Demonstration prototype. Figures and text are generated automatically from open data and AI models and may contain errors or be out of date: quality-assure against the linked sources before using anything in a decision.

Open to everyone; gathered 8 November 2026 and updated each night. Conflict-event data (ACLED) is shown to signed-in reviewers only.

Country page

Congo, Dem. Rep.

Aid recipient

Congo, Dem. Rep. is on the OECD DAC List of ODA Recipients for 2025 flows (group: least developed countries) (OECD ↗).

Open data gathered 8 Nov 2026, 23:53 UTC · 65 data cards · each card names its dataset, period and retrieval date

Congo, Dem. Rep. on one screen

Figures from the cards below, each with its period; the number after a figure opens its card, with the dataset and retrieval date.

Aid
USD 4,090.9m official aid, all sectors, 2024 (+37% since 2019, current USD) E28. Main donors, 2024: United States 26%, World Bank (IDA) 23%, Global Fund 7%. Donors whose total aid (all recipients) fell more than 10%, 2024→2025 (provisional): United States −56%, Germany −16%, Belgium −16% E68.
Appeal
2026 appeal 53% funded to date (USD 1,140.0m of 2,132.6m); 2025: 27%. E36
Need
14.9 million people in need (2026 plan) E52. 28.8 million in Phase 3+ in Sep–Dec 2026, IPC E53.
Crisis
Severity 9.2/10 (very high, stable; ACAPS, October 2026) E45; access constraints 5/5 (extreme, Nov 2026) E46.
Norway
NOK 286.6m in 2025 (Norway's data) E1; main partners 2021–2025: WFP, Norwegian Refugee Council, Kirkens Nødhjelp E2. More ↓

Newest figure: Sep–Dec 2026 (IPC) · Oldest: 2024 (OECD CRS).

Crisis severity (all crisis types, incl. conflict) and natural-hazard alerts

Retrieved 8 Nov 2026 · ACAPS crisis severity: October 2026 · ACAPS access: Nov 2026 · GDACS alerts: 8 Nov 2025 – 8 Nov 2026

Congo, Dem. Rep.: ACAPS severity 9.2 of 10, Complex crisis in DRC (very high, ACAPS)

Dots: 0 GDACS alert records plotted in this frame (tap or hover for details); a geographic subset of the evidence card, not an exhaustive disaster count. See the card for the recorded event-start window. Their colour is GDACS's estimate of the need for international humanitarian assistance, not of local severity E63. Outlines: Natural Earth.

Crises tracked by ACAPS E45 E46 · severity 1 to 10, higher is more severe; access constraints 0 to 5, 5 is extreme

At a glance

Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs

14.9mpeople in need, Congo, Dem. Rep. 2026 (all sectors)

Source: OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview ↗ · E52Retrieved 2026-11-08

28.8mpeople in Phase 3+ (IPC), Congo, Dem. Rep., Sep–Dec 2026

Source: IPC / Cadre Harmonisé ↗ · E53Retrieved 2026-11-08

9.2/10Crisis severity, Democratic Republic of the Congo · October 2026

Source: ACAPS INFORM Severity ↗ · E45Retrieved 2026-11-08

5/5Access constraints, Congo, Dem. Rep. · Nov 2026

Source: ACAPS Humanitarian Access ↗ · E46Retrieved 2026-11-08

53%of Congo, Dem. Rep.'s 2026 national appeal funded to date (2025: 27%)

Source: UN OCHA FTS ↗ · E36Retrieved 2026-11-08

Official aid, all sectors, rose 37%: 2019–2024All official donors in scope, current USD millions, gross disbursements; observations 2019–2024; OECD data by recipient end in 2024, 2025 due in December 2026
2019: 2,982.8 (USD millions)2,98320192020: 3,536.3 (USD millions)20202021: 3,698.5 (USD millions)20212022: 3,395.8 (USD millions)20222023: 4,634.5 (USD millions)4,63420232024: 4,090.9 (USD millions)4,0912024

USD millions

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E28Retrieved 2026-10-16Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients COD (combined); all sectors (CRS total)

United States provided 23% of official funding, 2019–2024Share of scoped gross disbursements over 2019–2024 combined, not a latest-year share
United States23%
World Bank (IDA)22%
Global Fund7%
IMF Concessional Trust Funds7%
EU Institutions6%

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E28Retrieved 2026-10-16Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients COD (combined); all sectors (CRS total)

Guarantees led the USD 266.9m mobilised in 2024Private finance mobilised by official development finance, 2024, USD millions
Guarantees226.5
Direct investment26.5
Syndicated loans12.5
Simple co-financing1.3
Fund shares0.2

Source: OECD, mobilised private finance for development ↗ · E41Retrieved 2026-10-22Dataset scope: OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Congo, Dem. Rep. (combined); current USD millions

Congo, Dem. Rep.'s 2026 appeal: 53% funded to dateNational humanitarian response plans, share of requirements funded; 2026 still being funded
Congo, Dem. Rep. 2026 (in progress)53%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 202451%
Congo, Dem. Rep. 202527%

Source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service ↗ · E36Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions

Congo, Dem. Rep.: 23% of people analysed in Phase 3 or worse (Sep–Dec 2026)IPC acute food insecurity, share of the population analysed in Phase 3+ (Crisis or worse); current and projected periods
Sep–Dec 202623%
Jan–Jun 2027 (projected)23%

Source: IPC / Cadre Harmonisé via HDX HAPI ↗ · E53Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections

Weakest score: control of corruption in Congo, Dem. Rep. (18/100)Worldwide Governance Indicators, 0 to 100, higher is better; observations 2025; ticks: Score 2019

Control of corruption

Congo, Dem. Rep.18

Regulatory quality

Congo, Dem. Rep.33

Rule of law

Congo, Dem. Rep.31

Political stability

Congo, Dem. Rep.28

Source: World Bank WGI ↗ · E64Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI

Need against funding

Computed by the app from the evidence cards it links to, with fixed rules, so two briefs on the same scope say the same thing.

Where need is outpacing money E67

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E37) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E52).

ClusterPeople in need, 2025 (change)Appeal fundedAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
Food Security17.61 m -31%10% · USD 106.3 m of 1,114.8 m-17 points6Critically underfunded
Emergency Shelter and NFI4.04 m +10%21% · USD 27.7 m of 133.4 m-6 points7Severely underfundedgap widening
Water Sanitation Hygiene6.22 m -9%24% · USD 35.5 m of 148.9 m-3 points6Severely underfunded
Nutrition6.47 m -23%32% · USD 86.7 m of 275.2 m+5 points13Underfunded
Protection - Child Protection4.01 m +0%32% · USD 23.6 m of 73.9 m+5 points6Underfunded
Multi-sector676,351 -1%37% · USD 71.8 m of 195.0 m+10 points106Underfunded
Health12.94 m -34%44% · USD 87.1 m of 200.2 m+17 points7Underfunded
Multipurpose CashNo need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector) n/a57% · USD 53.5 m of 94.2 m+30 pointsn/aHalf funded or more

Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

Donor concentration and cuts E68

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E28), all official donors USD 4,090.9m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E42).

United States
26%-56% total aid
World Bank (IDA)
23%multilateral: not assessed
Global Fund
7%multilateral: not assessed
EU Institutions
6%+48% total aid
IMF Concessional Trust Funds
6%multilateral: not assessed
Germany
4%-16% total aid
African Development Fund [AfDF]
4%multilateral: not assessed
United Kingdom
3%+1% total aid

donor's total aid fell more than 10% in the latest provisional year

  • 26% Largest donor's share
  • 56% Three largest donors' share
  • 33% Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) (USD 1,330.0 m)
  • 15% Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly (USD 628.8 m)

Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

Money: who funds what

23 cards; open a card for its table and sources.

All donors, the United States and other funders

Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) · OECD DAC Creditor Reporting System

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scopeDonorTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope
1United StatesTrend 2019–2024: 648 to 1,053 (6 years reported)647.9783.8903.5605.51,228.51,053.423%
2World Bank (IDA)Trend 2019–2024: 465 to 958 (6 years reported)465.1470.7584.21,119.21,248.7958.522%
3Global FundTrend 2019–2024: 199 to 283 (6 years reported)199.0217.4277.6318.1267.1282.97%
4IMF Concessional Trust FundsTrend 2019–2024: 0 to 245 (6 years reported)0.0405.7438.90.0406.4245.17%
5EU InstitutionsTrend 2019–2024: 213 to 255 (6 years reported)213.2200.2224.8211.9257.8255.46%
6GermanyTrend 2019–2024: 202 to 160 (6 years reported)202.0176.7191.2165.2144.6160.45%
7Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization [GAVI]Trend 2019–2024: 164 to 121 (6 years reported)164.0146.673.0114.5175.6120.84%
8African Development Fund [AfDF]Trend 2019–2024: 92.2 to 160 (6 years reported)92.2155.4154.485.3124.1160.33%
9United KingdomTrend 2019–2024: 236 to 130 (6 years reported)235.7174.5100.857.849.9129.73%
10BelgiumTrend 2019–2024: 101 to 116 (6 years reported)100.9104.5113.0103.9113.2116.23%
19NorwayTrend 2019–2024: 24.4 to 22.3 (6 years reported)24.431.330.528.434.722.31%
All official donorsTrend 2019–2024: 2,983 to 4,091 (6 years reported)2,982.83,536.33,698.53,395.84,634.54,090.9100%
All official donors, constant 2024 USDTrend 2019–2024: 3,466 to 4,091 (6 years reported)3,465.93,990.63,927.83,655.04,746.44,090.9

OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients COD (combined); all sectors (CRS total); retrieved 2026-10-16. 73 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 2,982.8m in 2019 → USD 4,090.9m in 2024 (+37%); peak USD 4,634.5m in 2023. United States: Trend: USD 647.9m in 2019 → USD 1,053.4m in 2024 (+63%); peak USD 1,228.5m in 2023. World Bank (IDA): Trend: USD 465.1m in 2019 → USD 958.5m in 2024 (+106%); peak USD 1,248.7m in 2023. Global Fund: Trend: USD 199.0m in 2019 → USD 282.9m in 2024 (+42%); peak USD 318.1m in 2022. All official donors in constant 2024 USD (the OECD's own deflators, which also take out exchange-rate changes): USD 3,465.9m in 2019 → USD 4,090.9m in 2024 (+18%); peak USD 4,746.4m in 2023. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.

Other donors' largest projects in scope (OECD CRS, 2023 to 2024) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorProjectChannel of deliveryRecipientDisbursed (USD m)
World Bank (IDA)DRC Multisectoral Nutrition and Health ProjectRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo301.3
World Bank (IDA)Second DRC Foundational Economic Governance Reforms Development Policy FinancingRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo281.2
World Bank (IDA)DR Congo Emergency Equity and System Strengthening in EducationRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo262.6
World Bank (IDA)DRC Eastern Recovery ProjectRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo206.1
Global FundContribution to universal access of DRC population to effective and impactful interventions against malaria - Developing country-based NGODemocratic Republic of the Congo151.8
Global FundContribution to universal access of DRC population to effective and impactful interventions against malariaDeveloping country-based NGODemocratic Republic of the Congo131.3
World Bank (IDA)Enhancing Collection of Revenue and Expenditure Management ProjectRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo124.5
World Bank (IDA)DRC Transport and Connectivity Support ProjectRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo91.6
Global FundInvestment for impact against Tuberculosis and HIV in the Democratic Republic of the CongoInternational NGODemocratic Republic of the Congo86.2
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization [GAVI]New vaccine support (NVS)United Nations Children’s FundDemocratic Republic of the Congo84.7
United StatesIntegrated Health Program - DRCPrivate sector in provider countryDemocratic Republic of the Congo79.7
World Bank (IDA)Regional Disease Surveillance Systems Enhancement Project (REDISSE) Phase IVRecipient GovernmentDemocratic Republic of the Congo72.6

OECD CRS project-level records, gross disbursements 2023 to 2024, current USD millions; recipients COD; all sectors; Norway excluded (see the Norwegian data); retrieved 2026-10-22. 2167 projects from 61 donors report in scope. Titles and descriptions are donor-reported; a project may cover more than the sector named.

Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: Congo, Dem. Rep. 2024 ↗ · FTS plan: Congo, Dem. Rep. 2025 ↗ · FTS plan: Congo, Dem. Rep. 2026 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2024 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2026 (all countries) ↗

CountryYearRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
Congo, Dem. Rep.20242,580.61,327.751%
Congo, Dem. Rep.20252,538.0682.227%
Congo, Dem. Rep.2026 (in progress)2,132.61,140.053%

UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.

Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service

About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.

Trace this: FTS plan: Congo, Dem. Rep. 2025 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗

CountryClusterRequired (USD m)Funded (USD m)Coverage
Congo, Dem. Rep.Food Security1,114.8106.310%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Nutrition275.286.731%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Health200.287.143%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Multi-sector195.071.837%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Water Sanitation Hygiene148.935.524%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Emergency Shelter and NFI133.427.721%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Multipurpose Cash94.253.557%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Protection - Child Protection73.923.632%

UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Congo, Dem. Rep. 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 131.9m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 113.3m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 80.3m; United States Department of State USD 46.8m; France, Government of USD 45.6m.

Country-based pooled fund allocations by partner type (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: OCHA CBPF data hub (allocations by fund and partner) ↗ · CBPF API: allocations by year, fund and partner type ↗

FundAllocation yearUN agencies (USD m)International NGOs (USD m)National NGOs (USD m)Other organisations (USD m)Total approved (USD m)National NGO share
DRC2026 (to date)186.90172.1523.811.15384.026.2%
DRC20250.3521.0025.350.3547.0553.9%
DRC20240.0016.8020.200.0037.0054.6%

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds DRC; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Approved allocations only (pipeline excluded); the current year is still being allocated, and years with no approved allocation are not shown. The national NGO share counts direct allocations, not sub-grants, so it is not the whole local share. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)

About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.

Trace this: CBPF API: DRC project records (CSV) ↗

OrganisationTypeFundProjectsIn the clusters covered (USD m)All approved (USD m)Largest clustersAllocation years
World Food ProgrammeUN AgencyDRC286.0086.00Food Security2026 (to date)
United Nations Children's FundUN AgencyDRC433.2033.20Nutrition, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2026 (to date)
Solidarités InternationalInternational NGODRC429.4130.70Food Security, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Health2025, 2026 (to date)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsUN AgencyDRC328.0028.00Food Security, Health2026 (to date)
Agency for Technical Cooperation and DevelopmentInternational NGODRC627.4628.43Food Security, Health, Emergency Shelter and NFI2025, 2026 (to date)
Save the ChildrenInternational NGODRC623.7224.25Health, Nutrition, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Norwegian Refugee CouncilInternational NGODRC714.1228.67Multi-purpose CASH, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Health2024, 2025, 2026 (to date)
Alliance for International Medical ActionInternational NGODRC513.7316.05Health, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Nutrition2025, 2026 (to date)
United Nations High Commissioner for RefugeesUN AgencyDRC29.9516.00Emergency Shelter and NFI, Multi-purpose CASH, Protection2026 (to date)
International Organization for MigrationUN AgencyDRC59.3114.75Camp Coordination / Management, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene2026 (to date)

UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds DRC; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Ranked by approved budget in the clusters covered (Education, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Food Security, Health, Nutrition, Protection, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.

UN Central Emergency Response Fund allocations (CERF) · UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)

About this source: The UN's global emergency fund, which releases money quickly to UN agencies and IOM for sudden or underfunded crises. Its grants signal where the UN sees urgent or neglected needs.

Trace this: CERF allocations (HDX, all countries and years) ↗ · CERF allocations by country ↗

CountryYearRapid Response (USD m)Underfunded Emergencies (USD m)Total approved (USD m)In the clusters covered (USD m)EmergenciesLargest recipient agenciesLatest approval
Congo, Dem. Rep.2026 (to date)48.750.0048.7538.78Cholera, Ebola, Violence/ClashesWorld Health Organization, World Food Programme, United Nations Children’s Fund, International Organization for Migration2026-09-30
Congo, Dem. Rep.202531.7419.3051.0446.59Cholera, Displacement/Migration, EbolaUnited Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization, United Nations Population Fund, World Food Programme2025-12-31
Congo, Dem. Rep.202415.9820.7136.6930.92Displacement, Displacement/Migration, FloodUnited Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, World Food Programme, World Health Organization2024-09-16

UN CERF; countries COD; 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved amounts, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. the clusters covered here: Early recovery, Education, Food security, Health, Nutrition, Protection, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene. Approved CERF grants by year; the current year is to date. CERF funds UN agencies and IOM only, which may pass funds on to partners. 'Agency to be confirmed' is approved money not yet split between agencies. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them. Not an open call.

Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) · OECD, mobilised private finance for development

About this source: The OECD's measure of private money brought in by public development finance, for example through guarantees or co-investment. It is the main reference for blended finance; amounts follow the OECD's attribution rules and are published here for groups of providers.

Trace this: OECD mobilised private finance dataflow (DSD_MOB@DF_MOBILISATION) ↗

MechanismTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)
GuaranteesTrend 2022–2024: 146 to 226 (3 years reported)145.761.1226.5
Direct investment in companies and SPVsTrend 2022–2024: 113 to 26.5 (3 years reported)113.396.126.5
Syndicated loansTrend 2022–2024: 32.0 to 12.5 (3 years reported)32.043.612.5
Simple co-financingTrend 2022–2024: 10.7 to 1.3 (3 years reported)10.715.71.3
Shares in investment funds (CIVs)Trend 2022–2024: 0 to 0.2 (3 years reported)0.00.00.2
All mechanisms, all sectorsTrend 2022–2024: 302 to 267 (3 years reported)301.7216.6266.9
of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 232 to 153 (3 years reported)232.0150.7152.9
of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors)Trend 2022–2024: 69.7 to 114 (3 years reported)69.765.9114.1

OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Congo, Dem. Rep. (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-22. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Guarantees: Trend: USD 145.7m in 2022 → USD 226.5m in 2024 (+55%); peak USD 226.5m in 2024. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers the sectors covered. No sector-level provider split is in the data. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.

Donors' total aid (net ODA), all recipients (2021 to 2025, 2025 provisional) · OECD DAC1 (includes preliminary data)

About this source: The OECD's headline aid totals for each donor, the source of the yearly figures on aid as a share of national income. It shows a donor's overall trend, not where the money goes.

Trace this: OECD DAC1 dataflow (DSD_DAC1@DF_DAC1) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

DonorTrend2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)2025 (USD m) provisional
United StatesTrend 2021–2025: 47,528 to 29,022 (5 years reported)47,528.260,328.764,461.965,336.829,021.9
EU InstitutionsTrend 2021–2025: 20,639 to 52,905 (5 years reported)20,639.127,165.937,544.235,654.152,904.8
GermanyTrend 2021–2025: 32,456 to 28,032 (5 years reported)32,455.636,444.641,253.333,249.328,032.0
United KingdomTrend 2021–2025: 16,278 to 16,365 (5 years reported)16,277.815,761.318,615.716,269.516,365.1
BelgiumTrend 2021–2025: 2,649 to 2,739 (5 years reported)2,649.22,687.42,865.73,246.52,738.9
NorwayTrend 2021–2025: 4,673 to 5,157 (5 years reported)4,673.05,161.05,292.94,905.35,156.8

OECD DAC1, net ODA disbursements to all recipients and sectors, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Shows each donor's overall aid, not its spending in this country or sector. 2025 figures are the OECD's preliminary estimates of aid already disbursed that year (not forecasts) and may be revised. United States: USD 65,336.8m in 2024 → USD 29,021.9m in 2025 (-56% in one year). EU Institutions: USD 35,654.1m in 2024 → USD 52,904.8m in 2025 (+48% in one year). Germany: USD 33,249.3m in 2024 → USD 28,032.0m in 2025 (-16% in one year). United Kingdom: USD 16,269.5m in 2024 → USD 16,365.1m in 2025 (+1% in one year). Belgium: USD 3,246.5m in 2024 → USD 2,738.9m in 2025 (-16% in one year). The same donors in this country and sector (OECD CRS, gross disbursements; ends earlier): United States: USD 647.9m in 2019 → USD 1,053.4m in 2024. EU Institutions: USD 213.2m in 2019 → USD 255.4m in 2024. Germany: USD 202.0m in 2019 → USD 160.4m in 2024. United Kingdom: USD 235.7m in 2019 → USD 129.7m in 2024. Belgium: USD 100.9m in 2019 → USD 116.2m in 2024. Norway: USD 24.4m in 2019 → USD 22.3m in 2024. Measure: net ODA disbursement flows in current USD, not budgets or grant-only funding. Preserve the provisional label on the corresponding observation year.

US foreign assistance by fiscal year (ForeignAssistance.gov), to FY2026 · ForeignAssistance.gov (US government)

About this source: The US government's own record of its foreign assistance: every obligation and payment by country, sector, agency and implementing partner, published much sooner than the OECD's data. It shows the effect of the 2025 US cuts country by country; economic and military aid are kept apart.

Trace this: ForeignAssistance.gov data downloads ↗

CountryMeasureFY2021 (USD m)FY2022 (USD m)FY2023 (USD m)FY2024 (USD m)FY2025 (USD m)FY2026 to date (USD m)Trend
Congo, Dem. Rep.Disbursed, all economic aid840.9831.0974.21,250.0742.1212.4Trend 2021–2025: 841 to 742 (5 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Disbursed, in the sectors covered745.8724.5837.41,089.2606.0193.3Trend 2021–2025: 746 to 606 (5 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Newly obligated (committed), in the sectors covered739.3748.8847.91,196.2330.0132.3Trend 2021–2025: 739 to 330 (5 years reported)

US government obligations and disbursements of economic (non-military) assistance, current USD, from the ForeignAssistance.gov complete dataset (file of Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:40:59 GMT); loaded 2026-10-14; retrieved 2026-10-14. US fiscal years run October to September; FY2026 is incomplete. Obligations are new commitments; disbursements are payments, often against earlier commitments, so they fall later than obligations. Agencies report with a lag and revise. Sectors use the OECD codes the US assigns, which can differ from the recipient's or the OECD's classification. Military and security assistance is excluded. Partners the US withholds by name (redacted) are left out of the partner list. Largest implementing partners by disbursements, FY2025–FY2026: World Food Program (USD 149.1m); United Nations Children's Fund (USD 67.8m); U.S. Government - U.S. Agency for International Development (USD 40.2m); Abt Associates, Inc. (USD 34.4m); Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development (USD 29.8m).

Private foundations in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)

About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.

Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped aggregate query (CSV) ↗

RankFoundationTrend2019 (USD m)2020 (USD m)2021 (USD m)2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Reported period total (USD m)
1Gates FoundationTrend 2019–2024: 27.5 to 63.1 (6 years reported)27.51327.93035.54625.65137.70963.073217.423
2Bezos Earth FundTrend 2021–2022: 25.9 to 23.5 (2 years reported)not reportednot reported25.85023.467not reportednot reported49.317
3Good Ventures FoundationTrend 2023–2024: 1.6 to 22.1 (2 years reported)not reportednot reportednot reportednot reported1.59922.10623.705
4David and Lucile Packard FoundationTrend 2019–2024: 3.4 to 3.2 (6 years reported)3.3984.3173.6903.7504.1693.23822.563
5Wellcome TrustTrend 2019–2024: 2.7 to 5.1 (5 years reported)2.7201.9516.040not reported6.4605.13022.301
6Arcus FoundationTrend 2019–2024: 2.3 to 2.8 (6 years reported)2.3302.1682.5052.8272.3412.76814.939
7Susan T. Buffett FoundationTrend 2021–2023: 2.5 to 5.0 (3 years reported)not reportednot reported2.5002.5005.000not reported10.000
8Oak FoundationTrend 2019–2024: 2.0 to 2.1 (3 years reported)2.000not reportednot reportednot reported1.3122.0825.394
9Bloomberg Family FoundationTrend 2019–2022: 0.975 to 2.0 (4 years reported)0.9750.3000.4811.996not reportednot reported3.753
10Conrad N. Hilton FoundationTrend 2022–2024: 1.9 to 0.375 (3 years reported)not reportednot reportednot reported1.9030.3940.3752.672

OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients COD; all sectors; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-22. Top ten by sum of available observations. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap. Foundation projects are listed in a brief for one or a few sectors.

Current activities reported to IATI: who is active now, and through whom · IATI Datastore (activities as published by each organisation)

About this source: The International Aid Transparency Initiative: an open standard under which donors, UN agencies and NGOs publish their own activity data, often more up to date than the OECD's. Completeness and quality depend on each publisher.

Trace this: Climate Finance - Yangambi centre of excellence on climate a (Directorate-general Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid) ↗ · Localising Protection: Red Cross Action to Assist the Most V (Directorate-general Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid) ↗ · Resource Matters - transparency in the cobalt value chain (Sweden) ↗

CountryPublisherActivityImplementing organisationsStartPlanned endLast updatedIATI identifier
Congo, Dem. Rep.Directorate-general Development Cooperation and Humanitarian AidClimate Finance - Yangambi centre of excellence on climate and biodiversity (phase 2)Not stated2024-07-012027-07-012026-11-08XM-DAC-2-10-5267
Congo, Dem. Rep.Directorate-general Development Cooperation and Humanitarian AidLocalising Protection: Red Cross Action to Assist the Most Vulnerable in Times of Complex, Humanitarian Crises in Burkina Faso, Uganda,…Not stated2025-12-012027-11-302026-11-08XM-DAC-2-10-6274
Congo, Dem. Rep.SwedenResource Matters - transparency in the cobalt value chainNot stated2022-05-232027-06-302026-11-08SE-0-SE-6-15654
Congo, Dem. Rep.SwedenYtterligare stöd till IFRC 2026 för Ebola-responsNot stated2026-01-012027-06-302026-11-08SE-0-SE-2-92545
Congo, Dem. Rep.Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkOCHA DR Congo Humanitarian Fund 2025 to 2026Not stated2025-07-012026-12-312026-11-08XM-DAC-3-1-289514-37754
Congo, Dem. Rep.Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DenmarkUNHCR Humanitarian Partnership Framework Agreement 2022-2026Not stated2022-01-012026-12-312026-11-08XM-DAC-3-1-286888-35592
Congo, Dem. Rep.Belgian agency for international cooperation (Enabel)Portefeuille Thématique Protection Sociale-Volet RDCongoNot stated2022-06-072027-06-072026-11-08BE-BCE_KBO-0264814354-COD21005
Congo, Dem. Rep.Belgian agency for international cooperation (Enabel)Compétences axées sur les potentialités d'investissement - TshopoNot stated2023-04-012029-06-302026-11-08BE-BCE_KBO-0264814354-COD22007
Congo, Dem. Rep.Care NederlandCOD041N TUMA PSE & InnovationCARE DEMO REP OF CONGO CO2023-04-012027-03-312026-11-08NL-KVK-41158230-COD041N
Congo, Dem. Rep.United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOCHA Field activities, Democratic Republic of CongoUNOCHA2006-01-012030-12-312026-11-07XM-DAC-41127-O076
Congo, Dem. Rep.Oxfam NovibDemocratic Republic of Congo HST LHLNot stated2024-04-012027-09-302026-11-07NL-KVK-27108436-A-07330-09:CD
Congo, Dem. Rep.Oxfam NovibCO DRCNot stated2026-06-012026-11-302026-11-07NL-KVK-27108436-A-07837-02:CD

IATI Datastore, activities in implementation (status 2) in Congo, Dem. Rep., all sectors; most recently updated first, at most two per publisher; activities whose planned end has passed or that have no end date and started over five years ago are left out; retrieved 2026-11-08. Published by each organisation to the IATI Standard, usually more current than the OECD but uneven: coverage depends on who publishes, and the same work can be reported by both funder and implementer. Leads to check, not a complete list; amounts are not shown or totalled here and must not be added to OECD or OCHA figures.

Who funds climate action here: climate-related development finance by provider (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD: development finance for climate and the environment ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2022.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2023.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryRankProviderProvider typeTrend2022 (USD m)2023 (USD m)2024 (USD m)Share
Congo, Dem. Rep.1World Bank (IDA)Multilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 936 to 400 (3 years reported)935.5784.7400.454%
Congo, Dem. Rep.2United StatesDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 144 to 160 (3 years reported)144.3184.2160.413%
Congo, Dem. Rep.3African Development FundMultilateral development bankTrend 2022–2024: 56.3 to 160 (3 years reported)56.323.8159.96%
Congo, Dem. Rep.4EU Institutions (excl. EIB)DAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 73.6 to 111 (3 years reported)73.635.7110.86%
Congo, Dem. Rep.5GermanyDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 104 to 66.2 (3 years reported)104.243.366.25%
Congo, Dem. Rep.6FranceDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 20.2 to 29.9 (3 years reported)20.2116.029.94%
Congo, Dem. Rep.7BelgiumDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 24.9 to 33.4 (3 years reported)24.936.633.42%
Congo, Dem. Rep.8JapanDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 40.0 to 1.4 (3 years reported)40.029.81.42%
Congo, Dem. Rep.9United KingdomDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 0 to 48.3 (3 years reported)0.04.048.31%
Congo, Dem. Rep.10SwedenDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 30.1 to 10.5 (3 years reported)30.111.510.51%
Congo, Dem. Rep.11NorwayDAC memberTrend 2022–2024: 3.2 to 15.2 (3 years reported)3.223.215.21%
Congo, Dem. Rep.All providersTrend 2022–2024: 1,487 to 1,058 (3 years reported)1,486.91,358.81,058.2100%
Congo, Dem. Rep.All providers: adaptation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 946 to 686 (3 years reported)945.5561.9685.8
Congo, Dem. Rep.All providers: mitigation (includes overlap)Trend 2022–2024: 714 to 530 (3 years reported)713.71,008.8530.4
Congo, Dem. Rep.All providers: principal objective or climate component onlyTrend 2022–2024: 1,100 to 622 (3 years reported)1,100.2962.2622.4

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2022–2024: commitments in current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. Commitments, not disbursements. Bilateral activities count at full value when climate is a principal or significant objective (OECD Rio markers), so the totals are an upper bound; multilateral development banks report only each project's climate component. The 'principal objective or climate component only' row is the stricter measure. Adaptation and mitigation overlap where an activity targets both, so they do not add up to the total. Congo, Dem. Rep.: USD 1,486.9m in 2022 → USD 1,058.2m in 2024 (-29%); peak USD 1,486.9m in 2022.

Largest climate-related commitments in 2024 (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)

About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.

Trace this: OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗

CountryProviderProjectPurposeClimate objectiveInstrumentUSD m
Congo, Dem. Rep.World Bank (IDA)DRC DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION PROJECTInformation and communication technology (ICT)Climate ComponentsStandard loan289.0
Congo, Dem. Rep.World Bank (IDA)DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, AND RESILIENCE PROJECTMedical services; LivestockClimate ComponentsStandard loan111.4
Congo, Dem. Rep.African Development FundPADCV-PTAEnvironmental policy and administrative managementClimate ComponentsStandard loan104.5
Congo, Dem. Rep.African Development FundPROJET GOUVERNANCE-COMPETANCE PAGDC-PTAEducation policy and administrative managementClimate ComponentsStandard loan55.4
Congo, Dem. Rep.EU Institutions (excl. EIB)PROGRAMME D'APPUI AU RENFORCEMENT DE LA RÉSILIENCE DES COMMUNAUTÉS PAR L¿AMÉLIORATION DE LA SÉCURITÉ ET DES OPPORTUNITÉS ÉCONOMIQUES DURABLES À L'ESTAgricultural developmentSignificantStandard grant45.9
Congo, Dem. Rep.EU Institutions (excl. EIB)FINALISATION DE LA RÉHABILITATION DE LA ROUTE NATIONALE N°1 ENTRE KAMUESHA ET KANANGA EN RD CONGORoad transportSignificantStandard grant37.9
Congo, Dem. Rep.United StatesINTEGRATED HEALTH PROGRAM - DRCBasic health care; Basic nutrition and 4 moreSignificantStandard grant32.8
Congo, Dem. Rep.United StatesGLOBAL HEALTH SUPPLY CHAIN - PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT (GSHC-PSM) IDIQ - HIV/AIDS TASK ORDERSTD control including HIV/AIDS; COVID-19 controlSignificantStandard grant29.4

OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2024; climate-related amount of each commitment, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. The climate-related amount of each activity as the OECD counts it (the whole activity when climate is a Rio-marked objective; the climate component for multilateral development banks). Titles as reported by the provider.

Need against funding at a glance (computed) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryMeasureValueDetailCard
Congo, Dem. Rep.People in food crisis or worse (Phase 3+)28.84 m → 30.30 mNow (Sep–Dec 2026) → projected (Jan–Jun 2027), +5%E53
Congo, Dem. Rep.Humanitarian appeal funded51% → 27%2024 → 2025E36
AllOfficial aid in this scope, real terms+18%USD 3,465.9m (2019) → 4,090.9m (2024), constant 2024 USDE28

Computed by the app from the cards named in the last column. Each figure is taken from the named card; changes are computed from the card's own figures.

Need against funding by cluster, 2025 (computed from cards E37, E52, E36) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
CountryClusterPeople in need, 2025Change from 2024Required (USD m)Funded (USD m)CoverageAgainst the whole appealFunded per person in need (USD)Flag
Congo, Dem. Rep.Food Security17.61 m-31%1,114.8106.310%-17 points6Critically underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Emergency Shelter and NFI4.04 m+10%133.427.721%-6 points7Severely underfunded, gap widening
Congo, Dem. Rep.Water Sanitation Hygiene6.22 m-9%148.935.524%-3 points6Severely underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Nutrition6.47 m-23%275.286.732%+5 points13Underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Protection - Child Protection4.01 m+0%73.923.632%+5 points6Underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Multi-sector676,351-1%195.071.837%+10 points106Underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Health12.94 m-34%200.287.144%+17 points7Underfunded
Congo, Dem. Rep.Multipurpose CashNo need figure (a way of delivering aid, not a sector)n/a94.253.557%+30 pointsn/aHalf funded or more

Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E37) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E52). Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.

How exposed the money is: donor concentration and cuts (computed from cards E28, E42) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
Donor or measureAid in this scope, 2024 (USD m)ShareChange in the donor's total aid, 2024→2025Exposed
United States1,053.426%-56%Yes
World Bank (IDA)958.523%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
Global Fund282.97%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
EU Institutions255.46%+48%No
IMF Concessional Trust Funds245.16%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
Germany160.44%-16%Yes
African Development Fund [AfDF]160.34%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
United Kingdom129.73%+1%No
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization [GAVI]120.83%Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported)n/a
Belgium116.23%-16%Yes
Norway22.31%+5%No
Largest donor's share26%
Three largest donors' share56%
Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025)1,330.033%
Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly628.815%

Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E28), all official donors USD 4,090.9m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E42). Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.

Single projects and agreements (6): Norway's largest agreements, related Norwegian projects and other donors' largest projects
Other donor's project: Strengthening the Child Protection System in the Democratic Republic of Congo/Renforcer le système d (Canada) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Canada. Channel of delivery: Donor country-based NGO. Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: Human rights; Legal and judicial development; Security system management and reform; Social protection. Disbursed USD 4.0m in 2023 to 2024. Description (donor-reported): The project aims to improve respect for the rights of girls and boys, especially those in situations of deprived freedoms and at risk or victims of economic or sexual exploitation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The project contributes to the structural improvement of the child protection system in the DRC through the promotion, mobilization and strengthening of competencies in crucial sectors that are often overlooked: labour inspection, detention centres and the tourism sector. The project also aims to increase children's participation in the mechanisms of protection, prevention and action against the sexual violence in which they are victims. Project activities include: (1) organization of a series of workshops with children and civil society on their roles within the protection system, (2) development, validation, testing and integration of a child rights training kit inte

Other donor's project: Contribution to universal access of DRC population to effective and impactful interventions against (Global Fund) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Global Fund. Channel of delivery: Developing country-based NGO. Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: Malaria control. Disbursed USD 151.8m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): The program will invest in the following areas: Analysis, evaluations, reviews and transparency, Augmenting national supply chain system with outsourcing, Capacity building and leadership development, Case management, clinical operations and therapeutics, Community engagement, linkages and coordination, Community-based monitoring, Community-led monitoring, Community-led research and advocacy, Coordination and management of national disease control programs, Country-level coordination and planning, COVID diagnostics and testing, COVID-19 control and containment including health systems strengthening, COVID-19 CSS: Community-based organizations institutional capacity building, COVID-19 CSS: Community-led advocacy and research, COVID-19 CSS: Community-led monitoring, Data quality, Ensuring drug quality, Epidemic preparedness, Facility-based treatment, Grant management, Health products and w

Other donor's project: Investment for impact against Tuberculosis and HIV in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Congo ( (Global Fund) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Global Fund. Channel of delivery: United Nations Development Programme. Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: STD control including HIV/AIDS. Disbursed USD 48.8m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): The program will invest in the following areas: Analyses, evaluations, reviews and data use, Capacity building and leadership development, Community-based TB/DR-TB care, Community-based testing for AGYW and their male sexual partners programs, Community-based testing for KP programs, Community-based testing outside of KP and AGYW programs, Condom and lubricant programing for MSM, Condom and lubricant programing for prisoners, Condom and lubricant programing for PUD, Condom and lubricant programing for sex workers, Condom and lubricant programing for transgender people, Data quality, Diagnosis and management of advanced disease (adults and children), DR-TB diagnosis/drug susceptibility testing (DST), DR-TB treatment, care and support, Early infant diagnosis and follow-up HIV testing for exposed infants, Eliminating TB-related stigma and discrimination, Ensuring nondiscriminatory provision

Other donor's project: Investing to Reduce the Burden of Tuberculosis and HIV in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. - Co (Global Fund) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Global Fund. Channel of delivery: Central Government (recipient govt.). Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: STD control including HIV/AIDS. Disbursed USD 13.5m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): The program will invest in the following areas: Analyses, evaluations, reviews and data use, Collaboration with other programs/sectors, Community mobilization and advocacy for human rights, Comprehensive sexuality education for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and adolescent boys and young men (ABYM), Coordination and management of national disease control programs, Data quality, Diagnosis and management of advanced disease (adults and children), DR-TB diagnosis/drug susceptibility testing (DST), DR-TB treatment, care and support, Eliminating stigma and discrimination in all settings, Ensuring nondiscriminatory provision of health care, Facility-based testing outside of key population (KP) and adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) programs, Grant management, HIV prevention communication, information and demand creation for prisoners, HIV prevention communication, information and

Other donor's project: Contribution to universal access of DR Congo populations to effective interventions to fight malaria (Global Fund) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Global Fund. Channel of delivery: Central Government (recipient govt.). Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: Malaria control. Disbursed USD 11.6m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): The program will invest in the following areas: Active case detection and investigation (elimination phase), Analysis, evaluations, reviews and transparency, Case management, clinical operations and therapeutics, Civil registration and vital statistics, Community-based monitoring, Coordination and management of national disease control programs, Country-level coordination and planning, COVID diagnostics and testing, COVID-19 control and containment including health systems strengthening, COVID-19 CSS: Social mobilization, Data quality, Ensuring drug quality, Entomological monitoring, Epidemic preparedness, Facility-based treatment, Grant management, Health products and waste management systems, Infection prevention and control, and protection of the health workforce, Insecticide treated nets (ITNs) - Mass campaign: universal, In-service training (excluding community health workers), Inte

Other donor's project: UNDP DRC programme support 2021-2025 - UNDP programme support (Sweden) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)

About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.

Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗

Donor: Sweden. Channel of delivery: United Nations Development Programme. Recipient: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Purpose: Civilian peace-building, conflict prevention and resolution; Legal and judicial development. Disbursed USD 9.5m in 2024. Description (donor-reported): UNDP has turned to Sida to seek support for the implementation of their country program in DRC. The support is program based with a focus on strengthened rule of law, decentralisation reform, stabilisation of post-conflict provinces linked to the phasing out of Monusco and support to the government for aid coordination. Theses efforts correspond to Sweden's priorities in the current strategy for development cooperation with DR Congo (2021-2025) and specifically contributes to the following strategic goals: Human rights, democracy, the rule of law and gender equality(1)Strengthened respect for human rights, democracy and rule of law, including reduced corruption (2)Greater gender equality including reduced gender-based violencePeaceful and inclusive societies(1)Inclusive processes to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts by peaceful means, including strengthened resilience to crisesThe co

Back to top ↑

Crises and humanitarian needs

7 cards; open a card for its table and sources.

Food insecurity by district

Analysis period · Congo, Dem. Rep.: IPC, Sep–Dec 2026

Kinshasa (CD1000): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 54,263 of 361,752 people analysedMatadi (CD2001): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 99,344 of 662,293 people analysedBoma (CD2002): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 52,093 of 347,286 people analysedMoanda (CD2003): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 103,995 of 693,299 people analysedLukula (CD2005): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 99,594 of 663,957 people analysedTshela (CD2007): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 126,201 of 841,338 people analysedSeke-Banza (CD2009): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 49,854 of 498,535 people analysedLuozi (CD2010): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 103,698 of 518,488 people analysedSongololo (CD2011): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 100,893 of 672,617 people analysedMbanza-Ngungu (CD2013): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 212,280 of 1,415,200 people analysedKasangulu (CD2015): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 48,908 of 489,077 people analysedMadimba (CD2017): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 85,729 of 857,290 people analysedKimvula (CD2019): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 25,299 of 168,661 people analysedKenge (CD3102): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 103,848 of 1,038,481 people analysedFeshi (CD3103): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 84,518 of 563,450 people analysedKahemba (CD3105): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 188,368 of 627,893 people analysedKasongo-Lunda (CD3106): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 170,457 of 1,136,381 people analysedPopokabaka (CD3108): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 72,073 of 288,290 people analysedBandundu (CD3201): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 61,921 of 309,606 people analysedBagata (CD3202): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 77,580 of 775,802 people analysedKikwit (CD3203): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 115,845 of 772,299 people analysedBulungu (CD3204): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 283,571 of 1,890,474 people analysedIdiofa (CD3206): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 194,190 of 1,941,897 people analysedGungu (CD3210): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 125,150 of 834,331 people analysedMasi-Manimba (CD3212): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 169,677 of 1,131,183 people analysedInongo (CD3302): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 102,155 of 681,035 people analysedKiri (CD3303): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 50,971 of 339,805 people analysedOshwe (CD3304): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 89,950 of 599,667 people analysedKutu (CD3306): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 102,078 of 680,520 people analysedKwamouth (CD3307): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 45,047 of 225,234 people analysedBolobo (CD3308): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 62,510 of 250,041 people analysedYumbi (CD3310): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 43,156 of 215,782 people analysedMushie (CD3311): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 33,383 of 222,550 people analysedMbandaka (CD4101): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 77,621 of 776,205 people analysedBikoro (CD4102): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 98,769 of 658,458 people analysedLukolela (CD4103): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 73,288 of 366,438 people analysedBomongo (CD4104): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 59,024 of 393,492 people analysedMakanza (CD4105): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 25,027 of 250,266 people analysedBasankusu (CD4107): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 114,298 of 761,984 people analysedBolomba (CD4108): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 183,803 of 919,015 people analysedIngende (CD4109): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 79,575 of 530,502 people analysedGemena (CD4202): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 160,264 of 1,602,638 people analysedBudjala (CD4203): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 124,424 of 829,493 people analysedKungu (CD4204): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 94,543 of 630,285 people analysedLibenge (CD4205): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 80,825 of 538,832 people analysedZongo (CD4206): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 15,852 of 105,679 people analysedGbadolite (CD4301): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 15,604 of 156,038 people analysedMobayi-Mbongo (CD4302): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 12,094 of 120,936 people analysedYakoma (CD4304): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 53,240 of 354,933 people analysedBusinga (CD4305): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 54,401 of 544,006 people analysedBosobolo (CD4306): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 56,510 of 376,735 people analysedLisala (CD4402): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 162,362 of 649,448 people analysedBumba (CD4404): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 183,080 of 915,400 people analysedBongandanga (CD4405): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 146,832 of 734,162 people analysedBoende (CD4502): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 60,082 of 240,329 people analysedBefale (CD4503): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 68,289 of 273,157 people analysedDjolu (CD4504): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 94,889 of 316,297 people analysedIkela (CD4505): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 73,213 of 292,852 people analysedBokungu (CD4506): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 156,451 of 521,502 people analysedMonkoto (CD4507): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 28,764 of 115,055 people analysedKisangani (CD5101): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 126,864 of 634,320 people analysedUbundu (CD5102): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 70,633 of 235,443 people analysedOpala (CD5103): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 39,772 of 198,859 people analysedIsangi (CD5105): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 85,140 of 425,698 people analysedYahuma (CD5107): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 20,652 of 137,682 people analysedBasoko (CD5109): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 77,350 of 257,833 people analysedBanalia (CD5110): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 48,484 of 193,934 people analysedBafwasende (CD5111): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 39,680 of 158,722 people analysedButa (CD5202): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 60,544 of 302,719 people analysedAketi (CD5204): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 47,570 of 237,848 people analysedBondo (CD5206): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 72,827 of 291,306 people analysedAngo (CD5207): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 23,989 of 119,946 people analysedPoko (CD5208): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 51,958 of 259,791 people analysedBambesa (CD5209): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 36,029 of 144,115 people analysedRungu (CD5302): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 43,378 of 144,593 people analysedNiangara (CD5303): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 24,050 of 160,333 people analysedDungu (CD5305): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 68,044 of 272,177 people analysedFaradje (CD5307): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 127,896 of 511,585 people analysedWatsa (CD5309): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 78,865 of 394,325 people analysedWamba (CD5311): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 143,463 of 573,853 people analysedIrumu (CD5402): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 339,104 of 968,867 people analysedMambasa (CD5403): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 177,466 of 507,045 people analysedDjugu (CD5405): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 1,101,432 of 2,447,627 people analysedMahagi (CD5407): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 659,740 of 1,884,970 people analysedAru (CD5409): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 337,320 of 1,349,282 people analysedGoma (CD6101): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 172,756 of 863,778 people analysedNyiragongo (CD6102): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 151,161 of 431,889 people analysedMasisi (CD6103): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 1,026,677 of 1,866,686 people analysedWalikale (CD6104): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 263,757 of 586,125 people analysedLubero (CD6105): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 725,769 of 1,451,537 people analysedOïcha (CD6107): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 633,426 of 1,407,613 people analysedButembo (CD6110): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 145,035 of 725,170 people analysedRutshuru (CD6111): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 695,772 of 1,546,160 people analysedKabare (CD6202): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 457,166 of 1,306,188 people analysedShabunda (CD6203): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 467,190 of 849,436 people analysedKalehe (CD6205): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 532,580 of 1,065,159 people analysedIdjwi (CD6206): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 125,285 of 357,955 people analysedWalungu (CD6207): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 480,453 of 960,906 people analysedUvira (CD6208): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 432,763 of 1,081,908 people analysedFizi (CD6210): 55% in Phase 3 or worse, 583,662 of 1,061,204 people analysedMwenga (CD6212): 50% in Phase 3 or worse, 472,907 of 945,814 people analysedKindu (CD6301): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 89,800 of 359,199 people analysedKailo (CD6302): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 58,602 of 195,339 people analysedPunia (CD6303): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 82,315 of 235,185 people analysedLubutu (CD6305): 40% in Phase 3 or worse, 110,373 of 275,934 people analysedPangi (CD6307): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 128,986 of 515,943 people analysedKabambare (CD6309): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 207,190 of 591,971 people analysedKasongo (CD6311): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 209,201 of 836,804 people analysedKibombo (CD6313): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 77,950 of 259,833 people analysedLubumbashi (CD7101): 5% in Phase 3 or worse, 192,146 of 3,842,916 people analysedKipushi (CD7102): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 48,199 of 481,990 people analysedSakania (CD7104): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 38,133 of 381,330 people analysedKambove (CD7105): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 217,202 of 1,448,013 people analysedLikasi (CD7106): 5% in Phase 3 or worse, 11,468 of 229,362 people analysedKasenga (CD7107): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 199,135 of 995,676 people analysedMitwaba (CD7108): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 118,157 of 472,629 people analysedPweto (CD7109): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 321,074 of 917,352 people analysedMutshatsha (CD7202): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 105,548 of 703,655 people analysedLubudi (CD7203): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 153,297 of 1,021,980 people analysedDilolo (CD7205): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 132,006 of 880,042 people analysedSandoa (CD7206): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 67,633 of 676,326 people analysedKapanga (CD7207): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 72,688 of 484,587 people analysedKamina (CD7302): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 151,448 of 757,240 people analysedKaniama (CD7303): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 52,421 of 349,474 people analysedKabongo (CD7304): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 136,925 of 912,834 people analysedMalemba-Nkulu (CD7305): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 226,383 of 1,131,914 people analysedBukama (CD7306): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 194,900 of 1,299,332 people analysedKalemie (CD7402): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 220,907 of 736,354 people analysedMoba (CD7404): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 192,948 of 551,281 people analysedManono (CD7406): 45% in Phase 3 or worse, 358,649 of 796,998 people analysedKabalo (CD7407): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 85,834 of 286,112 people analysedKongolo (CD7409): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 195,264 of 557,897 people analysedNyunzu (CD7410): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 73,474 of 293,897 people analysedKabinda (CD8102): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 118,643 of 790,952 people analysedMwene-Ditu (CD8103): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 158,936 of 794,681 people analysedLuilu (CD8104): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 203,093 of 1,015,467 people analysedKamiji (CD8105): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 23,463 of 117,316 people analysedNgandajika (CD8106): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 182,557 of 912,784 people analysedLubao (CD8108): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 128,240 of 641,199 people analysedMbuji-Mayi (CD8201): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 622,605 of 3,113,027 people analysedTshilenge (CD8202): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 133,250 of 533,001 people analysedMiabi (CD8205): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 69,534 of 347,670 people analysedKabeya-Kamwanga (CD8207): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 28,706 of 191,376 people analysedLupatapata (CD8208): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 82,032 of 328,129 people analysedKatanda (CD8209): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 100,844 of 403,376 people analysedLusambo (CD8302): 35% in Phase 3 or worse, 134,784 of 385,097 people analysedLodja (CD8303): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 57,655 of 576,553 people analysedKole (CD8306): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 34,235 of 228,235 people analysedLomela (CD8307): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 62,557 of 250,229 people analysedKatako-Kombe (CD8308): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 78,617 of 393,087 people analysedLubefu (CD8309): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 78,494 of 523,290 people analysedKananga (CD9101): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 179,806 of 1,198,707 people analysedDibaya (CD9102): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 207,501 of 691,669 people analysedLuiza (CD9104): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 100,889 of 1,008,891 people analysedKazumba (CD9105): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 217,152 of 1,085,759 people analysedDemba (CD9106): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 136,469 of 909,795 people analysedDimbelenge (CD9107): 15% in Phase 3 or worse, 78,431 of 522,875 people analysedKamonia (CD9202): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 545,602 of 2,182,409 people analysedLuebo (CD9204): 30% in Phase 3 or worse, 132,553 of 441,843 people analysedIlebo (CD9205): 25% in Phase 3 or worse, 145,747 of 582,989 people analysedMweka (CD9207): 20% in Phase 3 or worse, 149,098 of 745,488 people analysedDekese (CD9208): 10% in Phase 3 or worse, 16,371 of 163,707 people analysedCongo, Dem. Rep.
  • Under 10%2districts
  • 10–19%65districts
  • 20–29%57districts
  • 30–39%24districts
  • 40–49%7districts
  • 50% or more7districts
Share of each district's analysed population in Phase 3 (Crisis) or worse, from the latest current analysis E53; where an analysis splits a district (rural, urban, displaced people), its groups are added up. This is the population share, not the IPC area classification, and it describes the analysis period, not today. Drawn only where the analysis uses the same districts as the boundary set. Tap or hover a district for its figures. Boundaries: Democratic Republic of the Congo - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 164 of 164 analysis areas matched by code and name).

Food prices against a year earlier, by market

Period · Sep 2026, each against the same month a year earlier

Bosobolo (Bosobolo, Nord-Ubangi): Oil (palm) 714 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Businga (Businga, Nord-Ubangi): Oil (palm) 1,944 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Gemena (Gemena, Sud-Ubangi): Oil (palm) 1,389 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Moba (Kaoze, Tanganyika): Oil (palm) 6,849 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Lubumbashi (Lubumbashi, Haut-Katanga): Oil (palm) 4,000 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mbandaka (Bomongo, Equateur): Oil (palm) 2,790 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Uvira (Uvira, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 8,088 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kabalo (Kabalo, Tanganyika): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kindu (Kindu, Maniema): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Nyawera (Bukavu, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,333 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Bunia (Bunia, Ituri): Oil (palm) 3,333 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Bandundu ville (Bandundu, Kwilu): Oil (palm) 3,194 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Boma (Boma, Kongo-Central): Oil (palm) 4,000 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Matadi (Matadi, Kongo-Central): Oil (palm) 2,153 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Basoko (Basoko, Tshopo): Oil (palm) 1,382 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Tshikapa (Tshikapa, Kasaï): Oil (palm) 2,500 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kananga (Kananga, Kasaï-Central): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mwene-Ditu (Mwene-Ditu, Lomami): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kamina (Kamina, Haut-Lomami): Oil (palm) 3,866 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kolwezi (Kolwezi, Lualaba): Oil (palm) 5,333 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Likasi (Likasi, Haut-Katanga): Oil (palm) 5,667 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kisangani (Kisangani, Tshopo): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Isiro (Isiro, Haut-Uele): Oil (palm) 2,267 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Dungu (Mutshatsha, Lualaba): Oil (palm) 3,333 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Gbadolite (Gbadolite, Nord-Ubangi): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mbuji-mayi (Mbuji-Mayi, Kasaï-Oriental): Oil (palm) 1,250 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Aru (Aru, Ituri): Oil (palm) 4,400 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Libenge (Libenge, Sud-Ubangi): Oil (palm) 3,030 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kahemba (Kahemba, Kwango): Oil (palm) 2,080 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mugunga3 (Nyiragongo, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Nyiragongo (Nyiragongo, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,000 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Masisi Centre (Masisi, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,283 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Luebo (Luebo, Kasaï): Oil (palm) 1,380 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Luiza Centre (Luiza, Kasaï-Central): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kaniola (Walungu, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 5,556 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mwenga (Mwenga, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 6,944 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kadutu (Bukavu, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,111 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Songololo (Songololo, Kongo-Central): Oil (palm) 1,515 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mbanza-Ngungu (Mbanza-Ngungu, Kongo-Central): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kavumu (Kabare, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,167 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mudaka (Kabare, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,861 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kibombo (Kibombo, Maniema): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Sandoa (Sandoa, Lualaba): Oil (palm) 4,167 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kirungu (Moba, Tanganyika): Oil (palm) 5,822 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Tshilenge (Tshilenge, Kasaï-Oriental): Oil (palm) 1,250 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mabalako (Beni, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,009 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kayna (Lubero, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,167 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Buta (Buta, Bas-Uele): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mitwaba (Mitwaba, Haut-Katanga): Oil (palm) 7,727 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kalomba (Kazumba, Kasaï-Central): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Kabeya Kamuanga (Kabeya-Kamwanga, Kasaï-Oriental): Oil (palm) 2,361 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Bafwasende (Bafwasende, Tshopo): Oil (palm) 1,805 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Nyamukubi (Kalehe, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 5,500 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Marché de Bagata (Bagata, Kwilu): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Lubero (Lubero, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026; no price for Sep 2025Mambasa (Mambasa, Ituri): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, +0% from 3,472 CDF in Sep 2025Mubi (Walikale, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 2,870 CDF in Sep 2026, +3% from 2,778 CDF in Sep 2025Aloya (Oïcha, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026, +3% from 2,686 CDF in Sep 2025Walungu (Walungu, Sud-Kivu): Oil (palm) 5,833 CDF in Sep 2026, +5% from 5,556 CDF in Sep 2025Birere (Goma, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 6,944 CDF in Sep 2026, -10% from 7,677 CDF in Sep 2025Kilokwa (Beni, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026, +10% from 2,530 CDF in Sep 2025Bweremana (Masisi, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,861 CDF in Sep 2026, -14% from 5,630 CDF in Sep 2025Kiwanja (Rutshuru, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,167 CDF in Sep 2026, +17% from 3,573 CDF in Sep 2025Pweto (Pweto, Haut-Katanga): Oil (palm) 5,000 CDF in Sep 2026, -17% from 6,000 CDF in Sep 2025Kirumba (Lubero, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, -17% from 4,167 CDF in Sep 2025Nyanzale (Rutshuru, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,167 CDF in Sep 2026, -18% from 5,093 CDF in Sep 2025Sake (Masisi, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 6,944 CDF in Sep 2026, -19% from 8,565 CDF in Sep 2025Mahagi Centre (Mahagi, Ituri): Oil (palm) 4,653 CDF in Sep 2026, +22% from 3,819 CDF in Sep 2025Marché de Kasongo-Lunda (Kasongo-Lunda, Kwango): Oil (palm) 2,083 CDF in Sep 2026, -25% from 2,778 CDF in Sep 2025Rutshuru (Rutshuru, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, -26% from 4,707 CDF in Sep 2025Nyunzu (Nyunzu, Tanganyika): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, +27% from 2,740 CDF in Sep 2025Alanine (Goma, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 4,444 CDF in Sep 2026, -29% from 6,243 CDF in Sep 2025Walikale Centre (Walikale, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,889 CDF in Sep 2026, +40% from 2,778 CDF in Sep 2025Beni (Beni, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, +42% from 2,454 CDF in Sep 2025Virunga (Goma, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, -43% from 6,077 CDF in Sep 2025Butembo (Lubero, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 3,472 CDF in Sep 2026, +47% from 2,361 CDF in Sep 2025Kamonia (Kamonia, Kasaï): Oil (palm) 1,389 CDF in Sep 2026, -50% from 2,778 CDF in Sep 2025Kitshanga (Rutshuru, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 2,778 CDF in Sep 2026, -50% from 5,556 CDF in Sep 2025Kituku (Goma, Nord-Kivu): Oil (palm) 8,333 CDF in Sep 2026, +67% from 4,977 CDF in Sep 2025Kalemie (Kalemie, Tanganyika): Oil (palm) 4,514 CDF in Sep 2026, +81% from 2,500 CDF in Sep 2025
  • Fell over 50%0markets
  • Fell 25–50%5markets
  • Fell 5–25%7markets
  • Within 5%3markets
  • Rose 5–25%4markets
  • Rose 25–50%4markets
  • Rose over 50%2markets
  • No year-earlier price55markets
Each dot is a market WFP monitors: the change in one staple's retail price from the same month a year earlier, in that market E54. Mapped: Oil (palm) (L), Sep 2026 against Sep 2025. Nominal prices in local currency, so a rise includes general inflation and currency depreciation, not only scarcity; colours compare markets within a country, not prices across countries. Tap or hover a market for its prices. Outlines: Natural Earth.

Who reports working where, by district

Period · Latest reporting round: Congo, Dem. Rep. Jul 2026

Kinshasa (CD1000): 5 organisations in the sectors coveredMatadi: no organisation reported here in this roundBoma: no organisation reported here in this roundMoanda: no organisation reported here in this roundLukula: no organisation reported here in this roundTshela: no organisation reported here in this roundSeke-Banza: no organisation reported here in this roundLuozi: no organisation reported here in this roundSongololo: no organisation reported here in this roundMbanza-Ngungu: no organisation reported here in this roundKasangulu: no organisation reported here in this roundMadimba: no organisation reported here in this roundKimvula: no organisation reported here in this roundKenge (CD3102): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredFeshi (CD3103): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredKahemba: no organisation reported here in this roundKasongo-Lunda (CD3106): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredPopokabaka (CD3108): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredBandundu: no organisation reported here in this roundBagata: no organisation reported here in this roundKikwit: no organisation reported here in this roundBulungu: no organisation reported here in this roundIdiofa: no organisation reported here in this roundGungu: no organisation reported here in this roundMasi-Manimba: no organisation reported here in this roundInongo: no organisation reported here in this roundKiri: no organisation reported here in this roundOshwe: no organisation reported here in this roundKutu: no organisation reported here in this roundKwamouth (CD3307): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredBolobo: no organisation reported here in this roundYumbi: no organisation reported here in this roundMushie: no organisation reported here in this roundMbandaka: no organisation reported here in this roundBikoro: no organisation reported here in this roundLukolela: no organisation reported here in this roundBomongo: no organisation reported here in this roundMakanza: no organisation reported here in this roundBasankusu: no organisation reported here in this roundBolomba: no organisation reported here in this roundIngende: no organisation reported here in this roundGemena: no organisation reported here in this roundBudjala: no organisation reported here in this roundKungu: no organisation reported here in this roundLibenge: no organisation reported here in this roundZongo: no organisation reported here in this roundGbadolite: no organisation reported here in this roundMobayi-Mbongo (CD4302): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredYakoma: no organisation reported here in this roundBusinga (CD4305): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredBosobolo: no organisation reported here in this roundLisala: no organisation reported here in this roundBumba: no organisation reported here in this roundBongandanga: no organisation reported here in this roundBoende (CD4502): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredBefale: no organisation reported here in this roundDjolu: no organisation reported here in this roundIkela: no organisation reported here in this roundBokungu: no organisation reported here in this roundMonkoto: no organisation reported here in this roundKisangani (CD5101): 6 organisations in the sectors coveredUbundu (CD5102): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredOpala (CD5103): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredIsangi: no organisation reported here in this roundYahuma: no organisation reported here in this roundBasoko: no organisation reported here in this roundBanalia: no organisation reported here in this roundBafwasende (CD5111): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredButa (CD5202): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredAketi: no organisation reported here in this roundBondo: no organisation reported here in this roundAngo: no organisation reported here in this roundPoko: no organisation reported here in this roundBambesa (CD5209): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredRungu (CD5302): 6 organisations in the sectors coveredNiangara (CD5303): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredDungu: no organisation reported here in this roundFaradje: no organisation reported here in this roundWatsa (CD5309): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredWamba (CD5311): 6 organisations in the sectors coveredIrumu (CD5402): 46 organisations in the sectors covered, 48 in any sectorMambasa (CD5403): 19 organisations in the sectors covered, 20 in any sectorDjugu (CD5405): 47 organisations in the sectors covered, 50 in any sectorMahagi (CD5407): 29 organisations in the sectors covered, 30 in any sectorAru (CD5409): 10 organisations in the sectors coveredGoma (CD6101): 59 organisations in the sectors coveredNyiragongo (CD6102): 35 organisations in the sectors coveredMasisi (CD6103): 57 organisations in the sectors covered, 61 in any sectorWalikale (CD6104): 24 organisations in the sectors covered, 25 in any sectorLubero (CD6105): 36 organisations in the sectors covered, 40 in any sectorOïcha (CD6107): 27 organisations in the sectors covered, 29 in any sectorButembo (CD6110): 15 organisations in the sectors coveredRutshuru (CD6111): 30 organisations in the sectors covered, 32 in any sectorKabare (CD6202): 20 organisations in the sectors covered, 23 in any sectorShabunda (CD6203): 6 organisations in the sectors covered, 7 in any sectorKalehe (CD6205): 44 organisations in the sectors covered, 48 in any sectorIdjwi (CD6206): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredWalungu (CD6207): 16 organisations in the sectors covered, 19 in any sectorUvira (CD6208): 20 organisations in the sectors covered, 22 in any sectorFizi (CD6210): 33 organisations in the sectors covered, 34 in any sectorMwenga (CD6212): 4 organisations in the sectors covered, 6 in any sectorKindu: no organisation reported here in this roundKailo (CD6302): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredPunia (CD6303): 7 organisations in the sectors coveredLubutu: no organisation reported here in this roundPangi: no organisation reported here in this roundKabambare (CD6309): 6 organisations in the sectors coveredKasongo: no organisation reported here in this roundKibombo: no organisation reported here in this roundLubumbashi (CD7101): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredKipushi: no organisation reported here in this roundSakania: no organisation reported here in this roundKambove: no organisation reported here in this roundLikasi (CD7106): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredKasenga: no organisation reported here in this roundMitwaba: no organisation reported here in this roundPweto (CD7109): 5 organisations in the sectors coveredMutshatsha (CD7202): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredLubudi: no organisation reported here in this roundDilolo: no organisation reported here in this roundSandoa: no organisation reported here in this roundKapanga: no organisation reported here in this roundKamina: no organisation reported here in this roundKaniama: no organisation reported here in this roundKabongo (CD7304): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredMalemba-Nkulu: no organisation reported here in this roundBukama (CD7306): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredKalemie (CD7402): 28 organisations in the sectors covered, 30 in any sectorMoba (CD7404): 14 organisations in the sectors covered, 15 in any sectorManono (CD7406): 4 organisations in the sectors coveredKabalo (CD7407): 4 organisations in the sectors covered, 5 in any sectorKongolo (CD7409): 3 organisations in the sectors covered, 4 in any sectorNyunzu (CD7410): 7 organisations in the sectors coveredKabinda (CD8102): 4 organisations in the sectors coveredMwene-Ditu (CD8103): 7 organisations in the sectors coveredLuilu (CD8104): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredKamiji (CD8105): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredNgandajika (CD8106): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredLubao (CD8108): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredMbuji-Mayi (CD8201): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredTshilenge: no organisation reported here in this roundMiabi: no organisation reported here in this roundKabeya-Kamwanga: no organisation reported here in this roundLupatapata: no organisation reported here in this roundKatanda: no organisation reported here in this roundLusambo: no organisation reported here in this roundLodja (CD8303): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredKole: no organisation reported here in this roundLomela: no organisation reported here in this roundKatako-Kombe: no organisation reported here in this roundLubefu: no organisation reported here in this roundKananga (CD9101): 12 organisations in the sectors coveredDibaya (CD9102): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredLuiza (CD9104): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredKazumba (CD9105): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredDemba (CD9106): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredDimbelenge (CD9107): 3 organisations in the sectors coveredKamonia (CD9202): 9 organisations in the sectors coveredLuebo (CD9204): 2 organisations in the sectors coveredIlebo: no organisation reported here in this roundMweka (CD9207): 1 organisation in the sectors coveredDekese: no organisation reported here in this roundCongo, Dem. Rep.
  • 1–229districts
  • 3–513districts
  • 6–1010districts
  • 11–207districts
  • 21+13districts
  • No reports90districts: not covered by this round, or not matched; not the same as nobody there
Number of organisations reporting operational presence in each district, in the sectors covered, from OCHA's 3W reports for the latest round E49. Self-reported presence: it shows where organisations say they work, not their scale, funding or quality. Tap or hover a district for its counts. Boundaries: Democratic Republic of the Congo - Subnational Administrative Boundaries (CC BY-IGO, 74 of 74 3W districts matched by code and name).
Humanitarian crisis severity: INFORM Severity - October 2026 · ACAPS INFORM Severity Index (via HDX)

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how severe each ongoing humanitarian crisis is, based on its analysts' review of many sources. It is used to compare crises and to see whether one is getting worse.

Trace this: ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly files on HDX ↗

CountryCrisisDriversSeverity (1-10)CategoryTrend (last 3 months)Complexity (1-10)Data reliability
Democratic Republic of the CongoComplex crisis in DRCConflict/ Violence, Floods9.2Very HighStable9.2Very High

ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly edition published on the Humanitarian Data Exchange; retrieved 2026-11-08. It rates the severity of ongoing crises (impact, conditions of people affected, complexity); a country's first row is ACAPS's country-level rating where it gives one, then its separate crises; countries without an active crisis are not listed.

Humanitarian access constraints: ACAPS, Nov 2026 · ACAPS Humanitarian Access

About this source: ACAPS's rating of how hard it is for humanitarian organisations to reach people in a crisis, because of insecurity, bureaucratic restrictions or physical obstacles.

Trace this: ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset ↗

CountryCrisisAccess constraints (0-5)LevelPeople's access to aidAid actors' access to peopleSecurity and physical constraintsStrongest constraints
Congo, Dem. Rep.Complex crisis in DRC5Extreme555obstructed access to services and aid; restricted movement within the country; interference in humanitarian work; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure)

ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset, Nov 2026 edition (API); retrieved 2026-11-08. Scores 0 (no constraints) to 5 (extreme), from three pillars and nine indicators; countries without a tracked crisis are not listed. Congo, Dem. Rep.: the most constrained crisis is Complex crisis in DRC (5 of 5, Extreme).

Who works where: organisations reporting operational presence (OCHA 3W) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA 3W operational presence)

About this source: 'Who does What Where': OCHA's lists of the organisations that report activities in each area and sector. Useful for finding partners on the ground; it shows only what organisations report.

Trace this: République Démocratique du Congo : Présence Opérationnelle (operational_presence_july2026, OCHA Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)) ↗

CountryOrganisationTypeSectorsReported geographyRegions (up to 3)Ranking reach in selected sectors
Congo, Dem. Rep.United Nations Children's FundUnited NationsEducation, Health, Multi-sector, Nutrition, Protection, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene37 admin2 area(s)Haut-Lomami, Haut-Uele, Ituri37 coded admin2 areas
Congo, Dem. Rep.World Health OrganizationUnited NationsHealth, Protection26 admin2 area(s)Bas-Uele, Haut-Uele, Ituri26 coded admin2 areas
Congo, Dem. Rep.UN Refugee AgencyUnited NationsCamp management, Health, Multi-sector, Protection, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene22 admin2 area(s)Haut-Katanga, Ituri, Nord-Kivu22 coded admin2 areas
Congo, Dem. Rep.World Vision InternationalInternational NGOFood security, Health, Nutrition, Protection, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene22 admin2 area(s)Ituri, Kasaï-Central, Kinshasa22 coded admin2 areas
Congo, Dem. Rep.World Food ProgrammeUnited NationsFood security, Multi-sector, Protection22 admin2 area(s)Haut-Uele, Ituri, Nord-Kivu21 coded admin2 areas
Congo, Dem. Rep.United Nations Population FundUnited NationsHealth, Protection19 admin2 area(s)Ituri, Nord-Kivu, Sud-Kivu19 coded admin2 areas

OCHA 3W operational presence via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest period: Congo, Dem. Rep. Jul 2026; retrieved 2026-11-08. Organisations in the sectors covered are listed first; most reported coded areas in selected sectors first, ties alphabetical; reach, not capacity (not a capacity ranking). Congo, Dem. Rep.: ranking counts distinct coded admin2 areas. Congo, Dem. Rep.: 286 organisations reported for Jul 2026, 274 of them in the sectors covered. Presence is self-reported to the humanitarian clusters; it shows where an organisation reports working, not its funding, scale or quality. Admin levels are counted separately and can overlap; they must not be added together. Displayed geography includes all reported sectors; where geographic codes are absent, displayed counts use names qualified by their parent area. Ranking uses codes only, at the finest available level in selected sectors for that country. Only sectors with a supported DAC-to-cluster mapping contribute to sector reach. Missing comparable coded reach is not zero presence or capacity.

People in need of humanitarian assistance (OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)

About this source: The yearly humanitarian needs overviews agreed by UN agencies and partners in each crisis, with the official number of people in need. They are the basis of humanitarian appeals.

Trace this: Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2024, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2026, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗

CountrySectorPeople in needPeople targetedPlan period
Congo, Dem. Rep.All sectors (intersectoral)14,940,7277,313,7632026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Education3,901,894480,7582026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Food security13,003,0645,922,8232026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Health7,544,1152,512,1342026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Nutrition4,256,9571,853,4012026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Protection5,850,8141,373,4662026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Child protection4,033,808806,7612026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Gender-based violence5,225,5381,000,5042026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Housing, land and property2,705,252562,6872026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Mine action2,508,214789,2172026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Shelter and NFI3,422,2371,090,8612026
Congo, Dem. Rep.Water, sanitation, hygiene5,375,2402,822,9982026

OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle (Humanitarian Needs Overview), national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest plan period per country and sector; retrieved 2026-11-08. The intersectoral figure counts each person once across all sectors; sector figures overlap and must not be added together, or to the intersectoral figure. Targeted is the part of the need the response plan aims to reach. Figures are planning estimates. Each row is its sector's latest overview, so the plan period can differ between rows.

Acute food insecurity: people in Phase 3 (Crisis) or worse (IPC / Cadre Harmonisé) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)

About this source: The IPC, and the Cadre Harmonisé in West Africa and the Sahel, are the standard, consensus-based classifications of food insecurity used by governments, the UN and NGOs. Phase 3 means crisis; Phase 5 means catastrophe or famine.

Trace this: Global: Acute Food Insecurity Country Data (ipc_global_national_wide.csv, Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)) ↗

CountryAnalysisStatusPeriodPeople in Phase 3+Share of analysed populationPeople in Phase 5 (Catastrophe)Population analysed
Congo, Dem. Rep.IPCCurrentSep–Dec 202628,840,95623%0129,088,935
Congo, Dem. Rep.IPCProjection (first)Jan–Jun 202730,304,76523%0129,088,935

Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections; retrieved 2026-11-08. Phase 3+ counts people in Crisis, Emergency or Catastrophe. Shares are of the population analysed, which may be smaller than the national population. Projections are estimates made at the time of the analysis, not observations; a past projection covers a period that has ended without a newer published analysis.

Staple food prices in local markets (WFP) · WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API

About this source: Prices of staple foods that WFP and partners collect in local markets. Rising prices are an early warning of hunger and reduce what cash assistance buys.

Trace this: Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2026, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗ · Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2025, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗

CountryCommodity (unit)Latest monthMedian retail priceMarketsChange from a year earlier (same markets)Markets compared
Congo, Dem. Rep.Beans (KG)Sep 20263,489 CDF76+4%24
Congo, Dem. Rep.Cassava flour (KG)Sep 20261,273 CDF78-16%25
Congo, Dem. Rep.Maize flour (KG)Sep 20261,671 CDF78-19%24
Congo, Dem. Rep.Oil (palm) (L)Sep 20263,333 CDF80-9%25

WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API; retail prices of cereals, pulses and oils; four staples per country reported by the most markets; median across markets; retrieved 2026-11-08. Nominal prices in local currency: a change includes general inflation and currency depreciation, not only food scarcity, and prices cannot be compared across countries. The year-on-year change uses only markets reporting in both months. Markets are those WFP monitors, not a national average.

Displacement: people hosted at the end of 2025 (UNHCR year-end count, not a current figure) · UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics

About this source: UNHCR's official statistics on refugees and other forcibly displaced people, compiled from governments and its own operations; the global reference for refugee numbers.

Trace this: UNHCR population API: hosted in COD, 2025 ↗ · UNHCR Refugee Data Finder ↗

CountryEnd of yearRefugees hostedAsylum seekersInternally displaced
Congo, Dem. Rep.2025503,732100,1125,669,479

UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics API, end-year figures by country of asylum; retrieved 2026-11-08. Internally displaced counts cover people UNHCR protects or assists and may be zero where it does not report them.

Back to top ↑

Development needs

3 cards; open a card for its table and sources.

Education: out of school, completion and learning (UNESCO UIS) · UNESCO Institute for Statistics

About this source: UNESCO's statistics institute is the official keeper of the global education goal's figures: who is out of school, who finishes primary and lower secondary school, and how many children can read and do basic maths by the end of primary. The World Bank's education figures are copied from it, usually later.

Trace this: UIS data browser ↗ · UIS country page: Congo, Dem. Rep. ↗

CountryMeasureValueYearTrend
Congo, Dem. Rep.Completion rate, primary (%)70.0%2023Trend 2018–2023: 66.7 to 70.0 (2 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Completion rate, lower secondary (%)60.3%2023Trend 2018–2023: 54.4 to 60.3 (2 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Minimum proficiency in reading, end of primary (%)9.2%2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.Minimum proficiency in mathematics, end of primary (%)3.2%2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.Government spending on education (% of GDP)2.8%2022Trend 2015–2022: 2.2 to 2.8 (6 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Education's share of government spending (%)13.1%2017Trend 2015–2017: 14.9 to 13.1 (3 years reported)

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, February 2026 Data Release; latest year per measure within the last ten; retrieved 2026-11-08. Out-of-school rates count children of official school age who are not enrolled; completion rates count young people a few years above the final grade's age who finished that level; proficiency shares come from regional and international learning assessments (such as PASEC or PIRLS) taken in the year shown, so they are older and not comparable across assessment types. Years differ by measure: check the year before comparing.

Human development, poverty and displacement (UNDP, IOM) · UNDP Human Development Report Office and IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix

About this source: UNDP's Human Development Index combines health, education and income into one measure and is the best-known summary of human development; IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix counts people displaced within their own country in crises.

Trace this: UNDP Human Development Report: data center ↗ · UNDP country data and charts: Congo, Dem. Rep. ↗ · UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index: downloads ↗

CountryMeasureValueYearTrend
Congo, Dem. Rep.Human Development Index (0-1)0.5222023Trend 2013–2023: 0.456 to 0.522 (11 years reported)
Congo, Dem. Rep.HDI rank1712023
Congo, Dem. Rep.Inequality-adjusted HDI (0-1)0.3412023
Congo, Dem. Rep.Human development lost to inequality (%)34.7%2023
Congo, Dem. Rep.Gender Inequality Index (0-1, higher is more unequal)0.6042023
Congo, Dem. Rep.People in multidimensional poverty (%)67.6%2023/2024 (DHS)

UNDP Human Development Report, composite indices time series; UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index; latest year per measure; retrieved 2026-11-08. The HDI combines life expectancy, schooling and income per person; the inequality-adjusted HDI discounts it for how unequally these are shared. Multidimensional poverty counts people deprived in several of health, education and living standards at once, from the household survey named in the year column. Displacement counts are IOM's latest national round and are shown only where IOM reports one; check the year before comparing. Congo, Dem. Rep. HDI: 0.456 in 2013 → 0.522 in 2023 (+14%); peak 0.522 in 2023.

Country indicators — Congo, Dem. Rep. · World Bank World Development Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's main collection of development statistics on poverty, health, education and the economy, compiled from national and international sources. It is the common reference for country indicators; the latest years are often missing.

Trace this: Population (SP.POP.TOTL) ↗ · GDP per capita (current US$) (NY.GDP.PCAP.CD) ↗ · Poverty headcount at $3.00/day (% of population) (SI.POV.DDAY) ↗

IndicatorValueYearTrend
Population112,832,4732025Trend 2016–2025: 84.0 m to 112.8 m (10 years reported)
GDP per capita (current US$)806.82025Trend 2016–2025: 460 to 807 (10 years reported)
Poverty headcount at $3.00/day (% of population)85.32020

World Bank World Development Indicators, most recent value; retrieved 2026-11-08. Most recent non-empty year differs by indicator. Trend lines cover the reported years of the last ten.

Back to top ↑

Economy and investment

2 cards; open a card for its table and sources.

Economic outlook (IMF World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor) · IMF World Economic Outlook

About this source: The IMF's twice-yearly economic figures and forecasts for its member countries, the standard reference for growth, inflation and public debt; revenue comes from its Fiscal Monitor. Forecasts are revised as conditions change.

Trace this: IMF WEO DataMapper: real GDP growth ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: inflation ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: government debt ↗

CountryMeasure20252026 (projection)2027 (projection)
Congo, Dem. Rep.Real GDP growth (%)5.75.25.7
Congo, Dem. Rep.Inflation, average consumer prices (%)7.44.37.4
Congo, Dem. Rep.Government gross debt (% of GDP)20.423.726.9
Congo, Dem. Rep.Government revenue including grants (% of GDP)14.514.615.0

IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2026) (growth, inflation, debt) and Fiscal Monitor (October 2026) (revenue) via the DataMapper API; retrieved 2026-11-08. 2026 and 2027 are IMF projections and are revised twice a year.

External debt and public debt service (World Bank International Debt Statistics) · World Bank International Debt Statistics

About this source: The World Bank's official statistics on low- and middle-income countries' external debt and debt payments, reported by the borrowing countries.

Trace this: World Bank International Debt Statistics ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (USD m) ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (% of GNI) ↗ · World Bank data: Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) ↗

CountryMeasureTrend20202021202220232024
Congo, Dem. Rep.External debt stocks (USD m)Trend 2020–2024: 8,476 to 12,485 (5 years reported)8,476.210,483.910,683.412,008.012,484.9
Congo, Dem. Rep.External debt stocks (% of GNI)Trend 2020–2024: 17.9 to 18.3 (5 years reported)17.919.717.218.518.3
Congo, Dem. Rep.Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m)Trend 2020–2024: 221 to 386 (5 years reported)220.6310.9854.5399.2386.2

World Bank International Debt Statistics via the World Bank API (DT.DOD.DECT.CD, DT.DOD.DECT.GN.ZS, DT.TDS.DPPG.CD), current USD; retrieved 2026-11-08. Debt stocks are all external debt outstanding at year end (public, publicly guaranteed and private non-guaranteed, including IMF credit). Debt service is principal and interest actually paid on public and publicly guaranteed external debt in the year. The World Bank publishes the statistics once a year, in December.

Back to top ↑

Governance

1 card; open a card for its table and sources.

Governance and investment climate · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators

About this source: The World Bank's composite measures of governance, built from surveys and expert assessments. They are widely used to compare countries, but they measure perceptions and come with margins of error.

Trace this: Worldwide Governance Indicators in the World Bank DataBank ↗ · WDI FDI net inflows (% of GDP) (BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS) ↗

CountryMeasureScoreYearScore 2019
Congo, Dem. Rep.Control of corruption18202517
Congo, Dem. Rep.Political stability and absence of violence28202536
Congo, Dem. Rep.Regulatory quality33202532
Congo, Dem. Rep.Government effectiveness18202519
Congo, Dem. Rep.Rule of law31202531
Congo, Dem. Rep.Voice and accountability36202535
Congo, Dem. Rep.FDI net inflows (% of GDP)2.12025

World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI; retrieved 2026-11-08. WGI uses an absolute 0-100 scale anchored to fixed reference points, not percentile ranks. Perception-based estimates have uncertainty; small differences should not be overinterpreted.

Back to top ↑

Risk and environment

3 cards; open a card for its table and sources.

Rainfall against the usual, by region

Period · Three months to 20 Oct 2026

Kasaï-Oriental (CD82): 100% of average, 276 mm against 277 mm over three monthsTshopo (CD51): 98% of average, 503 mm against 514 mm over three monthsIturi (CD54): 92% of average, 463 mm against 505 mm over three monthsKongo-Central (CD20): 77% of average, 67 mm against 89 mm over three monthsMaï-Ndombe (CD33): 111% of average, 426 mm against 382 mm over three monthsKwilu (CD32): 107% of average, 324 mm against 303 mm over three monthsKwango (CD31): 101% of average, 251 mm against 249 mm over three monthsEquateur (CD41): 116% of average, 598 mm against 517 mm over three monthsSud-Ubangi (CD42): 113% of average, 681 mm against 604 mm over three monthsNord-Ubangi (CD43): 113% of average, 699 mm against 619 mm over three monthsMongala (CD44): 104% of average, 609 mm against 585 mm over three monthsTshuapa (CD45): 100% of average, 542 mm against 545 mm over three monthsBas-Uele (CD52): 105% of average, 631 mm against 599 mm over three monthsHaut-Uele (CD53): 90% of average, 537 mm against 596 mm over three monthsNord-Kivu (CD61): 96% of average, 496 mm against 519 mm over three monthsManiema (CD63): 92% of average, 300 mm against 326 mm over three monthsLualaba (CD72): 104% of average, 114 mm against 110 mm over three monthsHaut-Lomami (CD73): 95% of average, 129 mm against 137 mm over three monthsTanganyika (CD74): 77% of average, 93 mm against 123 mm over three monthsHaut-Katanga (CD71): 107% of average, 44 mm against 41 mm over three monthsSankuru (CD83): 99% of average, 375 mm against 379 mm over three monthsLomami (CD81): 95% of average, 234 mm against 248 mm over three monthsKasaï-Central (CD91): 102% of average, 281 mm against 275 mm over three monthsKasaï (CD92): 98% of average, 333 mm against 341 mm over three monthsSud-Kivu (CD62): 108% of average, 337 mm against 310 mm over three monthsKinshasa (CD10): 94% of average, 139 mm against 148 mm over three monthsCongo, Dem. Rep.
  • Under 60%0regions
  • 60–85%2regions
  • 85–115%23regions
  • 115–140%1region
  • Over 140%0regions
Rainfall over the three months to 20 Oct 2026 as a share of the 1989–2018 average for the same months, from WFP's regional figures E55. Brown is drier than usual, blue wetter. Tap or hover a region for its figures. Only regions whose name and boundary were confirmed against WFP's data are drawn. Boundaries: OCHA common operational boundaries (COD-AB), current and earlier editions (CC BY-IGO; 26 of 29 regions drawn).
Crisis risk: INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026 · INFORM Risk Index (EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: An index from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and partners that rates how likely a humanitarian crisis or disaster is to overwhelm a country's capacity to cope. Humanitarian donors and agencies use it to compare countries; it measures structural risk, not current needs.

Trace this: INFORM Risk results and data (EU JRC) ↗

CountryINFORM Risk Mid 2026 (0-10)ClassRank (1 = highest risk)Hazard & exposureVulnerabilityLack of coping capacity
Congo, Dem. Rep.8.0Very high3 of 1918.37.58.2

INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026, EU Joint Research Centre with IASC partners; retrieved 2026-11-08. Scores 0-10, higher means a higher risk that a humanitarian crisis overwhelms national capacity. Congo, Dem. Rep.: the highest of the three dimensions is Hazard & exposure (8.3); read the score through that dimension. Congo, Dem. Rep.: INFORM Risk 7.6 in 2022 → 8.0 in Mid 2026 (Very high → Very high); the method changed slightly between editions, so read this as direction, not a precise trend.

Rainfall against the long-term average, by region, to 20 Oct 2026 (CHIRPS via WFP) · CHIRPS rainfall (Climate Hazards Center, aggregated by WFP) via the HDX Humanitarian API

About this source: Satellite rainfall estimates combined with weather-station data, produced by the Climate Hazards Center at UC Santa Barbara and widely used in food-security early warning; WFP averages them by region.

Trace this: Democratic Republic of the Congo: Rainfall Indicators at Subnational Level (cod-rainfall-subnat-5ytd.csv, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗

CountryRegionRegion code (P-code)Rainfall, 3 months (mm)Average, 3 months (mm)3 months, % of averageLast month, % of average
Congo, Dem. Rep.TanganyikaCD749312377%81%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Kongo-CentralCD20678977%78%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Sud-KivuCD6228634982%93%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Name not confirmedCD5427130390%121%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Haut-UeleCD5353759690%102%
Congo, Dem. Rep.IturiCD5446350592%110%
Congo, Dem. Rep.ManiemaCD6330032692%102%
Congo, Dem. Rep.KinshasaCD1013914894%92%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Haut-LomamiCD7312913795%96%
Congo, Dem. Rep.LomamiCD8123424895%102%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Nord-KivuCD6149651996%98%
Congo, Dem. Rep.KasaïCD9233334198%108%
Congo, Dem. Rep.TshopoCD5150351498%105%
Congo, Dem. Rep.SankuruCD8337537999%110%
Congo, Dem. Rep.TshuapaCD45542545100%111%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Kasaï-OrientalCD82276277100%110%
Congo, Dem. Rep.KwangoCD31251249101%101%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Kasaï-CentralCD91281275102%110%
Congo, Dem. Rep.LualabaCD72114110104%106%
Congo, Dem. Rep.MongalaCD44609585104%113%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Bas-UeleCD52631599105%114%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Haut-KatangaCD714441107%111%
Congo, Dem. Rep.KwiluCD32324303107%108%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Name not confirmedCD62337310108%66%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Maï-NdombeCD33426382111%124%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Sud-UbangiCD42681604113%127%
Congo, Dem. Rep.Nord-UbangiCD43699619113%126%
Congo, Dem. Rep.EquateurCD41598517116%130%

CHIRPS satellite rainfall estimates with station data, averaged per region by WFP, via the HDX Humanitarian API; rolling periods ending 20 Oct 2026; retrieved 2026-11-08. Percentages compare with the 1989-2018 average for the same period. Recent periods use preliminary estimates that are replaced by final data about a month later. 'Dry period' marks regions whose average for the period is under 30 mm, where a percentage says little. Rainfall is one input to harvests and water supply, not a drought declaration. Driest regions first. Region names are matched to WFP's region codes from OCHA's common operational boundaries (current and earlier editions), checked against the size of each region in WFP's data; 2 regions without a confirmed name are shown by code only.

Recent disaster alerts (GDACS, 2025-11-08 to 2026-11-08) · GDACS (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre)

About this source: A UN and European Commission alert system that estimates within hours how serious an earthquake, cyclone, flood or drought may be for people. Alerts are model estimates to guide international response, not damage assessments.

Trace this: GDACS alert archive ↗

CountryHazardAlertsHighest alert levelDate of highest alertLatest alert (any level)

Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre), automatic near-real-time alerts; retrieved 2026-11-08. Colours estimate the need for international humanitarian assistance: Green = unlikely (local impact can still be significant), Orange = possible, Red = likely; one disaster can raise several alerts. Country attribution uses affected-country ISO3; window applies to event start date, not last update. Counts are returned records, not unique disasters; regional records may appear for multiple countries. Map shows only valid coordinates in the displayed frame. Congo, Dem. Rep.: excluded 46 records without matching country/start date. Congo, Dem. Rep.: no matching alert records in this response; not evidence of no disasters.

Back to top ↑

Norway in Congo, Dem. Rep.

Norway's own aid data (agreements and disbursements) and the OECD's figures for all donors. The full tables follow below.

286.6m NOKNorwegian aid to Congo, Dem. Rep. in 2025 net, after NOK 21 k returned (2024: NOK 237.0m net, after NOK 2.5m returned)

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E1Retrieved 2026-09-23

19thlargest official donor, 2019–2024 combined (1% of all official aid)

Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System · E28Retrieved 2026-10-16

2025: NOK 287m from Norway's own agreementsNOK millions a year, net of money returned; the estimate converted from USD at Norges Bank's annual average rate; the OECD's estimate is not on this page
2021: NOK 261.5m own disbursements, no estimate yet26220212022: NOK 270.8m own disbursements, no estimate yet27120222023: NOK 365.5m own disbursements, no estimate yet36620232024: NOK 237.0m own disbursements, no estimate yet23720242025: NOK 286.6m own disbursements, no estimate yet2872025
Norway's own agreements (incl. funds earmarked through multilaterals)Estimated share of Norway's core funding to multilaterals (OECD)

Source: Norwegian development assistance data; OECD imputed multilateral aid; Norges Bank · E1Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025

Norad's themes: Emergency assistance leadsNorwegian disbursements by Norad's theme (target area), 2021–2025 combined, NOK millions
Emergency assistance585.1m
Multisector and other243.9m
Governance, civil society and conflict prevention235.4m
Environment and energy225.2m
Health and social services87.4m

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E4Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025

Main sectors: Material relief assistance and services leadsNorwegian disbursements by sub-sector, 2021–2025 combined, NOK millions
Material relief assistance and services356.1m
Food security policy and administrative management205.7m
Environmental policy and administrative management176.6m
Emergency food assistance114.1m
Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions65.4m

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E5Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025

Main partners: WFP - World Food Programme received the mostDisbursements by agreement partner, 2021–2025 combined, NOK millions; partner type and years in the card
WFP - World Food Programme309.2m
Norwegian Refugee Council193.6m
Kirkens Nødhjelp150.4m
Regnskogfondet129.4m
Caritas Norge87.5m

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E2Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025

Channels: Norwegian NGOs received 53%Share of Norwegian disbursements by type of partner, 2021–2025 combined
Norwegian NGOs53%
Multilateral organisations (earmarked)42%
NGO Other donor countries2%
International NGOs2%
Local NGOs1%

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E3Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025

2025: the 5 largest of 42 agreements received 45% of the moneyShare of 2025's Norwegian disbursements by agreement size (agreements · share); size is what each was paid in 2025
NOK 20m to 50m4 · 39%
NOK 5m to 20m14 · 46%
NOK 1m to 5m17 · 12%
Under NOK 1m7 · 2%

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E8Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2025

Largest agreements in 2025: who gets themNOK millions paid in 2025
  1. 36.0mDRC - NRC Strategic Partnership AgreementNorwegian Refugee Council · Norwegian NGO
  2. 30.0mWFP-FAO DRC Resilience ProgrammeWFP - World Food Programme · Multilateral organisation
  3. 25.0mDRC Humanitarian FundUNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Multilateral organisation
  4. 22.0mEmergency Food Assistance - DRCWFP - World Food Programme · Multilateral organisation
  5. 16.2mHumanitarian Support: Child Protection - The Democratic Republic of the CongoRedd Barna Norge · Norwegian NGO

Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E9Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2025

Policy markers, share of disbursements tagged as a principal or significant objective, 2021–2025: Gender equality 73% · Climate adaptation 19% · Climate mitigation 18% · Biodiversity 16% · Disability inclusion 7%. One agreement can carry several markers, so the shares overlap and do not add up; agreements not screened count as not tagged, so each share is a lower bound. E7

Norwegian disbursements by year · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Trend 2021–2025: 310.1 m to 286.6 m (5 years reported)In 2025 kroner: 310.1 m in 2021 → 286.6 m in 2025
YearDisbursed (NOK)In 2025 kronerAgreementsShare of all Norwegian aid to these recipientsReturned to Norway (NOK)
2021261.5 m310.1 m76100.0%259 k
2022270.8 m303.7 m68100.0%2.2 m
2023365.5 m388.4 m48100.0%827 k
2024237.0 m244.3 m41100.0%2.5 m
2025286.6 m286.6 m43100.0%21 k
Total1,421.4 m1,533.1 m5.8 m

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025. Trend: 261.5 m in 2021 → 286.6 m in 2025 (+10%); peak 365.5 m in 2023. Amounts are net: money agreements returned to Norway is subtracted in the year it came back, so they are lower than the OECD's gross disbursements for the same years. In 2025 kroner, adjusted for inflation with Statistics Norway's consumer price index (annual average, table 08981; retrieved 2026-11-08): 310.1 m in 2021 → 286.6 m in 2025 (-8%); peak 388.4 m in 2023.

Channels: who receives the funds · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Partner typeAssistance typeDisbursed (NOK)Share (rounded; listed groups only)Agreements
NGO NorwegianBilateral747.9 m53%89
Multilateral institutionsEarmarked to multilaterals601.3 m42%25
NGO Other donor countriesBilateral30.7 m2%3
NGO InternationalBilateral24.3 m2%3
NGO LocalBilateral7.7 m1%2
Norwegian public sectorTriangular co-operation7.0 m0%1
Private sector in other donor countriesBilateral1.5 m0%1
Public sector other donor countriesBilateral1.0 m0%1

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025. Shares use the listed channel groups, not necessarily the entire portfolio. Rounded 100% is not exactly all and rounded 0% is not none; retain nonzero amounts.

Norad's themes (target areas) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

ThemeDisbursed (NOK)ShareAgreements
Emergency assistance585.1 m41%25
Multisector and other243.9 m17%9
Governance, civil society and conflict prevention235.4 m17%45
Environment and energy225.2 m16%21
Health and social services87.4 m6%9
Production sectors and trade26.4 m2%7
Education17.2 m1%8
Economic infrastructure and services902 k0%1

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025. Norad's own grouping of its statistics (target area), as in Norad's country snapshots; the DAC sub-sectors are in the next table.

What the money is for (sub-sectors) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Sub-sectorDisbursed (NOK)Agreements
Material relief assistance and services356.1 m13
Food security policy and administrative management205.7 m3
Environmental policy and administrative management176.6 m18
Emergency food assistance114.1 m4
Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions65.4 m5
Democratic participation and civil society57.8 m16
Relief co-ordination and support services57.0 m3
Reproductive health care46.9 m1
Solar energy for isolated grids and standalone systems46.5 m2
Education in Emergencies41.2 m2

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025.

Policy markers (share of disbursements tagged significant or principal) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

MarkerPrincipal or significantPrincipal objectiveSignificant objective
Gender equality73%12%61%
Climate adaptation19%3%16%
Climate mitigation18%15%3%
Biodiversity16%13%3%
Disability inclusion7%0%7%

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025. Donor-reported OECD policy markers; not outcome evidence. One agreement can carry several markers, so the shares overlap and must not be added up. Norway's data records 'not screened' the same as 'not targeted', so each share is a lower bound. The disability marker exists only from 2018.

Agreement sizes in 2025 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Size (disbursed in the year)AgreementsDisbursed (NOK)Share of the money
NOK 20m to 50m4113.0 m39%
NOK 5m to 20m14132.8 m46%
NOK 1m to 5m1735.7 m12%
Under NOK 1m75.2 m2%

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2025. 42 agreements received money in 2025, NOK 286.6 m in all; the 5 largest received 45%. Sizes are what each agreement was paid in 2025, not its whole value over several years. 1 more had only zero or negative entries that year (funds returned), so the net total for 2025 is NOK 286.6 m.

Norway's single agreements and related projects (20)
Largest agreement partners · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

PartnerTypeDisbursed (NOK)AgreementsYears
WFP - World Food ProgrammeMultilateral institutions309.2 m32021–2025
Norwegian Refugee CouncilNGO Norwegian193.6 m42021–2025
Kirkens NødhjelpNGO Norwegian150.4 m232021–2025
RegnskogfondetNGO Norwegian129.4 m162021–2025
Caritas NorgeNGO Norwegian87.5 m152021–2025
Redd Barna NorgeNGO Norwegian57.4 m32021–2025
UNFPA - UN Population FundMultilateral institutions56.9 m22022–2025
Norges Røde KorsNGO Norwegian55.0 m22021–2025
UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian AffairsMultilateral institutions47.0 m22021–2025
NEFCO - Nordic Environment Finance CorporationMultilateral institutions45.0 m12023
CARE NorgeNGO Norwegian38.4 m32021–2025
UN WomenMultilateral institutions29.5 m22021–2025

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2021–2025. Agreement partner labels as recorded; not resolved organisation identities.

Largest agreements in 2025 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

AgreementPartnerPartner typeDisbursed (NOK)
DRC - NRC Strategic Partnership AgreementNorwegian Refugee CouncilNGO Norwegian36.0 m
WFP-FAO DRC Resilience ProgrammeWFP - World Food ProgrammeMultilateral institutions30.0 m
DRC Humanitarian FundUNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian AffairsMultilateral institutions25.0 m
Emergency Food Assistance - DRCWFP - World Food ProgrammeMultilateral institutions22.0 m
Humanitarian Support: Child Protection - The Democratic Republic of the CongoRedd Barna NorgeNGO Norwegian16.2 m
UNFPA country program ( support for SRHR and Youth)UNFPA - UN Population FundMultilateral institutions14.4 m
Democratic Republic of the Congo - Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC)UNICEF - United Nations Children's FundMultilateral institutions13.0 m
Multisectoral humanitarian response in the DRC - ProtectionKirkens NødhjelpNGO Norwegian10.2 m

Congo, Dem. Rep.; all sectors; 2025. Paid in that year; an agreement can run over several years.

Largest agreement: WFP-FAO DRC Resilience Programme · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement COD-21/0008 — "WFP-FAO DRC Resilience Programme" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: WFP - World Food Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 71 - Food security policy and administrative management. Payments recorded in 2021–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 200.0 m NOK in the selected years; 200.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: This agreement is the third phase of a joint WFP-FAO Resilience project which adopts an holistic approach to contribute to lasting and sustainable food security in the Tanganyika Provicince in the DRC. The agreement is between the Norwegian Embassy in Kinshasa and WFP, whereas the latter has an MOU with FAO regarding the division of labour. It aims to strengthen the resilience of fragile communities, with the following goals: 1. Reducing food insecurity and poverty and malnutrition help build resilience and promote social cohesion. The joint resilience-building programme supports smallholder farmers and vulnerable communities achieve food security and better nutrition to enable them respond to shocks and have better sanitation. 2. The provision of food assistance and capacity building to crisis affected populations enables communities to grow their own food and diversify their incomes. …

Largest agreement: DRC. Humanitarian Response · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0048-4 — "DRC. Humanitarian Response" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Norwegian Refugee Council (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 117.5 m NOK in the selected years; 140.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian response in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Largest agreement: Emergency Food Assistance - DRC · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-22/0125-2 — "Emergency Food Assistance - DRC" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: WFP - World Food Programme (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 40 - Emergency food assistance. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 94.2 m NOK in the selected years; 94.2 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: WFP operations in DRC

Largest agreement: Humanitarian assistance · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0052-6 — "Humanitarian assistance" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 63.6 m NOK in the selected years; 79.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Save lives, alleviate suffering and protect human dignity. Focus:WASH, SGBV, ASRH and protection.

Largest agreement: UNFPA country program ( support for SRHR and Youth) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement COD-22/0002 — "UNFPA country program ( support for SRHR and Youth)" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: UNFPA - UN Population Fund (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 20 - Reproductive health care. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 46.9 m NOK in the selected years; 46.9 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Programme period stated in the description: 2020–2024. Description: Overall goal for UNFPA Country Programme will be implemented 2020-2024 and this support is for Outcome 1 on Sexual and reproductive health, and outcome 2 on adolescents and youth to ensure that youth are empowered and can advocate for their rights including improving their bodily autonomy. The programme will be implemented in close collaboration with the Congolese Government, civil society, and private-sector partners at national and subnational levels, with a geographic and programmatic focus.

Largest agreement: Beyond the Grid Fund for Afrca (BGFA) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement RAF-22/0010-3 — "Beyond the Grid Fund for Afrca (BGFA)" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: NEFCO - Nordic Environment Finance Corporation (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 31 - Solar energy for isolated grids and standalone systems. Payments recorded in 2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 45.0 m NOK in the selected years; 45.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Over 600 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa live today without access to electricity. The Beyond the Grid Fund for Africa (BGFA) aims to reduce this gap by stimulating and accelerating the emergency of new business models to incentivise the private sector to offer affordable and clean energy access at scale to people living in rural and peri-urban areas. The BGFA programme aims at actively promoting, incentivising and transferring best practices regarding gender equality in BGFA target countries. BGFA does this through requiring awardees (energy service providers) to offer equal opportunities for men and women Beyond the Grid Fund for Africa forms part of the ‘Power Africa’ initiative launched by former President Barack Obama and contributes to the Sustainable Development Goal 7 as well as the Paris Agreement on Climate. The planned period of implementation is in total six years. The …

Largest agreement: DRC Humanitarian Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0010-10 — "DRC Humanitarian Fund" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 50 - Relief co-ordination and support services. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 44.0 m NOK in the selected years; 44.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to Democratic Republic of Congo humanitarian Fund. Gender is mainstreamed in OCHAs activitives including in the pooled funds.

Largest agreement: Promoting Safe and Protective Environments for children in DRC · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0058-2 — "Promoting Safe and Protective Environments for children in DRC" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Redd Barna Norge (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 12 - Education in Emergencies. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 39.6 m NOK in the selected years; 46.4 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Promoting Safe and Protective Environments for children in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Protection of children and education in emergencies. Vulnerable children included.

Largest agreement: NORDEM – Support to Stabilisation objectives in DRC (UNDP and MONUSCO) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-21/0123-3 — "NORDEM – Support to Stabilisation objectives in DRC (UNDP and MONUSCO)" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Norwegian Refugee Council (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 30 - Participation in international peacekeeping operations. Payments recorded in 2021–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 39.1 m NOK in the selected years; 39.1 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project seconds international experts to wrok with national and international authorities to strengthen their capacities to handle conflicts, to plan and implement democratic elections and to promote good governance, democratic processes, human rights and the principles of rules of law in focal countries, countries with large UN- and EU-operations and in the OSSE region. Deployments MONUSCO

Largest agreement: DRC - NRC Strategic Partnership Agreement · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-25/0010-13 — "DRC - NRC Strategic Partnership Agreement" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Norwegian Refugee Council (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 36.0 m NOK in the selected years; 36.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Norwegian Refugee Council/NRC in the Democratic Republic of Congo works through an integrated and multi-sector approach to provide a holistic response to the people most in need. NRC provides assistance to 1) IDPs throughout all phases of displacement, from initial displacement to protracted displacement; and return, resettlement or integration, where the context allows; 2) returnees; and 3) vulnerable host community members. Cross-cutting factors like gender, age, disability, ethnicity among others, are taken into account as part of the community-based selection criteria of programme participants. Given the increasing needs and reduction of funding, NRC will prioritise assistance based on vulnerability, encompassing social and physical aspects. Sectors include Education, Livelihoods and food security (LFS), Shelter and settlements, Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH). The project design is …

Related project (similar description): Humanitarian support - Democratic Rep. of Congo · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0128-2 — "Humanitarian support - Democratic Rep. of Congo" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: IOM - International Organisation for Migration (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 10.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian support to DRC

Related project (similar description): Democratic Republic of the Congo - Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-25/0016-5 — "Democratic Republic of the Congo - Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC)" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: UNICEF - United Nations Children's Fund (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 13.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Contribution to the Democratic Republic of Congo Humanitarian Action for Children 2025. In DRC Unicef provides critical health and nutrition, protection, water and sanitation and education in emergencies services to millions of children and their caregivers displaced by the ongoing conflict in the country. According to UNICEF’s Strategic Plan and in accordance with the UNICEF Core Commitments for Children (CCCs) in Humanitarian Action, UNICEF focuses on gender-responsive and disability inclusive programming. UNICEF addresses the unique vulnerabilities of girls and women, ensuring their safety and access to essential services during emergencies and esnuring that programs are tailored to meet the specific needs of girls and boys. UNICFE further implements its disability inclusive humanitarian action toolkit which provides practical information on how to plan, coordinate, implement and …

Related project (similar description): DR Congo Appeal · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0004-20 — "DR Congo Appeal" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Norges Røde Kors (NGO Norwegian); implementing: ICRC - International Committee of the Red Cross. Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 30.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to ICRC's DR Congo Appeal. International humanitarian law aims to prevent and alleviate suffering in war without discrimination based on sex, but recognize that women face specific problems in armed conflict, such as sexual violence and risks to their health. It recognizes this in the general protection it affords to both women and men, as well as in some specific provisions providing additional protection to women.

Related project (similar description): Multisectoral humanitarian response in the DRC · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-25/0008-6 — "Multisectoral humanitarian response in the DRC" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian); implementing: Caritas - local partner. Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 8.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Norwegian Church Aid’s humanitarian response in the Democratic Republic of Congo will deliver inclusive, climate-resilient WASH services and strengthen community preparedness for environmental hazards. The response will deliver lifesaving support to vulnerable individuals in the targeted areas, including women, girls, and people living with disabilities. The response is implemented with local partners including the DRC Red Cross, Social Action for the Promotion of the Left Behind (ASPLC), Caritas, Panzi Foundation, Baptist Community in Central Africa (CBCA).

Related project (similar description): Support to UNHCR in DR Congo · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-18/0302-23 — "Support to UNHCR in DR Congo" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: UNHCR - UN Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 50 - Relief co-ordination and support services. Payments recorded in 2020–2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 20.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to UNHCR in DR Congo

Related project (similar description): Support to WHO in DRC · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-21/0154-5 — "Support to WHO in DRC" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: WHO - World Health Organization (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 11 - Basic Health Care Services in Emergencies. Payments recorded in 2021 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2021, which does not show that it ended); 3.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to WHO's preparedness and ermergency response in DRC, incl. Ebola response

Related project (similar description): Democratic Republic Congo - operational appeal · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-20/0074-9 — "Democratic Republic Congo - operational appeal" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Norges Røde Kors (NGO Norwegian); implementing: ICRC - International Committee of the Red Cross . Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 48.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Democratic Republic Congo - operational appeal

Related project (similar description): COD Together for Just, Inclusive and Sustainable Development · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)

About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.

Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗

Agreement QZA-23/0002-39 — "COD Together for Just, Inclusive and Sustainable Development" in Congo, Dem. Rep.. Partner: Digni (NGO Norwegian); implementing: CBCN - Communauté Baptiste du Congo Nord. Sector: 50 - Democratic participation and civil society. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 3.4 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Democratic participation and civil society. Strengthening civil society, participatory development.

Back to top ↑

Not reached when this page was gathered: debt risk, imputed multilateral. They are tried again with tomorrow's update.