Demonstration prototype. Figures and text are generated automatically from open data and AI models and may contain errors or be out of date: quality-assure against the linked sources before using anything in a decision.
Open to everyone; gathered 8 November 2026 and updated each night. Conflict-event data (ACLED) is shown to signed-in reviewers only.
Country page
Afghanistan
Aid recipient
Afghanistan on one screen
Figures from the cards below, each with its period; the number after a figure opens its card, with the dataset and retrieval date.
- Aid
- USD 2,216.0m official aid, all sectors, 2024 (−49% since 2019, current USD) E28. Main donors, 2024: United States 30%, EU Institutions 14%, United Kingdom 11%. Donors whose total aid (all recipients) fell more than 10%, 2024→2025 (provisional): United States −56%, Germany −16%, Japan −11% E64.
- Appeal
- 2026 appeal 33% funded to date (USD 559.7m of 1,714.2m); 2025: 42%. E31
Newest figure: Nov 2026 (ACAPS access) · Oldest: 2024 (OECD CRS).
Crisis severity (all crisis types, incl. conflict) and natural-hazard alerts
Retrieved 8 Nov 2026 · ACAPS crisis severity: October 2026 · ACAPS access: Nov 2026 · GDACS alerts: 8 Nov 2025 – 8 Nov 2026
Crisis severity scale (ACAPS, 1–10, all crisis types including conflict; each country is shaded by ACAPS's country rating, or by its most severe crisis where ACAPS gives none)
- Shade: crisis severity (ACAPS), the whole humanitarian crisis
- Very high9.2Afghanistan: Complex crisis in Afghanistan
- Dots: natural-hazard alerts (GDACS), one per flood, storm, wildfire or earthquake; colour is the need for international help from that event alone, not the overall crisis
- Green36this event alone: international assistance unlikely to be needed; local impact can still be significant
- Orange1this event alone: international assistance may be needed
- Red0this event alone: international assistance likely to be needed
Dots: 37 GDACS alert records plotted in this frame (tap or hover for details); a geographic subset of the evidence card, not an exhaustive disaster count. See the card for the recorded event-start window. Their colour is GDACS's estimate of the need for international humanitarian assistance, not of local severity E59. Outlines: Natural Earth.
Crises tracked by ACAPS E40 E41 · severity 1 to 10, higher is more severe; access constraints 0 to 5, 5 is extreme
- Complex crisis in Afghanistan: severity 9.2 of 10, stable; access constraints 5 of 5 (extreme)
At a glance
Useful for:FundingHumanitarianEconomy and investmentGovernanceRisk and environmentDevelopment needs
Source: OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview ↗ · E48Retrieved 2026-11-08
Source: IPC / Cadre Harmonisé ↗ · E49Retrieved 2026-11-08
Source: ACAPS INFORM Severity ↗ · E40Retrieved 2026-11-08
Source: ACAPS Humanitarian Access ↗ · E41Retrieved 2026-11-08
Source: UN OCHA FTS ↗ · E31Retrieved 2026-11-08
USD millions
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E28Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients AFG (combined); all sectors (CRS total)
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System ↗ · E28Retrieved 2026-10-14Dataset scope: OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients AFG (combined); all sectors (CRS total)
Source: OECD, mobilised private finance for development ↗ · E36Retrieved 2026-10-22Dataset scope: OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Afghanistan (combined); current USD millions
Source: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service ↗ · E31Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions
Source: IPC / Cadre Harmonisé via HDX HAPI ↗ · E49Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections
Control of corruption
Regulatory quality
Rule of law
Political stability
Source: World Bank WGI ↗ · E60Retrieved 2026-11-08Dataset scope: World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI
Need against funding
Computed by the app from the evidence cards it links to, with fixed rules, so two briefs on the same scope say the same thing.
Where need is outpacing money E63
Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E32) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E48).
| Cluster | People in need, 2025 (change) | Appeal funded | Against the whole appeal | Funded per person in need (USD) | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency Shelter and NFI | 5.76 m -13% | 17% · USD 30.9 m of 179.1 m | -25 points | 5 | Severely underfunded |
| Water Sanitation Hygiene | 20.97 m -1% | 18% · USD 48.6 m of 264.3 m | -24 points | 2 | Severely underfunded |
| Food Security | 14.76 m -7% | 19% · USD 208.1 m of 1,089.4 m | -23 points | 14 | Severely underfunded |
| Nutrition | 7.80 m +5% | 35% · USD 102.8 m of 296.4 m | -7 points | 13 | Underfundedgap widening |
| Health | 14.28 m -20% | 50% · USD 141.2 m of 279.7 m | +8 points | 10 | Half funded or more |
| Protection - Gender-Based Violence | 14.17 m +7% | 56% · USD 27.5 m of 48.8 m | +14 points | 2 | Half funded or more |
| Education | 8.89 m +11% | 83% · USD 77.0 m of 93.3 m | +41 points | 9 | Half funded or more |
| Protection | 14.21 m -4% | 208% · USD 78.6 m of 37.8 m | +166 points | 6 | Half funded or more |
Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.
Donor concentration and cuts E64
Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E28), all official donors USD 2,216.0m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E37).
donor's total aid fell more than 10% in the latest provisional year
- 30% Largest donor's share
- 55% Three largest donors' share
- 41% Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) (USD 910.9 m)
- 18% Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly (USD 404.4 m)
Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.
Money: who funds what
19 cards; open a card for its table and sources.
All donors, the United States and other funders
Who else funds this: all official donors (OECD CRS) · OECD DAC Creditor Reporting System
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Rank of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope | Donor | Trend | 2019 (USD m) | 2020 (USD m) | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Share of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 combined, all official donors in scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 1,443.2 | 1,015.6 | 1,490.8 | 1,305.7 | 1,232.5 | 664.8 | 31% | |
| 2 | Germany | 409.2 | 373.1 | 619.1 | 407.1 | 275.2 | 160.6 | 10% | |
| 3 | EU Institutions | 415.5 | 368.9 | 350.2 | 340.4 | 370.1 | 307.5 | 9% | |
| 4 | United Kingdom | 400.1 | 291.4 | 258.9 | 467.2 | 146.6 | 245.7 | 8% | |
| 5 | World Bank (IDA) | 379.9 | 609.5 | 301.3 | 30.4 | 29.7 | 93.4 | 6% | |
| 6 | Asian Development Bank [AsDB] | 206.9 | 338.7 | 57.5 | 304.5 | 212.2 | 0.6 | 5% | |
| 7 | Japan | 131.4 | 126.2 | 212.5 | 156.7 | 165.6 | 85.5 | 4% | |
| 8 | Sweden | 137.9 | 119.2 | 115.9 | 93.9 | 87.2 | 84.4 | 3% | |
| 9 | IMF Concessional Trust Funds | 89.1 | 344.9 | 150.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3% | |
| 10 | Canada | 117.1 | 86.0 | 113.2 | 160.5 | 43.3 | 50.2 | 3% | |
| 11 | Norway | 79.5 | 79.5 | 81.4 | 77.9 | 80.7 | 56.2 | 2% | |
| All official donors | 4,383.7 | 4,264.6 | 4,722.1 | 3,998.0 | 3,150.9 | 2,216.0 | 100% | ||
| All official donors, constant 2024 USD | 5,111.6 | 4,819.2 | 5,021.0 | 4,294.9 | 3,224.2 | 2,216.0 |
OECD Creditor Reporting System, gross disbursements, current USD millions; recipients AFG (combined); all sectors (CRS total); retrieved 2026-10-14. 75 individual donors report in scope. Latest OECD year lags national data. All official donors: Trend: USD 4,383.7m in 2019 → USD 2,216.0m in 2024 (-49%); peak USD 4,722.1m in 2021. United States: Trend: USD 1,443.2m in 2019 → USD 664.8m in 2024 (-54%); peak USD 1,490.8m in 2021. Germany: Trend: USD 409.2m in 2019 → USD 160.6m in 2024 (-61%); peak USD 619.1m in 2021. EU Institutions: Trend: USD 415.5m in 2019 → USD 307.5m in 2024 (-26%); peak USD 415.5m in 2019. All official donors in constant 2024 USD (the OECD's own deflators, which also take out exchange-rate changes): USD 5,111.6m in 2019 → USD 2,216.0m in 2024 (-57%); peak USD 5,111.6m in 2019. Rank and share use the combined displayed years and all official donors, including multilateral institutions; not a single-year or bilateral-only comparison.
Other donors' largest projects in scope (OECD CRS, 2023 to 2024) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Donor | Project | Channel of delivery | Recipient | Disbursed (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | Project in Afghanistan | Other | Afghanistan | 0.1 |
OECD CRS project-level records, gross disbursements 2023 to 2024, current USD millions; recipients AFG; all sectors; Norway excluded (see the Norwegian data); retrieved 2026-10-15. 1 projects from 1 donors report in scope. Titles and descriptions are donor-reported; a project may cover more than the sector named.
Humanitarian response plans: required vs funded (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service
About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.
Trace this: FTS plan: Afghanistan 2024 ↗ · FTS plan: Afghanistan 2025 ↗ · FTS plan: Afghanistan 2026 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2024 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2026 (all countries) ↗
| Country | Year | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 2024 | 3,059.6 | 1,590.4 | 52% |
| Afghanistan | 2025 | 2,416.8 | 1,021.5 | 42% |
| Afghanistan | 2026 (in progress) | 1,714.2 | 559.7 | 33% |
UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service, national humanitarian response plans 2024 to 2026, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Humanitarian appeals only (not development aid). The current year is still being funded. Coverage = funded / required. Use each row's plan year. Historical cluster funding does not establish current cluster coverage or persistent unmet need. Current country totals cannot supply a missing current cluster split; financial coverage is not needs met.
Humanitarian funding by cluster, 2025 (UN OCHA FTS) · UN OCHA Financial Tracking Service
About this source: The UN's tracking of humanitarian funding against appeals and response plans, from what donors and agencies report. It is the usual source for how well funded an appeal is; recent figures grow as reports come in.
Trace this: FTS plan: Afghanistan 2025 ↗ · FTS response plans overview, 2025 (all countries) ↗
| Country | Cluster | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Food Security | 1,089.4 | 208.1 | 19% |
| Afghanistan | Nutrition | 296.4 | 102.8 | 35% |
| Afghanistan | Health | 279.7 | 141.2 | 50% |
| Afghanistan | Water Sanitation Hygiene | 264.3 | 48.6 | 18% |
| Afghanistan | Emergency Shelter and NFI | 179.1 | 30.9 | 17% |
| Afghanistan | Education | 93.3 | 77.0 | 83% |
| Afghanistan | Protection - Gender-Based Violence | 48.8 | 27.5 | 56% |
| Afghanistan | Protection | 37.8 | 78.6 | 208% |
UN OCHA FTS, national humanitarian response plans 2025, eight largest clusters by requirement, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Afghanistan 2025 largest donors: United States of America, Government of USD 218.6m; European Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department USD 174.8m; United Kingdom, Government of USD 111.0m; World Bank USD 68.7m; Asian Development Bank USD 46.6m.
Country-based pooled fund allocations by partner type (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)
About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.
Trace this: OCHA CBPF data hub (allocations by fund and partner) ↗ · CBPF API: allocations by year, fund and partner type ↗
| Fund | Allocation year | UN agencies (USD m) | International NGOs (USD m) | National NGOs (USD m) | Other organisations (USD m) | Total approved (USD m) | National NGO share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 2026 (to date) | 0.00 | 16.85 | 21.57 | 0.00 | 38.42 | 56.1% |
| Afghanistan | 2025 | 12.01 | 35.33 | 26.10 | 0.00 | 73.44 | 35.5% |
| Afghanistan | 2024 | 10.62 | 29.90 | 14.69 | 0.00 | 55.21 | 26.6% |
UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Afghanistan; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Approved allocations only (pipeline excluded); the current year is still being allocated, and years with no approved allocation are not shown. The national NGO share counts direct allocations, not sub-grants, so it is not the whole local share. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.
Largest pooled-fund partners (OCHA CBPF) · UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPF)
About this source: Funds in individual crises, managed by OCHA, that pool donor money and allocate it to UN agencies and NGOs, including national and local organisations. They show who receives humanitarian money inside the country.
Trace this: CBPF API: Afghanistan project records (CSV) ↗
| Organisation | Type | Fund | Projects | In the clusters covered (USD m) | All approved (USD m) | Largest clusters | Allocation years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norwegian Refugee Council | International NGO | Afghanistan | 8 | 5.76 | 6.11 | Protection, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Organization for Coordination of Humanitarian Relief | National NGO | Afghanistan | 9 | 5.67 | 5.67 | Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Food Security, Emergency Shelter and NFI | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| International Organization for Migration | UN Agency | Afghanistan | 3 | 5.44 | 5.44 | Protection, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Health | 2024, 2025 |
| World Vision International | International NGO | Afghanistan | 9 | 4.69 | 5.78 | Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Health, Multi-Sector | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| World Health Organization | UN Agency | Afghanistan | 3 | 4.46 | 4.46 | Health, Nutrition | 2024, 2025 |
| Afghani Community and Health Rehabilitation Organization | National NGO | Afghanistan | 7 | 3.90 | 4.59 | Nutrition, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Multi-Sector | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Mission East | International NGO | Afghanistan | 5 | 3.77 | 3.77 | Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Food Security | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Islamic Relief Worldwide | International NGO | Afghanistan | 4 | 3.33 | 3.33 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, Health | 2025 |
| ORGANIZATION OF HUMAN WELFARE | National NGO | Afghanistan | 6 | 3.26 | 3.96 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Health, Multi-Sector | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
| Norwegian Afghanistan Committee | International NGO | Afghanistan | 6 | 3.19 | 5.19 | Emergency Shelter and NFI, Multi-Sector, Food Security | 2024, 2025, 2026 (to date) |
UN OCHA Country-Based Pooled Funds; funds Afghanistan; allocation years 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved budgets, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Ranked by approved budget in the clusters covered (Education, Emergency Shelter and NFI, Food Security, Health, Nutrition, Protection, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene); top ten. Approved allocations as recorded by OCHA; one project counted once. Pooled funds allocate in rounds to partners that passed the fund's eligibility and capacity checks: past allocations are not open calls. Direct recipients only: sub-grants to other partners are not shown. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them.
UN Central Emergency Response Fund allocations (CERF) · UN Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)
About this source: The UN's global emergency fund, which releases money quickly to UN agencies and IOM for sudden or underfunded crises. Its grants signal where the UN sees urgent or neglected needs.
Trace this: CERF allocations (HDX, all countries and years) ↗ · CERF allocations by country ↗
| Country | Year | Rapid Response (USD m) | Underfunded Emergencies (USD m) | Total approved (USD m) | In the clusters covered (USD m) | Emergencies | Largest recipient agencies | Latest approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 2026 (to date) | 0.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | Economic Disruption | agency to be confirmed | 2026-09-26 |
| Afghanistan | 2025 | 21.68 | 19.97 | 41.65 | 34.54 | Displacement/Migration, Drought, Earthquake, Post-conflict Needs | United Nations Children’s Fund, World Food Programme, World Health Organization, United Nations Population Fund | 2025-09-19 |
UN CERF; countries AFG; 2024-2026 (2026 to date); approved amounts, USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. the clusters covered here: Early recovery, Education, Food security, Health, Nutrition, Protection, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene. Approved CERF grants by year; the current year is to date. CERF funds UN agencies and IOM only, which may pass funds on to partners. 'Agency to be confirmed' is approved money not yet split between agencies. Already counted in the FTS funding figures: never add them. Not an open call.
Private finance mobilised by official development finance (OECD) · OECD, mobilised private finance for development
About this source: The OECD's measure of private money brought in by public development finance, for example through guarantees or co-investment. It is the main reference for blended finance; amounts follow the OECD's attribution rules and are published here for groups of providers.
Trace this: OECD mobilised private finance dataflow (DSD_MOB@DF_MOBILISATION) ↗
| Mechanism | Trend | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple co-financing | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.8 | |
| Guarantees | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | |
| All mechanisms, all sectors | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26.8 | |
| of which by multilateral banks and funds (all sectors) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | |
| of which by bilateral donors (DAC) (all sectors) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.2 |
OECD, mobilised private finance for development; recipients Afghanistan (combined); current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-22. Private money that official donors and development banks brought into projects through guarantees, loans, equity and co-financing. Published for groups of providers only, not per institution. Mechanism and provider-group rows cover ALL sectors; only the explicitly labelled selected-sector subtotal covers the sectors covered. No sector-level provider split is in the data. Latest amount, absolute increase and percentage growth are different comparisons; the highlighted trend is not a growth ranking.
Donors' total aid (net ODA), all recipients (2021 to 2025, 2025 provisional) · OECD DAC1 (includes preliminary data)
About this source: The OECD's headline aid totals for each donor, the source of the yearly figures on aid as a share of national income. It shows a donor's overall trend, not where the money goes.
Trace this: OECD DAC1 dataflow (DSD_DAC1@DF_DAC1) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
| Donor | Trend | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | 2025 (USD m) provisional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 47,528.2 | 60,328.7 | 64,461.9 | 65,336.8 | 29,021.9 | |
| Germany | 32,455.6 | 36,444.6 | 41,253.3 | 33,249.3 | 28,032.0 | |
| EU Institutions | 20,639.1 | 27,165.9 | 37,544.2 | 35,654.1 | 52,904.8 | |
| United Kingdom | 16,277.8 | 15,761.3 | 18,615.7 | 16,269.5 | 16,365.1 | |
| Japan | 15,767.0 | 16,747.3 | 18,661.9 | 15,245.9 | 13,523.6 | |
| Sweden | 5,937.6 | 5,463.8 | 5,481.9 | 4,829.0 | 5,769.2 | |
| Canada | 6,257.7 | 9,274.1 | 9,058.0 | 8,422.9 | 10,131.3 | |
| Norway | 4,673.0 | 5,161.0 | 5,292.9 | 4,905.3 | 5,156.8 |
OECD DAC1, net ODA disbursements to all recipients and sectors, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-11-08. Shows each donor's overall aid, not its spending in this country or sector. 2025 figures are the OECD's preliminary estimates of aid already disbursed that year (not forecasts) and may be revised. United States: USD 65,336.8m in 2024 → USD 29,021.9m in 2025 (-56% in one year). Germany: USD 33,249.3m in 2024 → USD 28,032.0m in 2025 (-16% in one year). EU Institutions: USD 35,654.1m in 2024 → USD 52,904.8m in 2025 (+48% in one year). United Kingdom: USD 16,269.5m in 2024 → USD 16,365.1m in 2025 (+1% in one year). Japan: USD 15,245.9m in 2024 → USD 13,523.6m in 2025 (-11% in one year). The same donors in this country and sector (OECD CRS, gross disbursements; ends earlier): United States: USD 1,443.2m in 2019 → USD 664.8m in 2024. Germany: USD 409.2m in 2019 → USD 160.6m in 2024. EU Institutions: USD 415.5m in 2019 → USD 307.5m in 2024. United Kingdom: USD 400.1m in 2019 → USD 245.7m in 2024. Japan: USD 131.4m in 2019 → USD 85.5m in 2024. Sweden: USD 137.9m in 2019 → USD 84.4m in 2024. Canada: USD 117.1m in 2019 → USD 50.2m in 2024. Norway: USD 79.5m in 2019 → USD 56.2m in 2024. Measure: net ODA disbursement flows in current USD, not budgets or grant-only funding. Preserve the provisional label on the corresponding observation year.
US foreign assistance by fiscal year (ForeignAssistance.gov), to FY2026 · ForeignAssistance.gov (US government)
About this source: The US government's own record of its foreign assistance: every obligation and payment by country, sector, agency and implementing partner, published much sooner than the OECD's data. It shows the effect of the 2025 US cuts country by country; economic and military aid are kept apart.
Trace this: ForeignAssistance.gov data downloads ↗
| Country | Measure | FY2021 (USD m) | FY2022 (USD m) | FY2023 (USD m) | FY2024 (USD m) | FY2025 (USD m) | FY2026 to date (USD m) | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Disbursed, all economic aid | 1,026.7 | 1,866.1 | 1,273.7 | 658.9 | 431.4 | -69.9 | |
| Afghanistan | Disbursed, in the sectors covered | 717.2 | 1,698.4 | 1,148.9 | 614.0 | 397.9 | -70.1 | |
| Afghanistan | Newly obligated (committed), in the sectors covered | 1,289.8 | 1,371.4 | 879.8 | 712.6 | -9.6 | 1.3 |
US government obligations and disbursements of economic (non-military) assistance, current USD, from the ForeignAssistance.gov complete dataset (file of Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:40:59 GMT); loaded 2026-10-14; retrieved 2026-10-14. US fiscal years run October to September; FY2026 is incomplete. Obligations are new commitments; disbursements are payments, often against earlier commitments, so they fall later than obligations. Agencies report with a lag and revise. Sectors use the OECD codes the US assigns, which can differ from the recipient's or the OECD's classification. Military and security assistance is excluded. Partners the US withholds by name (redacted) are left out of the partner list. Largest implementing partners by disbursements, FY2025–FY2026: World Food Program (USD 178.9m); World Health Organisation (USD 5.5m); U.S. Government - U.S. Agency for International Development (USD 4.3m); Abt Associates, Inc. (USD 3.5m); U.S. Government - Department of Defense (USD 1.0m).
Private foundations in scope (OECD PPFD) · OECD Private Philanthropy for Development (reporting foundations)
About this source: Foundations that report their grants to the OECD in the same format as government donors, among them the largest ones. Useful for comparing peer foundations; most smaller foundations do not report.
Trace this: OECD PPFD: exact scoped aggregate query (CSV) ↗
| Rank | Foundation | Trend | 2019 (USD m) | 2020 (USD m) | 2021 (USD m) | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Reported period total (USD m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gates Foundation | 4.849 | 20.937 | 21.326 | 18.516 | 47.323 | 89.875 | 202.826 | |
| 2 | Open Society Foundations | not reported | not reported | 5.451 | 5.695 | 5.995 | not reported | 17.141 | |
| 3 | LEGO Foundation | not reported | not reported | 4.366 | not reported | not reported | not reported | 4.366 | |
| 4 | Conrad N. Hilton Foundation | not reported | 0.500 | 1.000 | not reported | 0.500 | 0.550 | 2.550 | |
| 5 | Ford Foundation | not reported | not reported | 1.150 | 0.133 | not reported | not reported | 1.283 | |
| 6 | Rockefeller Foundation | not reported | not reported | 0.485 | 0.500 | not reported | not reported | 0.985 | |
| 7 | David and Lucile Packard Foundation | not reported | not reported | 0.650 | 0.100 | not reported | 0.038 | 0.788 | |
| 8 | Citi Foundation | not reported | not reported | 0.500 | not reported | not reported | not reported | 0.500 | |
| 9 | Van Leer Foundation | not reported | 0.017 | 0.296 | not reported | not reported | not reported | 0.313 | |
| 10 | Howard G. Buffett Foundation | not reported | not reported | not reported | 0.297 | not reported | not reported | 0.297 |
OECD Private Philanthropy for Development; recipients AFG; all sectors; 2019-2024; gross disbursements, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-16. Top ten by sum of available observations. OECD reporting foundations only, not all private philanthropy; absence is not proof of no activity. Missing observations are not zero. Do not add to official aid, humanitarian funding or mobilised-private-finance totals: scopes may overlap. Foundation projects are listed in a brief for one or a few sectors.
Current activities reported to IATI: who is active now, and through whom · IATI Datastore (activities as published by each organisation)
About this source: The International Aid Transparency Initiative: an open standard under which donors, UN agencies and NGOs publish their own activity data, often more up to date than the OECD's. Completeness and quality depend on each publisher.
Trace this: OCHA Field activities, Afghanistan (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) ↗ · UNTF to Eliminate Violence against Women (Sweden) ↗ · JPO - JPOSC - 2021 (Sweden) ↗
| Country | Publisher | Activity | Implementing organisations | Start | Planned end | Last updated | IATI identifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs | OCHA Field activities, Afghanistan | UNOCHA | 2008-01-01 | 2030-12-31 | 2026-11-08 | XM-DAC-41127-O445 |
| Afghanistan | Sweden | UNTF to Eliminate Violence against Women | Not stated | 2019-11-15 | 2027-12-31 | 2026-11-08 | SE-0-SE-6-13610 |
| Afghanistan | Sweden | JPO - JPOSC - 2021 | Not stated | 2021-02-11 | 2027-02-28 | 2026-11-08 | SE-0-SE-6-14809 |
| Afghanistan | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark | Salaam Support Group III Project Afghanistan | Not stated | 2023-03-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-08 | XM-DAC-3-1-288392-36165 |
| Afghanistan | Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark | Salam Support Group III 2025 | Not stated | 2023-03-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-08 | XM-DAC-3-1-288392-37977 |
| Afghanistan | Haut-Commissaire des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés (HCR) | UNHCR operation in Afghanistan | United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | 2025-01-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-06 | XM-DAC-41121-2025-ASO-AFG |
| Afghanistan | Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) | Polio eradication in Afghanistan | Not stated | 2025-03-06 | 2027-12-31 | 2026-11-06 | CA-3-P014097001 |
| Afghanistan | Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) | Human Rights Monitoring and Reporting in Afghanistan | Not stated | 2024-03-25 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-06 | CA-3-P012842001 |
| Afghanistan | Cordaid | Multi-sector emergency assistance for vulnerable population | Cordaid Afghanistan | 2024-09-01 | 2027-08-31 | 2026-11-04 | NL-KVK-41160054-201408 |
| Afghanistan | Cordaid | Afghanistan Joint Response 2024-26 - Joint Budget | Cordaid Afghanistan; Save the Children Nederland; Stichting Vluchteling | 2024-01-01 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-04 | NL-KVK-41160054-201329 |
| Afghanistan | Gates Foundation | Non-Financial Resource Requirement (non-FRR) support to WHO Afghanistan | World Health Organization Afghanistan Country Office | 2025-06-25 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-03 | DAC-1601-INV-090528 |
| Afghanistan | Gates Foundation | Delivering Awareness to Combat the Spread of Polio and Prevent Stunting | World Food Programme | 2025-12-22 | 2026-12-31 | 2026-11-03 | DAC-1601-INV-097551 |
IATI Datastore, activities in implementation (status 2) in Afghanistan, all sectors; most recently updated first, at most two per publisher; activities whose planned end has passed or that have no end date and started over five years ago are left out; retrieved 2026-11-08. Published by each organisation to the IATI Standard, usually more current than the OECD but uneven: coverage depends on who publishes, and the same work can be reported by both funder and implementer. Leads to check, not a complete list; amounts are not shown or totalled here and must not be added to OECD or OCHA figures.
World Bank projects: pipeline and active · World Bank Projects API (active and pipeline projects)
About this source: The World Bank's own database of the projects it finances, with approved amounts, dates and status, including projects still in preparation.
Trace this: Afghanistan Rural Livelihoods Program (P514302) ↗ · Afghanistan Human Capital and Jobs (P514193) ↗ · Afghanistan Private Sector Resilience Program (P512394) ↗ · World Bank projects and operations ↗
| Country | Project | Project ID | Status | Board approval | Commitment (USD m) | Major sectors | Closing date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Afghanistan Rural Livelihoods Program | P514302 | Pipeline | Planned 2027-01-28 | 149.5 | Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services | 2029-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Afghanistan Human Capital and Jobs | P514193 | Pipeline | Planned 2027-01-28 | 147.0 | Social Protection; Health; Education | 2028-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Afghanistan Private Sector Resilience Program | P512394 | Pipeline | Planned 2027-01-28 | 45.0 | Industry, Trade and Services; Social Sustainability and Inclusion; Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Social Protection | 2029-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Afghanistan Community Resilience and Livelihoods Project | P508839 | Active | 2026-01-20 | 143.0 | Social Sustainability and Inclusion | Not reported |
| Afghanistan | Emergency Food Security Project | P506507 | Active | 2025-04-07 | 115.0 | Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry; Industry, Trade and Services | Not reported |
| Afghanistan | AFGHANISTAN HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE (HER) PROJECT | P506249 | Active | 2025-03-06 | 241.0 | Health; Social Protection | Not reported |
| Afghanistan | Education Emergency Response in Afghanistan Additional Financing | P181643 | Active | 2024-12-12 | 95.0 | Education | 2026-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Additional Financing for the Afghanistan Community Resilience and Livelihoods Project | P181622 | Active | 2024-04-30 | 154.0 | Public Administration; Social Protection | 2027-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Additional Financing for Afghanistan Emergency Food Security Project | P181480 | Active | 2024-02-23 | 100.0 | Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry | 2027-12-31 |
| Afghanistan | Afghanistan Health Emergency Response (HER) Additional Financing | P181378 | Active | 2023-12-07 | 267.0 | Health | 2027-05-31 |
World Bank Projects API (search.worldbank.org), active and pipeline projects, sectors matching the scope; pipeline first, then newest approvals, up to 10 per country; retrieved 2026-11-08. Commitment is the IBRD/IDA amount plus World Bank grants at approval, not money disbursed. Pipeline projects are plans: dates and amounts change, and some are dropped. A project can span several sectors.
Who funds climate action here: climate-related development finance by provider (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)
About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.
Trace this: OECD: development finance for climate and the environment ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2022.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2023.xlsx ↗ · OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗
| Country | Rank | Provider | Provider type | Trend | 2022 (USD m) | 2023 (USD m) | 2024 (USD m) | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 1 | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | DAC member | 0.0 | 154.4 | 157.9 | 34% | |
| Afghanistan | 2 | Germany | DAC member | 104.7 | 12.8 | 22.2 | 15% | |
| Afghanistan | 3 | United States | DAC member | 78.9 | 37.1 | 11.0 | 14% | |
| Afghanistan | 4 | Japan | DAC member | 72.9 | 50.4 | 0.4 | 13% | |
| Afghanistan | 5 | Asian Development Bank | Multilateral development bank | 0.0 | 63.0 | 1.1 | 7% | |
| Afghanistan | 6 | Sweden | DAC member | 11.6 | 46.3 | 0.0 | 6% | |
| Afghanistan | 7 | Switzerland | DAC member | 0.0 | 6.3 | 19.9 | 3% | |
| Afghanistan | 8 | World Bank (IDA) | Multilateral development bank | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.7 | 2% | |
| Afghanistan | 9 | Denmark | DAC member | 5.6 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 2% | |
| Afghanistan | 10 | Norway | DAC member | 1.5 | 12.1 | 0.7 | 2% | |
| Afghanistan | All providers | 292.4 | 392.9 | 245.4 | 100% | |||
| Afghanistan | All providers: adaptation (includes overlap) | 227.6 | 334.4 | 244.1 | ||||
| Afghanistan | All providers: mitigation (includes overlap) | 156.7 | 92.2 | 10.0 | ||||
| Afghanistan | All providers: principal objective or climate component only | 36.2 | 126.4 | 45.7 |
OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2022–2024: commitments in current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. Commitments, not disbursements. Bilateral activities count at full value when climate is a principal or significant objective (OECD Rio markers), so the totals are an upper bound; multilateral development banks report only each project's climate component. The 'principal objective or climate component only' row is the stricter measure. Adaptation and mitigation overlap where an activity targets both, so they do not add up to the total. Afghanistan: USD 292.4m in 2022 → USD 245.4m in 2024 (-16%); peak USD 392.9m in 2023.
Largest climate-related commitments in 2024 (OECD) · OECD Climate-related development finance (recipient perspective)
About this source: The OECD's dataset of development finance for climate adaptation and mitigation from bilateral and multilateral providers, the basis of many climate finance studies. Its counting rules make bilateral totals generous.
Trace this: OECD CRDF recipient perspective, CRDF-RP_2024.xlsx ↗
| Country | Provider | Project | Purpose | Climate objective | Instrument | USD m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | EU Institutions (excl. EIB) | (untitled) | Basic nutrition; Basic health care and 6 more | Significant | Standard grant | 157.9 |
| Afghanistan | World Bank (IDA) | (untitled) | Decentralisation and support to subnational government; Social Protection and 2 more | Climate Components | Standard grant | 22.7 |
| Afghanistan | Germany | (untitled) | Basic sanitation; Food crop production and 6 more | Significant | Standard grant | 22.2 |
| Afghanistan | Switzerland | (untitled) | Rural development; Agricultural land resources and 5 more | Principal, Significant | Standard grant | 19.9 |
| Afghanistan | United States | (untitled) | Family planning; Agricultural development and 2 more | Significant | Standard grant | 11.0 |
| Afghanistan | Denmark | (untitled) | Material relief assistance and services ; Sectors not specified | Principal, Significant | Standard grant | 4.7 |
| Afghanistan | UNDP | (untitled) | Civilian peace-building, conflict prevention and resolution | Significant | Standard grant | 2.6 |
| Afghanistan | Asian Development Bank | (untitled) | Sectors not specified | Climate Components | Standard grant | 1.1 |
OECD Climate-related development finance, recipient perspective, 2024; climate-related amount of each commitment, current USD millions; retrieved 2026-10-13. The climate-related amount of each activity as the OECD counts it (the whole activity when climate is a Rio-marked objective; the climate component for multilateral development banks). Titles as reported by the provider.
Need against funding at a glance (computed) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Country | Measure | Value | Detail | Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | People in food crisis or worse (Phase 3+) | 15.91 m → 15.33 m | Now (Sep–Oct 2026) → projected (May–Sep 2027), -4% | E49 |
| Afghanistan | Humanitarian appeal funded | 52% → 42% | 2024 → 2025 | E31 |
| All | Official aid in this scope, real terms | -57% | USD 5,111.6m (2019) → 2,216.0m (2024), constant 2024 USD | E28 |
Computed by the app from the cards named in the last column. Each figure is taken from the named card; changes are computed from the card's own figures.
Need against funding by cluster, 2025 (computed from cards E32, E48, E31) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Country | Cluster | People in need, 2025 | Change from 2024 | Required (USD m) | Funded (USD m) | Coverage | Against the whole appeal | Funded per person in need (USD) | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Emergency Shelter and NFI | 5.76 m | -13% | 179.1 | 30.9 | 17% | -25 points | 5 | Severely underfunded |
| Afghanistan | Water Sanitation Hygiene | 20.97 m | -1% | 264.3 | 48.6 | 18% | -24 points | 2 | Severely underfunded |
| Afghanistan | Food Security | 14.76 m | -7% | 1,089.4 | 208.1 | 19% | -23 points | 14 | Severely underfunded |
| Afghanistan | Nutrition | 7.80 m | +5% | 296.4 | 102.8 | 35% | -7 points | 13 | Underfunded, gap widening |
| Afghanistan | Health | 14.28 m | -20% | 279.7 | 141.2 | 50% | +8 points | 10 | Half funded or more |
| Afghanistan | Protection - Gender-Based Violence | 14.17 m | +7% | 48.8 | 27.5 | 56% | +14 points | 2 | Half funded or more |
| Afghanistan | Education | 8.89 m | +11% | 93.3 | 77.0 | 83% | +41 points | 9 | Half funded or more |
| Afghanistan | Protection | 14.21 m | -4% | 37.8 | 78.6 | 208% | +166 points | 6 | Half funded or more |
Computed by the app: OCHA FTS appeal by cluster 2025 (card E32) against people in need in the 2025 and 2024 Humanitarian Needs Overviews (OCHA via the HDX Humanitarian API, card E48). Critically underfunded: less than 10% of the cluster's appeal funded. Severely underfunded: 10% to less than 25%. Underfunded: 25% to less than 50%. Half funded or more: 50% or more; a gap remains until 100%. Gap widening (added to the band): less than 50% funded and people in need up 5% or more on the previous year's overview. There is no agreed threshold; these bands follow common usage, and the comparison with the whole appeal shows how the cluster fares against the rest of the response, as the UN's CERF does when it compares crises. Funded per person in need: funding received for the cluster divided by its people in need, the same year. People in need overlap between clusters, so they do not add up to the cross-sector figure. Lowest coverage first. The eight largest clusters by requirement are shown.
How exposed the money is: donor concentration and cuts (computed from cards E28, E37) · Computed by the app from the cards it names
| Donor or measure | Aid in this scope, 2024 (USD m) | Share | Change in the donor's total aid, 2024→2025 | Exposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 664.8 | 30% | -56% | Yes |
| EU Institutions | 307.5 | 14% | +48% | No |
| United Kingdom | 245.7 | 11% | +1% | No |
| Germany | 160.6 | 7% | -16% | Yes |
| World Bank (IDA) | 93.4 | 4% | Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported) | n/a |
| Japan | 85.5 | 4% | -11% | Yes |
| Sweden | 84.4 | 4% | +19% | No |
| Norway | 56.2 | 3% | +5% | No |
| Canada | 50.2 | 2% | +20% | No |
| Asian Development Bank [AsDB] | 0.6 | 0% | Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported) | n/a |
| IMF Concessional Trust Funds | 0.0 | 0% | Not in the OECD totals (multilateral or not reported) | n/a |
| Largest donor's share | 30% | |||
| Three largest donors' share | 55% | |||
| Share from donors whose total aid fell more than 10% (2024→2025) | 910.9 | 41% | ||
| Rough estimate for 2025, not a forecast: less in this scope if those cuts fell evenly | 404.4 | 18% |
Computed by the app: OECD CRS gross disbursements in this scope, 2024 (card E28), all official donors USD 2,216.0m; donors' total net ODA from OECD DAC1 (card E37). Exposed: a donor whose total aid fell more than 10% in the OECD's provisional latest year. Rough estimate method: each donor's 2024 aid in this scope, reduced by the same percentage as its total aid fell from 2024 to 2025 in the OECD's provisional figures, summed over donors that fell more than 10%; donors that did not cut count as unchanged. It assumes each donor cut this country as much as its overall aid; in practice donors protect some countries and cut others harder. The OECD's country figures for 2025 will replace it, usually about a year after the year ends. Only the donors listed on the OECD card are assessed; multilateral donors are not in the OECD's donor totals.
Single projects and agreements (1): Norway's largest agreements, related Norwegian projects and other donors' largest projects
Other donor's project: Project in Afghanistan (Netherlands) · OECD Creditor Reporting System (project-level records)
About this source: The OECD's database of aid activities reported by its Development Assistance Committee members, multilateral organisations and some foundations. It is the standard reference for who gives aid to whom and for what, and most published aid statistics are built from it. Figures arrive about a year after the year ends.
Trace this: OECD CRS dataflow (DSD_CRS@DF_CRS) in the OECD Data Explorer ↗
Donor: Netherlands. Channel of delivery: Other. Recipient: Afghanistan. Purpose: Facilitation of orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility. Disbursed USD 0.1m in 2023. Description (donor-reported): Project in Afghanistan
Crises and humanitarian needs
7 cards; open a card for its table and sources.
Food prices against a year earlier, by market
Period · Nov 2026, each against the same month a year earlier
- Fell over 50%0markets
- Fell 25–50%0markets
- Fell 5–25%0markets
- Within 5%2markets
- Rose 5–25%15markets
- Rose 25–50%13markets
- Rose over 50%4markets
Who reports working where, by district
Period · Latest reporting round: Afghanistan Apr–Jun 2026
- 1–20districts
- 3–54districts
- 6–1077districts
- 11–20243districts
- 21+71districts
- No reports56districts: not covered by this round, or not matched; not the same as nobody there
Humanitarian crisis severity: INFORM Severity - October 2026 · ACAPS INFORM Severity Index (via HDX)
About this source: ACAPS's rating of how severe each ongoing humanitarian crisis is, based on its analysts' review of many sources. It is used to compare crises and to see whether one is getting worse.
Trace this: ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly files on HDX ↗
| Country | Crisis | Drivers | Severity (1-10) | Category | Trend (last 3 months) | Complexity (1-10) | Data reliability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Complex crisis in Afghanistan | Conflict/ Violence, Political/economic crisis, Floods, Drought/drier conditions, Earthquake | 9.2 | Very High | Stable | 9.2 | Very High |
ACAPS INFORM Severity Index, monthly edition published on the Humanitarian Data Exchange; retrieved 2026-11-08. It rates the severity of ongoing crises (impact, conditions of people affected, complexity); a country's first row is ACAPS's country-level rating where it gives one, then its separate crises; countries without an active crisis are not listed.
Humanitarian access constraints: ACAPS, Nov 2026 · ACAPS Humanitarian Access
About this source: ACAPS's rating of how hard it is for humanitarian organisations to reach people in a crisis, because of insecurity, bureaucratic restrictions or physical obstacles.
Trace this: ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset ↗
| Country | Crisis | Access constraints (0-5) | Level | People's access to aid | Aid actors' access to people | Security and physical constraints | Strongest constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Complex crisis in Afghanistan | 5 | Extreme | 5 | 5 | 5 | obstructed access to services and aid; interference in humanitarian work; violence against aid workers and assets; ongoing insecurity or hostilities; mines and explosive devices; physical constraints (terrain, climate, infrastructure) |
ACAPS Humanitarian Access dataset, Nov 2026 edition (API); retrieved 2026-11-08. Scores 0 (no constraints) to 5 (extreme), from three pillars and nine indicators; countries without a tracked crisis are not listed. Afghanistan: the most constrained crisis is Complex crisis in Afghanistan (5 of 5, Extreme).
Who works where: organisations reporting operational presence (OCHA 3W) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA 3W operational presence)
About this source: 'Who does What Where': OCHA's lists of the organisations that report activities in each area and sector. Useful for finding partners on the ground; it shows only what organisations report.
| Country | Organisation | Type | Sectors | Reported geography | Regions (up to 3) | Ranking reach in selected sectors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | World Food Programme | United Nations | Education, Food security, Nutrition | 311 admin2 area(s) | Badakhshan, Badghis, Baghlan | 311 coded admin2 areas |
| Afghanistan | International Organization for Migration | United Nations | Food security, Health, Nutrition, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene | 281 admin2 area(s) | Badakhshan, Badghis, Baghlan | 281 coded admin2 areas |
| Afghanistan | United Nations Children's Fund | United Nations | Education, Health, Nutrition, Shelter and NFI, Water, sanitation, hygiene | 255 admin2 area(s) | Badakhshan, Badghis, Baghlan | 255 coded admin2 areas |
| Afghanistan | Food and Agriculture Organization | United Nations | Food security | 203 admin2 area(s) | Badakhshan, Badghis, Baghlan | 203 coded admin2 areas |
| Afghanistan | World Health Organization | United Nations | Health, Nutrition, Water, sanitation, hygiene | 161 admin2 area(s) | Badakhshan, Badghis, Baghlan | 161 coded admin2 areas |
| Afghanistan | Agency for Assistance and Development of Afghanistan | National NGO | Food security, Health, Nutrition | 152 admin2 area(s) | Baghlan, Balkh, Bamyan | 152 coded admin2 areas |
OCHA 3W operational presence via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest period: Afghanistan Apr–Jun 2026; retrieved 2026-11-08. Organisations in the sectors covered are listed first; most reported coded areas in selected sectors first, ties alphabetical; reach, not capacity (not a capacity ranking). Afghanistan: ranking counts distinct coded admin2 areas. Afghanistan: 283 organisations reported for Apr–Jun 2026, 283 of them in the sectors covered. Presence is self-reported to the humanitarian clusters; it shows where an organisation reports working, not its funding, scale or quality. Admin levels are counted separately and can overlap; they must not be added together. Displayed geography includes all reported sectors; where geographic codes are absent, displayed counts use names qualified by their parent area. Ranking uses codes only, at the finest available level in selected sectors for that country. Only sectors with a supported DAC-to-cluster mapping contribute to sector reach. Missing comparable coded reach is not zero presence or capacity.
People in need of humanitarian assistance (OCHA Humanitarian Needs Overview) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)
About this source: The yearly humanitarian needs overviews agreed by UN agencies and partners in each crisis, with the official number of people in need. They are the basis of humanitarian appeals.
Trace this: Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2025, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2024, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗ · Global Humanitarian Programme Cycle, Humanitarian Needs (Global HPC HNO 2026, OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle Tools (HPC Tools)) ↗
| Country | Sector | People in need | People targeted | Plan period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | All sectors (intersectoral) | 21,889,283 | 17,479,657 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Education | 7,105,602 | 613,774 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Food security | 17,412,653 | 11,911,619 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Health | 14,423,290 | 7,218,662 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Nutrition | 7,464,230 | 5,682,222 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Protection | 14,988,378 | 5,347,659 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Child protection | 9,352,775 | 3,409,338 | 2025 |
| Afghanistan | Gender-based violence | 14,173,291 | 2,281,898 | 2025 |
| Afghanistan | Housing, land and property | 3,392,653 | 354,245 | 2025 |
| Afghanistan | Mine action | 4,369,984 | 1,651,315 | 2025 |
| Afghanistan | Shelter and NFI | 4,243,627 | 880,560 | 2026 |
| Afghanistan | Water, sanitation, hygiene | 15,909,907 | 7,838,434 | 2026 |
OCHA Humanitarian Programme Cycle (Humanitarian Needs Overview), national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API, latest plan period per country and sector; retrieved 2026-11-08. The intersectoral figure counts each person once across all sectors; sector figures overlap and must not be added together, or to the intersectoral figure. Targeted is the part of the need the response plan aims to reach. Figures are planning estimates. Each row is its sector's latest overview, so the plan period can differ between rows.
Acute food insecurity: people in Phase 3 (Crisis) or worse (IPC / Cadre Harmonisé) · HDX Humanitarian API (OCHA needs overviews; IPC / Cadre Harmonisé)
About this source: The IPC, and the Cadre Harmonisé in West Africa and the Sahel, are the standard, consensus-based classifications of food insecurity used by governments, the UN and NGOs. Phase 3 means crisis; Phase 5 means catastrophe or famine.
| Country | Analysis | Status | Period | People in Phase 3+ | Share of analysed population | People in Phase 5 (Catastrophe) | Population analysed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | IPC | Current | Sep–Oct 2026 | 15,908,130 | 32% | 0 | 50,489,104 |
| Afghanistan | IPC | Projection (first) | Nov 2026–Apr 2027 | 19,245,823 | 38% | 0 | 50,489,104 |
| Afghanistan | IPC | Projection (second) | May–Sep 2027 | 15,330,476 | 30% | 0 | 50,489,104 |
Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) global country data, including Cadre Harmonisé results for West Africa and the Sahel, national figures via the HDX Humanitarian API; latest current analysis per country and its projections; retrieved 2026-11-08. Phase 3+ counts people in Crisis, Emergency or Catastrophe. Shares are of the population analysed, which may be smaller than the national population. Projections are estimates made at the time of the analysis, not observations; a past projection covers a period that has ended without a newer published analysis.
Staple food prices in local markets (WFP) · WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API
About this source: Prices of staple foods that WFP and partners collect in local markets. Rising prices are an early warning of hunger and reduce what cash assistance buys.
Trace this: Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2026, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗ · Global - Food Prices (Global WFP food prices 2025, WFP - World Food Programme) ↗
| Country | Commodity (unit) | Latest month | Median retail price | Markets | Change from a year earlier (same markets) | Markets compared |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Pulses (KG) | Nov 2026 | 81 AFN | 34 | -13% | 34 |
| Afghanistan | Rice (high quality) (KG) | Nov 2026 | 120 AFN | 34 | +11% | 34 |
| Afghanistan | Rice (low quality) (KG) | Nov 2026 | 70 AFN | 34 | +32% | 34 |
| Afghanistan | Wheat flour (high quality) (KG) | Nov 2026 | 32 AFN | 34 | +4% | 34 |
WFP market monitoring via the HDX Humanitarian API; retail prices of cereals, pulses and oils; four staples per country reported by the most markets; median across markets; retrieved 2026-11-08. Nominal prices in local currency: a change includes general inflation and currency depreciation, not only food scarcity, and prices cannot be compared across countries. The year-on-year change uses only markets reporting in both months. Markets are those WFP monitors, not a national average.
Displacement: people hosted at the end of 2025 (UNHCR year-end count, not a current figure) · UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics
About this source: UNHCR's official statistics on refugees and other forcibly displaced people, compiled from governments and its own operations; the global reference for refugee numbers.
Trace this: UNHCR population API: hosted in AFG, 2025 ↗ · UNHCR Refugee Data Finder ↗
| Country | End of year | Refugees hosted | Asylum seekers | Internally displaced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 2025 | 20,869 | 382 | 3,199,023 |
UNHCR Refugee Population Statistics API, end-year figures by country of asylum; retrieved 2026-11-08. Internally displaced counts cover people UNHCR protects or assists and may be zero where it does not report them.
Development needs
3 cards; open a card for its table and sources.
Education: out of school, completion and learning (UNESCO UIS) · UNESCO Institute for StatisticsNewest: 2022
Older than usual. Newest available: 2022, about 3 years old. UNESCO UIS education statistics usually covers one to three years back; the publisher has released nothing newer yet. The next scheduled release is February 2027.
About this source: UNESCO's statistics institute is the official keeper of the global education goal's figures: who is out of school, who finishes primary and lower secondary school, and how many children can read and do basic maths by the end of primary. The World Bank's education figures are copied from it, usually later.
Trace this: UIS data browser ↗ · UIS country page: Afghanistan ↗
| Country | Measure | Value | Year | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Out-of-school rate, upper secondary age (%) | 54.5% | 2018 | |
| Afghanistan | Completion rate, primary (%) | 44.2% | 2022 | |
| Afghanistan | Completion rate, lower secondary (%) | 31.3% | 2022 | |
| Afghanistan | Government spending on education (% of GDP) | 4.3% | 2017 | |
| Afghanistan | Education's share of government spending (%) | 15.7% | 2017 |
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, February 2026 Data Release; latest year per measure within the last ten; retrieved 2026-11-08. Out-of-school rates count children of official school age who are not enrolled; completion rates count young people a few years above the final grade's age who finished that level; proficiency shares come from regional and international learning assessments (such as PASEC or PIRLS) taken in the year shown, so they are older and not comparable across assessment types. Years differ by measure: check the year before comparing.
Human development, poverty and displacement (UNDP, IOM) · UNDP Human Development Report Office and IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix
About this source: UNDP's Human Development Index combines health, education and income into one measure and is the best-known summary of human development; IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix counts people displaced within their own country in crises.
Trace this: UNDP Human Development Report: data center ↗ · UNDP country data and charts: Afghanistan ↗ · UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index: downloads ↗ · IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix ↗ · UN System Data Commons (IOM series) ↗
| Country | Measure | Value | Year | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Human Development Index (0-1) | 0.496 | 2023 | |
| Afghanistan | HDI rank | 181 | 2023 | |
| Afghanistan | Inequality-adjusted HDI (0-1) | 0.321 | 2023 | |
| Afghanistan | Human development lost to inequality (%) | 35.3% | 2023 | |
| Afghanistan | Gender Inequality Index (0-1, higher is more unequal) | 0.661 | 2023 | |
| Afghanistan | People in multidimensional poverty (%) | 64.9% | 2022/2023 (MICS) |
UNDP Human Development Report, composite indices time series; UNDP and OPHI global Multidimensional Poverty Index; IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix via the UN System Data Commons; latest year per measure; retrieved 2026-11-08. The HDI combines life expectancy, schooling and income per person; the inequality-adjusted HDI discounts it for how unequally these are shared. Multidimensional poverty counts people deprived in several of health, education and living standards at once, from the household survey named in the year column. Displacement counts are IOM's latest national round and are shown only where IOM reports one; check the year before comparing. Afghanistan HDI: 0.492 in 2013 → 0.496 in 2023 (+1%); peak 0.507 in 2019. Afghanistan: IOM's last national displacement count is 6,557,855 from 2022; for newer figures see the UNHCR displacement card.
Country indicators — Afghanistan · World Bank World Development Indicators
About this source: The World Bank's main collection of development statistics on poverty, health, education and the economy, compiled from national and international sources. It is the common reference for country indicators; the latest years are often missing.
Trace this: Population (SP.POP.TOTL) ↗ · GDP per capita (current US$) (NY.GDP.PCAP.CD) ↗ · Poverty headcount at $3.00/day (% of population) (SI.POV.DDAY) ↗
| Indicator | Value | Year | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,844,111 | 2025 | |
| GDP per capita (current US$) | 416.9 | 2024 |
World Bank World Development Indicators, most recent value; retrieved 2026-11-08. Most recent non-empty year differs by indicator. Trend lines cover the reported years of the last ten.
Economy and investment
2 cards; open a card for its table and sources.
Economic outlook (IMF World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor) · IMF World Economic Outlook
About this source: The IMF's twice-yearly economic figures and forecasts for its member countries, the standard reference for growth, inflation and public debt; revenue comes from its Fiscal Monitor. Forecasts are revised as conditions change.
Trace this: IMF WEO DataMapper: real GDP growth ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: inflation ↗ · IMF WEO DataMapper: government debt ↗
| Country | Measure | 2025 | 2026 (projection) | 2027 (projection) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Real GDP growth (%) | 1.5 | n/a | n/a |
| Afghanistan | Inflation, average consumer prices (%) | 3.6 | n/a | n/a |
| Afghanistan | Government gross debt (% of GDP) | 7.6 | n/a | n/a |
| Afghanistan | Government revenue including grants (% of GDP) | 20.4 | n/a | n/a |
IMF World Economic Outlook (October 2026) (growth, inflation, debt) and Fiscal Monitor (October 2026) (revenue) via the DataMapper API; retrieved 2026-11-08. 2026 and 2027 are IMF projections and are revised twice a year.
External debt and public debt service (World Bank International Debt Statistics) · World Bank International Debt Statistics
About this source: The World Bank's official statistics on low- and middle-income countries' external debt and debt payments, reported by the borrowing countries.
Trace this: World Bank International Debt Statistics ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (USD m) ↗ · World Bank data: External debt stocks (% of GNI) ↗ · World Bank data: Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) ↗
| Country | Measure | Trend | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | External debt stocks (USD m) | 3,040.1 | 3,555.8 | 3,393.2 | 3,428.1 | 3,344.1 | |
| Afghanistan | External debt stocks (% of GNI) | 15.1 | 24.8 | 23.3 | 19.9 | Not reported | |
| Afghanistan | Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (USD m) | 28.7 | 19.2 | 12.0 | 13.2 | 35.1 |
World Bank International Debt Statistics via the World Bank API (DT.DOD.DECT.CD, DT.DOD.DECT.GN.ZS, DT.TDS.DPPG.CD), current USD; retrieved 2026-11-08. Debt stocks are all external debt outstanding at year end (public, publicly guaranteed and private non-guaranteed, including IMF credit). Debt service is principal and interest actually paid on public and publicly guaranteed external debt in the year. The World Bank publishes the statistics once a year, in December.
Governance
1 card; open a card for its table and sources.
Governance and investment climate · World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators
About this source: The World Bank's composite measures of governance, built from surveys and expert assessments. They are widely used to compare countries, but they measure perceptions and come with margins of error.
Trace this: Worldwide Governance Indicators in the World Bank DataBank ↗ · WDI FDI net inflows (% of GDP) (BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS) ↗
| Country | Measure | Score | Year | Score 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Control of corruption | 22 | 2025 | 18 |
| Afghanistan | Political stability and absence of violence | 30 | 2025 | 20 |
| Afghanistan | Regulatory quality | 31 | 2025 | 33 |
| Afghanistan | Government effectiveness | 12 | 2025 | 18 |
| Afghanistan | Rule of law | 28 | 2025 | 31 |
| Afghanistan | Voice and accountability | 18 | 2025 | 39 |
| Afghanistan | FDI net inflows (% of GDP) | 0.1 | 2021 |
World Bank Worldwide Governance Indicators (absolute scores 0-100, higher is better; perception-based composites with wide margins of error) and World Development Indicators for FDI; retrieved 2026-11-08. WGI uses an absolute 0-100 scale anchored to fixed reference points, not percentile ranks. Perception-based estimates have uncertainty; small differences should not be overinterpreted.
Risk and environment
3 cards; open a card for its table and sources.
Rainfall against the usual, by region
Period · Three months to 20 Oct 2026
- Under 60%0regions
- 60–85%0regions
- 85–115%3regions
- 115–140%3regions
- Over 140%1region
- Dry season27regions, average under 30 mm
Crisis risk: INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026 · INFORM Risk Index (EU Joint Research Centre)
About this source: An index from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre and partners that rates how likely a humanitarian crisis or disaster is to overwhelm a country's capacity to cope. Humanitarian donors and agencies use it to compare countries; it measures structural risk, not current needs.
Trace this: INFORM Risk results and data (EU JRC) ↗
| Country | INFORM Risk Mid 2026 (0-10) | Class | Rank (1 = highest risk) | Hazard & exposure | Vulnerability | Lack of coping capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | 7.8 | Very high | 5 of 191 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.4 |
INFORM Risk Index Mid 2026, EU Joint Research Centre with IASC partners; retrieved 2026-11-08. Scores 0-10, higher means a higher risk that a humanitarian crisis overwhelms national capacity. Afghanistan: the highest of the three dimensions is Vulnerability (8.2); read the score through that dimension. Afghanistan: INFORM Risk 8.2 in 2022 → 7.8 in Mid 2026 (Very high → Very high); the method changed slightly between editions, so read this as direction, not a precise trend.
Rainfall against the long-term average, by region, to 20 Oct 2026 (CHIRPS via WFP) · CHIRPS rainfall (Climate Hazards Center, aggregated by WFP) via the HDX Humanitarian API
About this source: Satellite rainfall estimates combined with weather-station data, produced by the Climate Hazards Center at UC Santa Barbara and widely used in food-security early warning; WFP averages them by region.
| Country | Region | Region code (P-code) | Rainfall, 3 months (mm) | Average, 3 months (mm) | 3 months, % of average | Last month, % of average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Takhar | AF18 | 14 | 18 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Panjsher | AF08 | 23 | 27 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Baghlan | AF09 | 12 | 13 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Uruzgan | AF25 | 3 | 4 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Badghis | AF31 | 4 | 5 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Nuristan | AF16 | 40 | 42 | 96% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Hirat | AF32 | 2 | 2 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Daykundi | AF24 | 8 | 9 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Nimroz | AF34 | 1 | 1 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Farah | AF33 | 1 | 1 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Kandahar | AF27 | 3 | 4 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Kunduz | AF19 | 4 | 4 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Jawzjan | AF28 | 3 | 3 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Hilmand | AF30 | 2 | 2 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Faryab | AF29 | 3 | 4 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Ghor | AF23 | 5 | 5 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Badakhshan | AF17 | 40 | 40 | 101% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Samangan | AF20 | 5 | 5 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Sar-e-Pul | AF22 | 4 | 4 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Balkh | AF21 | 3 | 3 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Zabul | AF26 | 6 | 6 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Ghazni | AF11 | 8 | 7 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Bamyan | AF10 | 8 | 7 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Parwan | AF03 | 16 | 13 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Kapisa | AF02 | 22 | 19 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Kunar | AF15 | 113 | 99 | 114% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Laghman | AF07 | 37 | 32 | 115% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Paktika | AF12 | 34 | 27 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Kabul | AF01 | 18 | 13 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Nangarhar | AF06 | 69 | 55 | 124% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Logar | AF05 | 20 | 15 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Maidan Wardak | AF04 | 10 | 7 | Dry period | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Paktya | AF13 | 57 | 41 | 137% | Dry period |
| Afghanistan | Khost | AF14 | 161 | 113 | 141% | Dry period |
CHIRPS satellite rainfall estimates with station data, averaged per region by WFP, via the HDX Humanitarian API; rolling periods ending 20 Oct 2026; retrieved 2026-11-08. Percentages compare with the 1989-2018 average for the same period. Recent periods use preliminary estimates that are replaced by final data about a month later. 'Dry period' marks regions whose average for the period is under 30 mm, where a percentage says little. Rainfall is one input to harvests and water supply, not a drought declaration. Driest regions first. Region names are matched to WFP's region codes from OCHA's common operational boundaries (current and earlier editions), checked against the size of each region in WFP's data.
Recent disaster alerts (GDACS, 2025-11-08 to 2026-11-08) · GDACS (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre)
About this source: A UN and European Commission alert system that estimates within hours how serious an earthquake, cyclone, flood or drought may be for people. Alerts are model estimates to guide international response, not damage assessments.
Trace this: GDACS alert archive ↗
| Country | Hazard | Alerts | Highest alert level | Date of highest alert | Latest alert (any level) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan | Earthquake | 30 | Green | 2026-10-27 | 2026-10-27 |
| Afghanistan | Flood | 7 | Orange | 2026-03-25 | 2026-08-03 |
Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System (UN OCHA and EU Joint Research Centre), automatic near-real-time alerts; retrieved 2026-11-08. Colours estimate the need for international humanitarian assistance: Green = unlikely (local impact can still be significant), Orange = possible, Red = likely; one disaster can raise several alerts. Country attribution uses affected-country ISO3; window applies to event start date, not last update. Counts are returned records, not unique disasters; regional records may appear for multiple countries. Map shows only valid coordinates in the displayed frame. Afghanistan: excluded 1 records without matching country/start date. Afghanistan orange/red alerts: Flood in Afghanistan (Orange, 2026-03-25).
Norway in Afghanistan
Norway's own aid data (agreements and disbursements) and the OECD's figures for all donors. The full tables follow below.
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E1Retrieved 2026-09-23
Source: OECD Creditor Reporting System · E28Retrieved 2026-10-14
Source: Norwegian development assistance data; OECD imputed multilateral aid; Norges Bank · E1Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E4Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E5Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E2Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E3Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E8Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2025
- 75.5mAfghanistan Resilience Trust Fund (ARTF) 2024 - 2026World Bank · Multilateral organisation
- 52.8mDAARTT - Equitable Access to Quality Eucation in Faryab Province - Cont.Dansk Folkehjelp - Danish Peoples's Aid · NGO Other donor countrie
- 44.9mAfghanistan - NRC Strategic Partnership AgreementNorwegian Refugee Council · Norwegian NGO
- 42.0mUNDP STFA Special Trust Fund for AfghanistanMPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office · Multilateral organisation
- 34.6mTemporarily anonymisedNorges Røde Kors · Norwegian NGO
Source: Norwegian development assistance data · E9Retrieved 2026-09-23Dataset scope: Afghanistan; all sectors; 2025
Policy markers, share of disbursements tagged as a principal or significant objective, 2021–2025: Gender equality 66% · Climate adaptation 5% · Climate mitigation 4% · Biodiversity 0% · Disability inclusion 7%. One agreement can carry several markers, so the shares overlap and do not add up; agreements not screened count as not tagged, so each share is a lower bound. E7
Norwegian disbursements by year · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Year | Disbursed (NOK) | In 2025 kroner | Agreements | Share of all Norwegian aid to these recipients | Returned to Norway (NOK) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 668.5 m | 792.9 m | 61 | 100.0% | 10.8 m |
| 2022 | 728.3 m | 816.6 m | 66 | 100.0% | 1.1 m |
| 2023 | 841.1 m | 893.7 m | 54 | 100.0% | 4.2 m |
| 2024 | 576.2 m | 593.9 m | 48 | 100.0% | 27.4 m |
| 2025 | 600.3 m | 600.3 m | 46 | 100.0% | 13 k |
| Total | 3,414.5 m | 3,697.5 m | 43.6 m |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025. Trend: 668.5 m in 2021 → 600.3 m in 2025 (-10%); peak 841.1 m in 2023. Amounts are net: money agreements returned to Norway is subtracted in the year it came back, so they are lower than the OECD's gross disbursements for the same years. In 2025 kroner, adjusted for inflation with Statistics Norway's consumer price index (annual average, table 08981; retrieved 2026-11-08): 792.9 m in 2021 → 600.3 m in 2025 (-24%); peak 893.7 m in 2023.
Channels: who receives the funds · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Partner type | Assistance type | Disbursed (NOK) | Share (rounded; listed groups only) | Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multilateral institutions | Earmarked to multilaterals | 1,445.5 m | 42% | 34 |
| NGO Norwegian | Bilateral | 1,179.3 m | 35% | 59 |
| NGO International | Bilateral | 415.6 m | 12% | 19 |
| NGO Other donor countries | Bilateral | 285.2 m | 8% | 8 |
| Unknown | Bilateral | 50.8 m | 1% | 17 |
| NGO Local | Bilateral | 26.4 m | 1% | 6 |
| Private sector in developing countries | Bilateral | 5.8 m | 0% | 2 |
| Public sector other donor countries | Bilateral | 5.0 m | 0% | 1 |
| Public sector in developing countries | Bilateral | 850 k | 0% | 1 |
| Norwegian public sector | Bilateral | 86 k | 0% | 1 |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025. Shares use the listed channel groups, not necessarily the entire portfolio. Rounded 100% is not exactly all and rounded 0% is not none; retain nonzero amounts.
Norad's themes (target areas) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Theme | Disbursed (NOK) | Share | Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency assistance | 1,133.9 m | 33% | 35 |
| Multisector and other | 1,105.8 m | 32% | 8 |
| Governance, civil society and conflict prevention | 399.5 m | 12% | 71 |
| Education | 392.2 m | 11% | 13 |
| Health and social services | 228.9 m | 7% | 13 |
| Production sectors and trade | 146.1 m | 4% | 6 |
| Environment and energy | 7.5 m | 0% | 1 |
| Economic infrastructure and services | 440 k | 0% | 1 |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025. Norad's own grouping of its statistics (target area), as in Norad's country snapshots; the DAC sub-sectors are in the next table.
What the money is for (sub-sectors) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Sub-sector | Disbursed (NOK) | Agreements |
|---|---|---|
| Multisector aid | 760.5 m | 3 |
| Material relief assistance and services | 732.7 m | 20 |
| Rural development | 293.3 m | 4 |
| Primary education | 245.0 m | 4 |
| Women’s rights organisations and movements, and government institutions | 180.2 m | 5 |
| Relief co-ordination and support services | 170.3 m | 7 |
| Agricultural development | 146.1 m | 6 |
| Emergency food assistance | 145.0 m | 2 |
| Health personnel development | 133.4 m | 2 |
| Basic Health Care Services in Emergencies | 85.9 m | 6 |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025.
Policy markers (share of disbursements tagged significant or principal) · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Marker | Principal or significant | Principal objective | Significant objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender equality | 66% | 10% | 56% |
| Climate adaptation | 5% | 0% | 4% |
| Climate mitigation | 4% | 0% | 4% |
| Biodiversity | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Disability inclusion | 7% | 1% | 6% |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025. Donor-reported OECD policy markers; not outcome evidence. One agreement can carry several markers, so the shares overlap and must not be added up. Norway's data records 'not screened' the same as 'not targeted', so each share is a lower bound. The disability marker exists only from 2018.
Agreement sizes in 2025 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Size (disbursed in the year) | Agreements | Disbursed (NOK) | Share of the money |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOK 50m or more | 2 | 128.3 m | 21% |
| NOK 20m to 50m | 8 | 249.2 m | 42% |
| NOK 5m to 20m | 17 | 200.6 m | 33% |
| NOK 1m to 5m | 10 | 18.9 m | 3% |
| Under NOK 1m | 7 | 3.2 m | 1% |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2025. 44 agreements received money in 2025, NOK 600.3 m in all; the 5 largest received 42%. Sizes are what each agreement was paid in 2025, not its whole value over several years. 2 more had only zero or negative entries that year (funds returned), so the net total for 2025 is NOK 600.3 m.
Norway's single agreements and related projects (20)
Largest agreement partners · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Partner | Type | Disbursed (NOK) | Agreements | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office | Multilateral institutions | 455.9 m | 4 | 2021–2025 |
| World Bank | Multilateral institutions | 352.5 m | 3 | 2022–2025 |
| Norges Røde Kors | NGO Norwegian | 340.9 m | 6 | 2021–2025 |
| NAC - Afghanistankomiteen | NGO Norwegian | 335.0 m | 9 | 2021–2025 |
| ACTED - Agency for Technical Cooperation And Development | NGO International | 290.1 m | 5 | 2021–2025 |
| Norwegian Refugee Council | NGO Norwegian | 253.8 m | 6 | 2021–2025 |
| Dansk Folkehjelp - Danish Peoples's Aid | NGO Other donor countries | 150.0 m | 2 | 2021–2025 |
| WFP - World Food Programme | Multilateral institutions | 145.0 m | 2 | 2021–2023 |
| UN Women | Multilateral institutions | 140.0 m | 3 | 2022–2025 |
| Kirkens Nødhjelp | NGO Norwegian | 135.8 m | 18 | 2021–2025 |
| UNHCR - UN Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees | Multilateral institutions | 119.0 m | 3 | 2021–2025 |
| DACAAR - Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees | NGO Other donor countries | 112.8 m | 2 | 2021–2025 |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2021–2025. Agreement partner labels as recorded; not resolved organisation identities.
Largest agreements in 2025 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
| Agreement | Partner | Partner type | Disbursed (NOK) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund (ARTF) 2024 - 2026 | World Bank | Multilateral institutions | 75.5 m |
| DAARTT - Equitable Access to Quality Eucation in Faryab Province - Cont. | Dansk Folkehjelp - Danish Peoples's Aid | NGO Other donor countries | 52.8 m |
| Afghanistan - NRC Strategic Partnership Agreement | Norwegian Refugee Council | NGO Norwegian | 44.9 m |
| UNDP STFA Special Trust Fund for Afghanistan | MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office | Multilateral institutions | 42.0 m |
| Temporarily anonymised | Norges Røde Kors | NGO Norwegian | 34.6 m |
| Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 - Health Education | NAC - Afghanistankomiteen | NGO Norwegian | 30.2 m |
| UN Women Afghanistan Strategic Note - 2025-2027 | UN Women | Multilateral institutions | 30.0 m |
| Improved participatory and resource-based local development planning using the Manteqa Framework | ACTED - Agency for Technical Cooperation And Development | NGO International | 26.0 m |
Afghanistan; all sectors; 2025. Paid in that year; an agreement can run over several years.
Largest agreement: UNDP STFA Special Trust Fund for Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-21/0013 — "UNDP STFA Special Trust Fund for Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: MPTF Office - Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (Multilateral institutions); implementing: UNDP - UN Development Programme. Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2021–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 460.0 m NOK in the selected years; 460.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: STFA finances programmes supporting basic services, livelihoods and community resilience that complement humanitarian efforts by helping households, communities, and the private sector cope with the adverse effects of the crisis that followed Taliban’s takeover in August 2021.
Largest agreement: Humanitarian activities in Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-20/0075-5 — "Humanitarian activities in Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: Norges Røde Kors (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 194.2 m NOK in the selected years; 254.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian activities in Afghanistan
Largest agreement: Un-earmarked support to ARTF · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-22/0009-1 — "Un-earmarked support to ARTF" in Afghanistan. Partner: World Bank (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2022–2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 175.0 m NOK in the selected years; 175.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Un-earmarked support to Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund and its programmes within health, education, food security and livelihoods, all with a a particular focus on gender equality.
Largest agreement: Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund (ARTF) 2024 - 2026 · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-24/0011 — "Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund (ARTF) 2024 - 2026" in Afghanistan. Partner: World Bank (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Multisector aid. Payments recorded in 2024–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 125.5 m NOK in the selected years; 125.5 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund, including programmes for food security, livelihoods, education and health services. The Afghanistan Resilience Trust Fund (ARTF) is a multi-donor trust fund that coordinates international aid to improve the lives of Afghans. It’s administered by the World Bank and currently supported by 32 donor partners.
Largest agreement: Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 - Health Education · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-22/0016-3 — "Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 - Health Education" in Afghanistan. Partner: NAC - Afghanistankomiteen (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 81 - Health personnel development. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 121.6 m NOK in the selected years; 121.6 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The goal of Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 is the empowerment of rural communities by working to reduce poverty and improve resiliency in the face of multiple security, political, social, economic, and environmental threats. ERA II builds on the achievements of the ERA I and IRD programs. Training of health staff, nurses and midvwives, for basic health care services, with emphasis is on midwives and mother-child services. Planned activities continue to focus on reducing poverty (SDG1) and inequalities (SDG10) by improving access to healthcare/health personel (SDG3) and gender equality and women’s empowerment (SDG5).
Largest agreement: DAARTT - Equitable Access to Quality Eucation in Faryab Province - Cont. · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-23/0005 — "DAARTT - Equitable Access to Quality Eucation in Faryab Province - Cont." in Afghanistan. Partner: Dansk Folkehjelp - Danish Peoples's Aid (NGO Other donor countries). Sector: 20 - Primary education. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 120.9 m NOK in the selected years; 120.9 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project will adress the problems and needs of inadequate access to education in Faryab province, through the following main three interventions: 1. Construction of school buildings and other structures 2. Measures to improve the quality of education 3. Mobilization of local communities for education. The planned effect for the target group of the project is to increase school attendance, in particular among girls.
Largest agreement: Afghanistan. Humanitarian Response · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-20/0048-17 — "Afghanistan. Humanitarian Response" in Afghanistan. Partner: Norwegian Refugee Council (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 110.7 m NOK in the selected years; 132.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian response in Afghanistan.
Largest agreement: Improved participatory and resource-based local development planning using the Manteqa Framework · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-22/0003-3 — "Improved participatory and resource-based local development planning using the Manteqa Framework" in Afghanistan. Partner: ACTED - Agency for Technical Cooperation And Development (NGO International). Sector: 40 - Rural development. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 108.2 m NOK in the selected years; 108.2 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: This result will rely on AGORA community-based approach to provide inclusive governance, planning and service delivery at the manteqa level. ACTED will guide and assist the manteqa to build their good governance and strengthen their resilience and autonomy.
Largest agreement: Rural Development in Faryab and Jawzjan provinces · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-22/0014 — "Rural Development in Faryab and Jawzjan provinces" in Afghanistan. Partner: DACAAR - Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees (NGO Other donor countries). Sector: 40 - Rural development. Payments recorded in 2022–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 95.0 m NOK in the selected years; 95.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The project aims to improve health, livelihoods and quality of life on a sustainable basis among targeted communities in Faryab and Jawzjan provinces. The project will equally target both gender and age groups, with a particular focus on addressing needs and priorities of most-at-risk groups, including IDPs, recent returnees, farmers with little or no land, women and youth-headed households. The project has a dedicated women’s empowerment component that provides i) social and economic resources through the establishment of women-only market driven vocational courses, ii) support to women-headed households to improve farming practices and iii) literacy courses. Further, the project focuses on environmentally sustainable agricultural productivity through the use of environmentally safe agricultural inputs and provision of capacity building that is designed to bring behavior change around …
Largest agreement: Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 - Food Security and Natural Resource Management · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-22/0016-2 — "Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 - Food Security and Natural Resource Management" in Afghanistan. Partner: NAC - Afghanistankomiteen (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 20 - Agricultural development. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 92.7 m NOK in the selected years; 92.7 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: The goal of Empowering Rural Afghanistan 2 is the empowerment of rural communities by working to reduce poverty and improve resiliency in the face of multiple security, political, social, economic, and environmental threats. ERA II builds on the achievements of the ERA I and IRD programs. Agriculture development - strenghtening of rural communities so that they are resilient to impacts of natural disasters and climate change and have increased food security and sustainable livelihoods. Agricultural products and methods used in the project are environementally friendly and reduce emissions. Planned activities continue to focus on reducing poverty (SDG1) and inequalities (SDG10) by improving access to food security (SDG2) and natural resource management (SDG6, 11, 13 and 15), and gender equality and women’s empowerment (SDG5).
Related project (similar description): Humanitarian assistance · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-20/0052-4 — "Humanitarian assistance" in Afghanistan. Partner: Kirkens Nødhjelp (NGO Norwegian). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2020–2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 56.3 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Save lives, alleviate suffering and protect human dignity. Focus:WASH, SGBV, ASRH and protection.
Related project (similar description): Supporting Dialogue on Peace and Security Issues in Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement AFG-23/0009 — "Supporting Dialogue on Peace and Security Issues in Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: Undefined (Unknown). Sector: 20 - Civilian peace-building, conflict prevention and resolution. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 3.4 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Dialogue support on basic services/development and peace and security in Afghanistan
Related project (similar description): Afghanistan Humanitarian Fund · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-23/0010-9 — "Afghanistan Humanitarian Fund" in Afghanistan. Partner: UNOCHA - UN Office of Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 50 - Relief co-ordination and support services. Payments recorded in 2023–2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 59.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support for Afghanistan Humanitarian Fund. Gender is mainstreamed in OCHAs activitives including in the pooled funds.
Related project (similar description): Humanitarian support - Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-23/0128-1 — "Humanitarian support - Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: IOM - International Organisation for Migration (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2023 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2023, which does not show that it ended); 10.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian support to Afghanistan
Related project (similar description): Humanitarian Action Overview - Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-22/0081-1 — "Humanitarian Action Overview - Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: UNFPA - UN Population Fund (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 11 - Basic Health Care Services in Emergencies. Payments recorded in 2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 15.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian Action Overview. Support against sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV).
Related project (similar description): Afghanistan - Humanitarian Action for Children · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-22/0074-1 — "Afghanistan - Humanitarian Action for Children" in Afghanistan. Partner: UNICEF - United Nations Children's Fund (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 11 - Basic Health Care Services in Emergencies. Payments recorded in 2022 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2022, which does not show that it ended); 15.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) respons Afghanistan 1.2.22. The response will include gender-based violence services.
Related project (similar description): Humanitarian support Afghanistan · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-24/0104-1 — "Humanitarian support Afghanistan" in Afghanistan. Partner: IOM - International Organisation for Migration (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 10 - Material relief assistance and services. Payments recorded in 2024 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates; no payment recorded after 2024, which does not show that it ended); 25.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to IOM's country appeal and UN consolidated appeal for Afghanistan in 2024,
Related project (similar description): Afghanistan humanitarian appeal · Norwegian development assistance data (bistandsresultater.no)
About this source: Norway's own record of every aid agreement and payment, published by Norad. It is the most detailed source on Norwegian aid; it covers Norway only, so other donors come from the OECD cards.
Trace this: Norad's aid results portal (bistandsresultater.no) ↗
Agreement QZA-25/0102-5 — "Afghanistan humanitarian appeal" in Afghanistan. Partner: UNFPA - UN Population Fund (Multilateral institutions). Sector: 11 - Basic Health Care Services in Emergencies. Payments recorded in 2025 (disbursement years in the Norwegian data, not the agreement's start or end dates); 8.0 m NOK 2015–2025 total. Description: Support to the UNFPA humanitarian appeal for Afghanistan including provision of reproductive health and rights services, prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence, youth programming and protection cash assistance. UNFPAs mandate is focused on gender-responsive and disability inclusive programming. UNFPA addresses the unique vulnerabilities of girls and women, ensuring their safety and access to essential health and protection services during emergencies and ensuring that programs are tailored to meet the specific needs of girls.
Not reached when this page was gathered: debt risk, imputed multilateral. They are tried again with tomorrow's update.