, Eastern Equatoria): Wheat flour 8,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +60% from 5,000 SSP in Oct 2025Pibor (Pibor, Jonglei): Wheat flour 16,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +60% from 10,000 SSP in Oct 2025Wunrok (Twic, Warrap): Wheat flour 12,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +71% from 7,000 SSP in Oct 2025Wanjok (Aweil East, Northern Bahr el Ghazal): Wheat flour 14,000 SSP in Oct 2026, +97% from 7,104 SSP in Oct 2025
  • Fell over 50%0markets
  • Fell 25–50%0markets
  • Fell 5–25%3markets
  • Within 5%2markets
  • Rose 5–25%0markets
  • Rose 25–50%8markets
  • Rose over 50%7markets
  • No year-earlier price5markets
Each dot is a market WFP monitors: the change in one staple's retail price from the same month a year earlier, in that market E54. Mapped: Wheat flour (KG), Oct 2026 against Oct 2025. Nominal prices in local currency, so a rise includes general inflation and currency depreciation, not only scarcity; colours compare markets within a country, not prices across countries. Tap or hover a market for its prices. Outlines: Natural Earth.

Who reports working where, by district

Period · Latest reporting round: South Sudan Jan–Aug 2026

Juba: no organisation reported here in this roundKajo-keji: no organisation reported here in this roundLainya: no organisation reported here in this roundMorobo: no organisation reported here in this roundTerekeka: no organisation reported here in this roundYei: no organisation reported here in this roundBudi: no organisation reported here in this roundIkotos: no organisation reported here in this roundKapoeta East: no organisation reported here in this roundKapoeta North: no organisation reported here in this roundKapoeta South: no organisation reported here in this roundLafon: no organisation reported here in this roundMagwi: no organisation reported here in this roundTorit: no organisation reported here in this roundAkobo: no organisation reported here in this roundAyod: no organisation reported here in this roundBor South: no organisation reported here in this roundCanal/Pigi: no organisation reported here in this roundDuk: no organisation reported here in this roundFangak: no organisation reported here in this roundNyirol: no organisation reported here in this roundPibor: no organisation reported here in this roundPochalla: no organisation reported here in this roundTwic East: no organisation reported here in this roundUror: no organisation reported here in this roundAwerial: no organisation reported here in this roundCueibet: no organisation reported here in this roundRumbek Centre: no organisation reported here in this roundRumbek East: no organisation reported here in this roundRumbek North: no organisation reported here in this roundWulu: no organisation reported here in this roundYirol East: no organisation reported here in this roundYirol West: no organisation reported here in this roundAweil Centre: no organisation reported here in this roundAweil East: no organisation reported here in this roundAweil North: no organisation reported here in this roundAweil South: no organisation reported here in this roundAweil West: no organisation reported here in this roundAbiemnhom: no organisation reported here in this roundGuit: no organisation reported here in this roundKoch: no organisation reported here in this roundLeer: no organisation reported here in this roundMayendit: no organisation reported here in this roundMayom: no organisation reported here in this roundPanyijiar: no organisation reported here in this roundPariang: no organisation reported here in this roundRubkona: no organisation reported here in this roundBaliet: no organisation reported here in this roundFashoda: no organisation reported here in this roundLongochuk: no organisation reported here in this roundLuakpiny/Nasir: no organisation reported here in this roundMaban: no organisation reported here in this roundMaiwut: no organisation reported here in this roundMalakal: no organisation reported here in this roundManyo: no organisation reported here in this roundMelut: no organisation reported here in this roundPanyikang: no organisation reported here in this roundRenk: no organisation reported here in this roundUlang: no organisation reported here in this roundGogrial East: no organisation reported here in this roundGogrial West: no organisation reported here in this roundTonj East: no organisation reported here in this roundTonj North: no organisation reported here in this roundTonj South: no organisation reported here in this roundTwic: no organisation reported here in this roundAbyei: no organisation reported here in this roundJur River: no organisation reported here in this roundRaja: no organisation reported here in this roundWau: no organisation reported here in this roundEzo (SS1001): 4 organisations in this brief's sectors, 9 in any sectorIbba (SS1002): 7 organisations in this brief's sectors, 13 in any sectorMaridi (SS1003): 10 organisations in this brief's sectors, 14 in any sectorMundri East (SS1004): 5 organisations in this brief's sectors, 9 in any sectorMundri West (SS1005): 4 organisations in this brief's sectors, 12 in any sectorMvolo (SS1006): 1 organisation in this brief's sectors, 3 in any sectorNagero (SS1007): 3 organisations in this brief's sectors, 7 in any sectorNzara (SS1008): 9 organisations in this brief's sectors, 13 in any sectorTambura (SS1009): 4 organisations in this brief's sectors, 11 in any sectorYambio (SS1010): 14 organisations in this brief's sectors, 23 in any sectorSouth Sudan
  • 1–21district
  • 3–55districts
  • 6–103districts
  • 11–201district
  • 21+0districts
  • No reports69districts: not covered by this round, or not matched; not the same as nobody there
Number of organisations reporting operational presence in each district, in this brief's sectors, from OCHA's 3W reports for the latest round E47. Self-reported presence: it shows where organisations say they work, not their scale, funding or quality. Tap or hover a district for its counts. Boundaries: South Sudan - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 10 of 10 3W districts matched by code and name).

At a glance

Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs

9.9mpeople in need, South Sudan 2026 (all sectors)

Source: OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview ↗ · E52Retrieved 2026-10-14

8.0–9.0mpeople in Phase 3+, South Sudan, Sep 2026 (FEWS NET estimate)

Source: FEWS NET ↗ · E53Retrieved 2026-10-14

9.5/10Crisis severity, South Sudan · September 2026

Source: ACAPS INFORM Severity ↗ · E43Retrieved 2026-10-14

5/5Access constraints, South Sudan · Oct 2026

Source: ACAPS Humanitarian Access ↗ · E44Retrieved 2026-10-14

36%of South Sudan's 2026 national appeal funded to date (2025: 46%)

Source: UN OCHA FTS ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14

Official funding in the brief's sectors fell 14%: 2019–2024All official donors in scope, current USD millions, gross disbursements; observations 2019–2024; OECD data by recipient end in 2024, 2025 due in December 2026
2019: 1,096.1 (USD millions)1,09620192020: 1,144.5 (USD millions)20202021: 1,259.4 (USD millions)1,25920212022: 1,224.6 (USD millions)20222023: 904.9 (USD millions)20232024: 938.6 (USD millions)9392024

USD millions

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients SSD (combined); DAC sectors 122, 520, 720

United States provided 54% of official funding, 2019–2024Share of scoped gross disbursements over 2019–2024 combined, not a latest-year share
United States54%
United Kingdom8%
EU Institutions6%
Germany5%
Sweden4%

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E25Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients SSD (combined); DAC sectors 122, 520, 720

Direct investment led the USD 16.6m mobilised in 2024Private finance mobilised by official development finance, 2024, USD millions
Direct investment15.6
Simple co-financing0.9

Source: OECD, mobilised private finance for development ↗ · E39Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients South Sudan (combined); current USD millions

South Sudan's 2026 appeal: 36% funded to dateNational humanitarian response plans, share of requirements funded; 2026 still being funded
South Sudan 202472%
South Sudan 202546%
South Sudan 2026 (in progress)36%

Source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service ↗ · E34Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions

South Sudan: 42% of people analysed in Phase 3 or worse (Sep–Nov 2025)IPC acute food insecurity, share of the population analysed in Phase 3+ (Crisis or worse); current and projected periods; newest available (Sep–Nov 2025), older than this source usually is
Sep–Nov 202542%

FEWS NET estimates for Sep 2026, a different method not on the same scale: South Sudan 8.0–9.0 million people in Phase 3+.

Source: IPC / Cadre Harmonisé via HDX HAPI, FEWS NET ↗ · E53Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections

Weakest score: control of corruption in South Sudan (6/100)Worldwide Governance Indicators, 0 to 100, higher is better; observations 2025; ticks: Score 2019

Control of corruption

South Sudan6

Regulatory quality

South Sudan22

Rule of law

South Sudan25

Political stability

South Sudan39

Source: World Bank WGI ↗ · E63Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI

Need against funding

Computed by the app from the evidence cards it links to, with fixed rules, so two briefs on the same scope say the same thing.

Where need is outpacing money E66

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E52).

ClusterPeople in need, 2025 (change)Appeal fundedAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
Multi-sector680,000 n/a9% · USD 43.0 m of 468.0 m-37 points63Critically underfunded
Water Sanitation Hygiene5.01 m -10%29% · USD 25.2 m of 86.3 m-17 points5Underfunded
Education1.63 m -20%32% · USD 12.8 m of 40.4 m-14 points8Underfunded
Emergency Shelter and NFI4.24 m +98%36% · USD 16.8 m of 46.5 m-10 points4Underfundedgap widening
Health5.66 m -11%38% · USD 45.4 m of 119.2 m-8 points8Underfunded
Logistics300 n/a46% · USD 45.6 m of 99.8 m0 points152,000Underfunded
Nutrition4.33 m +72%53% · USD 104.9 m of 198.4 m+7 points24Half funded or more
Food Security7.76 m +11%63% · USD 297.5 m of 475.1 m+17 points38Half funded or more

Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

Donor concentration and cuts E67

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 938.6m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E40).

United States
57%-56% total aid
United Kingdom
11%+1% total aid
EU Institutions
7%+48% total aid
Sweden
2%+19% total aid
Central Emergency Response Fund [CERF]
2%multilateral: not assessed
Canada
2%+20% total aid
Germany
2%-16% total aid
Norway
1%+5% total aid

donor's total aid fell more than 10% in the latest provisional year

  • 57% Largest donor's share
  • 76% Three largest donors' share
  • 59% Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) (USD 551.7 m)
  • 32% Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly (USD 300.5 m)

Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

Extreme access constraints require county-level decisions

ACAPS’s October 2026 assessment rates both the complex crisis and displacement from Sudan at 5 of 5 for access constraints. E44 It identifies restricted movement, interference in humanitarian work, violence against aid workers and assets, hostilities, and terrain and infrastructure barriers. This is a current snapshot, not an access trend. E44

The September 2026 INFORM Severity edition records increasing severity over the preceding three months for both crises. E43 Fewer reported violence events should not be read as safer delivery: ACLED recorded 1,227 political-violence events and 3,417 estimated fatalities nationally in October 2025–September 2026, compared with 1,649 events and 3,071 estimated fatalities in the preceding twelve months. E45 In Jonglei, estimated fatalities rose from 595 to 1,046 across those windows. E45

GDACS recorded a regional Orange drought alert including South Sudan on 21 June 2026 and a Green flood alert on 15 August 2026; these indicate expected impact, not verified delivery disruption. E62 A useful grant condition would be a county-specific access plan covering alternative routes, stock positioning, suspension triggers and staff safety. Local delivery should not mean transferring unmanaged security risk to national partners.

Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal

The national humanitarian appeal received USD 1,289.3 million in 2024 and USD 787.3 million in 2025. E34 The 2026 appeal has received USD 534.0 million against USD 1,463.0 million required and is still being funded. E34 Coverage measures financing, not needs met. E34

Food Security was 63% funded and Nutrition 53% funded in the 2025 appeal; neither figure establishes current cluster coverage. E35 The 2026 needs overview estimates 7.7 million people needing food-security assistance and 5.3 million needing nutrition assistance, with overlapping populations that must not be added together. E52 FEWS NET estimated 8.0–9.0 million people in Crisis or worse in September 2026; the supplied IPC observations are older, covering September–November 2025. E53

More recent US country reporting confirms a local reduction: new obligations in the broad selected sectors fell from USD 628.8 million in FY2024 to USD 200.9 million in FY2025, alongside lower disbursements. E41 FY2026 records are incomplete and reporting is lagged. E41 This suggests checking partners’ confirmed commodity pipelines and grant balances rather than relying on historical donor relationships.

South Sudan Humanitarian Fund approved allocations moved in the opposite direction: USD 44.43 million in 2025 versus USD 148.16 million in 2026 to date. E36 Direct pooled-fund allocations to national NGOs rose from USD 19.78 million to USD 23.55 million, but their share fell from 44.5% to 15.9%. E36 These are approved budgets, not delivery results, and exclude sub-grants. E36 The larger fund therefore does not, by itself, establish stronger national-partner financing across the response.

A national-partner shortlist—with distinct reasons to investigate

The following are due-diligence leads, not endorsements:

Norwegian People’s Aid is a useful intermediary to contact: its project with payments recorded in 2025 describes work alongside national partners on WFP-linked in-kind distribution, nutrition sessions and multipurpose cash where markets allow. The national partners are not named in the supplied description. E17 Action Against Hunger is another technical lead: Sweden’s 2023–2024 South Sudan records describe prevention, detection and treatment of undernutrition, but current availability needs confirmation. E27

Use a switchable food model and a separate nutrition-service standard

For food assistance, consider a mixed portfolio rather than committing to cash or commodities countrywide. Norwegian People’s Aid’s reported design provides a relevant example of combining in-kind handling and distribution with market-contingent multipurpose cash; it is a design lead, not evidence of successful delivery. E17

Cash grants should include frequent local price checks and transfer-value review. In WFP-monitored markets in October 2026, nominal year-on-year prices rose 86% for imported white sorghum and 40% for vegetable oil. E54 These changes include inflation and currency depreciation and do not establish scarcity alone. E54 Require evidence of trader supply, restocking, payment-agent liquidity and safe recipient access before choosing cash; retain an in-kind fallback.

For nutrition, consider community screening and referral linked to outpatient treatment and reliable therapeutic supplies, with mobile outreach only where access and supervision can be verified. Nutrition education alone should not substitute for treatment capacity. Fund the operational conditions needed for continuity: partner overheads, transport, supervision, safeguarding, communications and contingency stocks. Use flexible grant amendments and agreed pause-or-switch triggers rather than fixed delivery targets that encourage unsafe access.

Current context from the web — search leads, verify before use

Written by a search-grounded model separately from the brief above. Its figures and claims are not checked against the evidence.

Where current reporting differs from the brief

Read the full web research (3 sources)

Humanitarian access has tightened, while funding cuts have reduced both the number reached and the size of assistance. Recent evidence points to a cycle: insecurity, bureaucratic impediments and floods disrupt delivery, and scarce funding forces agencies to focus on fewer people and critical hotspots.

  • OCHA’s South Sudan 2026 Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, issued December 2025, reports that active hostilities, insecurity and flooded roads obstructed aid. The plan says 10 million people need assistance in 2026, but prioritizes 4 million for life-saving support—down from 5.4 million prioritized in 2025—and seeks US$1.04 billion for those prioritized interventions.
  • WFP reported in October 2025 that funding constraints limited assistance to 2.7 million people, all receiving only 50–70 per cent rations; from October, baskets were expected to lose key staples and nutrition products because of pipeline breaks. In an earlier 2025 update, WFP said regular emergency food assistance could reach only 2.5 million people, about 30 per cent of those facing severe hunger.
  • The access problem continued to worsen: the UN Secretary-General’s report published January 2026 counted 165 access incidents in October–December 2025, versus 102 in the same period of 2024, citing hostilities, militarization and bureaucratic interference. In April 2026, IPC reported 7.8 million people facing Crisis-level hunger or worse and 2.2 million children needing acute-malnutrition treatment; it called for mobile and outreach nutrition services in hard-to-reach areas.

Plans and reforms point toward more local leadership and mixed delivery—not a wholesale move away from international agencies. The 2026 HNRP says 44 per cent of 2025 South Sudan Humanitarian Fund allocations went to local organizations, and pledges to increase this, strengthen local representation and build on Area-Based Coordination and Deep Field Coordination so local NGOs lead more response work. It also plans multipurpose cash where markets function, while retaining in-kind food, mobile nutrition teams, rapid-response mechanisms and air or river logistics where access or markets make those necessary.

The direction is locally led, community-informed and more targeted, but the plan’s sharp reduction in prioritized people—and WFP’s ration cuts—shows the funding gap is already shaping delivery.

Sources

  1. Funding cuts: six critical WFP operations at risk | World Food Programme · official
  2. 46. From October to December 2025, 165 humanitarian access incidents were reported, 52 of which were in December. By comparison, 102 incidents were reported during the same period in 2024. During the reporting period, humanitarian access across South Sudan progressively deteriorated as a result of active hostilities, increased militarization and expanding bureaucratic interference. Fighting and air strikes across Jonglei, Upper Nile, Unity, Western Equatoria and Eastern Equatoria States triggered widespread displacement, while insecurity constrained humanitarian operations. In October and November, the authorities began to require travel permits for movement from Malakal to counties in Upper Nile State. Targeted engagement with the authorities temporarily enabled access to Kurwai, allowing assistance to reach 24,000 people and nutrition services to be delivered to more than 2,000 children. · official
  3. https://solidarityssudan.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/South-Sudan-2026-HNRP-1.pdf · unverified site, treat with caution

Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) E34

CountryYearRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
South Sudan20241,788.81,289.372%
South Sudan20251,694.8787.346%
South Sudan2026 (in progress)1,463.0534.036%

UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.

Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) E35

CountryClusterRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
South SudanFood Security475.1297.563%
South SudanMulti-sector468.043.09%
South SudanNutrition198.4104.953%
South SudanHealth119.245.438%
South SudanLogistics99.845.646%
South SudanWater Sanitation Hygiene86.325.229%
South SudanEmergency Shelter and NFI46.516.836%
South SudanEducation40.412.832%

UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. South Sudan 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 235.6m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 119.6m; Germany, Government of USD 56.5m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 55.2m; United States Department of State USD 46.0m.

Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) E37

OrganisationTypeFundProjectsIn the reader's clusters (USD m)All approved (USD m)Largest clustersAllocation years
World Food ProgrammeUN AgencySouth Sudan440.0445.75Food Security, Nutrition, Logistics2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
HealthCare Foundation OrganizationNational NGOSouth Sudan148.4112.05Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
World Health OrganizationUN AgencySouth Sudan98.158.15Health2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
United Nations Children's FundUN AgencySouth Sudan27.2011.48Nutrition, Protection, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2025, 2026 (to date)
GOALInternational NGOSouth Sudan54.494.49Nutrition, Health2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
International Medical Corps UKInternational NGOSouth Sudan64.424.42Health, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
John Dau FoundationNational NGOSouth Sudan53.693.69Nutrition, Health, Food Security2025, 2026 (to date)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsUN AgencySouth Sudan33.543.54Food Security2024, 2025
Relief InternationalInternational NGOSouth Sudan53.354.42Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Christian Mission for DevelopmentNational NGOSouth Sudan62.883.95Nutrition, Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2025, 2026 (to date)

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds South Sudan; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ranked by approved budget in the reader's clusters (Food Security, Health, Nutrition); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

Talking points

Questions to ask

Next steps

What would change this advice

Before you use this brief

13 changed by the app

No figure needs checking: the automatic trace matched every cited figure to its evidence card. That is not proof of every claim, unit or interpretation.

Changed by the app 13

Shown so nothing changes silently. No action needed. A source is added only where the figure is in that card.

  • Talking point Removed: a claim about your organisation that your request does not supportour due diligence should distinguish education and prevention from verified treatment, referral and therapeutic-supply c
  • Question Removed: a claim about your organisation that your request does not supportour intended counties
  • Extreme access constraints require county-level decisions Source addedACAPS’s October 2026 assessment rates both the complex crisis and displacement from Sudan at 5 of 5 for access constraints.Open E44
  • Extreme access constraints require county-level decisions Source addedFewer reported violence events should not be read as safer delivery: ACLED recorded 1,227 political-violence events and 3,417 estimated fatalities nationally in October 2025–September 2026, compared with 1,649 events and 3,071 estimated fatalities in the preceding twelve months.Open E45
  • Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal Source addedThe national humanitarian appeal received USD 1,289.3 million in 2024 and USD 787.3 million in 2025.Open E34
  • Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal Source addedThe 2026 appeal has received USD 534.0 million against USD 1,463.0 million required and is still being funded.Open E34
  • Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal Source addedMore recent US country reporting confirms a local reduction: new obligations in the broad selected sectors fell from USD 628.8 million in FY2024 to USD 200.9 million in FY2025, alongside lower disbursements.Open E41
  • Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal Source addedSouth Sudan Humanitarian Fund approved allocations moved in the opposite direction: USD 44.43 million in 2025 versus USD 148.16 million in 2026 to date.Open E36
  • Funding has fallen, but pooled-fund allocations offer a contrasting signal Source addedDirect pooled-fund allocations to national NGOs rose from USD 19.78 million to USD 23.55 million, but their share fell from 44.5% to 15.9%.Open E36
  • A national-partner shortlist—with distinct reasons to investigate Source addedJohn Dau Foundation: a national NGO with USD 3.69 million approved across Food Security, Nutrition and Health during 2025–2026 to date.Open E37
  • A national-partner shortlist—with distinct reasons to investigate Source addedHealthCare Foundation Organization: a national NGO with USD 8.41 million approved in the table’s combined Food Security, Health and Nutrition scope during 2024–2026 to date; its largest clusters include Health, WASH and Nutrition.Open E37
  • Use a switchable food model and a separate nutrition-service standard Source addedIn WFP-monitored markets in October 2026, nominal year-on-year prices rose 86% for imported white sorghum and 40% for vegetable oil.Open E54
  • Talking point 2 Source added“A larger pooled fund does not automatically mean a larger national NGO share: direct national allocations increased in 2026 to date, while their share fell to 15.9%.Open E36

Keep watching this for me

The agent checks this scope every Monday and on days when something is due, and sends at most one brief a week, only when something has changed, and always says why. No email needed: you get a private link. While this is a demonstration, starting a watch needs an owner or invited reviewer sign-in; the agent board shows the demo watches to everyone.

What can change within a week: humanitarian funding and pooled-fund allocations, disaster alerts and newly published activities. Each month: crisis severity and food prices. Once or twice a year: economic outlook, displacement, needs and access. Official aid totals, including Norway's, change about once a year. How often each source updates

Evidence

Every citation in the brief opens its card here. Icons show what each source is useful for.

Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs

Show all 67 evidence cards
E1 Norwegian disbursements by year · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Trend 2021–2025: 286.6 m to 152.9 m (5 years reported)In 2025 kroner: 286.6 m in 2021 → 152.9 m in 2025
YearDisbursed (NOK)In 2025 kronerAgreementsShare of all Norwegian aid to these recipients
2021241.7 m286.6 m1439.9%
2022155.6 m174.4 m1323.0%
2023201.7 m214.3 m1324.4%
2024129.7 m133.7 m1121.0%
2025152.9 m152.9 m1321.7%
Total881.5 m961.9 m

South Sudan; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025. Trend: 241.7 m in 2021 → 152.9 m in 2025 (-37%); peak 241.7 m in 2021. In 2025 kroner, adjusted for inflation with Statistics Norway's consumer price index (annual average, table 08981; retrieved 2026-10-14): 286.6 m in 2021 → 152.9 m in 2025 (-47%); peak 286.6 m in 2021.

E2 Largest agreement partners · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

PartnerTypeDisbursed (NOK)AgreementsYears
Norges Røde KorsNGO Norwegian158.8 m42021–2025
FlyktninghjelpenNGO Norwegian130.1 m32021–2025
Kirkens NødhjelpNGO Norwegian112.2 m32021–2025
UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian AffairsMultilateral institutions95.1 m52021–2025
MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund OfficeMultilateral institutions90.0 m22021–2022
WFP - World Food ProgrammeMultilateral institutions82.0 m22021–2025
Norsk FolkehjelpNGO Norwegian74.0 m42021–2025
FAO - Food and Agricultural Organization of the United NationsMultilateral institutions55.5 m22021–2022
Caritas NorgeNGO Norwegian31.3 m42021–2025
UNHCR - UN Office of the UN High Commissioner for RefugeesMultilateral institutions22.5 m22021–2023
IOM - International Organisation for MigrationMultilateral institutions20.0 m12025
UNICEF - United Nations Children's FundMultilateral institutions5.0 m12021

South Sudan; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025. Agreement partner labels as recorded; not resolved organisation identities.

E3 Channels: who receives the funds · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Partner typeAssistance typeDisbursed (NOK)Share (rounded; listed groups only)Agreements
NGO NorwegianBilateral506.4 m57%18
Multilateral institutionsEarmarked to multilaterals370.1 m42%15
NGO Other donor countriesBilateral5.0 m1%1

South Sudan; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025. Shares use the listed channel groups, not necessarily the entire portfolio. Rounded 100% is not exactly all and rounded 0% is not none; retain nonzero amounts.

E4 What the money is for (sub-sectors) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Sub-sectorDisbursed (NOK)Agreements
10 - Material relief assistance and services521.0 m17
40 - Emergency food assistance172.4 m9
50 - Relief co-ordination and support services161.4 m7
20 - Basic health care26.7 m1

South Sudan; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025.

E5 Where Norway spends in this sector (recipients) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

RecipientDisbursed (NOK)Rank among countries
Global Unspecified14,010.0 m—
Ukraine8,978.8 m1
Syria3,298.1 m2
Palestine2,214.1 m3
Sudan1,295.8 m4
Afghanistan1,267.3 m5
Middle East Regional1,012.7 m—
Yemen975.1 m6
Lebanon889.9 m7
South Sudan881.5 m8

All recipients; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025. 80 recipients in scope. Regional and unallocated lines (e.g. Global Unspecified) are shown but not ranked.

E6 Policy markers (share of disbursements tagged significant or principal) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

MarkerShare
Gender equality67%
Climate adaptation2%
Climate mitigation0%
Disability inclusion4%

South Sudan; DAC sectors 520, 720, 122; 2021–2025. Donor-reported OECD policy markers; not outcome evidence.

E7 Largest agreement: South Sudan. Humanitarian Response · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0048-11 — "South Sudan. Humanitarian Response" in South Sudan. Partner: Flyktninghjelpen (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 95.1 m NOK in the selected years; 120.8 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian response in South Sudan.

E8 Largest agreement: Humanitarian assistance · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0052-9 — "Humanitarian assistance" in South Sudan. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 90.1 m NOK in the selected years; 110.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Save lives, alleviate suffering and protect human dignity. Focus:WASH, SGBV, ASRH and protection.

E9 Largest agreement: South Sudan Humanitarian Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0010-20 — "South Sudan Humanitarian Fund" in South Sudan. Partner: UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 50 - Relief co-ordination and support services. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 80.0 m NOK in the selected years; 80.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to South Sudan humanitarian fund. Gender is mainstreamed in OCHAs activitives including in the pooled funds.

E10 Largest agreement: Emergency Food Assistance - South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-22/0125-17 — "Emergency Food Assistance - South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: WFP - World Food Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 72.0 m NOK in the selected years; 72.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: WFP operations in South Sudan

E11 Largest agreement: Food security in South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0044-23 — "Food security in South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: Norsk Folkehjelp (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 62.0 m NOK in the selected years; 80.9 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Vulnerable populations protected against hunger and malnutrition.

E12 Largest agreement: South Sudan Appeal · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0004-17 — "South Sudan Appeal" in South Sudan. Partner: Norges Røde Kors (NGO Norwegian); implementing: ICRC - International Committee of the Red Cross. Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 60.0 m NOK in the selected years; 60.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to ICRC's South Sudan Appeal. International humanitarian law aims to prevent and alleviate suffering in war without discrimination based on sex, but recognize that women face specific problems in armed conflict, such as sexual violence and risks to their health. It recognizes this in the general protection it affords to both women and men, as well as in some specific provisions providing additional protection to women.

E13 Largest agreement: FAO, Emergency Livelihood Response Programme · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement SSD-17/0007 — "FAO, Emergency Livelihood Response Programme" in South Sudan. Partner: FAO - Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2018–2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 57.9 m NOK in the selected years; 290.2 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: FAO's quick intervention to provide time-critical livelihood support to 3.3 million crisis-affected, displaced and food - insecure people in South Sudan affected by the ongoing conflict. The programme is targeting vulnerable food insecure and displaced people, with a focus on those who have not been absorbed by host communities, and who have congregated in rural areas. Assistance will also be provided to host communities receiving the displaced.

E14 Largest agreement: South Sudan Humanitarian Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement SSD-20/0007 — "South Sudan Humanitarian Fund" in South Sudan. Partner: MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (Multilateral institutions); implementing: UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Sector: 50 - Relief co-ordination and support services. Payments recorded in 2020–2021 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2021, which does not show that it ended); 50.0 m NOK in the selected years; 111.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: South Sudan Humanitarin Fund. Standard Administrative Agreement for South Sudan Humanitarian Fund Between MFA and UNDP Multi Partner Trust Fund Office. Humanitarian assistance managed by OCHA

E15 Largest agreement: South Sudan Humanitarian Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement SSD-22/0003 — "South Sudan Humanitarian Fund" in South Sudan. Partner: MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (Multilateral institutions); implementing: UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 40.0 m NOK in the selected years; 40.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: South Sudan Humanitarin Fund. Standard Administrative Agreement for South Sudan Humanitarian Fund Between MFA and UNDP Multi Partner Trust Fund Office. Humanitarian assistance managed by OCHA

E16 Largest agreement: South Sudan - operational appeal · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0074-3 — "South Sudan - operational appeal" in South Sudan. Partner: Norges Røde Kors (NGO Norwegian); implementing: ICRC - International Committee of the Red Cross . Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 37.1 m NOK in the selected years; 49.6 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: South Sudan 2020

E17 Related project (semantic match): Food Security and Livelihoods in South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-25/0009-20 — "Food Security and Livelihoods in South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: Norsk Folkehjelp (NGO Norwegian); implementing: Norwegian People's Aid - local office. Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 7.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: NPA supports crisis-affected communities in South Sudan to ensure their immediate food needs are met and to strengthen their self-sufficiency and resilience to future shocks. Working alongside national partners, NPA helps fill gaps in large-scale food assistance programmes funded by the World Food Program (WFP) by facilitating the transport, handling, and distribution of in-kind food support for vulnerable households, including people with disabilities, older persons, displaced populations, returnees, and nutritionally at-risk women and children. Women and girls also participate in nutrition sessions that promote the preparation of diverse, nutritious meals and reduce food waste. Where markets allow, extremely vulnerable households receive multipurpose cash assistance to help them meet urgent food requirements with flexibility and dignity. NPA further supports women and girls through …

E18 Related project (semantic match): Norsk Folkehjelp - Emergency Crisis Response Project for IDPs · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement SSD-15/0005 — "Norsk Folkehjelp - Emergency Crisis Response Project for IDPs" in South Sudan. Partner: Norsk Folkehjelp (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2015–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 9.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The purpose of the Project is to provide essential relief assistance and emergency response to ease the effects of the disaster in South Sudan. (i) To provide food aid to civilians experiencing acute food insecurity because they have been caught up in the humanitarian crises created by the armed conflict. (ii) To make available needed Non-food items to minimize livelihood stress and exposure to preventable diseases.

E19 Related project (semantic match): Emergency humanitarian response and Resilience Programme for Food Security · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement SSD-23/0017 — "Emergency humanitarian response and Resilience Programme for Food Security" in South Sudan. Partner: WFP - World Food Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 30 - Agricultural land resources. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 165.6 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to emergency influx av returnees in South Sudan through emergency humanitarian response and resilience programme for food security. Engage targeted communities in resilience building activities including through community asset creation and climate adaptation using a conflict-sensitive and gender-transformative approach. In the longer term, the contribution will enhance the livelihoods and resilience of communities by engaging them in the construction or rehabilitation of productive community and household assets. These will include crop and vegetable farming, community infrastructure development, environment and natural resource management and adaptation to Climate Change through promotion of adaptive crops such as rice and cassava. The assets will facilitate communities’ engagement in livelihoods and income-generation activities beyond the period of interventions. Activities …

E20 Related project (semantic match): Food assistance support to strengthening social cohesion in South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-19/0212-317 — "Food assistance support to strengthening social cohesion in South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian); implementing: Norwegian Church Aid - local office. Sector: 30 - Basic drinking water supply and basic sanitation. Payments recorded in 2021 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2021, which does not show that it ended); 2.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: To increase food support to communities affected by conflict and floods particularly school going children and vulnerable households in Greater Pibor and Warrap state. The focus is on provision of adequate water to improve food security, incl. water supply through repairs of broken boreholes, wells, and optimisation of existing water facilities.

E21 Related project (semantic match): South Sudan Emergency food and NFI support · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-19/0067-1 — "South Sudan Emergency food and NFI support" in South Sudan. Partner: Caritas Norge (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2019–2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 2.9 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Emergency food and NFI support

E22 Related project (semantic match): WFP. Emergency food assistance - South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-18/0148-7 — "WFP. Emergency food assistance - South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: WFP - World Food Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2018–2021 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2021, which does not show that it ended); 50.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: SS01 South Sudan Country Office

E23 Related project (semantic match): Strengthening Ec dev and Food security systems for South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-24/0188-134 — "Strengthening Ec dev and Food security systems for South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian); implementing: Norwegian Church Aid - local office. Sector: 20 - Agricultural development. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 8.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: NCA's operational project for strengthening Economic development and Food security systems for South Sudan

E24 Related project (semantic match): Humanitarian assistance South Sudan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0053-27 — "Humanitarian assistance South Sudan" in South Sudan. Partner: Caritas Norge (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 1.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Lifesaving food and necessary non-food items assistance, protection and WASH in line with humanitarian principles.

E25 Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) · OECD DAC Creditor Reporting System

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scopeDonorTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope
1United StatesTrend 2019–2024: 430 to 536 (6 years reported)430.5595.5663.0823.1522.9536.254%
2United KingdomTrend 2019–2024: 169 to 108 (6 years reported)168.8113.859.838.843.0107.98%
3EU InstitutionsTrend 2019–2024: 51.3 to 64.9 (6 years reported)51.353.398.251.168.864.96%
4GermanyTrend 2019–2024: 83.5 to 15.5 (6 years reported)83.589.566.830.420.715.55%
5SwedenTrend 2019–2024: 38.9 to 21.9 (6 years reported)38.948.550.946.927.521.94%
6CanadaTrend 2019–2024: 26.4 to 16.6 (6 years reported)26.436.251.453.544.416.63%
7Central Emergency Response Fund [CERF]Trend 2019–2024: 27.9 to 20.0 (6 years reported)27.926.642.454.034.020.03%
8UNHCRTrend 2019–2024: 47.8 to 0 (6 years reported)47.836.041.70.45.50.02%
9NorwayTrend 2019–2024: 26.8 to 12.1 (6 years reported)26.827.828.416.519.112.12%
10Global FundTrend 2019–2024: 16.2 to 10.2 (6 years reported)16.217.639.010.88.310.22%
All official donorsTrend 2019–2024: 1,096 to 939 (6 years reported)1,096.11,144.51,259.41,224.6904.9938.6100%
All official donors, constant 2024 USDTrend 2019–2024: 1,294 to 939 (6 years reported)1,293.81,328.11,368.41,303.5928.1938.6

OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients SSD (combined); DAC sectors 122, 520, 720; retrieved 2026-10-14. 50 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 1,096.1m in 2019 → USD 938.6m in 2024 (-14%); peak USD 1,259.4m in 2021. United States: Trend: USD 430.5m in 2019 → USD 536.2m in 2024 (+25%); peak USD 823.1m in 2022. United Kingdom: Trend: USD 168.8m in 2019 → USD 107.9m in 2024 (-36%); peak USD 168.8m in 2019. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 51.3m in 2019 → USD 64.9m in 2024 (+27%); peak USD 98.2m in 2021. All official donors in constant 2024 USD (the OECD's own deflators, which also take out exchange-rate changes): USD 1,293.8m in 2019 → USD 938.6m in 2024 (-27%); peak USD 1,368.4m in 2021. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.

E26 Other donors' largest projects in scope (OECD CRS, 2023 to 2024) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorProjectChannel of deliveryRecipientDisbursed (USD m)
United StatesEmergency food assistanceWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan198.5
United StatesTitle II Emergency ProgramWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan189.0
United StatesHumanitarian AssistanceWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan133.9
United StatesTitle II Emergency Commodity Credit Corporation FundWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan100.3
United KingdomWorld Food ProgrammeWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan74.0
United StatesEmergency Humanitarian AssistanceDonor country-based NGOSouth Sudan49.4
United StatesEmergency Humanitarian AssistanceInternational Organisation for MigrationSouth Sudan46.5
United StatesHumanitarian AssistanceDonor country-based NGOSouth Sudan38.6
United StatesEmergency Humanitarian AssistanceInternational NGOSouth Sudan31.2
United StatesHumanitarian AssistanceInternational Organisation for MigrationSouth Sudan30.7
United StatesHumanitarian AssistanceUnited Nations Children’s FundSouth Sudan25.2
United KingdomEmergency Operation (EMOP) for the South Sudan Humanitarian Assistance and Resilience Building programme – ProWorld Food ProgrammeSouth Sudan24.6

OECD CRS project-level records, gross disbursements 2023 to 2024, current USD millions; recipients SSD; DAC sectors 122, 520, 720; Norway excluded (see the Norwegian data); retrieved 2026-10-14. 586 projects from 38 donors report in scope. Titles and descriptions are donor-reported; a project may cover more than the sector named.

E27 Other donor's project: Action Against Hunger: HUM 2021-2025 (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: International NGO. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Material relief assistance and services. Disbursed USD 3.9m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): The mission of AAH is to save, improve and protect lives by eliminating hunger through the prevention, detection and treatment of undernutrition, especially during and after emergency crises caused by situations of conflict, displacement, poverty, discrimination, inequality, or natural disaster. The funding to Action Against Hunger (AAH) in 202, which is encompassed in decision nr 2022-001383, is based on the Sida humanitarian allocation process that took place in late 2021 and 2022. The current decision concerns a financial contribution to AAH amounting to 411,5 MSEK.The following modality of support is financed:1. Country Programmes/annual projects in 20 countries – 348,5 MSEK,2. Rapid Response Mechanism - 50 MSEK,3. Capacity Building Support – 8 MSEK,4. Method Support – 5 MSEK.During 2022 the programme and project support covers the following 20 countries/crises: Burkina Faso, Central

E28 Other donor's project: Islamic Relief Humanitarian support 2022-2025 - Islamic Relief HUM 2022-2025 (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: International NGO. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Material relief assistance and services. Disbursed USD 2.8m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): In 2022, Sida and Islamic Relief Sweden entered into a multi-year agreement for the period 2022-2025 to enable support for Islamic Relief's humanitarian activities. The intervention consists of two different types of support. One part relates to support for annual projects in specific countries with ongoing humanitarian crises. A second part concerns funds that can be allocated in the event of sudden crises (Rapid Response Mechanism, RRM). The proposed support for Islamic Relief is based on the fact that Islamic Relief is judged to have a good ability to respond to humanitarian crises, through its forty different country operations and 2000 employees globally. Sida has financed Islamic Relief for several years and based on the organization's abilityto deliver results in hard-to-reach areas, Sida has assessed Islamic Relief to be aappropriate implementing partners for humanitarian aid ope

E29 Other donor's project: OCHA CBPF 2023-2025 - OCHA CBPF 2023-2025 MPTFO (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: UN-Multi Partner Trust Fund Office. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Relief co-ordination and support services. Disbursed USD 4.7m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): Sida has supported the CBPFs since the establishment of the very first fund in Angola, already back in 1999. Since then, Sida has been one of the largest donors to the CBPFs. During 2022, the CBPFs received 1.34 billion USD in financial contributions to respond to humanitarian needs though 20 CBPFs.The CBPFs fund UN, NGOs and the Red Cross/Red Crescent Society. During the years, the CBPFs has increased its funding to local actors. In 2022, 28% of the total amount allocated went to local organisations, which is twice as much as in 2013.CBPFs are locally managed by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator and in consultation with the humanitarian community. Advisory Boards oversee the Funds, providing advice on key decisions, and ensuring efficient and effective management. The daily management of the funds is ov

E30 Other donor's project: OCHA CBPF 2023-2025 (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: United Nations Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Material relief assistance and services. Disbursed USD 2.8m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): Sida has supported the CBPFs since the establishment of the very first fund in Angola, already back in 1999. Since then, Sida has been one of the largest donors to the CBPFs. During 2022, the CBPFs received 1.34 billion USD in financial contributions to respond to humanitarian needs though 20 CBPFs.The CBPFs fund UN, NGOs and the Red Cross/Red Crescent Society. During the years, the CBPFs has increased its funding to local actors. In 2022, 28% of the total amount allocated went to local organisations, which is twice as much as in 2013.CBPFs are locally managed by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator and in consultation with the humanitarian community. Advisory Boards oversee the Funds, providing advice on key decisions, and ensuring efficient and effective management. The daily management of the funds is ov

E31 Other donor's project: NRC's Humanitarian Programme 2021-2025 - NRC Humanitarian Country programmes 2021-2025 (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: Donor country-based NGO. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Material relief assistance and services. Disbursed USD 1.9m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): NRC has applied as well to Sida for funding of 364.5 million SEK to carry out the Humanitarian Programme for 2021 in 26 humanitarian crisis settings: Afghanistan, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico, Palestine, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania/Burundi, Uganda, Venezuela, Yemen. The application includes provision of 40 million SEK to replenish the Rapid Response Mechanism funding instrument and 7 individual projects for method, capacity-building and coordination.The intervention's tentative total budget is 4 263 200 000 Norwegian krona (NOK), that the organisation is financing with Sida's funding in a proportion of 8% approximately. Other donors, like the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DG ECHO, UNHCR, et

E32 Other donor's project: NRC's Humanitarian Programme 2021-2025 - NRC Humanitarian Country programmes 2021-2025 (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: International NGO. Recipient: South Sudan. Purpose: Material relief assistance and services. Disbursed USD 1.9m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): NRC has applied as well to Sida for funding of 364.5 million SEK to carry out “the Humanitarian Programme for 2021” in 26 humanitarian crisis settings: Afghanistan, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico, Palestine, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania/Burundi, Uganda, Venezuela, Yemen. The application includes provision of 40 million SEK to replenish the Rapid Response Mechanism funding instrument and 7 individual projects for method, capacity-building and coordination.The intervention’s tentative total budget is 4 263 200 000 Norwegian krona (NOK), that the organisation is financing with Sida’s funding in a proportion of 8% approximately. Other donors, like the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DG ECHO, UNHCR,

E33 Norway's aid through multilateral organisations, attributed to the country (imputed, USD m) · ONE Imputed Multilateral Sectors and OECD DAC2A, via the Development Finance Observatory

About this source: Estimates of where a donor's core contributions to multilateral organisations end up, by country and sector, by ONE and the OECD. They are modelled from each organisation's spending, not reported project by project.

Trace this: ONE: Imputed Multilateral Sectors, methodology ↗ · Development Finance Observatory: sources and licences ↗

CountryMeasureTrend20202021202220232024
South SudanAll sectors (OECD estimate)Trend 2020–2024: 8.9 to 11.5 (5 years reported)8.8920.4213.5711.7511.54
South SudanSectors in this brief (ONE estimate)Trend 2020–2024: 6.1 to 5.9 (5 years reported)6.0812.688.547.515.94
South Sudanof which Development food assistance (520)Trend 2020–2021: 0 to 0 (2 years reported)0.000.00Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
South Sudanof which Emergency response (720)Trend 2020–2024: 4.4 to 4.8 (5 years reported)4.3810.547.606.584.76
South Sudanof which Basic health (122)Trend 2020–2024: 1.7 to 1.2 (5 years reported)1.692.150.950.931.18

Imputed multilateral ODA from Norway, gross disbursements in current USD millions: all sectors from OECD DAC2A, the brief's sectors from ONE's Imputed Multilateral Sectors (CRS purpose codes starting 520, 720, 122), via the Development Finance Observatory; retrieved 2026-10-14. Modelled estimates: each multilateral organisation's spending in the country is attributed to Norway in proportion to Norway's share of its core funding. Norway did not direct this money to the country. It covers core contributions only, so it does not overlap with the Norwegian agreement data (Norway's own agreements, including funds earmarked through multilaterals). The OECD and ONE totals differ slightly because their methods do. Sector rows are sums of ONE's purpose-code rows, added up by this app.

E34 Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: South Sudan 2024 ↗ · FTS plan: South Sudan 2025 ↗ · FTS plan: South Sudan 2026 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2024 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2026 (all countries) ↗

CountryYearRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
South Sudan20241,788.81,289.372%
South Sudan20251,694.8787.346%
South Sudan2026 (in progress)1,463.0534.036%

UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.

E35 Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: South Sudan 2025 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗

CountryClusterRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
South SudanFood Security475.1297.563%
South SudanMulti-sector468.043.09%
South SudanNutrition198.4104.953%
South SudanHealth119.245.438%
South SudanLogistics99.845.646%
South SudanWater Sanitation Hygiene86.325.229%
South SudanEmergency Shelter and NFI46.516.836%
South SudanEducation40.412.832%

UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. South Sudan 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 235.6m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 119.6m; Germany, Government of USD 56.5m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 55.2m; United States Department of State USD 46.0m.

E36 Country-based pooled fund allocations by partner type (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: OCHA CBPF data hub (allocations by fund and partner) ↗ · CBPF API: allocations by year, fund and partner type ↗

FundAllocation yearUN agencies (USD m)International NGOs (USD m)National NGOs (USD m)Other organisations (USD m)Total approved (USD m)National NGO share
South Sudan2026 (to date)83.5741.0423.550.00148.1615.9%
South Sudan202513.5611.0919.780.0044.4344.5%
South Sudan202412.4014.7111.800.0038.9230.3%

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds South Sudan; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Approved allocations only (pipeline excluded); the current year is still being allocated, and years with no approved allocation are not shown. The national NGO share counts direct allocations, not sub-grants, so it is not the whole local share. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

E37 Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: CBPF API: South Sudan project records (CSV) ↗

OrganisationTypeFundProjectsIn the reader's clusters (USD m)All approved (USD m)Largest clustersAllocation years
World Food ProgrammeUN AgencySouth Sudan440.0445.75Food Security, Nutrition, Logistics2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
HealthCare Foundation OrganizationNational NGOSouth Sudan148.4112.05Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
World Health OrganizationUN AgencySouth Sudan98.158.15Health2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
United Nations Children's FundUN AgencySouth Sudan27.2011.48Nutrition, Protection, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2025, 2026 (to date)
GOALInternational NGOSouth Sudan54.494.49Nutrition, Health2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
International Medical Corps UKInternational NGOSouth Sudan64.424.42Health, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
John Dau FoundationNational NGOSouth Sudan53.693.69Nutrition, Health, Food Security2025, 2026 (to date)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsUN AgencySouth Sudan33.543.54Food Security2024, 2025
Relief InternationalInternational NGOSouth Sudan53.354.42Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Nutrition2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Christian Mission for DevelopmentNational NGOSouth Sudan62.883.95Nutrition, Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2025, 2026 (to date)

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds South Sudan; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ranked by approved budget in the reader's clusters (Food Security, Health, Nutrition); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

E38 UN Central Emergency Response Fund allocations (CERF) · UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)

About this source: The UN's global emergency fund, which releases money quickly to UN agencies and IOM for sudden or underfunded crises. Its grants signal where the UN sees urgent or neglected needs.

Trace this: CERF allocations (HDX, all countries and years) ↗ · CERF allocations by country ↗

CountryYearRapid Response (USD m)Underfunded Emergencies (USD m)Total approved (USD m)In the reader's clusters (USD m)EmergenciesLargest recipient agenciesLatest approval
South Sudan2026 (to date)46.9915.0061.9917.64Displacement/Migration, Drought, Ebola, Violence/Clashesagency to be confirmed, World Food Programme, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization2026-09-26
South Sudan202510.000.0010.005.78Displacement/Migration, FloodUnited Nations Children’s Fund, World Food Programme, World Health Organization, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees2025-06-25
South Sudan202420.000.0020.005.51Displacement, FloodInternational Organization for Migration, United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Health Organization2024-09-30

UN CERF; countries SSD; 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved amounts, USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. The reader's clusters here: Food security, Health, Nutrition. Approved CERF grants by year; the current year is to date. CERF funds UN agencies and IOM only, which may pass funds on to partners. 'Agency to be confirmed' is approved money not yet split between agencies. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them. Not an open call.

E39 Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) · OECD, mobilised private finance for development

About this source: The OECD's measure of private money brought in by public development finance, for example through guarantees or co-investment. It is the main reference for blended finance; amounts follow the OECD's attribution rules and are published here for groups of providers.

Trace this: OECD mobilised private finance dataflow (DSD_MOB@DF_MOBILISATION) ↗

MechanismTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)
Direct investment in companies and SPVsTrend 2022–2024: 12.6 to 15.6 (3 years reported)12.60.015.6
Simple co-financingTrend 2022–2024: 0.1 to 0.9 (3 years reported)0.10.90.9
All mechanisms, all sectorsTrend 2022–2024: 12.7 to 16.6 (3 years reported)12.70.916.6
In this brief's sectors (122, 520, 720)Trend 2022–2024: 0 to 0 (3 years reported)0.00.00.0
of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 12.6 to 0.8 (3 years reported)12.60.00.8
of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 0.1 to 15.7 (3 years reported)0.10.915.7

OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients South Sudan (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers this brief's sectors. No sector-level provider split is supplied. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.

E40 Donors' total aid (net ODA), all recipients (2021 to 2025, 2025 provisional) · OECD DAC1 (includes preliminary data)

About this source: The OECD's headline aid totals for each donor, the source of the yearly figures on aid as a share of national income. It shows a donor's overall trend, not where the money goes.

Trace this: OECD DAC1 dataflow (DSD_DAC1@DF_DAC1) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorTrend2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)2025 (USD m) provisional
United StatesTrend 2021–2025: 47,528 to 29,022 (5 years reported)47,528.260,328.764,461.965,336.829,021.9
United KingdomTrend 2021–2025: 16,278 to 16,365 (5 years reported)16,277.815,761.318,615.716,269.516,365.1
EU InstitutionsTrend 2021–2025: 20,639 to 52,905 (5 years reported)20,639.127,165.937,544.235,654.152,904.8
GermanyTrend 2021–2025: 32,456 to 28,032 (5 years reported)32,455.636,444.641,253.333,249.328,032.0
SwedenTrend 2021–2025: 5,938 to 5,769 (5 years reported)5,937.65,463.85,481.94,829.05,769.2
CanadaTrend 2021–2025: 6,258 to 10,131 (5 years reported)6,257.79,274.19,058.08,422.910,131.3
NorwayTrend 2021–2025: 4,673 to 5,157 (5 years reported)4,673.05,161.05,292.94,905.35,156.8

OECD DAC1, net ODA disbursements to all recipients and sectors, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Shows each donor's overall aid, not its spending in this country or sector. 2025 figures are the OECD's preliminary estimates of aid already disbursed that year (not forecasts) and may be revised. United States: USD 65,336.8m in 2024 → USD 29,021.9m in 2025 (-56% in one year). United Kingdom: USD 16,269.5m in 2024 → USD 16,365.1m in 2025 (+1% in one year). EU Institutions: USD 35,654.1m in 2024 → USD 52,904.8m in 2025 (+48% in one year). Germany: USD 33,249.3m in 2024 → USD 28,032.0m in 2025 (-16% in one year). Sweden: USD 4,829.0m in 2024 → USD 5,769.2m in 2025 (+19% in one year). The same donors in this country and sector (OECD CRS, gross disbursements; ends earlier): United States: USD 430.5m in 2019 → USD 536.2m in 2024. United Kingdom: USD 168.8m in 2019 → USD 107.9m in 2024. EU Institutions: USD 51.3m in 2019 → USD 64.9m in 2024. Germany: USD 83.5m in 2019 → USD 15.5m in 2024. Sweden: USD 38.9m in 2019 → USD 21.9m in 2024. Canada: USD 26.4m in 2019 → USD 16.6m in 2024. Norway: USD 26.8m in 2019 → USD 12.1m in 2024. Measure: net ODA disbursement flows in current USD, not budgets or grant-only funding. Preserve the provisional label on the corresponding observation year.

E41 US foreign assistance by fiscal year (ForeignAssistance.gov), to FY2026 · ForeignAssistance.gov (US government)

About this source: The US government's own record of its foreign assistance: every obligation and payment by country, sector, agency and implementing partner, published much sooner than the OECD's data. It shows the effect of the 2025 US cuts country by country; economic and military aid are kept apart.

Trace this: ForeignAssistance.gov data downloads ↗

CountryMeasureFY2021 (USD m)FY2022 (USD m)FY2023 (USD m)FY2024 (USD m)FY2025 (USD m)FY2026 to date (USD m)Trend
South SudanDisbursed, all economic aid856.4962.1784.6836.9507.2151.2Trend 2021–2025: 856 to 507 (5 years reported)
South SudanDisbursed, in this brief's sectors707.6810.5610.9640.2385.3124.9Trend 2021–2025: 708 to 385 (5 years reported)
South SudanNewly obligated (committed), in this brief's sectors767.6955.0552.0628.8200.969.1Trend 2021–2025: 768 to 201 (5 years reported)

US government obligations and disbursements of economic (non-military) assistance, current USD, from the ForeignAssistance.gov complete dataset (file of Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:40:59 GMT); loaded 2026-10-14; retrieved 2026-10-14. US fiscal years run October to September; FY2026 is incomplete. Obligations are new commitments; disbursements are payments, often against earlier commitments, so they fall later than obligations. Agencies report with a lag and revise. Sectors use the OECD codes the US assigns, which can differ from the recipient's or the OECD's classification. Military and security assistance is excluded. Partners the US withholds by name (redacted) are left out of the partner list. Largest implementing partners by disbursements, FY2025–FY2026: World Food Program (USD 301.8m); United Nations Children's Fund (USD 55.4m); International Organisation for Migration (USD 23.1m); World Health Organisation (USD 7.5m); Danish Refugee Council (USD 7.1m).

E42 Crisis risk: INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026 · INFORM Risk Index (EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: An index from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and partners that rates how likely a humanitarian crisis or disaster is to overwhelm a country's capacity to cope. Humanitarian donors and agencies use it to compare countries; it measures structural risk, not current needs.

Trace this: INFORM Risk results and data (EU JRC) ↗

CountryINFORM Risk Mid 2026 (0-10)ClassRank (1 = highest risk)Hazard & exposureVulnerabilityLack of coping capacityINFORM Risk 2022
South Sudan8.3Very high1 of 1917.38.79.18.4

INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026, EU Joint Research Centre with IASC partners; retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0-10, higher means a higher risk that a humanitarian crisis overwhelms national capacity; the earlier score is from the published edition of that year, whose method differed slightly. South Sudan: the highest of the three dimensions is Lack of coping capacity (9.1); read the score through that dimension. South Sudan: INFORM Risk 8.4 in 2022 → 8.3 in Mid 2026 (Very high → Very high).

E43 Humanitarian crisis severity: INFORM Severity - September 2026 · ACAPS INFORM Severity Index (via HDX)

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how severe each ongoing humanitarian crisis is, based on its analysts' review of many sources. It is used to compare crises and to see whether one is getting worse.

Trace this: ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly files on HDX ↗

CountryCrisisDriversSeverity (1-10)CategoryTrend (last 3 months)Complexity (1-10)Data reliability
South SudanComplex crisis in South SudanConflict/ Violence, Floods, Political/economic crisis, International Displacement9.5Very HighIncreasing9.2High
South SudanDisplacement from Sudan to South SudanInternational Displacement7.6HighIncreasing8.5High

ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly edition published on the Humanitarian Data Exchange; retrieved 2026-10-14. It rates the severity of ongoing crises (impact, conditions of people affected, complexity); countries without an active crisis are not listed.

E44 Humanitarian access constraints: ACAPS, Oct 2026 · ACAPS Humanitarian Access

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how hard it is for humanitarian organisations to reach people in a crisis, because of insecurity, bureaucratic restrictions or physical obstacles.

Trace this: ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset ↗

CountryCrisisAccess constraints (0-5)LevelPeople's access to aidAid actors' access to peopleSecurity and physical constraintsStrongest constraints
South SudanComplex crisis in South Sudan5Extreme555obstructed access to services and aid; restricted movement within the country; interference in humanitarian work; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure)
South SudanDisplacement from Sudan to South Sudan5Extreme555obstructed access to services and aid; restricted movement within the country; interference in humanitarian work; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure)

ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset, Oct 2026 edition (API); retrieved 2026-10-14. Scores 0 (no constraints) to 5 (extreme), from three pillars and nine indicators; countries without a tracked crisis are not listed. South Sudan: the most constrained crisis is Complex crisis in South Sudan (5 of 5, Extreme).

E45 Conflict and protest events reported by ACLED, to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX

About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.

Trace this: South Sudan - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗

CountryAreaCategoryEvents Sep 2026Fatalities Sep 2026Events, 12 monthsFatalities, 12 monthsEvents, previous 12 monthsFatalities, previous 12 months
South SudanNationalPolitical violence582511,2273,4171,6493,071
South SudanNationalCivilian targeting23355491,015864987
South SudanNationalDemonstrations1Not reported29Not reported54Not reported
South SudanRegion: JongleiPolitical violence141103281,046396595
South SudanRegion: WarrapPolitical violence59139577242678
South SudanRegion: Upper NilePolitical violence866106461172421

ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. National and regional figures are sums of ACLED's district rows, added up by this app; the district card lists the districts. Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.

E46 Conflict and protest events by district (ACLED), to Sep 2026 · ACLED (Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project), files on HDX

About this source: A widely used dataset of reported political violence and protests, coded from news, local partners and other sources. Counts depend on reporting, so areas with little coverage may be under-recorded.

Trace this: South Sudan - Conflict Events: ACLED's monthly files on HDX (2026-10-09) ↗ · ACLED terms of use and attribution policy ↗

CountryRegionDistrictDistrict code (P-code)CategoryEvents Sep 2026Fatalities Sep 2026Events, 12 monthsFatalities, 12 months
South SudanUpper NileBalietSS0701Political violence1011276
South SudanWarrapTonj NorthSS0804Political violence2340270
South SudanUnityAbiemnhomSS0601Political violence116218
South SudanJongleiAkoboSS0301Political violence0049204
South SudanJongleiPiborSS0308Political violence48050180
South SudanCentral EquatoriaJubaSS0101Political violence41280172
South SudanJongleiUrorSS0311Political violence0044161
South SudanWarrapTonj EastSS0803Political violence1046153
South SudanJongleiDukSS0305Political violence11327128
South SudanJongleiNyirolSS0307Political violence3848124
South SudanUpper NileUlangSS0712Political violence5663099
South SudanUpper NileBalietSS0701Civilian targeting00790
South SudanJongleiAyodSS0302Political violence321786
South SudanJongleiAkoboSS0301Civilian targeting002284
South SudanCentral EquatoriaJubaSS0101Civilian targeting3115581
South SudanUnityMayomSS0606Political violence344680
South SudanWarrapGogrial EastSS0801Political violence141868
South SudanLakesCueibetSS0402Political violence352463
South SudanJongleiTwic EastSS0310Political violence142358
South SudanWarrapTonj SouthSS0805Political violence001858
South SudanJongleiNyirolSS0307Civilian targeting001757
South SudanLakesRumbek NorthSS0405Political violence222655
South SudanUnityRubkonaSS0609Political violence242854
South SudanEastern EquatoriaToritSS0208Political violence004952
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalJur RiverSS0901Political violence1201352
South SudanJongleiBor SouthSS0303Political violence233951
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMundri EastSS1004Political violence103146
South SudanUpper NileLuakpiny/NasirSS0704Political violence002946
South SudanUnityPanyijiarSS0607Political violence161546
South SudanJongleiCanal/PigiSS0304Political violence001844
South SudanEastern EquatoriaBudiSS0201Political violence121844
South SudanCentral EquatoriaMoroboSS0104Political violence123143
South SudanJongleiDukSS0305Civilian targeting001642
South SudanWarrapTonj EastSS0803Civilian targeting003041
South SudanJongleiAyodSS0302Civilian targeting00541
South SudanEastern EquatoriaBudiSS0201Civilian targeting001239
South SudanJongleiTwic EastSS0310Civilian targeting001438
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta EastSS0203Political violence002537
South SudanCentral EquatoriaYeiSS0106Political violence204535
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMundri EastSS1004Civilian targeting102134
South SudanWestern EquatoriaYambioSS1010Political violence001934
South SudanLakesRumbek CentreSS0403Political violence212033
South SudanJongleiPiborSS0308Civilian targeting342630
South SudanWarrapGogrial EastSS0801Civilian targeting141030
South SudanWarrapTonj SouthSS0805Civilian targeting00930
South SudanWarrapTonj NorthSS0804Civilian targeting132028
South SudanCentral EquatoriaTerekekaSS0105Political violence00328
South SudanUnityMayomSS0606Civilian targeting001126
South SudanUnityRubkonaSS0609Civilian targeting11726
South SudanUpper NilePanyikangSS0710Political violence001025
South SudanUnityPanriangSS0608Political violence00824
South SudanUpper NileUlangSS0712Civilian targeting00624
South SudanWarrapTwicSS0806Political violence001423
South SudanCentral EquatoriaLainyaSS0103Political violence001323
South SudanLakesRumbek NorthSS0405Civilian targeting111020
South SudanJongleiBor SouthSS0303Civilian targeting002119
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalWauSS0903Political violence001818
South SudanEastern EquatoriaToritSS0208Civilian targeting001816
South SudanJongleiUrorSS0311Civilian targeting001116
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta EastSS0203Civilian targeting00916
South SudanWestern EquatoriaTamburaSS1009Political violence001515
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalJur RiverSS0901Civilian targeting00515
South SudanLakesCueibetSS0402Civilian targeting221014
South SudanCentral EquatoriaKajo KejiSS0102Political violence00714
South SudanLakesYirol EastSS0407Political violence00614
South SudanEastern EquatoriaLafonSS0206Political violence001313
South SudanCentral EquatoriaYeiSS0106Civilian targeting103312
South SudanLakesRumbek EastSS0404Political violence221112
South SudanUnityGuitSS0602Political violence00811
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMvoloSS1006Political violence13411
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMvoloSS1006Civilian targeting13311
South SudanEastern EquatoriaMagwiSS0207Political violence00910
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta SouthSS0205Political violence1049
South SudanUnityPanriangSS0608Civilian targeting0039
South SudanUpper NileMalakalSS0707Political violence20158
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalWauSS0903Civilian targeting0098
South SudanWestern EquatoriaNageroSS1007Political violence1088
South SudanEastern EquatoriaLafonSS0206Civilian targeting0078
South SudanJongleiPochallaSS0309Political violence0078
South SudanJongleiPochallaSS0309Civilian targeting0068
South SudanUnityKochSS0603Political violence0058
South SudanLakesYirol WestSS0408Political violence0038
South SudanCentral EquatoriaMoroboSS0104Civilian targeting00187
South SudanLakesRumbek CentreSS0403Civilian targeting1197
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMundri WestSS1005Political violence2287
South SudanUnityLeerSS0604Political violence0057
South SudanLakesYirol EastSS0407Civilian targeting0017
South SudanWestern EquatoriaTamburaSS1009Civilian targeting0076
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta NorthSS0204Political violence0066
South SudanUnityMayenditSS0605Political violence0046
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta SouthSS0205Civilian targeting1036
South SudanUnityMayenditSS0605Civilian targeting0036
South SudanLakesYirol WestSS0408Civilian targeting0026
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalAweil EastSS0502Political violence0026
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMundri WestSS1005Civilian targeting1055
South SudanUpper NileLuakpiny/NasirSS0704Civilian targeting0055
South SudanUnityAbiemnhomSS0601Civilian targeting1135
South SudanWarrapGogrial WestSS0802Political violence1235
South SudanUpper NileMalakalSS0707Civilian targeting1074
South SudanUpper NileMabanSS0705Political violence0064
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalRajaSS0902Political violence0034
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalRajaSS0902Civilian targeting0034
South SudanUpper NilePanyikangSS0710Civilian targeting0014
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalAweil EastSS0502Civilian targeting0014
South SudanWarrapGogrial WestSS0802Civilian targeting1223
South SudanEastern EquatoriaIkotosSS0202Political violence0023
South SudanEastern EquatoriaIkotosSS0202Civilian targeting0023
South SudanWarrapTwicSS0806Civilian targeting0062
South SudanJongleiFangakSS0306Political violence0062
South SudanLakesRumbek EastSS0404Civilian targeting2252
South SudanUpper NileMabanSS0705Civilian targeting0022
South SudanLakesWuluSS0406Political violence0022
South SudanWestern EquatoriaYambioSS1010Civilian targeting0022
South SudanCentral EquatoriaKajo KejiSS0102Civilian targeting0012
South SudanLakesWuluSS0406Civilian targeting0012
South SudanWestern EquatoriaEzoSS1001Political violence0051
South SudanEastern EquatoriaMagwiSS0207Civilian targeting0041
South SudanWestern EquatoriaEzoSS1001Civilian targeting0021
South SudanUpper NileManyoSS0708Political violence0021
South SudanUpper NileManyoSS0708Civilian targeting0021
South SudanEastern EquatoriaKapoeta NorthSS0204Civilian targeting0021
South SudanUnityPanyijiarSS0607Civilian targeting0011
South SudanJongleiCanal/PigiSS0304Civilian targeting0011
South SudanUpper NileFashodaSS0702Political violence0011
South SudanWestern EquatoriaNageroSS1007Civilian targeting0011
South SudanWestern EquatoriaIbbaSS1002Political violence0011
South SudanUpper NileRenkSS0711Political violence0011
South SudanUpper NileRenkSS0711Civilian targeting0011
South SudanCentral EquatoriaLainyaSS0103Civilian targeting0090
South SudanCentral EquatoriaJubaSS0101Demonstrations0Not reported5Not reported
South SudanUnityRubkonaSS0609Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
South SudanUpper NileRenkSS0711Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
South SudanUnityPanriangSS0608Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
South SudanJongleiAkoboSS0301Demonstrations0Not reported3Not reported
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMaridiSS1003Political violence0020
South SudanWestern EquatoriaMaridiSS1003Civilian targeting0020
South SudanWarrapGogrial WestSS0802Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
South SudanUpper NileMalakalSS0707Demonstrations0Not reported2Not reported
South SudanUnityPanyijiarSS0607Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanUpper NileMelutSS0709Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalAweil WestSS0505Political violence0010
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalAweil WestSS0505Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanWarrapTwicSS0806Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanEastern EquatoriaToritSS0208Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanUnityLeerSS0604Civilian targeting0010
South SudanJongleiNyirolSS0307Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanWestern EquatoriaYambioSS1010Demonstrations1Not reported1Not reported
South SudanJongleiBor SouthSS0303Demonstrations0Not reported1Not reported
South SudanLakesAwerialSS0401Political violence0010
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalAweil CentreSS0501Political violence0010
South SudanUpper NileMaiwutSS0706Political violence0010
South SudanUpper NileMaiwutSS0706Civilian targeting0010

ACLED monthly event counts from ACLED's files on HDX; latest complete month Sep 2026, twelve months Oct 2025–Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. ACLED's district rows and P-codes, summed only over months: one row per district and category with at least one event in the twelve months, most fatalities first. The P-code joins a row to administrative boundaries. The full monthly files are on HDX (links). Counts are of events reported in news, NGO and local sources and coded by ACLED; fatalities are reported estimates and ACLED does not count them for demonstrations. The three categories overlap (an attack on civilians can also be political violence): never add them. ACLED updates its files weekly and can revise recent months. Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), acleddata.com.

E47 Who works where: organisations reporting operational presence (OCHA 3W) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA 3W operational presence)

About this source: 'Who does What Where': OCHA's lists of the organisations that report activities in each area and sector. Useful for finding partners on the ground; it shows only what organisations report.

Trace this: South Sudan: Operational Presence (ss_202601012_3w_operational presence_Jan-Aug_2026.xlsx, OCHA South Sudan) ↗

CountryOrganisationTypeSectorsReported geographyRegions (up to 3)Ranking reach in selected sectors
South SudanCatholic Medical Missons BoardInternational NGOHealth, Nutrition10 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria10 coded admin2 areas
South SudanWorld Vision InternationalInternational NGOEducation, Health9 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria9 coded admin2 areas
South SudanAgency for Technical Cooperation and DevelopmentInternational NGOFood security4 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria4 coded admin2 areas
South SudanAmref Health AfricaInternational NGOHealth4 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria4 coded admin2 areas
South SudanAndre Foods South SudanNational NGONutrition4 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria4 coded admin2 areas
South SudanInternational Organization for MigrationUnited NationsHealth4 admin2 area(s)Western Equatoria4 coded admin2 areas

OCHA 3W operational presence via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest period: South Sudan Jan–Aug 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. Organisations in the brief's sectors are listed first; most reported coded areas in selected sectors first, ties alphabetical; reach, not capacity (not a capacity ranking). South Sudan: ranking counts distinct coded admin2 areas. South Sudan: 41 organisations reported for Jan–Aug 2026, 21 of them in this brief's sectors. Presence is self-reported to the humanitarian clusters; it shows where an organisation reports working, not its funding, scale or quality. Admin levels are counted separately and can overlap; they must not be added together. Displayed geography includes all reported sectors; where geographic codes are absent, displayed counts use names qualified by their parent area. Ranking uses codes only, at the finest available level in selected sectors for that country. Only sectors with a supported DAC-to-cluster mapping contribute to sector reach. Missing comparable coded reach is not zero presence or capacity.

E48 Private foundations in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)

About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.

Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped aggregate query (CSV) ↗

RankFoundationTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Reported period total (USD m)
1Gates FoundationTrend 2019–2024: 1.5 to 6.3 (6 years reported)1.4594.2959.3915.2507.6916.34134.427
2Mastercard FoundationTrend 2020–2022: 0.082 to 1.5 (3 years reported)not reported0.0821.0701.469not reportednot reported2.621
3Conrad N. Hilton FoundationTrend 2020–2023: 0.04 to 0.5 (2 years reported)not reported0.040not reportednot reported0.500not reported0.540
4LEGO Foundationnot reportednot reportednot reportednot reportednot reported0.4580.458
5UBS Optimus Foundationnot reportednot reported0.250not reportednot reportednot reported0.250
6H&M Foundation0.088not reportednot reportednot reportednot reportednot reported0.088

OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients SSD; DAC sectors 122, 520, 720; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Top ten by sum of available observations. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.

E49 Foundation projects in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)

About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.

Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped project query (CSV) ↗

FoundationProjectReported project IDRecipientYearsDisbursed (USD m)
Gates FoundationEnd-game Support to the Guinea Worm Eradication Program (GWEP)?INV-038876South Sudan2022, 20244.500
Gates FoundationCommunity-Based Surveillance & Routine Immunization in South SudanINV-037750South Sudan20214.049
Gates FoundationCommunity-Based Surveillance & Routine Immunization in South SudanINV-025624South Sudan2020, 20214.001
Gates FoundationCommunity Based Surveillance in South Sudan SupplementINV-003931South Sudan2019, 20203.205
Gates FoundationARISE Project - Phase 2INV-045796South Sudan2022, 20242.900
Gates FoundationCOMMUNITY-BASED SURVEILLANCE & ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION IN SOUTH SUDANINV-037750South Sudan20232.700
Gates FoundationEND-GAME SUPPORT TO THE GUINEA WORM ERADICATION PROGRAM (GWEP)?INV-038876South Sudan20232.250
Gates FoundationStrengthen RI In South Sudan: Support to Local Implementing partnerINV-063999South Sudan20242.236
Mastercard Foundation2021 Urgent Support for Africa CDC Capacity Building1627South Sudan2021, 20221.833
Gates FoundationFCDO gap filling: Trachoma elimination in South SudanINV-036406South Sudan20211.562

OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients SSD; DAC sectors 122, 520, 720; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ten largest returned titled project records, grouped by reported ID, title and recipient. Not a complete activity inventory; reporting IDs/titles can change between years. Project values are a drilldown, not additional to the foundation totals. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap.

E50 Current activities reported to IATI: who is active now, and through whom · IATI Datastore (activities as published by each organisation)

About this source: The International Aid Transparency Initiative: an open standard under which donors, UN agencies and NGOs publish their own activity data, often more up to date than the OECD's. Completeness and quality depend on each publisher.

Trace this: Danish Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) annual contributio (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · ICRC Strategic support through the Danish Red Cross 2022-202 (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark) ↗ · OCHA Field activities, South Sudan (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) ↗

CountryPublisherActivityImplementing organisationsStartPlanned endLast updatedIATI identifier
South SudanMinistry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkDanish Emergency Management Agency (DEMA) annual contribution 2021-2028Not stated2021-01-012028-12-312026-10-14XM-DAC-3-1-286279-34899
South SudanMinistry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkICRC Strategic support through the Danish Red Cross 2022-2024Not stated2022-01-012028-12-312026-10-14XM-DAC-3-1-287084-35798
South SudanUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOCHA Field activities, South SudanUNOCHA2011-01-012030-12-312026-10-13XM-DAC-41127-O496
South SudanOxfam NovibSouth Sudan HST LHLNot stated2024-04-012027-09-302026-10-13NL-KVK-27108436-A-07330-08:SS
South SudanGates FoundationEnhancing Leadership and Management for Malaria Elimination Phase 2Strathmore University2024-02-082026-12-312026-10-12DAC-1601-INV-059081
South SudanGates FoundationReaching the Last Mile FundThe END Fund2018-10-232028-05-312026-10-12DAC-1601-OPP1193778
South SudanUnited Nations Development ProgrammeSouth Sudan-GAVI Supply Chain Strengthening in South SudanUNDP2025-04-012026-12-312026-10-12XM-DAC-41114-PROJECT-01004489
South SudanForeign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD)Multi country Crisis - humanitarian response - Canadian Lutheran World Relief 2024Not stated2024-07-162026-11-302026-10-12CA-3-P014147001
South SudanForeign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD)Humanitarian Responses coordinated by the Country-Based Pooled Funds - OCHA 2025-2026Not stated2025-05-012026-12-312026-10-12CA-3-P015704001
South SudanSwedenUNESCO Our Rights, Our Lives, Our Future Phase II (2023 - 2027)Not stated2023-06-092028-06-302026-10-09SE-0-SE-6-14653
South SudanSwedenAct Church of Sweden 2023-2025 (CSO-strategy)Not stated2023-03-162027-12-312026-10-09SE-0-SE-6-15302
South SudanHaut-Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés (HCR)UNHCR operation in South SudanUnited Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)2025-01-012026-12-312026-10-08XM-DAC-41121-2025-EHGL-SSD

IATI Datastore, activities in implementation (status 2) in South Sudan, DAC sectors 122, 520, 720; most recently updated first, at most two per publisher; activities whose planned end has passed or that have no end date and started over five years ago are left out; retrieved 2026-10-14. Published by each organisation to the IATI Standard, usually more current than the OECD but uneven: coverage depends on who publishes, and the same work can be reported by both funder and implementer. Leads to check, not a complete list; amounts are not shown or totalled here and must not be added to OECD or OCHA figures.

E51 World Bank projects: pipeline and active · World Bank Projects API (active and pipeline projects)

About this source: The World Bank's own database of the projects it finances, with approved amounts, dates and status, including projects still in preparation.

Trace this: South Sudan Health Sector Transformation Project (HSTP) (P508356) ↗ · South Sudan Resilient Livestock Sector Project (P500553) ↗ · Productive Safety Net for Socioeconomic Opportunities Project Additional Financing (P181549) ↗ · World Bank projects and operations ↗

CountryProjectProject IDStatusBoard approvalCommitment (USD m)Major sectorsClosing date
South SudanSouth Sudan Health Sector Transformation Project (HSTP)P508356Active2025-06-1740.0HealthNot reported
South SudanSouth Sudan Resilient Livestock Sector ProjectP500553Active2025-06-1040.0Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry2030-05-31
South SudanProductive Safety Net for Socioeconomic Opportunities Project Additional FinancingP181549Active2024-09-0370.0Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Social Protection2027-06-30
South SudanSouth Sudan Health Sector Transformation Project (HSTP)P181385Active2023-12-20157.0Health2027-07-31
South SudanSouth Sudan Resilient Agricultural Livelihoods Project Additional FinancingP180940Active2023-12-0430.5Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services2027-02-23
South SudanSouth Sudan Productive Safety Net for Socioeconomic Opportunities ProjectP177663Active2022-06-06199.0Social Protection2027-06-30
South SudanSouth Sudan Women's Social and Economic Empowerment ProjectP176900Active2022-05-2470.0Public Administration; Social Protection2027-06-30
South SudanSouth Sudan Resilient Agricultural Livelihoods ProjectP169120Active2021-06-0862.5Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services2027-02-23

World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-10-14. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.

E52 People in need of humanitarian assistance (OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)

About this source: The yearly humanitarian needs overviews agreed by UN agencies and partners in each crisis, with the official number of people in need. They are the basis of humanitarian appeals.

Trace this: Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2025, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2026, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗

CountrySectorPeople in needPeople targetedPlan period
South SudanAll sectors (intersectoral)9,913,8634,343,4352026
South SudanFood security7,650,9622,664,0322026
South SudanHealth6,269,6922,884,6002026
South SudanNutrition5,250,9331,833,6122026

OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle (Humanitarian Needs Overview), national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest plan period per country and sector; retrieved 2026-10-14. The intersectoral figure counts each person once across all sectors; sector figures overlap and must not be added together, or to the intersectoral figure. Targeted is the part of the need the response plan aims to reach. Figures are planning estimates. Each row is its sector's latest overview, so the plan period can differ between rows.

E53 Acute food insecurity: people in Phase 3 (Crisis) or worse (IPC / Cadre Harmonisé) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)Newest: Sep–Nov 2025

Older than usual. Newest available: Sep–Nov 2025, about 12 months old. Acute food insecurity (IPC / Cadre Harmonisé) usually covers an analysis period that ended within about nine months; the publisher has released nothing newer yet. FEWS NET's current estimate for Sep 2026 is in the same card: a different method, not on the same scale.

About this source: The IPC, and the Cadre Harmonisé in West Africa and the Sahel, are the standard, consensus-based classifications of food insecurity used by governments, the UN and NGOs. Phase 3 means crisis; Phase 5 means catastrophe or famine.

Trace this: Global: Acute Food Insecurity Country Data (ipc_global_national_wide.csv, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)) ↗ · FEWS NET, South Sudan ↗

CountryAnalysisStatusPeriodPeople in Phase 3+Share of analysed populationPeople in Phase 5 (Catastrophe)Population analysed
South SudanIPCCurrentSep–Nov 20255,972,14442%27,85614,203,031
South SudanIPCPast projection (first)Dec 2025–Mar 20265,856,64641%27,85614,203,031
South SudanIPCPast projection (second)Apr–Jul 20267,834,75855%73,30614,203,031
South SudanFEWS NET outlook Sep 2026FEWS NET estimate, currentSep 20268.0–9.0 millionNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
South SudanFEWS NET outlook Sep 2026FEWS NET estimate, projectionMar 20277.0–8.0 millionNot reportedNot reportedNot reported

Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections; retrieved 2026-10-14. Phase 3+ counts people in Crisis, Emergency or Catastrophe. Shares are of the population analysed, which may be smaller than the national population. Projections are estimates made at the time of the analysis, not observations; a past projection covers a period that has ended without a newer published analysis. Where no IPC or Cadre Harmonisé period covers today, FEWS NET's monthly estimate is added: people in Phase 3+ as a range, from FEWS NET's own analysis (a different method, so not comparable with the shares above).

E54 Staple food prices in local markets (WFP) · WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API

About this source: Prices of staple foods that WFP and partners collect in local markets. Rising prices are an early warning of hunger and reduce what cash assistance buys.

Trace this: Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2026, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗ · Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2025, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗

CountryCommodity (unit)Latest monthMedian retail priceMarketsChange from a year earlier (same markets)Markets compared
South SudanBeans (red) (KG)Oct 202617,000 SSP25+32%20
South SudanOil (vegetable) (L)Oct 202620,000 SSP25+40%20
South SudanSorghum (white, imported) (3.5 KG)Oct 202623,000 SSP23+86%17
South SudanWheat flour (KG)Oct 202612,000 SSP25+48%20

WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API; retail prices of cereals, pulses and oils; four staples per country reported by the most markets; median across markets; retrieved 2026-10-14. Nominal prices in local currency: a change includes general inflation and currency depreciation, not only food scarcity, and prices cannot be compared across countries. The year-on-year change uses only markets reporting in both months. Markets are those WFP monitors, not a national average.

E55 Rainfall against the long-term average, by region, to 30 Sep 2026 (CHIRPS via WFP) · CHIRPS rainfall (Climate Hazards Center, aggregated by WFP) via the HDX Humanitarian APINewest: 30 Sep 2026

Older than usual. Newest available: 30 Sep 2026, about 2 months old. CHIRPS rainfall (WFP) usually covers the last few weeks; the publisher has released nothing newer yet.

About this source: Satellite rainfall estimates combined with weather-station data, produced by the Climate Hazards Center at UC Santa Barbara and widely used in food-security early warning; WFP averages them by region.

Trace this: South Sudan: Rainfall Indicators at Subnational Level (ssd-rainfall-subnat-5ytd.csv, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗

CountryRegionRegion code (P-code)Rainfall, 3 months (mm)Average, 3 months (mm)3 months, % of averageLast month, % of average
South SudanEastern EquatoriaSS0220533861%47%
South SudanLakesSS0434347273%80%
South SudanCentral EquatoriaSS0133044874%76%
South SudanUnitySS0638351475%87%
South SudanJongleiSS0335045976%70%
South SudanWarrapSS0840652378%93%
South SudanWestern EquatoriaSS1043755379%89%
South SudanUpper NileSS0736243683%77%
South SudanNorthern Bahr el GhazalSS0547155086%116%
South SudanWestern Bahr el GhazalSS0955764487%116%

CHIRPS satellite rainfall estimates with station data, averaged per region by WFP, via the HDX Humanitarian API; rolling periods ending 30 Sep 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. Percentages compare with the 1989-2018 average for the same period. Recent periods use preliminary estimates that are replaced by final data about a month later. 'Dry period' marks regions whose average for the period is under 30 mm, where a percentage says little. Rainfall is one input to harvests and water supply, not a drought declaration. Driest regions first. Region names are matched to WFP's region codes from OCHA's common operational boundaries (current and earlier editions), checked against the size of each region in WFP's data.

E56 Displacement: people hosted at the end of 2025 (UNHCR year-end count, not a current figure) · UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics

About this source: UNHCR's official statistics on refugees and other forcibly displaced people, compiled from governments and its own operations; the global reference for refugee numbers.

Trace this: UNHCR population API: hosted in SSD, 2025 ↗ · UNHCR Refugee Data Finder ↗

CountryEnd of yearRefugees hostedAsylum seekersInternally displaced
South Sudan2025601,8183,2461,277,527

UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics API, end-year figures by country of asylum; retrieved 2026-10-14. Internally displaced counts cover people UNHCR protects or assists and may be zero where it does not report them.

E57 Economic outlook (IMF World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor) · IMF World Economic Outlook

About this source: The IMF's twice-yearly economic figures and forecasts for its member countries, the standard reference for growth, inflation and public debt; revenue comes from its Fiscal Monitor. Forecasts are revised as conditions change.

Trace this: IMF WEO DataMapper: real GDP growth ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: inflation ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: government debt ↗

CountryMeasure20252026 (projection)2027 (projection)
South SudanReal GDP growth (%)41.410.53.9
South SudanInflation, average consumer prices (%)97.627.628.3
South SudanGovernment gross debt (% of GDP)64.243.243.0
South SudanGovernment revenue including grants (% of GDP)21.421.021.6

IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2026) (growth, inflation, debt) and Fiscal Monitor (October 2026) (revenue) via the DataMapper API; retrieved 2026-10-14. 2026 and 2027 are IMF projections and are revised twice a year.

E58 Risk of external debt distress (IMF and World Bank debt sustainability analysis) · IMF and World Bank debt sustainability analysis

About this source: Joint IMF and World Bank assessments of whether low-income countries can carry their debt, rated from low risk to in debt distress. They influence how much of the World Bank's IDA support a country gets as grants rather than loans.

Trace this: IMF list of LIC DSAs (as of March 31, 2026) ↗ · IMF-World Bank Debt Sustainability Framework for low-income countries ↗

CountryRisk of external debt distressDebt sustainable?Assessment publishedJoint with the World Bank
South SudanHighSustainable10 Jun 2024Yes

IMF, List of LIC DSAs for PRGT-eligible countries, as of March 31, 2026; retrieved 2026-10-14. Ratings come from the latest published debt sustainability analysis for each low-income country and change only when a new one is published, so check the date. Debt sustainability is assessed only for countries at high risk or in debt distress. The list covers countries eligible for the IMF's concessional lending; others are not rated.

E59 Who funds climate action here: climate-related development finance by provider (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD: development finance for climate and the environment ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2022.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2023.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryRankProviderProvider typeTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share
South Sudan1International Development AssociationMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 178 to 65.6 (3 years reported)178.3328.265.645%
South Sudan2United KingdomDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 20.6 to 72.1 (3 years reported)20.641.472.111%
South Sudan3GermanyDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 56.1 to 42.3 (3 years reported)56.16.042.38%
South Sudan4African Development FundMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 33.1 to 47.6 (3 years reported)33.15.247.67%
South Sudan5EU Institutions (excl. EIB)DAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 43.3 (3 years reported)0.042.443.37%
South Sudan6NorwayDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 10.3 to 37.0 (3 years reported)10.314.937.05%
South Sudan7JapanDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 27.6 to 1.3 (3 years reported)27.628.11.35%
South Sudan8United StatesDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 14.6 to 16.7 (3 years reported)14.615.516.74%
South Sudan9NetherlandsDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 3.9 to 3.6 (3 years reported)3.917.43.62%
South Sudan10IrelandDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 10.4 to 5.0 (3 years reported)10.43.25.01%
South SudanAll providersTrend 2022–2024: 365 to 374 (3 years reported)365.3519.4373.8100%
South SudanAll providers: adaptation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 330 to 362 (3 years reported)330.4480.6362.5
South SudanAll providers: mitigation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 60.1 to 33.3 (3 years reported)60.157.733.3
South SudanAll providers: principal objective or climate component onlyTrend 2022–2024: 223 to 183 (3 years reported)223.1400.1182.6

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2022–2024: commitments in current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. Commitments, not disbursements. Bilateral activities count at full value when climate is a principal or significant objective (OECD Rio markers), so the totals are an upper bound; multilateral development banks report only each project's climate component. The 'principal objective or climate component only' row is the stricter measure. Adaptation and mitigation overlap where an activity targets both, so they do not add up to the total. South Sudan: USD 365.3m in 2022 → USD 373.8m in 2024 (+2%); peak USD 519.4m in 2023.

E60 Largest climate-related commitments in 2024 (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryProviderProjectPurposeClimate objectiveInstrumentUSD m
South SudanInternational Development AssociationPRODUCTIVE SAFETY NET FOR SOCIOECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT ADDITIONAL FINANCINGSocial ProtectionClimate ComponentsStandard grant54.2
South SudanEU Institutions (excl. EIB)GREEN AND RESILIENT ECONOMY SOUTH SUDANEnvironmental policy and administrative management; Agricultural education/training and 2 morePrincipalStandard grant43.3
South SudanAfrican Development FundCRAFT-1Agricultural policy and administrative managementClimate ComponentsStandard grant42.1
South SudanUnited KingdomWORLD FOOD PROGRAMMERelief co-ordination and support services; Emergency food assistance and 1 moreSignificantStandard grant28.4
South SudanGermanySTRENGTHENING RESILIENCE IN SOUTH SUDAN JOINT PROGRAM - UNICEF AND WFP (UNICEF)Multisector aid for basic social servicesSignificantStandard grant19.5
South SudanGermanySTRENGTHENING RESILIENCE IN SOUTH SUDAN - JOINT PROGRAM UNICEF AND WFP (WFP)Multisector aid for basic social servicesSignificantStandard grant19.5
South SudanNorwayBUILDING RESILIENT LIVELIHOODS TO CLIMATE CHANGEAgricultural land resourcesPrincipalStandard grant15.8
South SudanUnited KingdomRESPONDING TO HUMANITARIAN NEEDS WHILE BUILDING THE RESILIENCE OF MOST VULNERABLE CHILDREN & WOMEN.Material relief assistance and services SignificantStandard grant10.4

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2024; climate-related amount of each commitment, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. The climate-related amount of each activity as the OECD counts it (the whole activity when climate is a Rio-marked objective; the climate component for multilateral development banks). Titles as reported by the provider.

E61 Human development, poverty and displacement (UNDP, IOM) · UNDP Human Development Report Office and IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix

About this source: UNDP's Human Development Index combines health, education and income into one measure and is the best-known summary of human development; IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix counts people displaced within their own country in crises.

Trace this: UNDP Human Development Report: data center ↗ · UNDP country data and charts: South Sudan ↗ · UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index: downloads ↗ · IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix ↗ · UN System Data Commons (IOM series) ↗

CountryMeasureValueYearTrend
South SudanHuman Development Index (0-1)0.3882023Trend 2013–2023: 0.391 to 0.388 (11 years reported)
South SudanHDI rank1932023
South SudanInequality-adjusted HDI (0-1)0.2262023
South SudanHuman development lost to inequality (%)41.8%2023
South SudanInternally displaced people (IOM DTM)1,992,5132025

UNDP Human Development Report, composite indices time series; UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index; IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix via the UN System Data Commons; latest year per measure; retrieved 2026-10-14. The HDI combines life expectancy, schooling and income per person; the inequality-adjusted HDI discounts it for how unequally these are shared. Multidimensional poverty counts people deprived in several of health, education and living standards at once, from the household survey named in the year column. Displacement counts are IOM's latest national round and are shown only where IOM reports one; check the year before comparing. South Sudan HDI: 0.391 in 2013 → 0.388 in 2023 (-1%); peak 0.403 in 2019.

E62 Recent disaster alerts (GDACS, 2025-10-14 to 2026-10-14) · GDACS (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: A UN and European Commission alert system that estimates within hours how serious an earthquake, cyclone, flood or drought may be for people. Alerts are model estimates to guide international response, not damage assessments.

Trace this: GDACS alert archive ↗

CountryHazardAlertsHighest alert levelDate of highest alertLatest alert (any level)
South SudanDrought1Orange2026-06-212026-06-21
South SudanFlood1Green2026-08-152026-08-15

Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre), automatic near-real-time alerts; retrieved 2026-10-14. Colours estimate the need for international humanitarian assistance: Green = unlikely (local impact can still be significant), Orange = possible, Red = likely; one disaster can raise several alerts. Country attribution uses affected-country ISO3; window applies to event start date, not last update. Counts are returned records, not unique disasters; regional records may appear for multiple countries. Map shows only valid coordinates in the displayed frame. South Sudan orange/red alerts: Drought in Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, Cameroon, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, South Sudan, Chad (Orange, 2026-06-21).

E63 Governance and investment climate · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's composite measures of governance, built from surveys and expert assessments. They are widely used to compare countries, but they measure perceptions and come with margins of error.

Trace this: Worldwide Governance Indicators in the World Bank DataBank ↗

CountryMeasureScoreYearScore 2019
South SudanControl of corruption6202510
South SudanPolitical stability and absence of violence39202523
South SudanRegulatory quality22202522
South SudanGovernment effectiveness620258
South SudanRule of law25202528
South SudanVoice and accountability23202522

World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI; retrieved 2026-10-14. WGI uses an absolute 0-100 scale anchored to fixed reference points, not percentile ranks. Perception-based estimates have uncertainty; small differences should not be overinterpreted.

E64 Country indicators — South Sudan · World Bank World Development Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's main collection of development statistics on poverty, health, education and the economy, compiled from national and international sources. It is the common reference for country indicators; the latest years are often missing.

Trace this: Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population) (SN.ITK.DEFC.ZS) ↗ · Under-5 mortality (per 1,000 live births) (SH.DYN.MORT) ↗ · Population (SP.POP.TOTL) ↗

IndicatorValueYearTrend
Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)19.12024Trend 2020–2024: 21.8 to 19.1 (5 years reported)
Under-5 mortality (per 1,000 live births)96.72024Trend 2016–2024: 273 to 96.7 (9 years reported)
Population12,188,7882025Trend 2016–2025: 10.8 m to 12.2 m (10 years reported)

World Bank World Development Indicators, most recent value; retrieved 2026-10-14. Most recent non-empty year differs by indicator. Trend lines cover the reported years of the last ten.

E65 Need against funding at a glance (computed) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryMeasureValueDetailCard
South SudanHumanitarian appeal funded72% → 46%2024 → 2025E34
AllOfficial aid in this scope, real terms-27%USD 1,293.8m (2019) → 938.6m (2024), constant 2024 USDE25

Computed by the app from the cards named in the last column. Each figure is taken from the named card; changes are computed from the card's own figures.

E66 Need against funding by cluster, 2025 (computed from cards E35, E52, E34) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryClusterPeople in need, 2025Change from 2024Required (USD m)Funded (USD m)CoverageAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
South SudanMulti-sector680,000n/a468.043.09%-37 points63Critically underfunded
South SudanWater Sanitation Hygiene5.01 m-10%86.325.229%-17 points5Underfunded
South SudanEducation1.63 m-20%40.412.832%-14 points8Underfunded
South SudanEmergency Shelter and NFI4.24 m+98%46.516.836%-10 points4Underfunded, gap widening
South SudanHealth5.66 m-11%119.245.438%-8 points8Underfunded
South SudanLogistics300n/a99.845.646%0 points152,000Underfunded
South SudanNutrition4.33 m+72%198.4104.953%+7 points24Half funded or more
South SudanFood Security7.76 m+11%475.1297.563%+17 points38Half funded or more

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E35) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E52). Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

E67 How exposed the money is: donor concentration and cuts (computed from cards E25, E40) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
Donor or measureAid in this scope, 2024 (USD m)ShareChange in the donor's total aid, 2024→2025Exposed
United States536.257%-56%Yes
United Kingdom107.911%+1%No
EU Institutions64.97%+48%No
Sweden21.92%+19%No
Central Emergency Response Fund [CERF]20.02%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
Canada16.62%+20%No
Germany15.52%-16%Yes
Norway12.11%+5%No
Global Fund10.21%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
UNHCR0.00%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
Largest donor's share57%
Three largest donors' share76%
Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025)551.759%
Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly300.532%

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E25), all official donors USD 938.6m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E40). Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

How this brief was made

Scoped as: Understand how humanitarian access and funding for food assistance and nutrition in South Sudan have changed, and identify suitable local partners and delivery models for funding decisions.

Data path: Norwegian aid data (bistandsresultater.no), cleaned and reconciled → exact totals and search by meaning over 20k agreement descriptions. Live: OECD CRS (all donors), World Bank WDI, web search.

Timings (s): inform 0.0, governance 0.0, outlook 0.0, severity 0.0, access 0.0, cerf 0.0, debt_risk 0.0, climate_finance 0.0, education 0.0, us_aid 0.08, external_debt 0.09, imputed_multilateral 0.11, private_finance 0.24, refugees 0.25, philanthropy 0.32, indicators 0.39, disasters 0.41, human_development 0.43, presence 0.83, oecd_projects 0.93, bank_projects 0.91, conflict 1.07, iati 1.09, semantic_search 1.16, rainfall 1.37, portfolio 1.43, humanitarian 1.89, needs 1.92, food_prices 3.91, cbpf 8.67, oecd 9.88, oecd_totals 9.88, plan 5.91, web 31.96, web_compare 6.24, compose 52.1, total 74.15.

Trace checks: 0 items to check, listed under Before you use this brief.

Draft for review. Figures come from the evidence cards; highlighted figures could not be traced automatically. Web research is a lead, not verified evidence.

Prepare another brief